Legal Problems of Spatial Development of the Arctic Ecological Zone of the Russian Federation
Н. Г. Жаворонкова,
No information about this author
В. Б. Агафонов
No information about this author
Lex Russica,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
73(3), P. 105 - 113
Published: March 28, 2020
The
paper
considers
the
strategic
directions
of
legal
support
for
spatial
development
Arctic
ecological
zone
Russian
Federation.
It
is
proved
that
a
key
principle
preservation
and
balance
between
economic
activity,
human
presence
conservation
environment.
Therefore,
existing
planning
documents
defining
guidelines
Federation
shall
be
brought
into
compliance
with
basic
state
in
field
environmental
protection
safety,
as
well
national,
economic,
other
types
security.
authors
substantiate
conclusion
it
necessary
to
develop
adopt
separate
strategy
marine
(aquatic)
development,
which
contains
specialization
relation
individual
water
areas,
promising
reference
zones
growth,
main
ensuring
safety.
According
authors,
implementation
tasks
specified
Federation,
determine
status
whole
(strategic,
environmental,
social,
etc.),
and,
given
special
international
national
Arctic,
its
position
testing
ground
ideas
environmental-economic
investments,
law
"On
Federation"
or
integrate
requirements
project
Federal
Federation".
Language: Английский
Genetic and Technological Factors in legal Regulation of Food Security in the Russian Federation
Nadezhda M. Mityakina,
No information about this author
Alevtina E. Novikova,
No information about this author
A. S. Fedoryashchenko
No information about this author
et al.
Lex genetica.,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
3(4), P. 25 - 45
Published: Dec. 27, 2024
Contemporary
socioeconomic,
geopolitical,
and
technological
conditions
pose
unprecedented
threats
challenges.
Recent
years
have
witnessed
a
transformation
of
the
world
order,
resulting
in
establishment
new
rules
principles
human
coexistence.
Such
global
transformations
affect
all
public
spheres,
imposing
special
requirements
on
quality
measures
to
ensure
national
security
at
both
governmental
individual
levels.
Therefore,
aspects
security,
including
food
is
increasingly
attracting
research
attention.
In
this
article,
we
set
out
identify
recent
trends
policy
terms
using
genetic
technologies
Russian
Federation
formulate
proposals
for
improving
legal
regulation
area.
The
conducted
by
fulfilling
following
tasks:
(1)
an
analysis
Russia’
strategic
documents
order
assess
current
status
support
country;
(2)
modern
scientific
concepts
safety
impact
technologies,
gene
editing
agriculture;
(3)
formulation
legislation.
Our
has
revealed
need
develop
state
based
approaches
role
technologies.
importance
related
agriculture
industry,
highlighted.
Agrarian
legislation
should
reflect
main
provisions
concerning
promotion
field
animal
feed
production.
Language: Английский
Principles of Biological Safety in Intellectual Property Law
A. V. Latyntsev
No information about this author
Lex Russica,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
77(8), P. 9 - 18
Published: Aug. 16, 2024
The
impact
of
many
modern
biotechnologies
on
health
and
the
environment
has
not
yet
been
sufficiently
studied.
In
recent
years,
we
have
witnessed
their
intensive
development
active
application
in
all
new
areas
public
life,
which
leads
to
need
take
into
account
principles
biosafety
legal
regulation
only
traditional
sanitary
epidemiological
supervision
control,
but
also
other
areas,
including
civil
law
relations.
It
is
necessary
form
a
unified
framework
at
intersectoral
level
order
biological
safety
where
intellectual
property
protection
should
separate
place.
Thus,
patent
be
granted
inventions
results
activity,
or
use
may
entail
an
unacceptable
risks
(exceptions
used
certain
cases
interests
national
security).
paper
examines
doctrinal
legislative
approaches
concretization
consideration
law,
it
presents
proposals
for
making
appropriate
changes
Russian
developed
basis
analysis
requirements
special
legislation.
Language: Английский
Environmental, Biological, Social Security: An Organizational and Legal Aspect
Н. Г. Жаворонкова,
No information about this author
В. Б. Агафонов
No information about this author
Lex Russica,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
7, P. 43 - 49
Published: July 23, 2020
The
paper
is
devoted
to
the
analysis
of
current
trends
and
prospects
development
legislation
Russian
Federation
in
area
environmental,
biological
social
safety.
Based
on
results
study
mechanisms
operation
modern
legal
systems
context
increasing
exponential
threats
risks,
authors
carry
out
general
evaluation
ability
emergency
situations
respond
contemporary
challenges.
also
identifies
factors
that
could
have
a
decisive
impact
formation
new
environmental
security.
author
substantiates
that,
since
any
extreme
situation
sudden,
rapid,
it
rapidly
transforms
from
local
global,
should
be
as
specific,
clear,
logical
possible,
consistent
with
goals
objectives
prevention
harm
life
health.
In
this
regard,
revised
primarily
perspective
notions,
variability
consequences,
establishment
causality,
description
basic
solutions
responsibility.
It
fundamentally
necessary
change
paradigm
elimination
accidents,
disasters,
fires
other
man-made
accidents
presentation
emergencies
systemic
crisis
management
law.
Special
acts
clarify
criteria
for
“danger”
“safety”,
taking
into
account
socio-economic
competence
authorities,
security
provision
economy,
permissible
risks
losses,
protocols
entire
state
public
machinery
emergencies.
addition,
law-maker
adopt
regulating
health
system,
which
must
sufficient
reserves
capacity
resources
emergencies,
financial
special
accounts
financing
mechanisms,
well
information
situations.
Language: Английский
Ensuring Environmental Safety of the Arctic Region: The Case of Genomic Technologies
N. P. Voronina
No information about this author
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
670(1), P. 012050 - 012050
Published: Feb. 1, 2021
Abstract
The
Arctic
is
a
unique
macro-region
of
national
and
global
significance.
vulnerability
its
ecosystems
predetermines
the
uniqueness
region.
territory
with
significant
natural
biological
resources,
including
hydrocarbons.
also
place
traditional
residence
economic
activity
indigenous
people.
Climate
change
can
irreversibly
alter
ecosystems.
Therefore,
development
legal
mechanisms
for
environmental
protection
priority.
Currently,
biotechnologies
are
becoming
increasingly
important.
Using
genomic
technologies
allows
one
to
solve
Arctic-specific
problems,
such
as
providing
food
security.
However,
application
safety
has
not
yet
received
proper
research
in
Russia.
documents
on
strategic
planning
indicate
that
is,
currently,
environmentally
inadequate.
This
consequence
current
lack
framework
applying
technologies.
principles
“green”
economy
integral
ensuring
Arctic.
this
paper
aims
formulate
region
author
employed
comparative-legal
formal-logical
methods
analyze
political,
legal,
regulatory
acts
As
result
study,
authors
formed
security
implementation
These
may
become
foundation
ecological-legal
paradigm
Language: Английский
Organizational and legal problems of the program for the development of genetic technologies implementation
Н. Г. Жаворонкова,
No information about this author
В. Б. Агафонов
No information about this author
RUDN JOURNAL OF LAW,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
25(4), P. 901 - 916
Published: Nov. 24, 2021
The
relevance
of
this
study
is
determined
by
the
fact
that
at
present
legal
regulation
genetic
research
not
comprehensive
and
does
provide
a
complete
social
relations
in
focus.
Оne
factors
hindering
development
technologies
absence
basic
law
On
technologies.
purpose
.
article
devoted
to
analysis
modern
problems
search
for
optimal
solutions
organizational
program
implementation.
Materials
methods
In
order
understand
approaches
relevant
improving
mechanism
implementation
associated
with
environmental
biological
risks
threats,
comparison
various
management,
including
dialectical,
logical,
predictive
methods,
as
well
method
system
analysis,
carried
out.
Results.
Application
these
allowed
conduct
current
legislation
state
strategic
planning
documents,
work
out
theoretical
basis
Genetic
Technologies
formulate
other
proposals
improve
legislation.
core
powers
National
(federal)
Bioresource
Center,
network
federal
regional
centers
technologies,
Center
Biosafety
have
been
identified
grounded
authors.
Language: Английский
LEGAL CHALLENGES IN MINIMIZING THE IMPACT OF PAST (ACCUMULATED) ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE ON HUMAN HEALTH AND THE HUMAN GENOME
Н. Г. Жаворонкова,
No information about this author
Alexander A. Mokhov,
No information about this author
В. Б. Агафонов
No information about this author
et al.
Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Pravo,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
38, P. 113 - 120
Published: Jan. 1, 2020
The
article
is
devoted
to
the
study
of
theoretical
problems
legal
provision
biological
safety
as
a
component
environmental
in
elimination
past
(accumulated)
envi-ronmental
damage
and
minimizing
its
impact
on
human
health
genome.
It
noted
that
at
present
potential
real
risks
threats
objects
accumulated
harm,
which
can
cause
harm
life
health,
are
not
identified,
also
affecting
favorable
(natural)
state
environment
ensure
systematized.
Thus,
given
danger
damage,
tasks
associated
with
protection
natural
complexes
sites,
ecosystems,
biodi-versity
conservation,
well
currently
acquire
particular
relevance.
necessity
solving
these
has
been
repeatedly
highest
priority
policy
strategic
planning
documents.
Based
results
main
areas
(potential
real)
harms
genome,
conclusion
was
made
that,
taking
into
account
global
climate
change,
expansion
economic
other
activities,
including
use
genomic
technologies,
it
actually
impossible
assess
level
negative
To
address
this
problem,
authors
formulated
conceptual
proposals
define
objectives
field
through
legislative
consolidation
measures
genetic
safety,
should
be
recognized
an
integral
part
security
modern
expanding
paradigm
law.
Language: Английский
The Concept of Four "Bio" in Law and Legislation
Actual Problems of Russian Law,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
15(8), P. 146 - 154
Published: Aug. 30, 2020
Developing
biotechnologies
have
an
impact
not
only
on
technical,
technological
and
other
economic
processes,
but
also
industries
sectors
of
the
economy,
public
relations,
change
prevailing
stereotypes
behavior
habits.
In
this
regard,
new
sprouts
innovative
changing
social
sphere,
psychology
individual
groups
communities
determine
need
for
a
unified
balanced
biopolitics.
This
policy
manifests
itself
in
provisions
rule
law
legislation,
strategic
planning
documents,
enforcement.
Due
to
nontriviality
technologies,
their
great
potential
opportunities,
as
well
challenges,
risks
threats
population,
society,
biopolitics
is
becoming
important
factor
pursued
general.
The
author
proves
systemic
comprehensive
regulation
allowed
use,
taking
into
account
biological
types
safety,
contribution
(positive
effects)
developing
bioeconomy
development
society.
connection
with
above,
concept
four
"bio"
(biotechnology
—
biosafety
bioeconomics
biopolitics)
proposed,
which
requires
legislation
based
modern
trends
technology,
society
state.
Language: Английский
Biopolitics, biotechnologies, biomedicine, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation
Aleksandr Anatolyevich Mokhov,
No information about this author
Anatolii Nikolaevich Levushkin,
No information about this author
A.N. Yavorskiy
No information about this author
et al.
SHS Web of Conferences,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
108, P. 01009 - 01009
Published: Jan. 1, 2021
Modern
science,
education,
and
medicine
are
increasingly
becoming
the
primary
agents
of
biopolitics.
Biomedicine
is
emerging,
before
our
eyes,
it
a
part
social
sphere
and,
in
long
term,
new
economic
order
one
state’s
main
In
this
regard,
attention
to
ethical
legal
issues
biomedicine
will
only
increase
coming
years.
The
study’s
objective
was
determine
role
nature
biotechnologies,
biopolitics,
biomedicine,
bioethics,
biolaw
as
forms
bioregulation.
methodological
basis
work
provided
by
general
scientific
methods
cognition
phenomena,
such
synthesis,
method
analogy,
formal
logic,
others,
well
private,
research
biotechnology,
issue
considered
from
perspective
concept
four
“BIOs”:
biotechnology-biosafety-bioeconomics-biopolitics.
It
concluded
that
not
bioethics
but
also
emerging
implementation
i.e.,
policies
aimed
at
development
economy,
sphere,
society,
taking
into
account
realities
formed
under
onslaught
modern
biological
technologies,
significantly
increasing.
Progress
biology
led
need
combine
theoretical,
socio-cultural
knowledge
solve
society’s
problems,
began
take
shape.
authors
propose
accelerated
supra-sectoral
formation,
allowing
systematic
approach
combining
achievements
both
established
sectoral
sciences
(administrative
law,
civil
etc.)
medical
pharmaceutical
law
leveling
threats,
risks,
ensuring
safety.
cannot
be
done
without
interdisciplinary
links
with
biology,
medicine,
economics,
public
health,
healthcare,
others.
Language: Английский
State legal mechanism for ensuring environmental and technogenic safety
Вопросы безопасности,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
3, P. 21 - 43
Published: March 1, 2021
In
the
light
of
ongoing
state
administration
reform,
it
is
relevant
to
examine
legal
mechanism
for
ensuring
environmental
and
technogenic
security
as
types
national
security.
The
subject
this
research
definition
concept
structure
such
mechanism,
which
an
essential
condition
protection
favorable
environment;
observance
interests
citizens
entities,
society
state;
prevention
threats
natural
emergency
situations;
minimization
consequences
situations.
On
institutional
level,
safety
represents
system
governing
institutions
assigned
with
implementation
key
directions
mechanisms
safety;
well
private
whose
status
includes
rights
responsibilities
in
sphere
safety.
technological
characterized
by
activity.
instrumental
represent
a
set
means
methods
at
disposal
entities.
scientific
novelty
lies
examination
aspects
certain
security,
formulation
applicable
safety,
absence
impedes
assessment
effectiveness
relation
identity,
society,
from
hazards,
conflicts.
conclusion
made
that
range
problems
arises
context
formation
safety:
existing
model
regulation
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
based
on
voluntary
inventory,
obstructs
acquisition
information
volume
emissions
administrative
authorities;
created
systems
are
not
effective
achieving
goals
Strategy
Environmental
Security;
there
inconsistency
surveillance
regulation.
Language: Английский