Brain Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
12(3), P. 408 - 408
Published: March 19, 2022
Despite
extensive
research
on
COVID-19's
impact
healthcare
workers,
few
studies
have
targeted
mental
health
workers
(MHWs)
and
none
investigated
previous
traumatic
events.
We
psychological
distress
in
MHWs
after
the
first
lockdown
Italy
to
understand
which
COVID-19,
sociodemographic,
professional
variables
represented
greater
effects,
role
of
trauma.
The
survey
included
sociodemographic
questions,
COVID-19
variables,
questionnaires
Life
Events
Checklist
for
DSM-5
(LEC-5),
Impact
Event
Scale-Revised
(IES-R),
Depression
Anxiety
Stress
Scales
21
(DASS-21).
On
271
who
completed
(73.1%
female;
mean
age
45.37),
we
obtained
significant
effects
contagion
fear,
experience
patients'
death,
increased
workload,
worse
team
relationship
during
wave.
Nurses
were
more
affected
showed
post-traumatic
stress
symptoms,
assessed
by
IES-R,
depressive,
anxiety,
DASS-21.
strongest
risk
factors
age,
role,
relationship,
separation
from
family
members.
Previous
severe
human
suffering
unwanted
sexual
experiences
negatively
impacted
IES-R
DASS-21
scores.
Being
a
psychiatrist
or
psychologist/psychotherapist
good
relationships
protective
factors.
Recent
but
also
stressful
events
might
represent
relevant
distress,
reducing
resilience
skills.
Identifying
vulnerable
categories
may
help
development
dedicated
measures
prevent
emotional
burden
support
health.
Highlights:
Psychological
pandemic
is
frequent
nurses,
depression,
symptoms.
recent
are
should
guide
intervention
strategies.
PLoS Medicine,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
20(4), P. e1004206 - e1004206
Published: April 25, 2023
Background
There
remains
uncertainty
about
the
impact
of
Coronavirus
Disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
on
mental
health.
This
umbrella
review
provides
a
comprehensive
overview
association
between
and
common
disorders.
We
qualitatively
summarized
evidence
from
reviews
with
meta-analyses
individual
study-data
in
general
population,
healthcare
workers,
specific
at-risk
populations.
Methods
findings
A
systematic
search
was
carried
out
5
databases
for
peer-reviewed
prevalence
depression,
anxiety,
post-traumatic
stress
disorder
(PTSD)
symptoms
during
published
December
31,
until
August
12,
2022.
identified
123
which
7
provided
standardized
mean
differences
(SMDs)
either
longitudinal
pre-
to
or
cross-sectional
compared
matched
pre-pandemic
data.
Methodological
quality
rated
Assessment
Multiple
Systematic
Reviews
checklist
scores
(AMSTAR
2)
instrument
generally
low
moderate.
Small
but
significant
increases
and/or
health
were
reported
people
preexisting
physical
conditions,
children
(3
reviews;
SMDs
ranged
0.11
0.28).
Mental
depression
significantly
increased
periods
social
restrictions
(1
review;
0.41
0.83,
respectively)
anxiety
did
not
(SMD:
0.26).
Increases
larger
longer-lasting
0.16
0.23)
than
those
(2
reviews:
0.12
0.18).
Females
showed
increase
males
review:
SMD
0.15).
In
disorders,
any
patient
group,
adolescents,
students,
no
found
SMD’s
ranging
−0.16
0.48).
116
pooled
rates
PTSD
9%
48%
across
Although
heterogeneity
studies
high
largely
unexplained,
assessment
tools
cut-offs
used,
age,
sex
gender,
COVID-19
exposure
factors
be
moderators
some
reviews.
The
major
limitations
are
inability
quantify
explain
included
shortage
within-person
data
multiple
studies.
Conclusions
small
consistent
deterioration
particularly
early
has
been
population
chronic
somatic
Also,
associations
stronger
females
younger
age
groups
others.
Explanatory
individual-level,
exposure,
time-course
scarce
inconsistencies
For
policy
research,
repeated
assessments
panels
including
vulnerable
individuals
recommended
respond
current
future
crises.
Heliyon,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
7(4), P. e06677 - e06677
Published: April 1, 2021
IntroductionThe
COVID-19
pandemic
has
impacted
biopsychosocial
health
and
wellbeing
globally.
Pre-pandemic
studies
suggest
a
high
prevalence
of
common
mental
disorders,
including
anxiety
depression
in
South
Asian
countries,
which
may
aggravate
during
this
pandemic.
This
systematic
meta-analytic
review
was
conducted
to
estimate
the
pooled
countries
pandemic.MethodWe
systematically
searched
for
cross-sectional
on
eight
major
bibliographic
databases
additional
sources
up
October
12,
2020,
that
reported
or
any
countries.
A
random-effects
model
used
calculate
proportion
depression.ResultsA
total
35
representing
41,402
participants
were
included
review.
The
31
with
sample
28,877
41.3%
(95%
confidence
interval
[CI]:
34.7–48.1,
I2
=
99.18%).
Moreover,
34.1%
CI:
28.9–39.4,
99%)
among
37,437
28
studies.
Among
India
had
higher
number
studies,
whereas
Bangladesh
Pakistan
depression.
No
identified
from
Afghanistan,
Bhutan,
Maldives.
Studies
heterogeneity,
publication
bias
confirmed
by
Egger's
test,
varying
rates
across
sub-groups.ConclusionSouth
have
depression,
suggesting
heavy
psychosocial
burden
Clinical
public
interventions
should
be
prioritized
alongside
improving
social
determinants
these
Lastly,
low
heterogeneity
requires
further
research
exploring
epidemiology
COVID-19,
inform
better
policymaking
practice
Asia.
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
13(2), P. 127 - 135
Published: July 26, 2021
Background
This
study
was
conducted
to
systematically
review
the
existing
literature
examining
prevalence
of
anxiety
among
hospital
staff
and
identifying
contributing
factors
address
complications
this
disorder
develop
effective
programmes
for
reducing
mental
health
problem.
Methods
We
searched
electronic
databases
including
PubMed,
EMBASE,
Scopus,
Web
Science
Google
Scholar
from
January
2020
February
2021.
To
perform
meta-analysis,
random
effects
model
used.
assess
statistical
heterogeneity
included
studies,
I
2
index
used,
95%
CI
estimated.
Data
analysis
performed
by
R
software.
Results
In
final
analysis,
46
articles
with
total
sample
size
61
551
members
were
included.
Accordingly,
healthcare
workers
(HCWs)
26.1%
(95%
19%
34.6%).
The
rates
in
technicians
medical
students
39%
13%
73%)
36%
15%
65%),
respectively,
indicating
a
much
higher
than
other
members.
Furthermore,
positive
significant
relationship
between
HCWs
their
age
approved
(p<0.001).
rate
women
37.7%
25.4%
51.8%)
men
27.2%
18.2%
38.6%).
Conclusion
findings
show
moderately
high
staff.
Due
problem
technicians,
frontline
workers,
it
is
highly
suggested
that
institutions
offer
these
working
groups
order
appropriately
manage
during
COVID-19
pandemic.
Journal of Clinical Nursing,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
33(1), P. 393 - 403
Published: Nov. 27, 2022
Abstract
Aims
and
Objectives
The
COVID‐19
pandemic
has
caused
an
increase
in
the
workload
of
nurses
changes
working
conditions.
Stress
during
had
a
negative
effect
on
nurses'
intention
to
leave.
This
study
aimed
determine
current
rate
leave
job
among
outbreak
by
conducting
rapid
systematic
review
meta‐analysis.
Methodology/Methods
procedure
was
conducted
PRISMA
criteria.
researchers
searched
PubMed
Web
Science
databases
for
studies
providing
intent
leave,
published
until
31
December
2021.
Heterogeneity
assessed
using
I
2
test,
publication
bias
measured
Egger's
test.
Results
estimated
overall
profession
31.7%
(95%
CI:
25%–39%)
with
significant
heterogeneity
(Q
test:
188.9;
p
=
0.0001;
:
%95.2;
Tau
0.225).
Additionally,
regression
test
suggested
no
estimating
pooled
outbreak.
No
Patient
or
Public
Contribution
Since
research
is
meta‐analysis
study,
literature
model
used.
Ethics
committee
approval
not
obtained
because
did
directly
affect
humans
animals.
Conclusion
showed
that
approximately
one‐third
thoughts
about
intending
their
job.
findings
indicate
need
strategies
involving
precautions
solutions
minimise
psychological
impacts
nurses.
Relevance
Clinical
Practice
In
this
period
when
global
nurse
crisis
exists,
it
great
importance
institutions
retain
workforce.
There
urgent
prepare
cope
better
pandemic.
Identification
risk
factors
could
be
weapon
giving
healthcare
systems
ability
response
way
against
following
waves
near
future.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
17(2), P. e0263666 - e0263666
Published: Feb. 16, 2022
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
led
to
significant
re-organisation
of
healthcare
delivery
in
hospitals,
with
repercussions
on
all
professionals
working
healthcare.
We
aimed
assess
the
impact
mental
health
care
institutions
and
identify
individual
environmental
factors
influencing
risk
disorders.
From
4
June
22
September
2020,
a
total
4370
responded
an
online
questionnaire
evaluating
psychological
distress,
severity
post-traumatic
stress
symptoms,
factors,
coping
strategies.
About
57%
suffered
from
21%
showed
symptoms
potential
stress.
Professionals
radiology,
those
quality/hygiene/security
nurses'
aides
were
most
affected
groups.
media
focus
crisis,
high
workload
prevalent
followed
by
uncertainty
regarding
possibility
containing
epidemic,
constantly
changing
hygiene
recommendations/protocols,
lack
personal
protective
equipment.
use
strategies,
notably
positive
thinking,
helped
mitigate
relation
between
perceived
had
far-reaching
negative
for
professionals,
some
sectors
more
markedly
affected.
To
prevent
disorders
during
public
support
services
management
strategies
within
hospitals
should
take
account
importance
thinking
social
support.
Evaluation & the Health Professions,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
47(1), P. 11 - 20
Published: May 4, 2023
This
study
provides
an
overview
of
research
findings
on
long-term
effects
healthcare
workers
mental
health
and
factors
associated
with
positive
or
negative
changes.
Medline
PubMed
databases
were
searched
for
observational
longitudinal
studies
18
papers
included
in
the
review
(PROSPERO:
CRD42021260307).
12
articles
indicated
changes
over
time
six
revealed
a
trend
variety
outcomes
(anxiety,
depression,
insomnia,
others).
Female
sex,
younger
age,
nursing
occupation,
frontline
work,
longer
working
hours
concerns
about
contracting
COVID-19
identified
to
be
Conversely,
supportive
environment,
access
psychological
resources,
provision
sufficient
personal
protective
equipment
availability
tests
linked
Therefore,
our
can
assist
governmental
institutional
authorities
effective
interventions
improve
care
workers.
Healthcare,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
11(17), P. 2418 - 2418
Published: Aug. 29, 2023
The
COVID-19
pandemic,
on
a
global
scale,
has
prompted
multifaceted
challenges,
including
notable
psychological
toll
the
general
population.
This
study
uses
mixed-method
approach
for
nuanced
exploration
of
these
experiences.
Using
phenomenological
strategy,
qualitative
responses
from
999
participants
were
analyzed
regarding
their
pandemic-induced
anxiety
and
influence
quarantine
measures
lives.
Quantitative
measures,
revised
Impact
Event
Scale
(IES-R),
patient
health
questionnaire-9
(PHQ-9),
seven-item
generalized
disorder
assessment
(GAD-7),
Insomnia
Severity
Index
(ISI),
used
to
quantify
trauma,
depression,
anxiety,
insomnia
attributed
COVID-19.
Partial
least
squares
structural
equation
modeling
(PLS-SEM)
was
utilized
quantitative
data
analysis.
anxiety-related
mainly
clustered
into
four
themes:
life
threats,
support
shortage,
economic
consequences,
disruptions
family
social
life.
Subthemes
that
addressed
perceived
effects
encapsulated
academic
professional
lives,
familial
relationships,
psychopathological
stress,
movement
limitations.
findings
analysis
revealed
significant
associations
between
COVID-19-related
trauma
symptoms
insomnia,
as
indicated
by
coefficients
exceeding
0.10
(all
z-values
>
1.96;
p-values
<
0.05).
In
conclusion,
underscore
COVID-19’s
role
in
escalating
influenced
various
factors,
its
disruptive
daily
due
measures.
strong
pandemic
urgency
comprehensive
public
interventions
alleviate
impacts.