Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(7)
Published: July 1, 2024
Abstract
Quantifying
the
cost‐effectiveness
of
alternative
sampling
methods
is
crucial
for
efficient
biodiversity
monitoring
and
detection
population
trends.
In
this
study,
we
compared
three
novel
detecting
changes
in
koala
(
Phascolarctos
cinereus
)
occupancy:
thermal
drones,
passive
acoustic
recorders
camera
trapping.
Specifically,
fitted
single‐season
occupancy‐detection
models
to
data
recorded
from
46
sites
eight
bioregions
New
South
Wales,
Australia,
between
2018
2022.
We
explored
effect
weather
variables
on
daily
probability
each
method
and,
using
these
estimates,
calculated
statistical
power
detect
30%,
50%
80%
declines
occupancy.
different
combinations
(1–200)
repeat
surveys
(2–40)
developed
a
cost
model
that
found
cheapest
survey
design
achieved
change.
On
average,
detectability
koalas
was
highest
with
one
24‐h
period
(0.32,
95%
CI's:
0.26,
0.39)
25‐ha
flight
drone
(0.28,
0.15,
0.48)
or
trapping
consisting
six
cameras
(0.019,
0.014,
0.025).
negative
quadratic
relationship
air
temperature
all
methods.
Our
analysis
suggested
148
surveyed
deployed
14
days
would
be
sufficiently
30%
decline
occupancy
power.
recommend
as
most
drones.
Further
comparative
studies
are
needed
compare
relative
effectiveness
others
when
objective
change
abundance
over
time.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
380(1917)
Published: Jan. 9, 2025
Target
15
of
the
Kunming–Montreal
Global
Biodiversity
Framework
recognizes
importance
private
sector
monitoring,
assessing
and
disclosing
biodiversity-related
risks,
dependencies
impacts.
Many
businesses
financial
institutions
are
progressing
with
science-based
assessments,
targets
disclosures
integrating
into
strategy,
risk
management
capital
allocation
decisions.
Developments
will
continue
in
response
to
investor
expectations,
emerging
corporate
sustainability
reporting
regulations
Europe,
China
elsewhere
evolving
global
standards.
Voluntary
action
is
also
being
encouraged
by
disclosure
recommendations
Taskforce
on
Nature-related
Financial
Disclosures
target-setting
methods
Science
Based
Targets
Network.
experience
supporting
practice,
we
identify
four
critical
science
technical
advances
needed
enable
business
at
scale
redirect
finance
globally
halt
reverse
biodiversity
loss.
First,
consensus
indicators
metrics
for
measuring
changes
state
nature
provision
ecosystem
services.
Second,
access
global,
regularly
updated,
location-specific
consistent
data.
Third,
standardized
accounting
systems
that
structure
data,
support
create
accountability
corporate,
national
levels.
Fourth,
integrated
assessment
approaches
help
corporates,
institutions,
central
banks
supervisors
assess
nature-related
risks.
This
article
part
discussion
meeting
issue
‘Bending
curve
towards
recovery:
building
Georgina
Mace's
legacy
a
biodiverse
future’.
Conservation Biology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
36(1)
Published: Feb. 18, 2021
Species
monitoring,
defined
here
as
the
repeated,
systematic
collection
of
data
to
detect
long-term
changes
in
populations
wild
species,
is
a
vital
component
conservation
practice
and
policy.
We
created
database
nearly
1200
schemes,
ranging
start
date
from
1800
2018,
review
spatial,
temporal,
taxonomic,
methodological
patterns
global
species
monitoring.
identified
monitoring
schemes
through
standardized
web
searches,
an
online
survey
stakeholders,
in-depth
national
searches
sample
countries,
biodiversity
databases.
estimated
total
number
operating
at
3300-15,000.
Since
2000,
there
has
been
sharp
increase
new
being
initiated
lower-
middle-income
countries
megadiverse
but
decrease
high-income
countries.
The
country
its
per
capita
gross
domestic
product
were
strongly,
positively
correlated.
Schemes
that
active
2018
had
running
for
average
21
years
compared
with
13
10
low-income
In
over
one-half
received
government
funding,
this
was
less
than
one-quarter
Data
undertaken
partly
or
wholly
by
volunteers
37%
such
covered
significantly
more
sites
those
professionals
alone.
Birds
far
most
widely
monitored
taxonomic
group,
accounting
around
half
all
bias
declined
time.
Monitoring
groups
remains
sparse
uncoordinated,
generated
are
elusive
unlikely
feed
into
wider
processes.
These
shortcomings
could
be
addressed
by,
example,
creating
open
meta-database
enhancing
capacity
high
biodiversity.
Article
impact
statement:
population
purposes
strongly
biased
toward
few
vertebrate
taxa
wealthier
countries.Una
Revisión
Global
Cuantitativa
del
Monitoreo
Poblacional
de
Especies
Resumen
El
monitoreo
especies,
definido
aquí
como
la
recolección
sistemática
y
repetida
datos
para
detectar
cambios
largo
plazo
en
las
poblaciones
especies
silvestres,
es
un
componente
práctica
políticas
conservación.
Generamos
una
base
casi
1,200
esquemas,
con
rango
fecha
inicio
desde
hasta
revisar
los
patrones
espaciales,
temporales,
taxonómicos
metodológicos
el
especies.
Identificamos
esquemas
por
medio
búsquedas
estandarizadas
línea,
encuesta
digital
realizada
actores,
profundidad
muestra
países
revisión
bases
sobre
biodiversidad.
Estimamos
número
mundial
funcionales
entre
3,300
15,000.
Desde
ha
habido
fuerte
aumento
nuevos
que
han
iniciado
bajo
o
mediano
ingreso
megadiversos,
pero
disminución
alto
ingreso.
país
su
producto
interno
bruto
cápita
tuvieron
correlación
sólida
positiva.
Los
estaban
activos
lo
habían
estado
promedio
años
ingreso,
comparado
En
más
mitad
recibieron
financiamiento
gobierno,
menos
cuarto
La
se
realizó
parcial
totalmente
voluntarios
dichos
cubrieron
significativamente
sitios
aquellos
realizados
sólo
profesionales.
Las
aves
fueron
mucho
grupo
taxonómico
monitoreado,
comprendiendo
todos
este
sesgo
declinó
tiempo.
mayoría
grupos
todavía
disperso
descoordinado,
generados
son
vagos
tienen
poca
probabilidad
alimentar
procesos
amplios
conservación
Estas
deficiencias
podrían
abordarse,
ejemplo,
creando
meta-base
globales
abiertos
biodiversidad
mejorando
capacidad
alta
biodiversidad.物种监测,
在本文中指重复、系统地收集数据以检测野生物种种群的长期变化,
是保护实践和政策的重要组成部分。我们创建了一个包含近
项计划的数据库,
计划开始时间覆盖
1800-2018
年,
以综述全球物种监测的空间、时间、类群及方法的模式。这些计划是通过标准化网络搜索、利益相关者在线调查、一系列国家样本的深度搜索,
以及对全球生物多样性数据库的综合考察确定的。我们估计全球范围内开展的监测计划总数在
3,300-15,000
之间。自
2000年以来,
低收入和中等收入国家以及高生物多样性国家开启新计划的数量急剧增加,
而高收入国家中则有所下降。一个国家的监测计划总数与其人均国内生产总值之间存在着强烈的正相关关系。在高收入国家中,
年仍在进行的计划平均已开展
在中等收入国家中为
而在低收入国家中为
年。高收入国家超过一半的监测计划都获得了政府资助,
而在低收入国家,
这一比例不足四分之一。数据收集部分或全部由志愿者完成的计划占
37%,
它们覆盖的地点和物种远远多于仅由专业人员参与的计划。到目前为止,
得到监测最广泛的类群是鸟类,
约占所有计划的一半,
但这种偏倚正在随时间推移而减弱。然而,
对大多数类群的监测仍十分稀少且不对等,
产生的数据大多难以理解,
不太可能用于更广泛的生物多样性保护过程。最后,
我们提出了一些方法来解决以上缺点,
如建立开放的全球生物多样性监测计划元数据库,
以及加强高生物多样性国家的物种监测能力。【翻译
:
胡怡思
;
审校
聂永刚】.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
15(12), P. e0242923 - e0242923
Published: Dec. 2, 2020
Many
conservation
managers,
policy
makers,
businesses
and
local
communities
cannot
access
the
biodiversity
data
they
need
for
informed
decision-making
on
natural
resource
management.
A
handful
of
databases
are
used
to
monitor
indicators
against
global
goals
but
there
is
no
openly
available
consolidated
list
sets
help
especially
those
in
high-biodiversity
countries.
We
therefore
conducted
an
inventory
potential
use
monitoring
states,
pressures
responses
at
multiple
levels.
uncovered
145
sources,
as
well
a
selection
reports,
links
which
we
will
make
open-access
website.
describe
trends
availability
actions
needed
improve
sharing.
If
science
community
made
greater
effort
publicise
freely
people
who
most
it,
might
be
able
mainstream
into
stop
loss.
Conservation Science and Practice,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
3(12)
Published: Nov. 2, 2021
Abstract
Wildlife
monitoring
is
essential
for
conservation
science
and
data‐driven
decision‐making.
Tropical
forests
pose
a
particularly
challenging
environment
wildlife
due
to
the
dense
vegetation,
diverse
cryptic
species
with
relatively
low
abundances.
The
most
commonly
used
methods
in
tropical
are
observations
made
by
humans
(visual
or
acoustic),
camera
traps,
passive
acoustic
sensors.
These
come
trade‐offs
terms
of
coverage,
accuracy
precision
population
metrics,
available
technical
expertise,
costs.
Yet,
there
no
reviews
that
compare
characteristics
these
detail.
Here,
we
comprehensively
review
advantages
limitations
three
mentioned
methods,
asking
four
key
questions
always
important
relation
monitoring:
(1)
What
target
species?;
(2)
Which
metrics
desirable
attainable?;
(3)
tools,
effort
required
identification?;
(4)
financial
human
resources
data
collection
processing?
Given
diversity
objectives
circumstances,
do
not
aim
conclusively
prescribe
particular
all
situations.
Neither
claim
any
one
method
superior
others.
Rather,
our
aims
support
scientists
practitioners
understanding
options
criteria
must
be
considered
choosing
appropriate
method,
given
their
efforts
available.
We
focus
on
because
high
priority,
although
information
put
forward
also
relevant
other
biomes.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
376(1837), P. 20210063 - 20210063
Published: Sept. 20, 2021
Networks
of
species
interactions
underpin
numerous
ecosystem
processes,
but
comprehensively
sampling
these
is
difficult.
Interactions
intrinsically
vary
across
space
and
time,
given
the
number
that
compose
ecological
communities,
it
can
be
tough
to
distinguish
between
a
true
negative
(where
two
never
interact)
from
false
have
not
been
observed
interacting
even
though
they
actually
do).
Assessing
likelihood
an
imperative
for
several
fields
ecology.
This
means
predict
species-and
describe
structure,
variation,
change
networks
form-we
need
rely
on
modelling
tools.
Here,
we
provide
proof-of-concept,
where
show
how
simple
neural
network
model
makes
accurate
predictions
about
limited
data.
We
then
assess
challenges
opportunities
associated
with
improving
interaction
predictions,
conceptual
roadmap
forward
towards
predictive
models
explicitly
spatial
temporal.
conclude
brief
primer
relevant
methods
tools
needed
start
building
models,
which
hope
will
guide
this
research
programme
forward.
article
part
theme
issue
'Infectious
disease
macroecology:
parasite
diversity
dynamics
globe'.
FACETS,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
10, P. 1 - 19
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Knowledge
and
data
on
the
current
function,
future
threats,
benefits
of
peatlands
in
Canada
are
required
to
support
evidence-based
decision-making
ensure
they
continue
provide
critical
ecosystem
services.
This
is
particularly
relevant
for
Canada,
given
large
expanse
relatively
intact
peatland
area.
There
a
need,
not
only
standardize
protocols,
but
also
prioritize
types
information
knowledge
that
can
best
meet
conservation
management
goals.
was
challenge
posed
participants
Global
Peatlands
Initiative
workshop
June
2023
Quebec
City,
Quebec,
Canada.
Participants
were
composed
researchers
using
primarily
Western
science
approaches
use
carbon
accounting,
policy
or
sustainable
land
use,
reclamation/restoration,
conservation,
wildlife,
water
resources
applications.
For
seven
categories
(hydrometeorological
environmental
sensing;
peat
coring
depth;
greenhouse
gas
monitoring;
biodiversity;
vegetation,
woody
debris,
litter;
Traditional
Knowledge;
quality),
three
priority
measurements
identified
recommendations
their
collection
discussed.
The
key
from
(1)
create
standardized,
yet
flexible
protocols;
(2)
coordinate
field
where
possible;
(3)
weave
more
into
understanding
peatlands;
(4)
an
atlas
existing
information;
(5)
scope
opportunities
network
“super
sites”.
Achieving
a
climate-resilient
future
requires
rapid,
sustained
and
far-reaching
transformations
in
energy,
land-use,
infrastructure
industrial
systems.
Large-scale
expansion
of
renewable
energy
can
play
critical
role
meeting
the
world’s
growing
demands
fight
against
climate
change.
However,
even
‘clean’
sources
have
significant
unintended
impacts
on
environment.
The
guidelines
aim
to
provide
practical
support
for
solar
wind
developments
by
effectively
managing
risks
improving
overall
outcomes
related
biodiversity
ecosystem
services.
They
are
industry-focused
be
applied
across
whole
project
development
life
cycle,
from
early
planning
through
decommissioning
repowering,
using
mitigation
hierarchy
as
clear
framework
implementation.
is
direct,
indirect
cumulative
impacts.