Development and environmental impacts of China's livestock and poultry breeding
Journal of Cleaner Production,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
371, P. 133586 - 133586
Published: Aug. 13, 2022
Language: Английский
Livelihoods, Technological Constraints, and Low-Carbon Agricultural Technology Preferences of Farmers: Analytical Frameworks of Technology Adoption and Farmer Livelihoods
Dandan Zhao,
No information about this author
Zhou Hong
No information about this author
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
18(24), P. 13364 - 13364
Published: Dec. 18, 2021
In
the
context
of
achieving
carbon
neutrality,
it
is
scientifically
important
to
quantitatively
explore
relationships
among
livelihoods,
technological
property
constraints,
and
selection
low-carbon
technologies
by
farmers
promote
agricultural
modernization
neutrality
in
sector
China.
Based
on
scientific
classifications
farmer
capital
technologies,
a
technology
theory
model
considering
constraints
was
developed
this
study.
Microcosmic
survey
data
were
collected
from
Jiangsu
province
for
empirical
testing
analyses.
A
total
four
related
fertilizer
usage
three
types
farmers'
livelihoods
their
examined
using
logistic
model.
The
results
showed
existence
significant
coupling
relationship
between
intrinsic
decision
mechanism
involved
selecting
properties
different
farmers.
Significant
differences
exist
large-scale
farmers,
mid-level
part-time
low-level
(generally
small)
(1)
When
technology,
are
more
inclined
accept
capital-intensive,
such
as
new
varieties,
straw
recycling,
soil
testing,
formulated
fertilization.
Mid-level
intensive,
labor
saving,
or
low
risk
technologies.
contrast,
intensive
reduce
risks.
(2)
Large-scale
influenced
household
plot
characteristics,
while
characteristics.
(3)
Households
with
created
differentiated
face
challenges
adopting
capital-intensive
However,
stronger
areas
land
labor-saving
fertilization
technology.
Moreover,
preferences
tend
high-risk
like
recycling.
study
can
provide
basis
formulating
emission
reduction
policies
sector.
Language: Английский
Recognition on characteristics and applicability of typical modes for manure & sewage management in pig farming: A case study in Hebei, China
Waste Management,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
148, P. 83 - 97
Published: June 3, 2022
Language: Английский
Four-party evolutionary game analysis of third-party recycling treatment of livestock and poultry breeding waste
Journal of Cleaner Production,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
415, P. 137829 - 137829
Published: June 17, 2023
Language: Английский
Ocean-human relations in the Anthropocene: mapping trends in sustainability-related marine social sciences articles
Frontiers in Marine Science,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
10
Published: Aug. 18, 2023
Research
about
ocean-human
relations
has
significantly
increased
in
recent
years.
Compared
to
other
disciplines
the
oceanic
realm,
marine
social
sciences,
as
an
umbrella
term
for
diverse
and
research
streams
dealing
with
relations,
however
only
recently
gained
more
attention.
In
this
light,
UN
Ocean
Decade
stresses
science’s
pivotal
role
assessing
future
trajectories
toward
sustainable
relations.
Our
study
aims
identify
trends
sustainability-related
sciences.
Therefore,
we
thoroughly
analyzed
metadata
of
1,215
peer-reviewed
articles
published
between
1991
2023
retrieved
from
Web
Sciences
(WoS)
database
by
applying
various
bibliometric
analysis
methods.
provides
insights
into
(1)
scientific
production
sciences
its
evolution
(2)
main
topics
(3)
how
these
developed
over
time.
The
findings
demonstrate
a
significant
increase
annual
time
progressed,
some
countries
institutions
contributing
than
others.
We
identified,
discussed,
visualized
six
streams:
Perceptions
benefits
conservation;
Fisheries,
aquaculture,
food
security;
Climate
change
climate
responses;
(4)
Coastal
landscape
land
use
change;
(5)
management;
(6)
Development
health.
Based
on
those
discussions,
our
points
four
avenues
discussions
could
potentially
build
on.
These
include
strengthening
capacity
sciences;
enhancing
cross-country
studies
cooperation;
fostering
dialogue
natural
scientists;
making
(more)
sense
epistemic
features.
Language: Английский
Carbon emissions from smallholder pig production in China: a precise account based on farmers’ survey
Environmental Science and Pollution Research,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
29(17), P. 25651 - 25664
Published: Nov. 30, 2021
Language: Английский
Human factors and their acting pathway influencing livestock and poultry farmers' willingness to environmental management in coastal areas: a model of bayesian network
Xiaodi Jiang,
No information about this author
Jianguo Li,
No information about this author
Yuqi Tang
No information about this author
et al.
Discover Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
5(1)
Published: Sept. 16, 2024
Language: Английский
Small Scale Pig Farming in Northern Shanxi: An Environment, Health and Development Perspective
Lichao Yang,
No information about this author
Huanhuan Zhang
No information about this author
Open Journal of Social Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10(08), P. 18 - 39
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
Over
the
past
three
years,
under
combined
impact
of
national
policies
and
markets,
landscape
pig
farming
industry
in
China
is
undergoing
great
changes,
with
a
large
number
medium
small
farmers
scattered
(sanyang)
breeding
households
withdrawing
from
market,
market
shares
large-scale
enterprises
rising.
Pressure
environmental
protection
industrial
transformation
placing
households,
which
were
formerly
mainstay
industry,
dilemma.
Research
public
opinion
generally
believe
that
sharp
fluctuations
prices
pollution
are
primary
negative
effects
sector
both
due
to
lack
macro
control
nonstandard
practices
households.
But
this
really
case?
Drawing
on
qualitative
fieldwork
northern
Shanxi,
paper
aims
provide
case
study
its
interaction
protection.
Empirical
research
found
that,
region
Northern
where
animal
husbandry
horticulture
equally
important
complementary,
by
does
not
put
obvious
pressure
environment.
Although
there
still
room
for
improvement
policy
implementation
cooperation
among
government
departments,
so
on,
part
sustainable
agricultural
system.
Instead
discouraging
everywhere,
needs
take
local
conditions
relationship
between
livestock
rearing
into
account.
Language: Английский
Influences on Stakeholder Attitudes towards Government’s Great Barrier Reef Regulations
Martin Drennan,
No information about this author
Josephine Pryce
No information about this author
Journal of Resilient Economies (ISSN 2653-1917),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
2(1)
Published: July 31, 2022
The
Great
Barrier
Reef
(GBR)
off
Australia’s
east
coast
is
a
globally
significant
marine
environment
under
threat
from
polluted
runoff
resulting
adjacent
sugarcane
farming
(Waterhouse
et
al.,
2017).
Sustained
efforts
and
investment
by
all
levels
of
Government
over
20
years
have
challenged
the
Queensland
Sugar
Industry
to
transition
towards
more
sustainable
practices
reduce
non-point
source
(NPS)
pollutant
reaching
GBR.
In
light
issues
outlined
UNESCO
concerning
protection
GBR
in
its
2011
2012
reports
(UNESCO,
2011,
2012)
existing
government
regulations,
scoping
review
was
undertaken
identify
conceptualisation
farmer
attitudes
environmental
protection,
specifically
protecting
It
revealed
that
predominant
policy
mechanisms
across
countries
are
focused
on
voluntary
adoption
instruments
mitigate
NPS
pollution.
showed
no
or
combinations
universally
effective
reducing
pollution
populations
within
given
geographical
locations.
identified
behavioural
theories
underpin
factors
influencing
pro-environmental
practices.
Additionally,
it
found
farmers
heterogeneous
beliefs
attitudes,
responding
differently
different
incentive
options
challenging
framing.
Reviewing
surrounding
best
management
practice
(BMP)
exposes
additional
concepts,
which
could
lead
improved
approaches.
Therefore,
argued
for
importance
conducting
further
research
will
advance
innovative
strategies
achieving
balances
between
actions
sustainability
environment.
Language: Английский