BDJ,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
233(9), P. 757 - 764
Published: Nov. 11, 2022
Malnutrition
is
prevalent
in
patients
with
head
and
neck
cancer
(HNC)
at
diagnosis
but
can
occur
any
stage
of
the
treatment
pathway.
The
impact
disease
burden
side
effects
lead
to
altered
anatomy,
compromised
quality
quantity
saliva
impaired
swallowing
function,
which
result
deleterious
on
nutritional
status.
Optimising
nutrition
status
critical,
as
malnutrition
adversely
associated
tolerance
outcomes,
wound
healing,
morbidity,
mortality,
life
survival.
Dietitians
are
integral
members
HNC
multidisciplinary
team
uniquely
qualified
assessment,
management
optimisation
across
care
This
includes
providing
informational
counselling
carers
short-
long-term
planned
treatments
alongside
members.
recommendation,
provision
monitoring
support,
be
via
oral,
enteral
or
parenteral
route.
Oral
support
dietary
counselling,
nourishing
dietary,
food
fortification
advice
high
energy/protein
oral
supplements.
Enteral
tube
feeding,
required
a
and/or
basis
dietitians
appropriate
decision-making
for
type
timing
placement
ESMO Open,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
6(3), P. 100092 - 100092
Published: June 1, 2021
•This
ESMO
Clinical
Practice
Guideline
provides
key
recommendations
for
managing
cancer-related
cachexia.•It
covers
screening,
assessment
and
multimodal
management
of
cancer
cachexia.•All
were
compiled
by
a
multidisciplinary
group
experts.•Recommendations
are
based
on
available
scientific
data
the
author's
expert
opinion.
Cancer Medicine,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
8(16), P. 6923 - 6932
Published: Sept. 30, 2019
Abstract
In
recent
years,
whey
proteins
(WP)
have
attracted
increasing
attention
in
health
and
disease
for
their
bioactive
functions.
The
aim
of
this
study
was
to
evaluate
the
benefit
WP
isolate
(WPI)
supplementation
addition
nutritional
counseling
malnourished
advanced
cancer
patients
undergoing
chemotherapy
(CT).
a
single‐center,
randomized,
pragmatic,
parallel‐group
controlled
trial
(
ClinicalTrials.gov
:
NCT02065726),
166
with
mixed
tumor
entities
candidate
or
CT
were
randomly
assigned
receive
(N
=
82)
without
84)
WPI
(20
g/d)
3
months.
primary
endpoint
change
phase
angle
(PhA).
Secondary
endpoints
included
changes
standardized
PhA
(SPA),
fat‐free
mass
index
(FFMI),
body
weight,
muscle
strength,
toxicity
(CTCAE
4.0
events).
assessed
(modified
intention‐to‐treat
population),
plus
66)
resulted
improved
compared
alone
69):
mean
difference,
0.48°
(95%
CI,
0.05
0.90)
P
.027).
also
SPA
.021),
FFMI
.041),
weight
.023),
strength
<
.001),
reduced
risk
(risk
−9.8%
[95%
−16.9
−2.6];
.009),
particularly
severe
(grade
≥
3)
events
−30.4%
−44.4
−16.5];
.001).
CT,
receiving
counseling,
3‐month
composition,
toxicity.
Further
trials,
aimed
at
verifying
efficacy
intervention
on
mid‐
long‐term
clinical
newly
diagnosed
specific
types,
are
warranted.
Journal of Oncology,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
2019, P. 1 - 8
Published: Nov. 22, 2019
Cancer-related
malnutrition
is
associated
with
poor
health
outcomes,
including
decreased
tolerance
to
cancer
therapy,
greater
treatment
toxicities,
and
increased
mortality.
Medical
nutrition
therapy
(MNT)
optimizes
clinical
yet
registered
dietitian
nutritionists
(RDNs),
the
healthcare
professionals
specifically
trained
in
MNT,
are
not
routinely
employed
outpatient
centers
where
over
90%
of
all
patients
treated.
The
objective
this
study
was
evaluate
RDN
staffing
patterns,
services
provided
ambulatory
oncology
settings,
screening
practices,
referral
reimbursement
practices
across
nation
centers.
An
online
questionnaire
developed
by
Oncology
Nutrition
Dietetic
Practice
Group
(ON
DPG)
Academy
Dietetics
distributed
via
ON
DPG
electronic
mailing
list.
Complete
data
were
summarized
for
215
mean
full-time
equivalent
(FTE)
1.7
±
2.0.
After
stratifying
type
center,
National
Cancer
Institute-Designated
Centers
(NCI
CCs)
a
3.1
3.0
FTEs
compared
1.3
1.4
amongst
non-NCI
CCs.
RDN-to-patient
ratio,
based
on
reported
analytic
cases,
1
:
2,308.
Per
day,
RDNs
evaluated
counseled
an
average
7.4
4.3
patients.
Approximately
half
(53.1%)
screened
malnutrition,
64.9%
these
facilities
used
validated
tool.
majority
(76.8%)
do
bill
services.
This
first
national
provider-to-patient
ratios,
These
indicate
there
significant
gap
access
need
nutritional
care.
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
10(2), P. 368 - 377
Published: Feb. 4, 2019
Abstract
Background
Pancreatic
cancer
(PC)
patients
have
multiple
risk
factors
for
sarcopenia
and
loss
of
skeletal
muscle
mass
(LSMM),
which
may
cause
greater
treatment
toxicities,
reduced
response
to
therapy,
prolonged
hospitalization,
impaired
quality
life,
worse
prognosis.
Methods
This
is
a
retrospective
study
on
advanced
PC
treated
at
the
Department
Oncology
Udine,
Italy,
from
January
2012
November
2017.
Among
162
who
received
chemotherapy,
94
consecutive
with
an
available
computed
tomography
(CT)
scan
were
retrospectively
analyzed.
The
primary
objective
our
was
explore
if
early
LSMM
≥
10%
(measured
first
radiological
evaluation
compared
baseline)
and/or
baseline
impact
Baseline
defined
according
Prado's
criteria.
Skeletal
area
measured
as
cross‐sectional
areas
(cm
2
)
using
CT
data
through
Picture
archiving
communication
system
(PACS)
image
system.
Results
In
whole
cohort,
48%
≤70
years
old,
50%
had
metastatic
disease.
At
baseline,
73%
sarcopenia,
16%
presented
visceral
fat
44
cm
/m
.
Overall,
21%
experienced
10%.
Approximately
33%
sarcopenic
~35%
body
index
>
25
kg/m
Of
note,
71%
evaluated
by
nutritionist,
56%
dietary
supplementation
(oral
parenteral).
After
median
follow‐up
30.44
months,
overall
survival
(OS)
11.28
whereas
progression‐free
(PFS)
5.72
months.
By
multivariate
analysis,
significantly
associated
OS
[hazard
ratio
(HR):
2.16;
95%
confidence
interval
(CI)
1.23–3.78;
P
=
0.007]
PFS
(HR:
2.31;
CI
1.30–4.09;
0.004).
Moreover,
exploratory
analysis
showed
that
inflammatory
indexes,
such
neutrophil–lymphocyte
variation,
(odds
1.31,
1.06–1.61,
0.010).
Conclusions
Early
has
negative
prognostic
role
in
patients.
Further
prospective
investigations
are
needed
confirm
these
preliminary
data.
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
12
Published: Jan. 1, 2020
Knowledge
about
cancer-related
malnutrition
and
the
use
of
clinical
nutrition
(CN)
in
real-world
setting
are
lacking.
We
investigated
diagnosis
treatment
frequency
a
multinational
survey
to
identify
unmet
needs
cancer
patients'
care.
Nutrients,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
12(11), P. 3233 - 3233
Published: Oct. 22, 2020
The
aim
of
this
meta-analysis
was
to
examine
the
effects
nutritional
and
physical
exercise
interventions
combining
these
during
radiotherapy
treatment
for
patients
with
head
neck
cancer
on
body
composition,
objectively
measured
function
status.
Systematic
electronic
searches
were
conducted
in
MEDLINE
(PubMed
interface),
EMBASE
(Ovid
CINAHL
(EBSCO
interface)
Cochrane
Library
(Wiley
interface).
We
identified
13
randomized
controlled
trials
(RCTs)
that
included
858
patients.
For
using
only
nutrition
as
intervention,
a
significant
difference
between
control
group
observed
(SMD
0.42
(95CI
0.23–0.62),
p
<
0.001).
Only
pilot
RCTs
investigated
combination
no
groups
found
0.21
−0.16–0.58),
=
0.259).
function,
better
outcome
0.78
0.51–1.04),
No
status
found.
This
significantly
positive
alone
favor
groups.
studies
combined
observed.
Future
full-scaled
is
warranted.
Supportive Care in Cancer,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
30(4), P. 3073 - 3083
Published: Nov. 23, 2021
Abstract
Malnutrition,
muscle
loss,
and
cachexia
are
prevalent
in
cancer
remain
key
challenges
oncology
today.
These
conditions
frequently
underrecognized
undertreated
have
devastating
consequences
for
patients.
Early
nutrition
screening/assessment
intervention
associated
with
improved
patient
outcomes.
As
a
multifaceted
disease,
requires
multimodal
care
that
integrates
supportive
interventions,
specifically
exercise,
to
improve
nutrient
intake,
mass,
physical
functioning,
quality
of
life,
treatment
An
integrated
team
healthcare
providers
incorporates
societies’
recommendations
into
clinical
practice
can
help
achieve
the
best
possible
A
multidisciplinary
panel
experts
oncology,
nutrition,
medicine
participated
2-day
virtual
roundtable
October
2020
discuss
gaps
opportunities
alone
combination
relative
current
evidence
international
recommendations.
The
recommended
five
principles
optimize
practice:
(1)
position
at
center
care;
(2)
partner
colleagues
administrators
integrate
process
approach;
(3)
screen
all
patients
malnutrition
risk
diagnosis
regularly
throughout
treatment;
(4)
combine
exercise
interventions
before
(e.g.,
prehabilitation),
during,
after
as
standard
status
mass;
(5)
incorporate
patient-centered
approach
care.
Journal of Cancer,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
13(9), P. 2705 - 2716
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
Malnutrition
is
a
frequent
problem
in
cancer
patients,
which
leads
to
prolonged
and
repeated
hospitalizations,
increased
treatment-related
toxicity,
reduced
response
treatment,
impaired
quality
of
life,
worse
overall
prognosis
the
avoidable
waste
health
care
resources.
Despite
being
perceived
as
limiting
factor
oncologic
treatments
by
both
oncologists
there
still
considerable
gap
between
need
actual
delivery
nutrition
care,
attitudes
vary
considerably
among
professionals.
In
last
5
years,
Italian
Intersociety
Working
Group
for
Nutritional
Support
Cancer
Patients
(WG),
has
repeatedly
revisited
this
issue
concluded
that
some
improvement
nutritional
Italy
occurred,
at
least
with
regard
awareness
institutional
activities.
same
period,
new
international
guidelines
management
malnutrition
cachexia
have
been
released.
these
valuable
initiatives,
effective
structural
strategies
concrete
actions
aimed
facing
challenging
issues
oncology
are
needed,
requiring
active
participation
scientific
societies
authorities.
As
continuation
WG's
work,
we
reviewed
available
data
present
literature
from
January
2016
September
2021,
together
most
recent
issued
authorities,
thus
providing
an
update
WG
practical
recommendations,
suggestions
areas/issues
possible
implementation.