Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 21, 2023
Abstract
Purpose
Self-testing
is
an
effective
tool
to
bridge
the
testing
gap
for
several
infectious
diseases;
however,
its
performance
in
detecting
SARS-CoV-2
using
antigen-detection
rapid
diagnostic
tests
(Ag-RDTs)
has
not
been
systematically
reviewed.
To
inform
WHO
guideline
development,
we
evaluated
accuracy
of
COVID-19
self-testing
and/or
self-sampling
Ag-RDTs.
Methods:
We
searched
multiple
databases
articles
evaluating
or
through
November
7th,
2022.
Cohen’s
kappa
was
estimated
assess
concordance
between
self-testing/self-sampling
and
fully
professional-use
Ag-RDT
results.
Bivariate
meta-analysis
performed
obtain
pooled
estimates
compared
molecular
testing.
The
QUADAS-2
GRADE
tools
were
used
evaluate
quality
certainty
evidence.
Results:
Among
43
studies
included
review,
twelve
reported
on
self-testing,
while
31
assessed
only.
risk
bias
low
49.6%
studies.
Overall
with
Ag-RDTs
(n
=
7
datasets)
high
(kappa
0.92
[95%
confidence
interval
(CI)
0.89
0.95]).
sensitivity
specificity
54
70.5%
(95%
CI
64.3
76.0)
99.4%
99.1–99.6),
respectively.
Conclusion:
Despite
heterogeneity
among
studies,
exhibits
This
suggest
that
can
be
offered
as
part
strategies.
Trial
registration
PROSPERO:
CRD42021250706
Diagnostics,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(5), P. 972 - 972
Published: March 3, 2023
This
study
aimed
to
evaluate
the
performance
characteristics
of
a
rapid
antigen
test
developed
detect
SARS-CoV-2
(COVID-19),
influenza
A
virus
(IAV),
and
B
(IBV)
(flu)
compared
with
those
real-time
reverse
transcription-polymerase
chain
reaction
(rRT-PCR)
method.
One
hundred
SARS-CoV-2,
one
IAV,
twenty-four
IBV
patients
whose
diagnoses
were
confirmed
by
clinical
laboratory
methods
included
in
patient
group.
Seventy-six
patients,
who
negative
for
all
respiratory
tract
viruses,
as
control
The
Panbio™
COVID-19/Flu
A&B
Rapid
Panel
kit
was
used
assays.
sensitivity
values
97.5%,
97.9%,
33.33%
IBV,
respectively,
samples
viral
load
below
20
Ct
values.
16.7%,
36.5%,
11.11%
above
Ct.
kit's
specificity
100%.
In
conclusion,
this
demonstrated
high
IAV
loads
values,
but
not
compatible
PCR
positivity
lower
over
tests
may
be
preferred
routine
screening
tool
communal
environments,
especially
symptomatic
individuals,
when
diagnosing
caution.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(1)
Published: Dec. 11, 2023
Abstract
Self-testing
is
an
effective
tool
to
bridge
the
testing
gap
for
several
infectious
diseases;
however,
its
performance
in
detecting
SARS-CoV-2
using
antigen-detection
rapid
diagnostic
tests
(Ag-RDTs)
has
not
been
systematically
reviewed.
This
study
aimed
inform
WHO
guidelines
by
evaluating
accuracy
of
COVID-19
self-testing
and
self-sampling
coupled
with
professional
Ag-RDT
conduct
interpretation.
Articles
on
this
topic
were
searched
until
November
7th,
2022.
Concordance
between
self-testing/self-sampling
fully
professional-use
Ag-RDTs
was
assessed
Cohen’s
kappa.
Bivariate
meta-analysis
yielded
pooled
estimates.
Quality
certainty
evidence
evaluated
QUADAS-2
GRADE
tools.
Among
43
studies
included,
twelve
reported
self-testing,
31
only.
Around
49.6%
showed
low
risk
bias.
Overall
concordance
high
(kappa
0.91
[95%
confidence
interval
(CI)
0.88–0.94]).
Comparing
molecular
testing,
sensitivity
specificity
70.5%
(95%
CI
64.3–76.0)
99.4%
99.1–99.6),
respectively.
Higher
(i.e.,
93.6%
90.4–96.8]
Ct
<
25)
estimated
subgroups
higher
viral
loads
values
as
a
proxy.
Despite
heterogeneity
among
studies,
exhibits
Ag-RDTs.
suggests
that
can
be
offered
part
strategies.
Trial
registration:
PROSPERO:
CRD42021250706.
Small,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 18, 2025
Abstract
Affinity‐based
electrochemical
biosensors
hold
promise
for
detecting
pathogenic
bacteria
in
environmental
applications.
This
study
focuses
on
gram‐positive
bacteria,
which
can
cause
fatal
infections
and
are
a
major
global
mortality
factor.
An
biosensor
platform
using
high‐throughput
16‐channel
gold
disk
electrodes
(16‐GDEs)
inspired
by
bio‐microelectromechanical
systems
(BioMEMS)
is
developed,
it
incorporates
nanocomposite
(AuNPs@Ti
3
C
2
T
z
)
with
sandwich
peptide
structures
to
enhance
electroconductivity
biological
antifouling.
Using
AuNPs@Ti
‐coated
16‐GDEs,
sensitive
(
Staphylococcus
aureus
,
Bacillus
cereus
or
Micrococcus
luteus
constructed
validated
fresh‐water
samples
spiking
showed
linear
correlations
between
normalized
peak
current
logarithmic
concentrations
of
the
target
(adjusted
R‐square
≥
0.93).
A
single
containing
S.
M.
B.
also
exhibiting
specific
responses
without
any
cross‐reactivity
real
samples.
enabled
simultaneous
detection
multiple
analytes
(500
CFU
mL⁻¹)
be
applied
detect
analyte
suitable
pair.
The
strategy
implement
quantitative
real‐time
polymerase
chain
reaction
(RT‐qPCR)
adaptive
sensing
device
successfully
bacteria.
nanocomposite‐enabled
16‐GDEs
offers
valuable
tool
clinical
diagnostics.
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
36(6)
Published: April 20, 2022
Surveillance
and
control
of
SARS-CoV-2
outbreak
through
gold
standard
detection,
that
is,
real-time
polymerase
chain
reaction
(RT-PCR),
become
a
great
obstacle,
especially
in
overwhelming
outbreaks.
In
this
study,
we
aimed
to
analyze
the
performance
rapid
antigen
home
test
(RAHT)
as
an
alternative
detection
method
compared
with
RT-PCR.In
total,
79
COVID-19-positive
217
COVID-19-negative
patients
confirmed
by
RT-PCR
were
enrolled
study.
A
duration
from
symptom
onset
COVID-19
confirmation
<5
days
was
considered
recruiting
criterion
for
cases.
nasal
cavity
specimen
collected
RAHT,
nasopharyngeal
swab
RT-PCR.Sensitivity
STANDARD
Q
Ag
Home
Test
(SD
Biosensor,
Korea),
RT-PCR,
94.94%
(75/79)
(95%
[confidence
interval]
CI,
87.54%-98.60%),
specificity
100%.
Sensitivity
significantly
higher
symptomatic
(98.00%)
than
asymptomatic
(89.66%)
(p-value
=
0.03).
There
no
difference
sensitivity
according
(100%
0-2
96.97%
3-5
days,
respectively)
1.00).
The
RAHT
detected
all
51
whose
Ct
values
≤25
(100%),
whereas
73.33%
(11/15)
among
>25
0.01).The
showed
excellent
COVID-19-confirmed
cases,
those
symptoms.
decrease
when
value
is
over
25,
indicating
screening
may
be
useful
during
early
phase
onset,
viral
numbers
are
it
more
transmissible.
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
55(6), P. 1013 - 1024
Published: Sept. 28, 2022
The
coronavirus
disease
(COVID-19)
has
been
a
worldwide
concern
since
2019.
Vaccines
are
predicted
to
be
crucial
in
preventing
further
outbreaks.
development
and
kinetics
of
immune
responses
determine
the
efficacy
COVID-19
vaccines.We
measured
interferon-gamma
(IFN-γ)
levels
upon
administering
homologous
adenovirus
vector-based
(ChAdOx1-S
[AZ],
Ad26.COV2.S
[JAN]),
mRNA-based
(BNT162b2
[PF];
mRNA-1273
[MO]),
heterologous
(AZ/PF)
vaccines
healthy
Korean
individuals
using
two
IFN-γ
release
assays:
Covi-FERON
ELISA
T-SPOT
Discovery
SARS-CoV-2
assay.
B
cell
were
evaluated
by
assessing
production
neutralizing
antibodies
surrogate
virus
neutralization
response
among
vaccine
groups
was
compared
after
adjusting
vaccination
dose
interactions
between
each
group.AZ
triggered
highest
T
first
but
showed
instability
second.
PF
MO
yielded
stable
higher
increments
AZ.
than
PF.
JAN
at
lower
other
vaccines.
booster
significant
increases
is
therefore
needed
protect
against
given
possibility
waning
responses.Administering
doses
mRNA
provides
most
effective
results
administered
triggering
specific
individuals.
Administration
demonstrated
increase
may
provide
longer
protection
SARS-CoV-2.
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
52, P. 102548 - 102548
Published: Feb. 9, 2023
We
aim
to
determine
if
nasal
samples
have
equivalent
detection
sensitivity
nasopharyngeal
swabs
for
RAT
and
evaluate
the
diagnostic
accuracy
of
with
RAT.
Diagnostics,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
13(1), P. 32 - 32
Published: Dec. 22, 2022
We
evaluated
the
performance
of
STANDARD
Q
COVID/FLU
Ag
Combo
test
(Q
combo
test)
for
detection
SARS-CoV-2,
influenza
A,
and
B
using
a
single
point-of-care
device
compared
with
real-time
PCR.
A
total
408
individuals,
55
positives
90
68
B,
195
negatives
all
viruses,
participated.
The
demonstrated
high
level
sensitivity
92.73%
specificity
99.49%
SARS-CoV-2.
When
number
days
from
symptom
onset
(DSO)
was
restricted
to
0
<
DSO
≤
6,
detect
SARS-CoV-2
100%,
when
Ct
value
RdRp
≤20,
93.10%.
results
also
92.22%
100%
91.18%,
B.
agreement
analysis
RT-PCR
excellent
outcomes,
making
it
useful
efficient
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(1)
Published: Feb. 24, 2024
Abstract
The
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
has
created
a
public
health
crisis
.
This
study
aimed
to
evaluate
the
diagnostic
performance
of
Panbio
and
STANDARD
Q
COVID-19
antigen
rapid
tests
(RDTs)
against
real-time
polymerase
chain
reaction
(RT-PCR)
at
one
largest
hospitals
in
southern
Ethiopia.
Nasopharyngeal
samples,
which
were
collected
during
from
individuals
suspected
stored
−
70
°C,
analyzed
June
July
2022.
was
evaluated
200
randomly
selected
nasopharyngeal
samples
(100
positives
100
negatives
for
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
2
by
RT-PCR).
test
using
positive
50
negative
samples.
respective
sensitivity,
specificity,
predictive
value
values
88%,
99%,
98.9%
89.2%
91%,
98%,
84.5%,
test.
kappa
0.87
0.86
Based
on
findings
presented
here,
RDTs
could
be
utilized
as
an
alternative
conventional
RT-PCR
when
it
is
challenging
diagnose
owing
lack
time,
skilled
lab
personnel,
or
suitable
equipment
electricity.
Bioengineering,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
10(3), P. 322 - 322
Published: March 3, 2023
Rapid
antigen
tests
(RATs)
are
diagnostic
tools
developed
to
specifically
detect
a
certain
protein
of
infectious
agents
(viruses,
bacteria,
or
parasites).
RATs
easily
accessible
due
their
rapidity
and
simplicity.
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
have
been
widely
used
in
detecting
presence
specific
SARS-CoV-2
respiratory
samples
from
suspected
individuals.
Here,
authors
review
application
as
detection
for
COVID-19,
particularly
Korea,
well
several
other
diseases.
To
address
these
issues,
we
present
general
knowledge
on
design
that
adopt
lateral
flow
immunoassay
analyte
(antigen).
The
then
discuss
clinical
utilization
authorized
amidst
battle
against
pandemic
Korea
role
comparison
with
methods.
We
also
implementation
other,
non-COVID-19
diseases,
challenges
may
arise
during
application,
limitations
tools,
possible
problem
solving
those
maximize
performance
avoiding
any
misinterpretation
test
result.