Journal of Critical and Intensive Care,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
Aim:The
place
of
therapeutic
plasma
exchange
in
severe
COVID-19
patients
is
a
controversial
issue.Data
on
the
relationship
between
clinical
variables
and
dynamics
inflammatory
markers
outcomes
are
limited.In
this
study,
we
aimed
to
investigate
effects
laboratory
patient
undergoing
intensive
care
units.
Study
design:
Single-center
retrospective
studyMaterial
Methods:
Adult
unit
(ICU)
with
infection
who
underwent
at
least
one
procedure
single
tertiary
center
were
analyzed.The
primary
outcome
study
was
hospital
mortality.Secondary
ICU
14
th
day
mortality,
length
stay.Results:
Sixty-four
mean
age
56
included
study.A
total
51
(79%)
died.In
multivariate
analysis;
there
no
demographic,
or
parameters
affecting
mortality
mortality.Platelet
count
before
first
has
positive
moderate
correlation
both
(r=0.454)
(r=0.449)length
stay.
Conclusion:This
shows
that
test
parameter
define
likely
benefit
from
TPE.Further
studies
essential
determine
role
TPE
for
reduce
mortality.
Journal of Medical Virology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
95(6)
Published: May 31, 2023
Abstract
This
systematic
review
and
meta‐analysis
aimed
to
determine
the
efficacy
of
statins
in
hospitalized
patients
with
coronavirus
disease‐2019
(COVID‐19).
A
search
was
made
PubMed,
Embase,
Cochrane
Library,
clinicaltrials.gov
,
without
language
restrictions.
Randomized
controlled
trials
(RCTs)
on
treatment
COVID‐19
statins,
compared
placebo
or
standard
care,
were
reviewed.
Seven
RCTs
(enrolling
1830
participants)
met
inclusion
criteria.
There
no
statistically
significant
difference
all‐cause
mortality
(risk
ratio
[RR]:
0.92,
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]:
0.75–1.13),
length
hospital
stay
(weighted
mean
difference:
−0.21
days,
CI:
−1.01
0.59
days),
intensive
care
unit
(ICU)
admission
(RR:
1.84,
0.45–7.55),
mechanical
ventilation
1.09,
0.70–1.70)
between
two
groups.
Statins
failed
reduce
mortality,
ICU
admission,
ventilation,
COVID‐19.
probably
should
not
be
used
routinely
patients.
Reviews in Medical Virology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
33(2)
Published: Jan. 4, 2023
The
Coronavirus
disease-2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
continues,
and
the
death
toll
continues
to
surge.
This
meta-analysis
aimed
determine
efficacy
of
anakinra
on
mortality
in
patients
with
COVID-19.
A
systematic
search
was
made
PubMed,
Embase,
Cochrane
Library,
clinicaltrials.gov,
without
language
restrictions.
Randomized
controlled
trials
treatment
COVID-19
anakinra,
compared
placebo
or
blank,
were
reviewed.
Studies
pooled
risk
ratios
(RRs),
95%
confidence
intervals
(CIs).
Five
(enrolling
1859
participants)
met
inclusion
criteria.
There
no
statistically
significant
difference
14-day
(RR
0.78,
CI
0.43-1.39;
P
=
0.40),
28-day
1.06,
0.89-1.26;
0.51),
90-day
1.01,
0.73-1.39;
0.97)
between
two
groups.
Sensitivity
analyses
further
confirmed
these
results.
Anakinra
not
associated
reduced
hospitalised
probably
should
be
used
routinely
patients.
Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 14, 2025
Abstract
Introduction
To
evaluate
the
short‐
and
long‐term
clinical
financial
outcomes
of
apheresis
in
COVID‐19
survivors
after
hospital
discharge.
Methods
Intensive
care
unit‐discharged
patients
were
followed
for
6
months.
Vital
signs,
laboratory
markers,
quality
life,
direct
medical
costs
analyzed
to
calculate
incremental
cost‐effectiveness
ratios
(ICER)
plot
planes
acceptability
curves.
Results
A
total
68
(45
control,
18
plasmapheresis,
5
hemoperfusion)
included.
ICERs
plasmapheresis
hemoperfusion
at
discharge
$867.58
$198.89
per
quality‐adjusted
life
years
(QALY)
gained,
respectively.
Respiration
blood
pressure
improved
significantly
The
improvements
oxygenation
markers
groups
lower
than
controls
(8.56
±
10.31
11.75
16.88
vs.
11.37
7.28
percent
SpO
2
,
11.15
21.15
11.05
24.95
16.03
5.61
mm
Hg
PaO
respectively)
However,
respiratory
rate
corresponded
$1034.77
$269.94
hemoperfusion,
increasing
mean
arterial
$24.83
$30.94
Hg,
was
more
cost‐effective
serum
calcium
levels
($1649.35
mg/dL).
At
1‐month
post‐discharge,
both
treatments
showed
worse
compared
controls.
months,
ICER
($1884.95)
exceeded
willingness‐to‐pay
threshold.
months
$112.83
rehospitalization
day
avoided,
while
remained
less
effective
Conclusion
While
some
outcomes,
their
high
limited
suggest
that
these
interventions
may
not
be
economically
justified
treating
patients.
Careful
evaluation
is
needed
when
considering
use
practice.
Frontiers in Immunology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15
Published: Jan. 17, 2025
Immunological
disturbances
(anti-type
I
IFN
auto-antibody
production,
cytokine
storm,
lymphopenia,
T-cell
hyperactivation
and
exhaustion)
are
responsible
for
disease
exacerbation
during
severe
COVID-19
infections.
In
this
study,
we
set
up
a
prospective,
randomised
clinical
trial
(ClinicalTrials.gov
ID:
NCT04751643)
performed
therapeutic
plasma
exchange
(TPE)
in
patients
order
to
decrease
excess
cytokines
auto-antibodies
assess
whether
adding
TPE
the
standard
treatment
(ST,
including
corticosteroids
plus
high-flow
rate
oxygen)
could
help
restore
immune
parameters
limit
progression
of
acute
respiratory
distress
syndrome
(ARDS).
As
expected,
performing
decreased
amount
anti-type
improved
elimination
or
limited
production
certain
inflammatory
mediators
(IL-18,
IL-7,
CCL2,
CCL3,
etc.)
circulating
blood
patients,
compared
ST
controls.
Interestingly,
while
did
not
influence
changes
ARDS
throughout
protocol,
it
proved
more
effective
than
reversing
preventing
reducing
exhaustion,
notably
fraction
who
had
an
early
favourable
outcome.
also
restored
appropriate
numbers
CD4+
CD8+
memory
populations
increased
number
virus-specific
T
cells
these
patients.
Our
results
therefore
indicate
that
addition
sessions
accelerates
cell
recovery
contributes
development
antiviral
responses
some
with
disease.
Journal of Blood Medicine,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
Volume 14, P. 159 - 187
Published: Feb. 1, 2023
Abstract:
Worldwide
pandemic
with
coronavirus
disease-2019
(COVID-19)
was
caused
by
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus-2
(SARS-CoV-2).
As
November
2,
2022,
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
received
628,035,553
reported
incidents
on
COVID-19,
6,572,800
mortalities
and,
a
total
12,850,970,971
vaccine
doses
have
been
delivered
as
of
October
31,
2022.
The
infection
can
cause
mild
or
self-limiting
symptoms
pulmonary
and
infections
death
may
be
SARS-CoV-2
infection.
Simultaneously,
antivirals,
corticosteroids,
immunological
treatments,
antibiotics,
anticoagulants
proposed
potential
medicines
to
cure
COVID-19
affected
patients.
Among
these
initial
convalescent
plasma
(CCP),
which
retrieved
from
recovered
patients
used
passive
immune
therapy,
in
antibodies
cured
were
given
infected
prevent
illness.
Such
treatment
has
yielded
the
best
results
earlier
preventative
early
stages
Convalescent
(CP)
is
first
available
when
infectious
disease
initially
appears,
although
few
randomized
controlled
trials
(RCTs)
conducted
evaluate
its
effectiveness.
historical
record
suggests
benefit
for
other
infections,
coronaviruses
like
Severe
Acute
Respiratory
Syndrome-CoV-I
(SARS-CoV-I)
Middle
Eastern
Syndrome
(MERS),
though
analysis
such
research
constrained
some
non-randomized
experiments
(NREs).
Rigorous
studies
CP
are
made
more
demanding
following
immediacy
epidemics,
use
restrict
ability
utilize
it
clinical
testing,
non-homogenous
nature
product,
highly
decentralized
manufacturing
process;
constraints
capacity
measure
biologic
function,
ultimate
availability
substitute
therapies,
purified
globulins,
monoclonal
antibodies.
Though,
still
not
clear
how
effectively
CCP
works
among
hospitalized
current
review
tries
focus
efficiency
usage
scenarios
identifying
existing
benefits
implementation
during
assist
future
preventions.
Keywords:
plasma,
effectiveness,
CCP,
disease-2019,
SARA-CoV-2,
distress
syndrome-coronavirus-2,
era,
literature
Frontiers in Immunology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
14
Published: July 6, 2023
Nowadays,
people
have
relaxed
their
vigilance
against
COVID-19
due
to
its
declining
infection
numbers
and
attenuated
virulence.
However,
still
needs
be
concern
emerging
variants,
the
relaxation
of
restrictions
as
well
breakthrough
infections.
During
period
infection,
imbalanced
hyper-responsive
immune
system
plays
a
critical
role
in
pathogenesis.
Macrophage
Activation
Syndrome
(MAS)
is
fatal
complication
disease,
which
caused
by
excessive
activation
proliferation
macrophages
cytotoxic
T
cells
(CTL).
COVID-19-related
hyperinflammation
shares
common
clinical
features
with
above
MAS
symptoms,
such
hypercytokinemia,
hyperferritinemia,
coagulopathy.
In
MAS,
exhaustion
or
defective
anti-viral
responses
leads
inadequate
cytolytic
capacity
CTL
contributes
prolonged
interaction
between
CTL,
APCs
macrophages.
It
possible
that
same
process
also
occurred
patients,
further
led
cytokine
storm
confined
lungs.
associated
poor
prognosis
severe
patients
multiple
organ
failure
even
death.
The
main
difference
pneumonia
mainly
specific
damage
lung,
while
easy
develop
into
systemic.
attractive
therapeutic
approach
prevent
includes
antiviral,
antibiotics,
convalescent
plasma
(CP)
therapy
hemadsorption,
extensive
immunosuppressive
agents,
cytokine-targeted
therapies.
Here,
we
discuss
approaches
mentioned
two
diseases.
And
found
treatment
effect
different.
Clinical Cardiology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
45(10), P. 995 - 1001
Published: Aug. 2, 2022
Abstract
Considering
the
prevalence
of
dyspnea
in
acute
heart
failure
(AHF),
its
reduction
is
important
to
both
patients
and
caregivers.
This
meta‐analysis
was
performed
determine
efficacy
safety
tolvaptan
on
early
relief
with
AHF.
A
systematic
search
made
PubMed,
Embase,
Web
Science,
Cochrane
Library,
clinicaltrials.gov
,
without
language
restrictions.
Randomized
controlled
trials
(RCTs)
treatment
AHF
tolvaptan,
compared
placebo
or
blank,
were
reviewed.
Studies
pooled
relative
risk
(RR),
95%
confidence
interval
(CI).
Five
RCTs
(enrolling
4857
participants)
met
inclusion
criteria.
Tolvaptan
presented
significant
effects
12
h
(RR:
1.98;
CI:
1.24−3.15;
p
=
.004),
24
h/day
1
1.15;
1.07−1.24;
.0003),
48
1.20;
1.06−1.36;
72
1.18;
1.02−1.37;
.03).
No
increase
noticed
incidence
worsening
renal
function
group
1.10;
0.87−1.39;
.43).
significantly
improved
patient‐assessed
persistently
Complementary Therapies in Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
72, P. 102907 - 102907
Published: Dec. 10, 2022
The
Coronavirus
disease-2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
continues,
and
the
death
toll
continues
to
surge.
Ozone
therapy
has
long
been
used
in
treatment
of
a
variety
infectious
diseases,
probably
through
its
antioxidant
properties
supply
oxygen
hypoxic
tissues.
This
systematic
review
meta-analysis
aimed
determine
efficacy
ozone
on
mortality
patients
with
COVID-19.A
search
was
made
PubMed,
Embase,
Cochrane
Library,
clinicaltrials.gov,
without
language
restrictions.
Prospective
controlled
trials
COVID-19
ozone,
compared
placebo
or
blank,
were
reviewed.
Studies
pooled
risk
ratios
(RRs)
weighted
mean
differences
(WMDs),
95%
confidence
intervals
(CIs).Eight
(enrolling
371
participants)
met
inclusion
criteria.
showed
significant
effects
(RR
0.38,
CI
0.17-0.85;
P
=
0.02),
length
hospital
stay
(WMD
-1.63
days,
-3.05
-0.22
days;
polymerase
chain
reaction
(PCR)
positivity
0.07,
0.01-0.34;
0.001).Ozone
significantly
reduced
mortality,
PCR
positivity,
hospitalized
COVID-19.
should
be
considered
for
patients.