Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
unknown, С. 1 - 7
Опубликована: Апрель 25, 2023
Background:
The
aim
of
this
study
was
to
determine
the
reasons
for
request
antinuclear
antibody
(ANA)
in
ANA-positive
patients
and
final
diagnosis
these
whether
they
developed
a
rheumatologic
disease.
Method:
In
retrospective
study,
files
559
with
positive
ANA
were
reviewed.
Demographic,
laboratory
clinical
characteristics
noted.
At
end
follow-up,
recorded.
Results:
included
346
patients.
233
female,
113
male.
mean
age
at
time
positivity
9.4
4.7
years,
follow-up
period
19
5.7
months.
most
common
symptom
myalgia/arthralgia
(21.7%).
Other
urticaria,
abdominal
pain,
thrombocytopenia,
proteinuria.
Extractable
nuclear
antigens
(ENA)
panel
results
negative
170
(49.1%).
ENA
panel,
dense
fine
speckled
antigen
70
antibodies
frequently
135
(39.2%).
234
had
no
One
hundred
one
diagnosed
non-rheumatologic
diseases,
11
diseases.
Eleven
diseases
girls.
Rash
predictive
value
disease
3.2%
1.7%
systemic
lupus
erythematosus.
Conclusions:
Due
low
testing,
risk
autoimmune
should
be
identified
carefully
evaluated
before
is
requested.
Frontiers in Immunology,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
15
Опубликована: Янв. 6, 2025
Few
pathogens
have
historically
been
subjected
to
as
intense
scientific
and
clinical
scrutiny
SARS-CoV-2.
The
genetic,
immunological,
environmental
factors
influencing
disease
severity
post-infection
outcomes,
known
correlates
of
immunity,
remain
largely
undefined.
Clinical
outcomes
SARS-CoV-2
infection
vary
widely,
ranging
from
asymptomatic
cases
those
with
life-threatening
COVID-19
symptoms.
While
most
infected
individuals
return
their
former
health
fitness
within
a
few
weeks,
some
develop
debilitating
chronic
symptoms,
referred
long-COVID.
Autoimmune
responses
proposed
one
the
long-COVID
infection.
association
between
viral
infections
autoimmune
pathologies
is
not
new.
Viruses
such
Epstein-Barr
virus
cytomegalovirus,
among
others,
shown
induce
production
autoantibodies
onset
conditions.
Given
extensive
literature
on
SARS-CoV-2,
here
we
review
current
evidence
SARS-CoV-2-induced
pathologies,
focus
autoantibodies.
We
closely
examine
mechanisms
driving
autoantibody
production,
particularly
connection
AbstractBackground:
Detection
of
anti-nuclear
autoantibodies
(ANA)
is
based
on
a
two-step
algorithm
including
indirect
immunofluorescence
(IIF)
HEp2
cells
and
subsequent
reflex/confirmatory
testing
for
specific
autoantibodies.
Simultaneous
cell-
microbead-based
autoantibody
detection
by
IIF
may
be
utilized
the
evaluation
systemic
autoimmune
rheumatic
diseases
(SARDs).
In
present
study,
we
assessed
performance
CytoBead
ANA
2
in
ANA-specific
autoantibodies,
compared
to
BioPlex™
2200.
We
also
tested
ability
DFS-70
identify
dense-fine
speckled
(DFS)
pattern
associated
with
anti-DFS70
antibodies
non-SARDs
patients.
Methods:
Hundred-twelve
routine
sera
samples
were
manual
presence
parallel,
these
analyzed
test
multiplexed
assay
2200
ANA.
Twenty-nine
ANA-positive
obtained
from
patients
exhibiting
DFS
further
DFS-70.
Results:
A
substantial
agreement
was
observed
between
classical
(k
=
0.74).
Discordant
results
mainly
anti-SSA/Ro
detected
negative
A
good
almost
perfect
found
kappa
values
ranging
0.70
-
0.90.
Twenty
(68.9
%)
29
positive
without
SARDs
exhibited
DFS-70,
which
confirmed
antibodies.
Conclusion:
The
diagnostic
screening
comparable
followed
This
novel
one-step
enables
simultaneous
confirmation
represents
promising
alternative
approach
time-consuming
costly
two-tier
analysis.
Reviews in Medical Virology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
34(5)
Опубликована: Сен. 1, 2024
ABSTRACT
Autoantibodies
are
immune
system‐produced
antibodies
that
wrongly
target
the
body's
cells
and
tissues
for
attack.
The
COVID‐19
pandemic
has
made
it
possible
to
link
autoantibodies
both
severity
of
pathogenic
infection
emergence
several
autoimmune
diseases
after
recovery
from
infection.
An
overview
disorders
function
in
other
infectious
discussed
this
review
article.
We
also
investigated
different
categories
found
including
potential
pathways
by
which
they
contribute
illness.
Additionally,
highlights
probable
connection
between
vaccine‐induced
their
adverse
outcomes.
discusses
therapeutic
perspectives
autoantibodies.
This
paper
advances
our
knowledge
about
intricate
interaction
thoroughly
assessing
most
recent
findings.
Rheumatology & autoimmunity,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
3(1), С. 9 - 14
Опубликована: Сен. 21, 2022
Abstract
It
was
not
widely
recognized,
until
the
1950s,
that
an
immune
response
could
be
developed
only
against
“foreign”
but
also
“self”
antigens
from
studies
of
chronic
thyroiditis
leading
to
acceptance
autoimmune
diseases.
Paul
Ehrlich
coined
term
“horror
autotoxicus”
emphasize
pathogenesis
autoimmunity
and
how
system
distinguishes
“self”.
The
process
led
concept
tolerance.
discoveries
allergy
anaphylaxis
were
first
signs
capable
self‐damage.
autoantibodies
discovered
in
1940s,
when
antinuclear
antibodies
rheumatoid
factors
described
as
serum
bind
nuclear
immunoglobulins,
respectively.
has
now
becoming
increasingly
understandable
play
a
pivotal
role
several
diseases
mediate
systemic
inflammation
tissue
injury.
purpose
this
review
article
is
elucidate,
explain,
origins
history
autoimmunity.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM),
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
61(6), С. 1095 - 1104
Опубликована: Янв. 12, 2023
Abstract
Objectives
Autoantibodies
and,
specifically
antinuclear
antibodies
(ANA),
are
the
hallmark
of
systemic
autoimmune
diseases
(AID).
In
last
decades,
there
has
been
great
technical
development
to
detect
these
autoantibodies
along
with
an
increased
request
for
this
test
by
clinicians,
while
overall
pre-test
probability
decreased.
study,
we
compare
diagnostic
performance
three
different
methods
ANA
screening
(indirect
immunofluorescence
[IIF],
addressable
laser
bead
immunoassay
[ALBIA],
and
fluorescence
enzyme
[FEIA]).
Methods
Serum
samples
at
baseline
visit
from
2,997
participants
Camargo
Cohort,
a
population
low
AID,
were
analyzed
methods.
Participants
have
minimum
follow-up
10
years
was
collected
clinical
records.
Results
The
highest
frequency
positive
observed
IIF
assay.
However,
ALBIA
showed
high
sensitivity
AID.
Likewise,
solid
phase
assays
(SPA)
presented
higher
specificity
than
prevalence
any
method
significantly
in
females
age.
Triple
positivity
related
presence
anti-dsDNA–SSA/Ro60,
Ro52,
SSB/La,
RNP,
Scl-70,
centromere–specificities.
No
association
found
anti-Sm
–
RNP68,
or
ribosomal
P
specificities.
Noteworthy,
triple
associated
diagnosis
AID
both
follow-up.
Conclusions
detection
may
be
better
when
is
high,
whereas
SPA
techniques
more
useful
populations
Antinuclear
antibody
(ANA)
testing
is
common
practice
among
health
care
practitioners
when
evaluating
children
and
adolescents
with
non-specific
symptoms
including
fatigue
aches
pains.
When
positive,
ANA
results
often
lead
to
referrals
pediatric
rheumatologists
as
these
antibodies
may
be
key
indicators
for
specific
rheumatologic
diagnoses.
The
reliability
reproducibility
of
tests
varies
assay
techniques
validation
interpretation
results.
In
the
following
article,
review
in
pediatrics
provided
along
case
examples
that
demonstrate
scenarios
rheumatology.
Guidelines
more
accurate
utilization
are
presented
aim
improve
by
ordering
clinicians.
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
148(5), С. 566 - 572
Опубликована: Авг. 18, 2023
Context
Antinuclear
antibodies
(ANAs)
against
certain
antigens
are
useful
for
identifying
autoimmune
disorders.
Although
new
solid
phase–based
immunoassays
have
been
developed
evaluating
ANAs,
the
conventional
line
immunoassay
(LIA)
is
commonly
used
in
clinical
practice.
Objective
To
compare
performance
of
2
newly
methods
detecting
specific
ANAs
with
LIA.
Design
Six
hundred
ninety-six
serum
samples
were
collected
from
559
patients
disease
(AID)
and
137
controls.
The
screened
by
using
LIA,
digital
liquid
chip
method
(DLCM),
chemiluminescent
(CLIA)
ANAs.
agreement
across
assays
each
assay
diagnosing
ANA-associated
rheumatic
diseases
(AARDs)
evaluated.
Results
Almost
perfect
was
observed
among
all
anti–centromere
protein
B
(κ
=
0.85–0.97),
anti–ribosome
P
0.85–0.88),
anti–SSA
52
0.86–0.89),
60
0.89–0.91);
moderate
to
substantial
detected
autoantibodies
Sm,
Jo-1,
ribonucleoprotein,
Scl-70,
SSB
0.55–0.80).
LIA
exhibited
better
sensitivity
AARDs,
while
DLCM
CLIA
demonstrated
higher
specificity.
In
subset
AIDs,
especially
systemic
lupus
erythematosus,
antibody
positive
percentages
varied
greatly
between
assays.
Conclusions
3
showed
comparable
qualitative
agreement;
however,
standardization
testing
remains
challenging
owing
intermanufacturer
variations.
Moreover,
specificity
distinguishing
non-AID
individuals,
whereas
more
sensitive
AARDs.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
24(12), С. 10398 - 10398
Опубликована: Июнь 20, 2023
The
detection
of
antinuclear
antibodies
is
central
to
the
diagnosis
and
prognosis
systemic
lupus
erythematosus
(SLE),
primary
Sjögren's
syndrome
(pSS)
mixed
connective
tissue
disease
(MCTD).
Anti-U1-RNP
anti-RNP70
were
assayed
in
sera
patients
with
SLE
(n
=
114),
pSS
54)
MCTD
12).
In
group,
34/114
(30%)
anti-U1-RNP
positive,
21/114
(18%)
both
positive
positive.
10/12
(83%)
9/12
(75%)
Only
one
individual
was
antibody
(for
anti-RNP70).
All
anti-RNP70-positive
samples
also
Anti-U1-RNP-positive
subjects
younger
(p
<
0.0001);
showed
lower
concentrations
complement
protein
3
0.03);
had
eosinophil
0.0005),
lymphocyte
0.006)
monocyte
0.03)
counts;
accrued
less
organ
damage
than
anti-U1-RNP-negative
patients.
However,
we
observed
no
significant
clinical
or
laboratory
parameter
differences
between
anti-U1-RNP-positive
individuals
with/without
group.
conclusion,
are
not
exclusive
but
rarely
detected
healthy
individuals.
SLE,
associated
a
phenotype
that
resembles
MCTD,
hematologic
involvement
accrual.
Based
on
our
results,
value
subtyping
appears
be
limited
value.
RMD Open,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
9(3), С. e003365 - e003365
Опубликована: Сен. 1, 2023
Assessment
of
circulating
autoantibodies
represents
one
the
earliest
diagnostic
procedures
in
patients
with
suspected
connective
tissue
disease
(CTD),
providing
important
information
for
diagnosis,
identification
and
prediction
potential
clinical
manifestations.
The
purpose
this
study
was
to
evaluate
ability
multiparametric
assay
correctly
classify
multiple
CTDs
healthy
controls
(HC),
independent
features,
whether
serological
status
could
identify
clusters
similar
features.Patients
systemic
lupus
erythematosus
(SLE),
sclerosis
(SSc),
Sjogren's
syndrome
(SjS),
undifferentiated
(UCTD),
idiopathic
inflammatory
myopathies
(IIM)
HC
were
enrolled.
Serum
tested
29
autoantibodies.
An
XGBoost
model,
exclusively
based
on
autoantibody
titres
built
classification
accuracy
evaluated.
A
hierarchical
clustering
model
subsequently
developed
clinical/laboratory
features
compared
among
clusters.908
subjects
showed
a
mean
60.84±4.05%
area
under
receiver
operator
characteristic
curve
88.99±2.50%,
significant
discrepancies
groups.
Cluster
analysis
identified
four
(CL).
CL1
included
typical
SLE.
CL2
most
SjS,
along
some
SLE
UCTD
SjS-like
features.
CL4
anti-Jo1
only.
CL3
largest
heterogeneous,
including
all
remaining
subjects,
overall
characterised
by
low
titre
or
lower-prevalence
autoantibodies.Extended
allowed
an
accurate
CTD
patients,
independently
Clustering
according
is
able
their
final
diagnosis.