Payām-i naw., Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 21(2), P. 29 - 32
Published: June 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Payām-i naw., Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 21(2), P. 29 - 32
Published: June 1, 2024
Language: Английский
BMC Psychology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12(1)
Published: May 28, 2024
Abstract Purpose This review seeks to examine the current state of postpartum social support and psychosocial conditions among women around world, as well explore relationship between these factors. Additionally, it aims propose a logical framework for enhancing in this population. Methods Following development search strategy, two databases, PubMed Science Direct, were searched studies published January 2019 May 2023. The was conducted throughout entire month risk bias included cross-sectional assessed using Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, which adapted specific study design. To determine if main objective investigate conditions, based on AMSTAR checklist, PRISMA checklist flow diagram. Data extraction performed with consensus authors, narrative synthesis approach chosen data synthesis, following guidelines provided by Centre Reviews Dissemination (CRD). Results Eleven final analysis. Our findings revealed that all reviewed evidence positive association healthy period. However, due absence standardized measurement indicators identify compare outcomes various studies, there need develop conceptual could enhance our understanding condition including anxiety, depression, unfavorable quality life status up 24 after child birth. aimed incorporate childbirth motherhood "stressful events," while considering crucial "coping resource." Furthermore, acknowledged empowerment, help-seeking behavior, peer important actions," alongside implementing client-centered interventions. Lastly, recognized mental health optimal significant "effects" Conclusions proposed define women’s “the ability adapt self-manage.”
Language: Английский
Citations
7Health Expectations, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 27(3)
Published: June 1, 2024
Abstract Introduction Public and patient involvement can provide crucial insights to optimise research by enhancing relevance appropriateness of studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) engaged in an inclusive process ensure that both technical experts women had a voice defining the gaps needs increase or reintroduce use assisted vaginal birth (AVB) settings where this intervention is needed but unavailable underused. Methods We describe methods outcomes online workshops led WHO obtain representatives' perspectives about AVB needs. Results After created list questions based on various evidence syntheses, organised four with 31 women's representatives from 27 mostly low‐ middle‐income (LMIC) countries. Women rated importance priority proposed experts, improving broadening some them, added new questions, voiced their main concerns views AVB. helped put into context communities, highlighted neglected factors/dimensions influence practices affect experience during labour childbirth, underscored less salient consequences AVB, consolidated vision resulted brief published WHO. expected stimulate global action closely aligned priorities. Conclusions successful engaging women, LMICs, identification use. This contributed better aligning views, concerns, Given scarcity reports LMICs research, serve as inspiration for future work. Patient Contribution were involved at every stage described full manuscript.
Language: Английский
Citations
1Payām-i naw., Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 21(2), P. 29 - 32
Published: June 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
0