Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
25(5), P. 277 - 285
Published: June 10, 2023
End-of-life
care
changed
during
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
and
previous
prevailing
hospice
philosophy
essential
values
of
were
suddenly
under
pressure.
The
aim
was
to
explore
nurses'
lived
experience
providing
end-of-life
patients
admitted
in
an
out-hospital
setting
pandemic.
Data
consist
10
individual
in-depth
interviews
nurses.
A
purposive
sampling
strategy
used,
data
collection
analysis
guided
by
a
descriptive
phenomenology.
Providing
described
through
existential
dimension
practical-related
dimension.
pandemic
ensuing
constraints
created
unfamiliar
gap,
triggering
insecurity
unfamiliarity
within
nursing.
Findings
are
elaborated
following
constituents:
being
nurse
care.
latter
constituent
further
elucidated
additional
perspectives:
new
job
position
bending
rules.
regime
highly
challenging
distressing
due
coercion
maintaining
rules
restrictions
as
well
An
having
reinvent
work
agenda
present.
Furthermore,
nurses
experienced
significant
loss
satisfaction
may
be
morally
injured
exposed
secondary
traumatization.
BMC Health Services Research,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
23(1)
Published: Dec. 1, 2023
Abstract
The
detrimental
impacts
of
COVID-19
on
healthcare
providers’
psychological
health
and
well-being
continue
to
affect
their
professional
roles
activities,
leading
compassion
fatigue.
purpose
this
review
was
identify
summarize
published
literature
fatigue
among
providers
its
impact
patient
care.
Six
databases
were
searched:
MEDLINE
(Ovid),
PsycINFO
Embase
CINAHL,
Scopus,
Web
Science,
for
studies
in
providers,
English
from
the
peak
pandemic
2020
2023.
To
expand
search,
reference
lists
included
hand
searched
locate
additional
relevant
studies.
primarily
focused
nurses,
physicians,
other
allied
professionals.
This
scoping
registered
Open
Science
Framework
(OSF),
using
Preferred
Reporting
Items
Systematic
reviews
Meta-Analysis
(PRISMA)
extension
review.
From
11,715
search
results,
24
met
inclusion
criteria.
Findings
are
presented
four
themes:
prevalence
fatigue;
antecedents
consequences
interventions
address
potential
grouped
under
individual-,
organization-,
systems-level
factors.
Our
findings
suggest
that
differ
risk
developing
a
country-dependent
manner.
Interventions
such
as
increasing
available
personnel
helped
minimize
occurrence
offers
important
insight
common
causes
risks
identifies
strategies
support
well-being.
Nursing in Critical Care,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
29(4), P. 745 - 755
Published: Jan. 17, 2024
Abstract
Background
Paediatric
critical
care
(PCC)
is
a
high‐pressure
working
environment.
Staff
experience
high
levels
of
burnout,
symptoms
post‐traumatic
stress,
and
moral
distress.
Aim
To
understand
challenges
to
workplace
well‐being
in
PCC
help
inform
the
development
staff
interventions
improve
maintain
well‐being.
Study
Design
The
Enhanced
Critical
Incident
Technique
(ECIT)
was
used.
ECIT
encompasses
semi‐structured
interviews
thematic
analysis.
We
identified
‘critical
incidents’,
well‐being,
categorized
them
meaningful
way,
factors
which
helped
hindered
those
moments.
Fifty‐three
nurses
doctors
from
large
UK
quaternary
unit
were
consented
take
part.
Results
Themes
generated
are:
Context
,
examined
staff's
experiences
generally
during
COVID‐19;
Patient
distress
explored
significant
faced
by
caring
for
increasingly
complex
chronically
ill
patients;
Teamwork
leadership
demonstrated
importance
team‐belonging
clear
leadership;
Changing
workforce
impact
staffing
shortages
ageing
on
well‐being;
Satisfying
basic
human
needs
absences
requirements
food
rest.
Conclusions
Staff's
experiential
accounts
need
psychologically
informed
environments
enable
sharing
vulnerabilities,
foster
support,
resonated
with
self‐determination
theory
Maslow's
hierarchy
needs,
outline
fulfilment
(self‐actualization).
Relevance
Clinical
Practice
Well‐being
must
be
psychological
evidence.
Recommendations
are
flexible
rostering,
advanced
communication
training,
psychologically‐informed
supervision/mentoring
adequate
accommodation
hot
food.
Investment
required
develop
successful
BMC Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
25(1)
Published: Feb. 26, 2025
Several
studies
have
indicated
that
the
COVID-19
pandemic
has
had
an
impact
on
nurses'
psychological
and
physical
quality
of
life
(QoL),
as
well
their
professional
well-being.
The
literature
also
indicates
perceived
stress,
resilience,
social
support,
psychosocial
work
environment
identification
may
be
determinants
these
variables.
However,
no
examined
how
influence
QoL
or
well-being
throughout
pandemic.
Thus,
this
study
aimed
to
investigate
Portuguese
For
longitudinal
study,
data
were
collected
through
self-administered
questionnaires
focused
QoL,
well-being,
sociodemographic
characteristics.
collection
spanned
three
distinct
time
points,
from
November
2021
June
2023.
Data
Analysis
was
conducted
by
utilizing
random-intercept
linear
regression
models.
A
total
555
responses
analyzed
at
all
measurement
points
(340
T0,
122
T1,
93
T2),
compared
those
increased
T2.
Perceived
stress
support
colleagues
diminished
T2
T0.
During
pandemic,
participants
who
reported
low
high
supervisors,
colleagues,
and/or
job
satisfaction
tended
report
greater
QoL.
Throughout
consistently
negatively
influenced
QoL;
moreover,
resilience
significant
positive
outcomes.
These
insights
highlight
need
for
targeted
interventions
reduce
enhance
foster
among
nurses,
thus
ultimately
improving
effectiveness
in
health
care
delivery,
particularly
during
high-stress
periods
such
pandemics.
Future
research
should
explore
stressors
protective
factors
Journal of Advanced Nursing,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 18, 2025
ABSTRACT
Aims
To
explore
the
persistent
changes
in
working
conditions
and
nursing
practices
high
acuity
settings
post
COVID‐19
pandemic
era.
Design
A
qualitative
systematic
review
using
meta‐aggregation
design
of
Joanna
Briggs
Institute.
Methods
After
screening
by
two
authors
based
on
inclusion
exclusion
criteria,
36
studies
were
included.
Quality
was
appraised
Institute
Critical
Appraisal
Checklist
for
Qualitative
Research.
Data
then
extracted
synthesised.
Confidence
findings
assessed
ConQual
approach.
Sources
The
electronic
databases:
MEDLINE,
CINAHL,
Embase,
Scopus
searched
November
2023.
Additional
searches
conducted
preprint
servers:
medRxiv,
Open
Science
Foundation,
Social
Research
Network,
Journal
Medical
Internet
Results
Synthesised
‘unfavourable
changed
practices’
‘health
concerns
caused
with
eight
categories
identified.
Significant
included
increased
workloads;
overwhelming
use
insufficient
supply
personal
protective
equipment;
decreased
communication
between
nurses
patients,
families,
other
healthcare
workers;
lack
knowledge
disease;
adequate
support
from
coworkers,
but
inadequate
nurse
managers
physicians.
Conclusion
This
study
synthesised
existing
offered
insight
into
during
pandemic.
Clinical
need
to
actively
take
action
those
modifiable
aspects
their
a
future
similar
crisis.
did
not
identify
any
focusing
nurses'
post‐pandemic
kind
research
is
urgently
needed.
Impact
Nurse
policy
makers
can
this
help
construct
better
high‐acuity
staff
Frontline
clinical
may
guide
mitigate
negative
effects
crisis
practice
health.
Reporting
Method
reported
according
Enhancing
Transparency
Synthesis
statement.
Patient
or
Public
Contribution
No
patient
public
contribution.
Trial
Registration
International
Prospective
Register
Systematic
Reviews:
CRD42023473414
Australian Critical Care,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
37(5), P. 775 - 782
Published: April 9, 2024
BackgroundThe
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
has
put
an
exceptional
strain
on
intensive
care
delivery
and
significantly
impacted
nursing
practice
in
the
unit,
consequently
affecting
nurses'
working
environment
health.
Little
is
known
about
long-term
impact
workforce
anaesthetic
departments.Aim/objectiveThis
cross-sectional
study
aimed
to
describe
of
COVID-19
profession
from
perspectives
critical
nurses.MethodsIn
this
study,
online
questionnaire
with
open-
close-ended
questions
was
distributed
registered
nurses
anaesthesia
between
February
8
March
7,
2022.
The
data
were
analysed
using
content
analysis
descriptive
statistics.ResultsOf
514
who
responded
questionnaire,
256
(50%)
worked
215
(42%)
care.
expressed
three
categories:
hold,
insights
experiences
forming
a
new
professional
identity,
organisational
conditions
profession.
Critical
considered
comparable
that
before
pandemic.
Nurse
anaesthetics
experienced
changes
tasks
activities
compared
pandemic.ConclusionsNursing
still
influenced
by
due
lack
resources
persistent
high
workload
needs
be
reclaimed
prioritised.
Re-establishing
high-quality
shared
responsibility
organisation
profession,
create
prerequisites
for
this.
Furthermore,
views
into
their
developed
both
positively
negatively
during
pandemic,
which
must
further
considered,
including
profession's
values.
Journal of Nursing Management,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
2024, P. 1 - 11
Published: May 30, 2024
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
had
a
significant
impact
on
healthcare
professionals
globally,
with
nurses
facing
diverse
challenges
at
the
forefront.
Despite
their
resilience,
are
experiencing
emotional
burdens,
which
have
contributed
to
growing
intention
abandon
profession.
Understanding
these
factors
is
crucial
for
addressing
global
nursing
shortage.
A
qualitative
descriptive
approach
was
utilized
this
study.
Nurses
who
were
actively
working
during
last
waves
of
in
Catalonia,
Spain,
intentionally
recruited
through
social
media
and
personal
contacts,
data
collected
online
semistructured
interviews
until
saturation
reached.
Data
analyzed
using
Braun
Clarke's
thematic
analysis
method.
Fourteen
nurses,
an
average
22.8
years
work
experience,
interviewed.
Thematic
revealed
three
main
themes:
(1)
health,
(2)
influencing
decision
stay,
(3)
recommendations
improve
crisis
management.
faced
impacts
but
demonstrated
dedication
resilience.
Their
persevere
influenced
by
such
as
responsibility,
guilt,
economic
stability.
Urgent
measures
necessary
provide
tailored
mental
health
support
recognize
preparedness.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 26, 2024
Context:
Critical
care
encompasses
intensive
care,
therapy
and
high
dependency
is
operationalised
when
patients
require
specialised
monitoring
intervention
following
complex
surgery,
or
a
life-threatening
illness
injury.
Background:
During
the
pandemic,
Care
Department
at
UCLH
formed
family
liaison
team
to
bridge
connection
gap
between
patients,
families,
clinical
teams.
This
evolved
into
Patient
&
Family
Team
(PFT),
which
organised
several
engagement
events
understand
patient
experiences
in
critical
care.
Methods:
Focus
group
discussions
were
conducted
online
in-person
with
bereaved
families
exploring
their
experience
of
service.
Discussions
revolved
around
pivotal
moments
journey.
Feedback
was
analysed
thematically
validated
participants.
Findings:
Patients
described
journey
through
four
stages:
Admission,
Period
Disorientation,
Re-Awakening,
Recovery.
Bereaved
categorised
seven
stages
from
'The
Phone
Call'
'Bereavement.'
The
need
for
effective
compassionate
communication
support
evident
both
groups.
Discussion:
revealed
emotional
journeys
While
many
align
existing
literature,
they
also
highlight
areas
improvement,
emphasising
value
human
healthcare.
study
demonstrated
continuous
service
evaluation
strategies
understanding
underserved
populations.
Journal of Advanced Nursing,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Sept. 10, 2024
ABSTRACT
Aims
The
aims
of
this
study
were
to
describe
the
experiences
nurses
in
aftermath
COVID‐19
pandemic
and
explore
nurses'
current
desired
support
needs.
Design
This
used
a
qualitative
descriptive
design.
Methods
was
conducted
Southeastern
United
States
at
an
academic
health
system
encompassing
acute
care
hospitals
outpatient
speciality
clinics.
Thirteen
interviewed
August
September
2023
five
small
groups
two
or
three
nurses.
Photovoice
for
data
collection
each
nurse
submitted
photographs.
Data
analysed
utilising
conventional
content
analysis,
with
transcripts
photograph
analysis
occurring
concurrently.
Results
Three
themes
identified:
(1)
organisational
turmoil,
(2)
personal
traumatisation
transitions
(3)
striving
revival
renewal.
A
conceptual
model
illustrating
their
relationships
developed
depict
findings.
Conclusion
Nurses
impacted
by
factors,
such
as
staffing
issues
lack
support,
personally
through
psychological
trauma
that
has
remained
challenging.
found
renewal
lives,
but
still
desire
continued
improvement
factors
enhance
well‐being
ways
not
currently
being
addressed
allow
full
recovery.
Findings
from
are
pertinent
healthcare
organisations
leaders
develop
changes
mental
solutions
well‐being.
Implications
Profession
prioritisation
is
critical
nursing
profession
organisations.
Organisational
improvements
implementation
resources
urgently
needed
aid
recovery,
retention
ensure
patients
receive
quality
care.
Impact
identified
struggles
3
years
after
beginning
pandemic,
highlighting
ongoing
need
provide
interventions
Our
findings
offer
descriptions
needs
consider
future.
Reporting
Method
Standards
Qualitative
Research
(SRQR)
Checklist.
Patient
Public
Contribution
No
patient
public
contribution.
Health and Social Care Delivery Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 32
Published: April 25, 2024
Objective
To
use
the
job
demands−resources
model
of
occupational
stress
to
quantify
and
explain
impact
working
in
critical
care
during
COVID-19
pandemic
on
nurses
their
employing
organisation.
Design
Two-phase
mixed
methods:
a
cross-sectional
survey
(January
2021–March
2022),
with
comparator
baseline
data
from
April
October
2018
(critical
only),
semistructured
interviews.
Participants
Critical
(
n
=
461)
redeployed
200)
who
worked
United
Kingdom
National
Health
Service
(primarily
Scotland)
between
January
2021
March
2022.
The
was
completed
by
557
(Scotland
only).
Survey
response
rate
Scotland
32%
but
could
not
be
determined
outside
Scotland.
Forty-four
were
interviewed
28,
16).
Methods
A
measured
demands,
resources,
health
impairment,
work
engagement
organisational
outcomes.
Data
compared
data.
Regression
analyses
identified
predictors
Semistructured
interviews
conducted
remotely,
audio-recorded
transcribed.
analysed
deductively
using
framework
analysis.
Findings
Three-quarters
reached
threshold
for
psychological
distress,
approximately
50%
burnout
emotional
exhaustion
third
clinically
concerning
post-traumatic
symptoms.
Compared
2018,
at
elevated
risk
probable
odds
ratio
6.03
(95%
CI
4.75
7.95);
exhaustion,
4.02
(3.07
5.26);
depersonalisation,
3.18
(1.99
5.07);
accomplishment,
1.53
(1.18
1.97).
There
no
differences
impairment
outcomes,
suggesting
would
apply
nurses.
Job
demands
increased
resources
decreased
pandemic.
Higher
predicted
greater
distress.
reduced
negative
this
moderating
effect
observed
higher
levels
demand.
All
outcomes
worsened.
Lack
worse
In
interviews,
staff
described
pace
amount,
complexity,
physical
effort
as
most
difficult
demands.
sustained
high-demand
environment
impacted
well-being,
interviewees
experiencing
burnout,
symptoms
disorder.
Camaraderie
support
colleagues
supervisors
core
resources.
combination
well-being
incurred
consequences,
increasing
numbers
considering
leaving
specialty
or
nursing
altogether.
Dissemination
events
range
stakeholders,
including
study
participants,
staffing
issues
lack
learning
development
opportunities
problematic.
are
concerned
about
future
delivery
high-quality
services.
Positive
aspects
identified,
example,
bureaucratic
systems,
local
autonomy
decision-making,
recognition
nurse
skill
set.
Conclusions
needs
recognise
group,
prioritise
welfare
nurses,
implement
workplace
change/planning,
them
recover
is
struggling
retain
and,
unless
improved,
quality
patient
safety
will
likely
decline.
Funding
This
synopsis
presents
independent
research
funded
Institute
Care
Research
(NIHR)
Social
Delivery
award
number
NIHR132068.