EFSA Journal,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
21(11)
Published: Nov. 1, 2023
This
publication
is
linked
to
the
following
EFSA
Supporting
Publications
articles:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2023.EN-8441/full,
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2023.EN-8440/full,
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2023.EN-8437/full
Cosmetics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
11(3), P. 72 - 72
Published: May 4, 2024
Consumer
preferences,
safety,
and
sustainability
aspects
of
conventional
cosmetic
ingredients
have
contributed
to
an
increase
in
the
demand
for
natural
products.
Naturally
derived
active
agents
excipients
may
come
into
contact
with
various
naturally
occurring
synthetic
contaminants
throughout
supply
chain,
substantiating
their
safety
is
essential.
This
review
examines
legislative
requirements
applicable
European
Union
(EU).
Cosmetic
include
technical
data
based
on
ingredient
profile,
presence
hazards
risks
associated
intended
conditions
use.
The
hazard
analysis
includes
screening
microbial
such
as
aerobic
mesophilic
bacteria,
Escherichia
coli,
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa,
Staphylococcus
aureus,
Candida
albicans;
chemical
lead,
cadmium,
arsenic,
mercury;
toxins,
allergens.
toxicological
assessment
considers
both
local
effects
(such
skin
sensitisation,
eye/skin
irritation,
photo-induced
effects)
systemic
(including
acute
dermal
toxicity,
sub-acute
sub-chronic
mutagenicity
carcinogenicity,
reproductive
toxicokinetics).
EU
prohibit
use
animal-based
tests
evaluation
ingredients,
paving
way
alternatives
termed
New
Approach
Methodologies
(NAMs).
validation
NAMs
critical
wider
usage,
despite
advancements,
few
been
validated,
particularly
toxicity
testing.
evaluating
complex
further
examined.
Environmental Health Perspectives,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
133(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Various
countries
have
instituted
risk
governance
measures
to
control
and
minimize
the
risks
of
chemicals
at
national
international
levels.
Activities
typically
include
assessment
based
on
a)
hazard
exposure
assessments;
b)
setting
limits
production,
use,
emissions
chemicals;
c)
enforcement
regulations;
d)
monitoring
effectiveness
taken.
These
steps
largely
depend
chemical
analysis
access
pure
reference
standards.
However,
except
for
specific
highly
regulated
categories
chemicals,
such
standards
often
are
not
commercially
available.
This
raises
a
critical
question:
Given
widespread
lack
standards,
is
current
approach
governing
adequate
protect
humans
environment
from
harm?
If
not,
what
could
be
taken
improve
situation?
We
outline
how
hampered
by
produce
required
scientific
evidence.
also
provide
list
recommendations
controlling
in
absence
use
per-
polyfluoroalkyl
substances
(PFASs),
specifically
C6O4
[perfluoro
([5-methoxy-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]oxy)
acetic
acid],
illustrate
companies
that
can
prevent
argue
very
limited
availability
undermines
ability
scientists
independent
evidence
needed
and,
thereby,
prevents
society
protecting
people
against
pollution
its
harms.
Possible
ways
situation
guaranteeing
creating
repository,
redefining
level
confidence
sufficient
regulatory
action,
providing
alternative
options
identification
quantification
when
available,
considering,
no
regulation
class
rather
than
individually.
https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12331.
Environment International,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
184, P. 108474 - 108474
Published: Feb. 1, 2024
Human
health
risk
assessment
is
historically
built
upon
animal
testing,
often
following
Organisation
for
Economic
Co-operation
and
Development
(OECD)
test
guidelines
exposure
assessments.
Using
combinations
of
human
relevant
in
vitro
models,
chemical
analysis
computational
(in
silico)
approaches
bring
advantages
compared
to
studies.
These
include
a
greater
focus
on
the
species
molecular
mechanisms
kinetics,
identification
Adverse
Outcome
Pathways
downstream
Key
Events
as
well
possibility
addressing
susceptible
populations
additional
endpoints.
Much
advancement
progress
made
Next
Generation
Risk
Assessment
(NGRA)
have
been
primarily
focused
new
approach
methodologies
(NAMs)
physiologically
based
kinetic
(PBK)
modelling
without
incorporating
biomonitoring
(HBM).
The
integration
toxicokinetics
(TK)
PBK
an
essential
component
NGRA.
models
are
describing
quantitative
terms
TK
processes
with
effective
dose
at
expected
target
site.
Furthermore,
need
amplified
by
increasing
scientific
regulatory
interest
aggregate
cumulative
interactions
chemicals
mixtures.
Since
HBM
data
strengthens
reduces
uncertainties
assessment,
here
we
elaborate
integrated
use
TK,
highlighting
opportunities
challenges
limitations.
Examples
provided
where
TK/PBK
can
be
used
both
hazard
characterization
shifting
from
external
dose/response
assays
animal-free,
internal
exposure-based
EFSA Supporting Publications,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
21(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
The
future
of
risk
assessment
cannot
neglect
to
consider
the
vast
literature
produced
through
application
new
approach
methodologies
(NAMs).
This,
however,
constitutes
a
challenge
for
assessor,
as
availability
data
in
this
context
is
huge
and
heterogeneous
both
methods
applied
standardisation
quality
results.
integration
results
generated
from
NAMs
hence
only
feasible
under
some
degree
automation
workflow,
specifically
searching,
extracting
integrating
such
"AOP-like"
knowledge
networks
(AOP
–
Adverse
Outcome
Pathway).
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
with
its
state-of-the-art
tools
one
most
promising
sources
support
manual
tasks
among
modern
technologies.
present
paper
illustrates
exploration
possible
applications
AI
achieve
goal.
After
introduction
an
evaluation
framework
quantitatively
assess
these
methods,
implementation
six
selected
case
studies
selection
dedicated
workflow
are
presented.
A
qualitative
survey
which
also
incorporates
experience
gathered
during
study
implementation,
then
Finally,
recommendations
formulated
address
main
aspects
identified
that
should,
opinion
authors,
be
pursued
by
EFSA
SPIDO
roadmaps.
In
summary,
potentials
tool
could
throughout
workflow.
Although
many
can
supported
(semi-)automation,
showed
subject
matter
experts
need
involved
all
steps.
EFSA Journal,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
22(7)
Published: July 1, 2024
The
EFSA
Scientific
Committee
has
updated
its
2010
Guidance
on
risk-benefit
assessment
(RBA)
of
foods.
update
addresses
methodological
developments
and
regulatory
needs.
While
it
retains
the
stepwise
RBA
approach,
provides
additional
methods
for
complex
assessments,
such
as
multiple
chemical
hazards
all
relevant
health
effects
impacting
different
population
subgroups.
guidance
includes
approaches
systematic
identification,
prioritisation
selection
hazardous
beneficial
food
components.
It
also
offers
updates
to
characterising
adverse
effects,
measures
effect
size
dose-response
modelling.
expands
options
risks
benefits,
incorporating
variability,
uncertainty,
severity
categorisation
ranking
(beneficial
or
adverse)
effects.
impact
types
is
assessed
qualitatively
quantitatively,
depending
problem
formulation,
scope
question
data
availability.
integration
benefits
often
involves
value-based
judgements
should
ideally
be
performed
with
manager.
Metrics
Disability-Adjusted
Life
Years
(DALYs)
Quality-Adjusted
(QALYs)
can
used.
Additional
are
presented,
probability
and/or
given
severities
their
using
weight
functions.
practical
reporting
results,
interpreting
outcomes
communicating
outcome
an
RBA,
considering
consumer
perspectives
responses
advice.
Frontiers in Toxicology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
6
Published: April 5, 2024
The
ICH
S1B
carcinogenicity
global
testing
guideline
has
been
recently
revised
with
a
novel
addendum
that
describes
comprehensive
integrated
Weight
of
Evidence
(WoE)
approach
to
determine
the
need
for
2-year
rat
study.
In
present
work,
experts
from
different
organizations
have
joined
efforts
standardize
as
much
possible
procedural
framework
integration
evidence
associated
S1B(R1)
WoE
criteria.
uses
pragmatic
consensus
procedure
hazard
assessment
facilitate
transparent,
consistent,
and
documented
decision-making
it
discusses
best-practices
both
organization
studies
presentation
data
in
format
suitable
regulatory
review.
First,
is
acknowledged
six
factors
described
form
an
network
within
holistic
used
synergistically
analyze
explain
safety
signals.
Second,
proposed
standardized
builds
upon
considerations
related
primary
sources
evidence,
mechanistic
analysis,
alternative
methodologies
investigative
approaches,
metabolites,
reliability
other
acquired
information.
Each
highlighting
how
they
can
contribute
overall
assessment.
A
suggested
reporting
summarize
cross-integration
also
presented.
This
work
notes
even
if
study
ultimately
required,
creating
valuable
understanding
specific
levels
human
carcinogenic
risk
better
than
identified
previously
bioassay
alone.
EFSA Supporting Publications,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
21(6)
Published: June 1, 2024
Abstract
To
protect
individuals
who
already
have
or
are
at
risk
of
developing
immune‐mediated
adverse
reactions
to
food,
novel
foods
and
genetically
modified
organisms
(GMOs)
undergo
an
allergenicity
assessment.
There
shortcomings
in
this
process
that
could
be
improved
through
use
well‐defined
clinically
relevant
allergen
molecules
with
different
allergenic
potential.
The
objective
project
was
develop
strategies
for
predicting
innovative/novel
proteins
address
issue.
We
undertook
a
systematic
review
listed
on
Annex
II
the
Food
Information
Consumers
Regulation
together
additional
known
cause
IgE‐mediated
food
allergies
least
one
European
region
prevalence
0.5%.
Around
750
in‐scope
papers
were
quality
assessed
allow
clinical
relevance
ranked.
best
characterised
allergens
identified
peanut,
hazelnut,
cow's
milk,
fish
crustacean
shellfish
data
lacking
from
such
as
pecan,
Macadamia,
lupin
melon.
Furthermore,
assessment
silico
tools
prediction
found
that,
whilst
many
able
correctly
predict
allergenicity,
none
provide
output
linked
relevance.
Building
these
outcomes
approach
has
been
developed
brings
elements
exposure
assessment,
combining
silico,
vitro,
vivo
methods.
Tools
risks
cross‐reactive
more
mature
only
require
refinement
improve
outputs
inform
process.
However,
mechanisms
underlying
development
allergy
not
fully
elucidated,
remain
matter
ongoing
research,
de
novo
sensitisation
is
uncertain.
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
142, P. 105431 - 105431
Published: June 12, 2023
The
body
of
EU
chemicals
legislation
has
evolved
since
the
1960s,
producing
largest
knowledge
base
on
worldwide.
Like
any
evolving
system,
however,
it
become
increasingly
diverse
and
complex,
resulting
in
inefficiencies
potential
inconsistencies.
In
light
Chemicals
Strategy
for
Sustainability,
is
therefore
timely
reasonable
to
consider
how
aspects
system
could
be
simplified
streamlined,
without
losing
hard-earned
benefits
human
health
environment.
this
commentary,
we
propose
a
conceptual
framework
that
basis
2.0
-
future
safety
assessment
management
approach
based
application
New
Approach
Methodologies
(NAMs),
mechanistic
reasoning
cost-benefit
considerations.
designed
more
efficient
effective
assessing
chemicals,
comply
with
goal
completely
replace
animal
testing,
line
Directive
2010/63/EU.
We
five
design
criteria
define
what
should
achieve.
centered
classification
matrix
which
NAMs
toxicodynamics
toxicokinetics
are
used
classify
according
their
level
concern.
An
important
principle
need
ensure
an
equivalent,
or
higher,
protection
level.