An Anthropocentric Comparison of Han Kang’s The Vegetarian and Renato Baretić’s Osmi povjerenik (The Eighth Commissioner)

Anafora, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 11(2), P. 201 - 221

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

A geological era may be marked by a crucial agent of change whose influence on other species is incontestable. The current era, referred to some as the Anthropocene, views humans main agents change. Therefore, relationship between and nature has been placed, more strikingly than ever before, at centre literary studies. In this paper, inevitability Anthropocene will shown in two novels with extremely diverse cultural backgrounds: Renato Baretić’s Osmi povjerenik (The Eighth Commissioner) Han Kang’s Vegetarian. Despite both being products different traditions that are seemingly unrelated their stories nonetheless anthropocentric core, displaying new way looking humananimal relationships, through point view observers who powerless form these relationships themselves.

Language: Английский

---

Sentience is the foundation of animal rights

Animal Sentience, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 3(23)

Published: Jan. 1, 2019

Chapman & Huffman argue that the cognitive differences between humans and nonhuman animals do not make superior to animals. I suggest have domain-general abilities them in causing uniquely complex changes world caused by any other species. The ability conceive of articulate a claim rights is an example. However, possession does entitle moral status. It sentience, complexity, basis for assignment protections under law accompany them.

Language: Английский

---

Human superiority is obvious but does not justify cruelty

Animal Sentience, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 3(23)

Published: Jan. 1, 2019

Humans are obviously superior, in general, to other animals. This is also supported by evolution and Jerison's encephalization quotient. However, superiority does not justify cruelty towards Rather, it suggests higher responsibility. Just as adults more capable than 2-year-olds, they have a much responsibility helping others need, including

Language: Английский

---

Are some animals also moral agents?

Animal Sentience, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 3(23)

Published: Jan. 1, 2019

Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but rejected our uniqueness justifies denying animals moral rights. Humans were thought to be unique specifically because we possess agency. In this commentary, I explore some nonhuman also agents, and take note of its counter-intuitive implications.

Language: Английский

---

Unique in degree not kindness

Animal Sentience, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 3(23)

Published: Jan. 1, 2019

Humans are certainly unique among living species. This is evident in the transformation of human environments and its resulting impact on other animals. However, many traits to humans costly as well adaptive should not be used elevate their status above that

Language: Английский

---

Using anthropocentrism to the benefit of other species

Animal Sentience, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 3(23)

Published: Jan. 1, 2018

Chapman & Huffman (2018) argue that we should not consider humans as unique or superior to other animals when have the chance explore diversity of traits species. This is a valid and progressive point in our approach research, but I suggest an anthropocentric can animal welfare benefits it helps us perceive species – especially distantly related ones such crustaceans human light.

Language: Английский

---

Humans may be unique and superior — and that is irrelevant

Animal Sentience, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 3(23)

Published: Jan. 1, 2019

Chapman & Huffman argue that, because humans are neither unique nor superior to the other animals, cruelty animals is not justified. Though I agree with their conclusion, do think argument works. Many human beings have some capacities that and greater in respects, sense of having abilities. It a better deny any morally relevant. Sentience suffices for moral consideration, deriving duty harm assist them when they need.

Language: Английский

---

The Things That Really Matter: Philosophical conversations on the cornerstones of life

Published: April 29, 2022

While being rooted in the academic discourse, The Things That Really Matter comprehensively explores most fundamental aspects of human life an accessible, non-technical language, adding fresh perspectives and new arguments considerations that are designed to stimulate further debate and, some cases, a deliberate redirection research interests respective areas. It features series conversations about things our we all, one way or another, wrestle with if at all concerned what kind world live role it is: like birth, age, death, good evil, meaning life, nature self body plays for identity, gendered existence, love faith, free will, beauty, experience sacred. Situating abstract ideas concrete experience, encourages reader participate open-ended dialogue involving variety thinkers different backgrounds orientations. Lively shows thinking as process collaborative endeavour benefits from talking each other rather than against other, featuring real conversations, where explored, tested, changed, occasionally dropped. is motion, personal yet universal.

Language: Английский

---

Scepticism about moral superiority

Animal Sentience, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 3(23)

Published: Jan. 1, 2019

Chapman & Huffman suggest that we might change people's behavior toward animals by resisting an argument because humans are intellectually superior to animals, they also morally animals. C H try show the premise is false: Humans not superior. Several commentators have resisted this response. We there other ways of attacking argument: The notion moral superiority on which relies dubious, and obvious reformulating instances "naturalistic fallacy."

Language: Английский

---

Diversity on human difference: Unanimity on human responsibility

Animal Sentience, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 3(23)

Published: Jan. 1, 2019

Further commentaries on our original target article add important new points and expand understanding of the differences between animals, particularly non-human human primates. But whether they affirm or deny that humans are unique, all commentators agree special abilities mean we should be taking responsibility for care nature plants animals it supports. We ask: is humankind doing this?

Language: Английский

---