Policy and Society,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
38(2), P. 315 - 337
Published: July 2, 2018
Abstract
The
concept
of
‘wicked
problems’
is
a
major
current
in
the
fields
policy
analysis
and
planning.
However,
basis
has
been
insufficiently
examined.
This
re-examination
its
conceptual
explains
origins
limitations
flaws
wicked
problems
concept.
paper
analyses
rejects
notion
on
philosophical
practical
grounds.
We
argue
instead
that
sciences
already
had
better
conceptualizations
public
before
Rittel
Webber’s
flawed
formulation.
return
to
this
literature,
build
upon
it
by
reframing
‘wickedness’
terms
higher
lower
levels
problematicity
problem
structuring
efforts.
In
doing
so,
we
offer
an
alternative,
novel
combination
philosophy
questioning
work
approach
practice.
‘Wickedness’
re-conceptualized
as
problematicity,
conceived
distance
between
those
who
question
or
inquire
into
problem.
primarily
political
distance,
articulated
ideas,
interests,
institutions
practices.
High
arises
only
when
wide
distances
are
explicitly
maintained,
such
partial
answers
cannot
be
reached.
Practitioners
deal
with
dual
strategy
balancing
closing-down
opening-up
sub-questions
order
structure
them
they
become
amenable
action
through
answers.
simultaneously
incorporates
politics
negotiating
via
partisan
adjustment
serial
strategic
analysis.
argument
constitutes
theoretically
practically
superior
alternative
perspective.
Administration & Society,
Journal Year:
2013,
Volume and Issue:
47(6), P. 711 - 739
Published: March 28, 2013
The
concept
of
“wicked
problems”
has
attracted
increasing
focus
in
policy
research,
but
the
implications
for
public
organizations
have
received
less
attention.
This
article
examines
main
organizational
and
cognitive
dimensions
emerging
from
research
literature
on
wicked
problems.
We
identify
several
recent
approaches
to
addressing
problem
complexity
stakeholder
divergence
based
literatures
systems
thinking,
collaboration
coordination,
adaptive
leadership
roles
leaders
managers.
raise
some
challenges
management
key
functional
areas
government—strategy
making,
design,
people
management,
performance
measurement.
argue
that
provisional
solutions
can
be
developed,
despite
difficulties
reforming
governance
processes
address
problems
more
effectively.
Journal of Public Policy,
Journal Year:
2010,
Volume and Issue:
30(3), P. 345 - 362
Published: Nov. 4, 2010
Abstract
Policy
protagonists
are
keen
to
claim
that
policy
is
successful
while
opponents
more
likely
frame
policies
as
failures.
The
reality
outcomes
often
somewhere
in
between
these
extremes.
An
added
difficulty
has
multiple
dimensions,
succeeding
some
respects
but
not
others,
according
facts
and
their
interpretation.
This
paper
sets
out
a
framework
designed
capture
the
bundles
of
indicate
how
or
unsuccessful
been.
It
reviews
existing
literature
on
evaluation
improvement,
public
value,
good
practice,
political
strategy
failure
success
order
identify
what
can
be
built
gaps
need
filled.
conceives
having
three
realms:
processes,
programs
politics.
Policies
may
succeed
and/or
fail
each
along
spectrum
success,
resilient
conflicted
precarious
failure.
concludes
by
examining
contradictions
different
forms
including
known
colloquially
politics
bad
policy.
Public Management Review,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
23(7), P. 949 - 960
Published: Sept. 21, 2020
The
COVID-19
pandemic
reveals
that
the
public
sector
is
not
only
facing
simple
and
complex
problem,
but
also
turbulent
problems
characterized
by
surprising
emergence
of
inconsistent,
unpredictable,
uncertain
events.
Turbulent
call
for
robust
governance
solutions
are
sufficiently
adaptable,
agile
pragmatic
to
upheld
a
particular
goal
or
function
in
face
continuous
disruptions.
article
defines
concepts
turbulence
robustness
provides
examples
strategies
illustrated
current
response.
Finally,
it
draws
consequences
new
focus
on
administration
leadership.
Science,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
356(6335), P. 265 - 270
Published: April 20, 2017
Ecosystems
are
self-regulating
systems
that
provide
societies
with
food,
water,
timber,
and
other
resources.
As
demands
for
resources
increase,
management
decisions
replacing
properties.
Counter
to
previous
technical
approaches
applied
simple
formulas
estimate
sustainable
yields
of
single
species,
current
research
recognizes
the
inherent
complexity
ecosystems
inability
foresee
all
consequences
interventions
across
different
spatial,
temporal,
administrative
scales.
Ecosystem
is
thus
more
realistically
seen
as
a
“wicked
problem”
has
no
clear-cut
solution.
Approaches
addressing
such
problems
include
multisector
decision-making,
institutions
enable
span
boundaries,
adaptive
management,
markets
incorporate
natural
capital,
collaborative
processes
engage
diverse
stakeholders
address
inequalities.
must
avoid
two
traps:
falsely
assuming
tame
solution
inaction
from
overwhelming
complexity.
An
incremental
approach
can
help
these
traps.
Policy and Society,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
36(3), P. 397 - 413
Published: July 3, 2017
Abstract
This
paper
addresses
shortcomings
in
the
scholarship
about
‘wicked
problems’,
and
suggests
ways
of
tackling
them.
Firstly,
accounts
these
problems
tend
to
‘totalise’,
regarding
them
as
intractable
masses
complexity,
so
conflict-prone
and/or
that
they
defy
definition
solution.
By
contrast,
we
put
forward
a
more
nuanced
analysis,
arguing
complex
vary
extent
their
wickedness,
via
such
dimensions
cognitive
complexity
or
diversity
irreconcilability
actors
institutions
involved.
We
propose
typology
different
forms
wicked
problems.
A
second
shortcoming,
linked
intractability,
is
favoured
means
has
tended
towards
‘one
best
way’
approaches,
most
commonly
collaboration
with
key
stakeholders.
Moreover,
particular
be
routinely
applied
‘one-size-fits-all’
fashion
variety
situations
–
notably
plethora
actors,
focus
on
governance
rather
than
implementation
management.
contingency
framework,
based
our
typology,
proposing
which
types
are
suitable
for
problem.
Finally,
argue
realistic
standard
success
dealing
problems,
especially
difficult
ones.
To
call
‘solving’
set
up
not
only
impossible
but
also
perhaps
unnecessary.
do
much
‘solve’
make
progress
improvement
better
managing
spell
out
version
‘progress’.
Public Administration Review,
Journal Year:
2016,
Volume and Issue:
76(6), P. 887 - 897
Published: April 17, 2016
Abstract
What
makes
a
well‐functioning
governmental
crisis
management
system,
and
how
can
this
be
studied
using
an
organization
theory–based
approach?
A
core
argument
is
that
such
system
needs
both
governance
capacity
legitimacy.
Organizational
arrangements
as
well
the
legitimacy
of
government
authorities
will
affect
performance.
central
structural
features
cultural
context
matter,
does
nature
crisis.
Is
it
transboundary
crisis?
How
unique
it,
much
uncertainty
associated
with
it?
The
arguments
are
substantiated
empirical
examples
supported
by
literature
synthesis,
focusing
on
public
administration
research.
main
conclusion
there
no
optimal
formula
for
harmonizing
competing
interests
tensions
or
overcoming
ambiguous
structures.
Flexibility
adaptation
key
assets,
which
constrained
political,
administrative,
situational
context.
Furthermore,
future
research
agenda
indicated.