Frontiers in Neuroscience,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
17
Published: Jan. 11, 2024
Introduction
Maladaptive
functioning
of
the
amygdala
has
been
associated
with
impaired
emotion
regulation
in
affective
disorders.
Recent
advances
real-time
fMRI
neurofeedback
have
successfully
demonstrated
modulation
activity
healthy
and
psychiatric
populations.
In
contrast
to
an
abstract
feedback
representation
applied
standard
designs,
we
proposed
a
novel
paradigm
using
naturalistic
stimuli
like
human
emotional
faces
as
display
where
change
facial
expression
intensity
(from
neutral
happy
or
from
fearful
neutral)
was
coupled
participant’s
ongoing
bilateral
activity.
Methods
The
feasibility
this
experimental
approach
tested
on
64
participants
who
completed
single
training
session
four
runs.
Participants
were
assigned
one
groups
(
n
=
16
per
group),
i.e.,
happy-up,
happy-down,
fear-up,
fear-down.
Depending
group
assignment,
they
either
instructed
“try
make
face
happier”
by
upregulating
(happy-up)
downregulating
(happy-down)
less
fearful”
(fear-up)
(fear-down)
signal.
Results
Linear
mixed
effect
analyses
revealed
significant
changes
fear
condition,
specifically
fear-down
downregulation
last
two
runs
compared
first
run.
happy-up
happy-down
did
not
show
over
We
observe
improvement
questionnaire
scores
subsequent
behavior.
Furthermore,
task-dependent
effective
connectivity
between
amygdala,
fusiform
area
(FFA),
medial
orbitofrontal
cortex
(mOFC)
examined
dynamic
causal
modeling.
FFA
significantly
increased
(facilitatory
effect)
decreased
group.
Notably,
downregulated
through
inhibitory
mechanism
mediated
mOFC
during
Discussion
study,
intended
address
key
processes
stimuli,
participant
engagement
task,
bidirectional
regulation,
task
congruence,
their
influence
learning
success.
It
that
such
versatile
can
be
tailored
target
biased
processing
NeuroImage,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
258, P. 119400 - 119400
Published: June 18, 2022
Neurofeedback
is
a
procedure
that
measures
brain
activity
in
real-time
and
presents
it
as
feedback
to
an
individual,
thus
allowing
them
self-regulate
with
effects
on
cognitive
processes
inferred
from
behavior.
One
common
argument
neurofeedback
studies
can
reveal
how
the
measured
causes
particular
process.
The
causal
claim
often
made
regarding
being
manipulated
independent
variable,
similar
stimulation
studies.
However,
this
inference
vulnerable
other
upstream
activities
change
concurrently
cause
changes
which
derived.
In
paper,
we
outline
may
causally
affect
cognition
by
indirect
means.
We
further
argue
researchers
should
remain
open
idea
trained
could
be
part
of
"causal
network"
collectively
affects
rather
than
necessarily
primary.
This
provide
better
translation
evidence
rest
neuroscience.
recent
advent
multivariate
pattern
analysis,
when
combined
implicit
neurofeedback,
currently
comprises
strongest
case
for
causality.
Our
perspective
although
burden
inferring
direct
causality
difficult,
triangulated
using
collection
various
methods
Finally,
methodology
provides
unique
advantages
compared
revealing
but
mindful
effects.
Nature Human Behaviour,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
8(1), P. 43 - 62
Published: Oct. 30, 2023
The
brain's
arousal
state
is
controlled
by
several
neuromodulatory
nuclei
known
to
substantially
influence
cognition
and
mental
well-being.
Here
we
investigate
whether
human
participants
can
gain
volitional
control
of
their
using
a
pupil-based
biofeedback
approach.
Our
approach
inverts
mechanism
suggested
previous
literature
that
links
activity
the
locus
coeruleus,
one
key
regulators
central
pupil
dynamics.
We
show
enables
acquire
size.
Applying
self-regulation
systematically
modulates
coeruleus
other
brainstem
structures
involved
in
control.
Furthermore,
it
cardiovascular
measures
such
as
heart
rate,
behavioural
psychophysiological
responses
during
an
oddball
task.
provide
evidence
makes
system
accessible
control,
finding
has
tremendous
potential
for
translation
clinical
applications
across
various
domains,
including
stress-related
anxiety
disorders.
Frontiers in Neuroscience,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
18
Published: March 11, 2024
Introduction
Interpersonal
synchronization
involves
the
alignment
of
behavioral,
affective,
physiological,
and
brain
states
during
social
interactions.
It
facilitates
empathy,
emotion
regulation,
prosocial
commitment.
Mental
disorders
characterized
by
interaction
dysfunction,
such
as
Autism
Spectrum
Disorder
(ASD),
Reactive
Attachment
(RAD),
Social
Anxiety
(SAD),
often
exhibit
atypical
with
others
across
multiple
levels.
With
introduction
“second-person”
neuroscience
perspective,
our
understanding
interpersonal
neural
(INS)
has
improved,
however,
so
far,
it
hardly
impacted
development
novel
therapeutic
interventions.
Methods
To
evaluate
potential
INS-based
treatments
for
mental
disorders,
we
performed
two
systematic
literature
searches
identifying
studies
that
directly
target
INS
through
neurofeedback
(12
publications;
9
independent
studies)
or
stimulation
techniques
(7
studies),
following
PRISMA
guidelines.
In
addition,
narratively
review
indirect
manipulations
biofeedback,
hormonal
We
discuss
ASD,
RAD,
SAD
using
a
database
search
assess
acceptability
(4
neurostimulation
in
patients
dysfunction.
Results
Although
behavioral
approaches,
engaging
eye
contact
cooperative
actions,
have
been
shown
to
be
associated
increased
INS,
little
is
known
about
long-term
consequences
Few
proof-of-concept
utilized
techniques,
like
transcranial
direct
current
neurofeedback,
showing
feasibility
preliminary
evidence
interventions
can
boost
synchrony
connectedness.
Yet,
optimal
protocols
parameters
are
still
undefined.
For
SAD,
far
no
randomized
controlled
trial
proven
efficacy
intervention
although
general
methods
seem
well
accepted
these
patient
groups.
Discussion
Significant
work
remains
translate
into
effective
disorders.
Future
research
should
focus
on
mechanistic
insights
technological
advancements,
rigorous
design
standards.
Furthermore,
will
key
compare
targeting
those
other
modalities
define
dyads
clinical
Behaviour Research and Therapy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
176, P. 104523 - 104523
Published: March 15, 2024
Previous
work
has
shown
that
adults
suffering
from
major
depressive
disorder
(MDD)
can
increase
their
amygdala
reactivity
while
recalling
positive
memories
via
real-time
neurofeedback
(rt-fMRI-nf)
training,
which
is
associated
with
reduction
in
symptoms.
This
study
investigated
if
this
intervention
could
also
be
considered
for
patients
MDD
who
do
not
respond
to
standard
psychological
and
pharmacological
interventions,
i.e.,
treatment
resistant
(TR-MDD).
15
participants
received
5
sessions.
Outcome
measures
were
symptoms
assessed
by
BDI
scores
up
12
weeks
following
acute
intervention,
activity
changes
initial
baseline
final
transfer
run
during
sessions
(neurofeedback
success).
Participants
succeeded
increasing
activity.
A
main
effect
of
visit
on
indicated
a
significant
symptomatology.
Percent
signal
change
the
showed
learning
curve
first
session
only.
Neurofeedback
success
computed
was
significantly
only
second
session.
When
examining
response,
stabilized/asymptoted
3.
proof-of-concept
suggests
two
are
necessary
enable
those
upregulate
activity,
warranting
future
RCT.
Over
course
rtfMRI-nf
reported
reduced
Clinical
trial
registration
number:
NCT03428828
ClinicalTrials.gov.
Frontiers in Neuroscience,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
17
Published: Jan. 11, 2024
Introduction
Maladaptive
functioning
of
the
amygdala
has
been
associated
with
impaired
emotion
regulation
in
affective
disorders.
Recent
advances
real-time
fMRI
neurofeedback
have
successfully
demonstrated
modulation
activity
healthy
and
psychiatric
populations.
In
contrast
to
an
abstract
feedback
representation
applied
standard
designs,
we
proposed
a
novel
paradigm
using
naturalistic
stimuli
like
human
emotional
faces
as
display
where
change
facial
expression
intensity
(from
neutral
happy
or
from
fearful
neutral)
was
coupled
participant’s
ongoing
bilateral
activity.
Methods
The
feasibility
this
experimental
approach
tested
on
64
participants
who
completed
single
training
session
four
runs.
Participants
were
assigned
one
groups
(
n
=
16
per
group),
i.e.,
happy-up,
happy-down,
fear-up,
fear-down.
Depending
group
assignment,
they
either
instructed
“try
make
face
happier”
by
upregulating
(happy-up)
downregulating
(happy-down)
less
fearful”
(fear-up)
(fear-down)
signal.
Results
Linear
mixed
effect
analyses
revealed
significant
changes
fear
condition,
specifically
fear-down
downregulation
last
two
runs
compared
first
run.
happy-up
happy-down
did
not
show
over
We
observe
improvement
questionnaire
scores
subsequent
behavior.
Furthermore,
task-dependent
effective
connectivity
between
amygdala,
fusiform
area
(FFA),
medial
orbitofrontal
cortex
(mOFC)
examined
dynamic
causal
modeling.
FFA
significantly
increased
(facilitatory
effect)
decreased
group.
Notably,
downregulated
through
inhibitory
mechanism
mediated
mOFC
during
Discussion
study,
intended
address
key
processes
stimuli,
participant
engagement
task,
bidirectional
regulation,
task
congruence,
their
influence
learning
success.
It
that
such
versatile
can
be
tailored
target
biased
processing