Agricultural Systems, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 208, P. 103660 - 103660
Published: April 14, 2023
Language: Английский
Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 365, P. 121579 - 121579
Published: June 26, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
24
Applied Geography, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 176, P. 103530 - 103530
Published: Jan. 19, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
2
Sustainability, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 13(22), P. 12345 - 12345
Published: Nov. 9, 2021
Digitalization of agriculture is often hailed as the next agricultural revolution. However, little yet known about its social impacts and power effects. This review addresses this research gap by analyzing patterns inequality linked to development adoption digital technologies in reviewing strategies developed reduce these inequalities challenge relations which they are embedded. Analysis 84 publications found through a systematic literature identified five inequality: (1) technology development; (2) distribution benefits from use technologies; (3) sovereignty over data, hardware infrastructure; (4) skills knowledge (‘digital literacy’); (5) problem definition problem-solving capacities. also highlights existence emancipatory initiatives that applying existing advance alternative visions agriculture. These underscore political nature agriculture; however, their reach still quite limited. partly due fact structural represent expressions corporate power. From such perspective, digitalization not ‘revolution’ per se; rather, mirror reproduce relations.
Language: Английский
Citations
95
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 187, P. 122155 - 122155
Published: Dec. 1, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
69
Journal of Rural Studies, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 86, P. 398 - 409
Published: July 14, 2021
Understanding the complex process of generational renewal (GR) in agriculture is essential for supporting continuation farming. This paper demonstrates how multiple factors, simultaneously and through their mutual interactions, influence GR related individual decision-making processes. Results originated from 155 in-depth interviews performed on 85 farms eleven European regions, were triangulated with literature. Our analysis, combining inductive deductive approaches, revealed three conceptual phases (successor identity formation, farm succession process, development) fourteen factors important to understand GR. We elaborate these interact, hence exert impact (one of) a variable way. Implications highlight potential pitfalls opportunities attracting people into agriculture. Although policy-makers should be aware limited ability affect by targeting first phase, we propose some ideas that would complement current existing measures acting third phase.
Language: Английский
Citations
67
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 41, P. 96 - 98
Published: Oct. 12, 2021
• Transition scholars devote surprisingly little attention to the sustainability of digitalization. We call for more work on digitalization in transition studies. offer a number perspectives study roles transitions.
Language: Английский
Citations
63
Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 327, P. 116832 - 116832
Published: Nov. 30, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
61
The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 27(3), P. 277 - 286
Published: May 27, 2021
The field of research on agricultural and rural extension education, also referred to as advisory services intermediaries, has always engaged with different aspects the spaces in which a...
Language: Английский
Citations
58
Agricultural Systems, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 204, P. 103558 - 103558
Published: Nov. 4, 2022
Digital technologies nowadays play a major role in innovation within the agri-food domain. The evolution of IT systems has currently arrived at level that involves complex integration and business ecosystems which many stakeholders different roles are involved. A new paradigm for digital is needed copes with this increased complexity. This paper presents an empirically informed framework analysing designing viable, sustainable research based on series European large-scale public-private projects from 2011 to 2021 total budget 73 M€. They involved hundreds were developing large number solutions through ecosystem was formed. In longitudinal study, conceptual used analyse these describe how developed. Lessons learnt translated into design principles organizational approach foster agri-food. consists 6 key concepts: (i) strategy, (ii) organization, (iii) network contains (iv) process (v) object finally (vi) infrastructure. Along concepts, lessons 21 derived forming basis framework. At core lean multi-actor trials use case development interacting set multidisciplinary activities: common technical collaboration infrastructure, identifying value streams user engagement, engaging right partners time supported by strategic project planning dynamic management. most important conclusion effective, successful quick appropriate requires actors should not be analysed isolation both their technological environment. Another consequence 'minimal viable ecosystem' only emerges after considerable time, resources ingenuity invested may require outside (government) intervention. Results can public private diagnose improve develop
Language: Английский
Citations
55
Sustainable Production and Consumption, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 34, P. 613 - 637
Published: Oct. 5, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
53