Conservation Biology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
36(1)
Published: May 31, 2021
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
had
an
enormous
impact
on
almost
all
aspects
of
human
society
and
endeavor;
the
natural
world
its
conservation
have
not
been
spared.
Through
a
process
expert
consultation,
we
identified
categorized,
into
19
themes
70
subthemes,
ways
in
which
biodiversity
or
could
be
affected
by
globally.
Nearly
60%
effects
broadly
negative.
Subsequently,
created
compendium
each
with
explanatory
text,
August
2020
diverse
group
experienced
conservationists
expertise
from
across
sectors
geographies
assessed
subtheme
for
likely
9
subthemes
ranked
highest
negative
impact.
These
were,
rank
order,
governments
sidelining
environment
during
their
economic
recovery,
reduced
wildlife-based
tourism
income,
increased
habitat
destruction,
government
funding,
plastic
other
solid
waste
pollution,
weakening
nature-friendly
regulations
enforcement,
illegal
harvest
wild
animals,
philanthropy,
threats
to
survival
organizations.
In
combination,
these
impacts
present
worrying
future
but
capacity
counter
them.
ranking
positive
impact,
at
10,
was
beneficial
wildlife-trade
restrictions.
More
optimistically,
among
11-20,
6
were
4
We
hope
our
assessment
will
draw
attention
and,
thus,
improve
community's
ability
respond
such
future.La
pandemia
de
ha
tenido
un
impacto
enorme
sobre
casi
todos
los
aspectos
la
sociedad
humana
y
sus
proyectos;
el
mundo
su
conservación
no
han
sido
excepción.
Por
medio
proceso
consultas
expertos,
identificamos
categorizamos
en
temas
subtemas
las
maneras
que
biodiversidad
o
podrían
ser
afectadas
mundialmente
por
pandemia.
Casi
efectos
claramente
negativos.
Posteriormente,
creamos
compendio
subtemas,
cada
uno
con
textos
explicativos,
para
agosto
grupo
diverso
conservacionistas
experimentados
conocimiento
sectores
geografías
evaluara
subtema
acuerdo
probabilidad
impactar
todo
mundo.
Los
nueve
clasificación
más
alta
tienen
negativo.
Estos
son,
orden
clasificación:
gobiernos
dejando
lado
al
ambiente
durante
recuperación
económica,
reducción
ingresos
basados
turismo
fauna,
incremento
destrucción
hábitat,
financiamiento
reducido
del
gobierno,
aumento
contaminación
plásticos
otros
desechos
sólidos,
debilitamiento
regulaciones
pro
naturaleza
aplicación,
captura
ilegal
animales,
disminución
filantropía
amenazas
supervivencia
organizaciones
conservación.
La
combinación
estos
impactos
representa
futuro
preocupante
lleno
una
capacidad
reducida
contrarrestarlas.
El
positivo
alta,
fue
benéfico
restricciones
mercado
fauna.
De
manera
optimista,
entre
clasificados
lugares
11
20,
seis
fueron
positivos
cuatro
Esperamos
nuestra
evaluación
enfoque
atención
hacia
así
mejore
habilidad
comunidad
conservacionista
responder
tales
futuro.
Importancia
Relativa
Impactos
Pandemia
Conservación
Mundial
Biodiversidad.
Earth system science data,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
14(4), P. 1917 - 2005
Published: April 26, 2022
Accurate
assessment
of
anthropogenic
carbon
dioxide
(CO2)
emissions
and
their
redistribution
among
the
atmosphere,
ocean,
terrestrial
biosphere
in
a
changing
climate
is
critical
to
better
understand
global
cycle,
support
development
policies,
project
future
change.
Here
we
describe
synthesize
datasets
methodology
quantify
five
major
components
budget
uncertainties.
Fossil
CO2
(EFOS)
are
based
on
energy
statistics
cement
production
data,
while
from
land-use
change
(ELUC),
mainly
deforestation,
land
use
data
bookkeeping
models.
Atmospheric
concentration
measured
directly,
its
growth
rate
(GATM)
computed
annual
changes
concentration.
The
ocean
sink
(SOCEAN)
estimated
with
biogeochemistry
models
observation-based
products.
(SLAND)
dynamic
vegetation
resulting
imbalance
(BIM),
difference
between
total
biosphere,
measure
imperfect
understanding
contemporary
cycle.
All
uncertainties
reported
as
±1σ.
For
first
time,
an
approach
shown
reconcile
our
ELUC
estimate
one
national
greenhouse
gas
inventories,
supporting
collective
countries'
progress.
year
2020,
EFOS
declined
by
5.4
%
relative
2019,
fossil
at
9.5
±
0.5
GtC
yr−1
(9.3
when
carbonation
included),
was
0.9
0.7
yr−1,
for
emission
10.2
0.8
(37.4
2.9
GtCO2).
Also,
GATM
5.0
0.2
(2.4
0.1
ppm
yr−1),
SOCEAN
3.0
0.4
SLAND
1
BIM
−0.8
yr−1.
atmospheric
averaged
over
2020
reached
412.45
ppm.
Preliminary
2021
suggest
rebound
+4.8
(4.2
%)
globally.
Overall,
mean
trend
consistently
period
1959–2020,
but
discrepancies
up
persist
representation
semi-decadal
variability
fluxes.
Comparison
estimates
multiple
approaches
observations
shows
(1)
persistent
large
uncertainty
emissions,
(2)
low
agreement
different
methods
magnitude
flux
northern
extra-tropics,
(3)
discrepancy
strength
last
decade.
This
living
update
documents
used
this
new
progress
cycle
compared
previous
publications
dataset
(Friedlingstein
et
al.,
2019;
Le
Quéré
2018b,
a,
2016,
2015b,
2014,
2013).
presented
work
available
https://doi.org/10.18160/gcp-2021
2021).
Earth system science data,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
14(11), P. 4811 - 4900
Published: Nov. 11, 2022
Abstract.
Accurate
assessment
of
anthropogenic
carbon
dioxide
(CO2)
emissions
and
their
redistribution
among
the
atmosphere,
ocean,
terrestrial
biosphere
in
a
changing
climate
is
critical
to
better
understand
global
cycle,
support
development
policies,
project
future
change.
Here
we
describe
synthesize
data
sets
methodologies
quantify
five
major
components
budget
uncertainties.
Fossil
CO2
(EFOS)
are
based
on
energy
statistics
cement
production
data,
while
from
land-use
change
(ELUC),
mainly
deforestation,
land
use
bookkeeping
models.
Atmospheric
concentration
measured
directly,
its
growth
rate
(GATM)
computed
annual
changes
concentration.
The
ocean
sink
(SOCEAN)
estimated
with
biogeochemistry
models
observation-based
products.
(SLAND)
dynamic
vegetation
resulting
imbalance
(BIM),
difference
between
total
biosphere,
measure
imperfect
understanding
contemporary
cycle.
All
uncertainties
reported
as
±1σ.
For
year
2021,
EFOS
increased
by
5.1
%
relative
2020,
fossil
at
10.1
±
0.5
GtC
yr−1
(9.9
when
carbonation
included),
ELUC
was
1.1
0.7
yr−1,
for
emission
(including
sink)
10.9
0.8
(40.0
2.9
GtCO2).
Also,
GATM
5.2
0.2
(2.5
0.1
ppm
yr−1),
SOCEAN
0.4
SLAND
3.5
0.9
BIM
−0.6
(i.e.
sources
were
too
low
or
sinks
high).
atmospheric
averaged
over
2021
reached
414.71
ppm.
Preliminary
2022
suggest
an
increase
+1.0
(0.1
1.9
%)
globally
reaching
417.2
ppm,
more
than
50
above
pre-industrial
levels
(around
278
ppm).
Overall,
mean
trend
consistently
period
1959–2021,
but
discrepancies
up
1
persist
representation
semi-decadal
variability
fluxes.
Comparison
estimates
multiple
approaches
observations
shows
(1)
persistent
large
uncertainty
estimate
emissions,
(2)
agreement
different
methods
magnitude
flux
northern
extratropics,
(3)
discrepancy
strength
last
decade.
This
living
update
documents
used
this
new
progress
cycle
compared
previous
publications
set.
presented
work
available
https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2022
(Friedlingstein
et
al.,
2022b).
Earth system science data,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
15(12), P. 5301 - 5369
Published: Nov. 30, 2023
Abstract.
Accurate
assessment
of
anthropogenic
carbon
dioxide
(CO2)
emissions
and
their
redistribution
among
the
atmosphere,
ocean,
terrestrial
biosphere
in
a
changing
climate
is
critical
to
better
understand
global
cycle,
support
development
policies,
project
future
change.
Here
we
describe
synthesize
data
sets
methodology
quantify
five
major
components
budget
uncertainties.
Fossil
CO2
(EFOS)
are
based
on
energy
statistics
cement
production
data,
while
from
land-use
change
(ELUC),
mainly
deforestation,
bookkeeping
models.
Atmospheric
concentration
measured
directly,
its
growth
rate
(GATM)
computed
annual
changes
concentration.
The
ocean
sink
(SOCEAN)
estimated
with
biogeochemistry
models
observation-based
fCO2
products.
(SLAND)
dynamic
vegetation
Additional
lines
evidence
land
sinks
provided
by
atmospheric
inversions,
oxygen
measurements,
Earth
system
resulting
imbalance
(BIM),
difference
between
total
biosphere,
measure
imperfect
incomplete
understanding
contemporary
cycle.
All
uncertainties
reported
as
±1σ.
For
year
2022,
EFOS
increased
0.9
%
relative
2021,
fossil
at
9.9±0.5
Gt
C
yr−1
(10.2±0.5
when
carbonation
not
included),
ELUC
was
1.2±0.7
yr−1,
for
emission
(including
sink)
11.1±0.8
(40.7±3.2
yr−1).
Also,
GATM
4.6±0.2
(2.18±0.1
ppm
yr−1;
denotes
parts
per
million),
SOCEAN
2.8±0.4
SLAND
3.8±0.8
BIM
−0.1
(i.e.
sources
marginally
too
low
or
high).
averaged
over
2022
reached
417.1±0.1
ppm.
Preliminary
2023
suggest
an
increase
+1.1
(0.0
2.1
%)
globally
reaching
419.3
ppm,
51
above
pre-industrial
level
(around
278
1750).
Overall,
mean
trend
consistently
period
1959–2022,
near-zero
overall
imbalance,
although
discrepancies
up
around
1
persist
representation
semi-decadal
variability
fluxes.
Comparison
estimates
multiple
approaches
observations
shows
following:
(1)
persistent
large
uncertainty
estimate
emissions,
(2)
agreement
different
methods
magnitude
flux
northern
extra-tropics,
(3)
discrepancy
strength
last
decade.
This
living-data
update
documents
applied
this
most
recent
well
evolving
community
presented
work
available
https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2023
(Friedlingstein
et
al.,
2023).
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
19(3), P. 233 - 255
Published: July 1, 2021
Brazil
has
experienced
unprecedented
wildfires
in
the
last
decade.
Images
of
immense
burnt
areas
or
dead
animals
that
failed
to
escape
2020
have
shocked
world.
To
prevent
minimize
further
similar
disasters
we
must
understand
factors
led
these
catastrophic
events.
The
causes
and
consequences
entail
complex
interactions
between
biophysical
sociocultural
spheres,
suitable
management
decisions
require
a
sound
scientific
base.
We
present
recent
panorama
increasing
fire
outbreaks
Brazilian
biomes,
discuss
contributed
such
fires,
their
impacts
on
environment
overall
for
human
well-being,
based
reviewing
extensive
specialist
literature,
authors'
expert
knowledge
information
provided
by
environmental
managers,
researchers
politicians
during
workshop
organized
debate
wildfire
issue
Brazil.
Our
up-to-date
review
is
aimed
at
academic
public,
managers
decision-
policy-makers.
First,
evidence
contrasting
effects
different
ecosystems.
Second,
outline
historic
perceptions
policies
related
use
since
its
colonization
date.
Third,
propose
means
advance
prevention
develop
successful
strategies.
Finally,
answer
frequently
asked
questions
clarify
and/or
demystify
some
fire-related
issues
not
always
properly
addressed
media.
Science Advances,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
8(5)
Published: Feb. 4, 2022
The
lives
lost
and
economic
costs
of
viral
zoonotic
pandemics
have
steadily
increased
over
the
past
century.
Prominent
policymakers
promoted
plans
that
argue
best
ways
to
address
future
pandemic
catastrophes
should
entail,
“detecting
containing
emerging
threats.”
In
other
words,
we
take
actions
only
after
humans
get
sick.
We
sharply
disagree.
Humans
extensive
contact
with
wildlife
known
harbor
vast
numbers
viruses,
many
which
not
yet
spilled
into
humans.
compute
annualized
damages
from
zoonoses.
explore
three
practical
minimize
impact
pandemics:
better
surveillance
pathogen
spillover
development
global
databases
virus
genomics
serology,
management
trade,
substantial
reduction
deforestation.
find
these
primary
prevention
cost
less
than
1/20th
value
each
year
zoonoses
cobenefits.
The Lancet Planetary Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
5(11), P. e840 - e850
Published: Nov. 1, 2021
The
ongoing
COVID-19
pandemic,
caused
by
zoonotic
SARS-CoV-2,
has
important
links
to
biodiversity
loss
and
ecosystem
health.
These
range
from
anthropogenic
activities
driving
disease
emergence
extend
the
pandemic
affecting
conservation,
environmental
policy,
services,
multiple
conservation
facets.
Crucially,
such
effects
can
exacerbate
initial
drivers,
resulting
in
feedback
loops
that
are
likely
promote
future
outbreaks.
We
explore
these
relationships,
highlighting
known
potential
drivers
(eg,
land-use
change,
intensive
livestock
production,
wildlife
trade,
climate
change),
discuss
direct
indirect
of
on
stress
responses
must
include
actions
aimed
at
safeguarding
ecosystems,
order
avoid
zoonoses
prevent
their
wide-ranging
human
health,
economies,
society.
Such
would
benefit
adopting
a
One
Health
approach,
enhancing
cross-sector,
transboundary
communication,
as
well
collaboration
among
actors,
promoting
planetary