Journal of Fish Biology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
104(2), P. 345 - 364
Published: Nov. 6, 2023
China
harbors
a
high
species
diversity
of
freshwater
fishes
not
shared
with
any
its
neighboring
nations.
Freshwater
fish
in
the
country
has
been
under
severe
threat
from
human
activities
over
past
decades,
thus
conservation
and
ecosystems
is
urgently
needed.
To
accumulate
baseline
data
for
guiding
protection
actions,
third
red
list
assessment
Chinese
was
carried
out.
Among
assessed,
there
are
355
at-risk
(22.3%
total),
including
69
ranked
as
Critically
Endangered,
97
189
Vulnerable.
Two
classified
Extinct
one
Regionally
Extinct.
China's
level
seems
to
be
lower
than
known
average
found
IUCN's
global
fishes,
but
this
an
artifact
rate
Data
Deficient.
Conservation
presently
facing
grim
situation
China.
Imperilment
primarily
attributed
habitat
loss
degradation
arising
perturbations,
particularly
river
damming.
Despite
adoption
protected
areas
setting
up,
captive
breeding
release,
fishing
moratorium,
efforts
compromised
by
disproportional
attention
biodiversity
conservation,
deficiency,
insufficiently
designed
networks,
inefficient
or
inadequate
implementation
strategies.
achieve
objectives
it
proposed
conduct
national-scale
survey
reassess
their
status,
develop
systematic
planning
ecosystems,
prioritize
strategies
development,
perform
genetic-based
releasing
concert
other
implement
flexible
moratorium
different
water
bodies.
Ecology Letters,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
25(2), P. 255 - 263
Published: Dec. 1, 2021
Global
freshwater
biodiversity
is
declining
dramatically,
and
meeting
the
challenges
of
this
crisis
requires
bold
goals
mobilisation
substantial
resources.
While
reasons
are
varied,
investments
in
both
research
conservation
lag
far
behind
those
terrestrial
marine
realms.
Inspired
by
a
global
consultation,
we
identify
15
pressing
priority
needs,
grouped
into
five
areas,
an
effort
to
support
informed
stewardship
biodiversity.
The
proposed
agenda
aims
advance
globally
as
critical
step
improving
coordinated
actions
towards
its
sustainable
management
conservation.
Conservation Biology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
36(1)
Published: Feb. 18, 2021
Species
monitoring,
defined
here
as
the
repeated,
systematic
collection
of
data
to
detect
long-term
changes
in
populations
wild
species,
is
a
vital
component
conservation
practice
and
policy.
We
created
database
nearly
1200
schemes,
ranging
start
date
from
1800
2018,
review
spatial,
temporal,
taxonomic,
methodological
patterns
global
species
monitoring.
identified
monitoring
schemes
through
standardized
web
searches,
an
online
survey
stakeholders,
in-depth
national
searches
sample
countries,
biodiversity
databases.
estimated
total
number
operating
at
3300-15,000.
Since
2000,
there
has
been
sharp
increase
new
being
initiated
lower-
middle-income
countries
megadiverse
but
decrease
high-income
countries.
The
country
its
per
capita
gross
domestic
product
were
strongly,
positively
correlated.
Schemes
that
active
2018
had
running
for
average
21
years
compared
with
13
10
low-income
In
over
one-half
received
government
funding,
this
was
less
than
one-quarter
Data
undertaken
partly
or
wholly
by
volunteers
37%
such
covered
significantly
more
sites
those
professionals
alone.
Birds
far
most
widely
monitored
taxonomic
group,
accounting
around
half
all
bias
declined
time.
Monitoring
groups
remains
sparse
uncoordinated,
generated
are
elusive
unlikely
feed
into
wider
processes.
These
shortcomings
could
be
addressed
by,
example,
creating
open
meta-database
enhancing
capacity
high
biodiversity.
Article
impact
statement:
population
purposes
strongly
biased
toward
few
vertebrate
taxa
wealthier
countries.Una
Revisión
Global
Cuantitativa
del
Monitoreo
Poblacional
de
Especies
Resumen
El
monitoreo
especies,
definido
aquí
como
la
recolección
sistemática
y
repetida
datos
para
detectar
cambios
largo
plazo
en
las
poblaciones
especies
silvestres,
es
un
componente
práctica
políticas
conservación.
Generamos
una
base
casi
1,200
esquemas,
con
rango
fecha
inicio
desde
hasta
revisar
los
patrones
espaciales,
temporales,
taxonómicos
metodológicos
el
especies.
Identificamos
esquemas
por
medio
búsquedas
estandarizadas
línea,
encuesta
digital
realizada
actores,
profundidad
muestra
países
revisión
bases
sobre
biodiversidad.
Estimamos
número
mundial
funcionales
entre
3,300
15,000.
Desde
ha
habido
fuerte
aumento
nuevos
que
han
iniciado
bajo
o
mediano
ingreso
megadiversos,
pero
disminución
alto
ingreso.
país
su
producto
interno
bruto
cápita
tuvieron
correlación
sólida
positiva.
Los
estaban
activos
lo
habían
estado
promedio
años
ingreso,
comparado
En
más
mitad
recibieron
financiamiento
gobierno,
menos
cuarto
La
se
realizó
parcial
totalmente
voluntarios
dichos
cubrieron
significativamente
sitios
aquellos
realizados
sólo
profesionales.
Las
aves
fueron
mucho
grupo
taxonómico
monitoreado,
comprendiendo
todos
este
sesgo
declinó
tiempo.
mayoría
grupos
todavía
disperso
descoordinado,
generados
son
vagos
tienen
poca
probabilidad
alimentar
procesos
amplios
conservación
Estas
deficiencias
podrían
abordarse,
ejemplo,
creando
meta-base
globales
abiertos
biodiversidad
mejorando
capacidad
alta
biodiversidad.物种监测,
在本文中指重复、系统地收集数据以检测野生物种种群的长期变化,
是保护实践和政策的重要组成部分。我们创建了一个包含近
项计划的数据库,
计划开始时间覆盖
1800-2018
年,
以综述全球物种监测的空间、时间、类群及方法的模式。这些计划是通过标准化网络搜索、利益相关者在线调查、一系列国家样本的深度搜索,
以及对全球生物多样性数据库的综合考察确定的。我们估计全球范围内开展的监测计划总数在
3,300-15,000
之间。自
2000年以来,
低收入和中等收入国家以及高生物多样性国家开启新计划的数量急剧增加,
而高收入国家中则有所下降。一个国家的监测计划总数与其人均国内生产总值之间存在着强烈的正相关关系。在高收入国家中,
年仍在进行的计划平均已开展
在中等收入国家中为
而在低收入国家中为
年。高收入国家超过一半的监测计划都获得了政府资助,
而在低收入国家,
这一比例不足四分之一。数据收集部分或全部由志愿者完成的计划占
37%,
它们覆盖的地点和物种远远多于仅由专业人员参与的计划。到目前为止,
得到监测最广泛的类群是鸟类,
约占所有计划的一半,
但这种偏倚正在随时间推移而减弱。然而,
对大多数类群的监测仍十分稀少且不对等,
产生的数据大多难以理解,
不太可能用于更广泛的生物多样性保护过程。最后,
我们提出了一些方法来解决以上缺点,
如建立开放的全球生物多样性监测计划元数据库,
以及加强高生物多样性国家的物种监测能力。【翻译
:
胡怡思
;
审校
聂永刚】.
PLoS Biology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
20(11), P. e3001843 - e3001843
Published: Nov. 10, 2022
As
the
number
of
observations
submitted
to
citizen
science
platform
iNaturalist
continues
grow,
it
is
increasingly
important
that
these
can
be
identified
finest
taxonomic
level,
maximizing
their
value
for
biodiversity
research.
Here,
we
explore
benefits
acting
as
an
identifier
on
iNaturalist.
Achieving
a
climate-resilient
future
requires
rapid,
sustained
and
far-reaching
transformations
in
energy,
land-use,
infrastructure
industrial
systems.
Large-scale
expansion
of
renewable
energy
can
play
critical
role
meeting
the
world’s
growing
demands
fight
against
climate
change.
However,
even
‘clean’
sources
have
significant
unintended
impacts
on
environment.
The
guidelines
aim
to
provide
practical
support
for
solar
wind
developments
by
effectively
managing
risks
improving
overall
outcomes
related
biodiversity
ecosystem
services.
They
are
industry-focused
be
applied
across
whole
project
development
life
cycle,
from
early
planning
through
decommissioning
repowering,
using
mitigation
hierarchy
as
clear
framework
implementation.
is
direct,
indirect
cumulative
impacts.
Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
14(17), P. 10643 - 10643
Published: Aug. 26, 2022
Bioeconomy
and
circular
economy
approaches
are
being
adopted
by
an
increasing
number
of
international
organizations,
governments
companies
to
enhance
sustainability.
Concerns
have
been
raised
about
the
implications
for
biodiversity.
Here,
we
present
a
review
current
research
on
two
determine
their
relationship
each
other
economic
models,
impact
sustainability
with
both
poorly
defined,
inconsistently
implemented
inadequately
measured,
neither
provides
clear
pathway
Many
actors
promote
goals
around
growth
above
environmental
issues.
Biodiversity
is
often
addressed
indirectly
or
inadequately.
Furthermore,
many
traditionally
disadvantaged
groups,
including
women
indigenous
people,
may
be
neglected
rarely
engage
benefit.
These
challenges
compounded
capacity
gaps
legal
governance
complexities
implementation,
influenced
traditional
mindsets
approaches.
Countries
need
plan
strategies
more
explicitly
biodiversity
they
impact.
Opportunities
include
relevance
timeliness
sustainable
economics
delivering
Sustainable
Development
Goals
in
post-COVID
world,
existence
work
built
on,
diversity
stakeholders
already
engaged.
We
propose
five
main
steps
ensure
Ultimately,
can
only
starting
shift
establishing
focused
agenda
bioeconomy
that
puts
species,
ecosystems
wellbeing
local
people
at
center.
Diversity,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
14(10), P. 824 - 824
Published: Sept. 30, 2022
Many
stakeholders,
from
governments
to
civil
society
businesses,
lack
the
data
they
need
make
informed
decisions
on
biodiversity,
jeopardising
efforts
conserve,
restore
and
sustainably
manage
nature.
Here
we
review
importance
of
enhancing
biodiversity
monitoring,
assess
challenges
involved
identify
potential
solutions.
Capacity
for
monitoring
needs
be
enhanced
urgently,
especially
in
poorer,
high-biodiversity
countries
where
gaps
are
disproportionately
high.
Modern
tools
technologies,
including
remote
sensing,
bioacoustics
environmental
DNA,
should
used
at
larger
scales
fill
taxonomic
geographic
gaps,
tropics,
marine
freshwater
biomes,
plants,
fungi
invertebrates.
Stakeholders
follow
best
practices,
adopting
appropriate
indicators
using
counterfactual
approaches
measure
attribute
outcomes
impacts.
Data
made
openly
freely
available.
Companies
invest
collecting
required
enhance
sustainability
their
operations
supply
chains.
With
soon
commit
post-2020
global
framework,
time
is
right
a
concerted
push
monitoring.
However,
action
scale
needed
now
if
results-based
management
adequately
conserve
ecosystem
services
all
depend
on.