Brain state identification and neuromodulation to promote recovery of consciousness
Brain Communications,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
6(5)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Abstract
Experimental
and
clinical
studies
of
consciousness
identify
brain
states
(i.e.
quasi-stable
functional
cerebral
organization)
in
a
non-systematic
manner
largely
independent
the
research
into
state
modulation.
In
this
narrative
review,
we
synthesize
advances
identification
associated
with
animal
models
physiological
(sleep),
pharmacological
(anaesthesia)
pathological
(disorders
consciousness)
altered
humans.
We
show
that
reduced
frequencies
which
operates
are
slowed
down
pattern
communication
is
sparser,
less
efficient,
complex.
The
results
also
highlight
damaged
resting-state
networks,
particular
default
mode
network,
decreased
connectivity
long-range
connections
especially
thalamocortical
loops.
Next,
therapeutic
approaches
to
treat
disorders
consciousness,
through
pharmacology
(e.g.
amantadine,
zolpidem),
(non-)
invasive
stimulation
transcranial
direct
current
stimulation,
deep
stimulation)
have
shown
partial
effectiveness
promoting
recovery.
Although
some
features
conscious
may
improve
response
neuromodulation,
targeting
often
remains
non-specific
does
not
always
lead
(behavioural)
improvements.
fields
neuromodulation
relation
showing
fascinating
developments
that,
when
integrated,
might
propel
development
new
better-targeted
techniques
for
consciousness.
here
propose
framework
modulation
facilitate
interaction
between
two
fields.
should
be
identified
predictive
setting,
followed
by
theoretical
empirical
testing
models,
under
anaesthesia
patients
disorder
promote
line
such
predictions.
This
further
helps
where
challenges
opportunities
lay
maturation
context
It
will
become
apparent
one
angle
opportunity
provided
addition
computational
modelling.
Finally,
it
aids
recognizing
possibilities
obstacles
translation
these
diagnostic
treatment
options
across
both
multimodal
multi-species
outlined
throughout
review.
Language: Английский
A probabilistic model of behavioural emergence from general anaesthesia in mice
British Journal of Anaesthesia,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 1, 2025
Time
to
emergence
from
general
anaesthesia
is
highly
variable
between
individuals.
This
variability
has
been
attributed
individual
differences
in
anaesthetic
sensitivity.
However,
this
hypothesis
not
verified
experimentally.
We
explicitly
test
by
quantifying
repeatedly
the
same
individuals
over
time.
Genetically
identical
adult
(12-24
weeks
old)
male
(n=40)
and
female
(n=20)
C57BL/6J
mice
were
exposed
2
h
of
isoflurane
(0.90
vol%)
on
10
separate
occasions.
was
measured
using
return
righting
reflex.
Predictions
standard
effect-site
pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic
(PK-PD)
model
neuronal
dynamics
stochastic
fluctuations
awake
anaesthetised
states
fit
observed
times.
Repeated
steady-state
assessments
reflex
obtained
during
last
a
4-h
exposure
0.3,
0.4,
0.6,
or
0.7
vol%
(n=20
per
concentration)
used
determine
probabilities
losing
reflex,
which
defined
as
an
individual's
Emergence
times
varied
at
least
two
orders
magnitude
after
exposure.
did
find
consistent
inter-individual
Instead,
we
found
that
across
trials
each
large
different
correlated
Consistent
with
previous
work,
identified
sensitivity
persisted
time
scale
1
week.
A
PK-PD
failed
reproduce
inter-trial
variability.
In
contrast,
reproduced
both
population-
individual-level
Stochastic
state
switching
contributes
inherent
anaesthesia.
Delayed
occurred
small
proportion
exposures
genetically
homogeneous
population.
The
predicts
will
be
probabilistically
long,
might
explain
delayed
clinical
settings.
Language: Английский
The Inhibition of Reactive Oxygen Species Modulator 1 Attenuates Sevoflurane-Induced Neural Injury via Reducing Apoptosis and Oxidative Stress
Long-Jun Gu,
No information about this author
Xuehu Wang,
No information about this author
Zhihao Wu
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
74(4)
Published: Oct. 16, 2024
Language: Английский
How does the brain emerge from anesthesia and regain consciousness
Xue‐Jun Song,
No information about this author
Jiang-Jian Hu
No information about this author
Chinese Medical Journal,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Nov. 8, 2024
Herein,
we
first
discuss
advancements
in
our
understanding
of
the
mechanisms
involved
induction
anesthesia.
This
includes
fundamentals
anesthesia
as
shaped
by
three
influential
theories:
non-specific
lipid
theory,
specific
protein
target
and
neural
circuit
theory.
We
then
traditional
identification
purely
passive
recovery
from
due
to
elimination
anesthetics
body
brain.
is
followed
a
recent
study
that
has
revealed
common
mechanism
based
on
brain's
intrinsic
ability
actively
reboot
consciousness
Finally,
novel
theory
how
brain
emerges
regains
presented.
Advancements
whereby
loses
or
after
General
was
used
patients
1840s
for
clinical
surgery.
Since
then,
reversible
loss
(LOC)
induced
still
unclear
been
complex
elusive
subject
scientific
challenge
debate.
Anesthesia-induced
LOC
model
investigate
neurobiological
basis
and,
more
recently,
general
principles
function,
including
nature
consciousness.
The
lipid,
target,
theories.
These
hypotheses
provide
explanations
different
perspectives
levels
induce
There
are
pharmacological
targets
diverse
As
an
overarching
principle,
it
logical
propose
disrupt
activity
integrity
function
circuits
responsible
signal
transmission
conscious
perception/subjective
experience
binding
molecular
through
membrane-mediated
targets.[1–5]
However,
there
significant
knowledge
gaps
process
inhibition
neuronal
activity,
disruption
blocking
information
various
anesthetics,
For
instance,
some
reagents
act
blockers/antagonists
γ-aminobutyric
acid
type
A
(GABAARs)
N-methyl-d-aspartate
(NMDARs)
receptors
were
initially
believed
LOC.
this
not
case.[1]
It
hypothesized
cognitive
process,
contrast
anesthesia,
which
depends
anesthetic
hypothesis
lacks
solid
experimental
support
does
explain
long
delay
emergence
full
have
major
challenges
practice.
Over
past
20
years,
extensive
evidence
animal
studies
shown
artificial
manipulation
certain
cortical
subcortical
nuclei
along
with
arousal
pathways
can
either
reverse
deepen
accelerate
its
emergence.
glutamatergic,
GABAergic,
cholinergic,
noradrenergic,
dopaminergic,
orexigenic
efferent
circuitries
nuclei,
e.g.,
prefrontal
cortex,
basal
forebrain,
locus
coeruleus,
ventral
tegmental
area,
etc.,
may
play
important
roles
emergence.[1,6–8]
demonstrated
dynamic
controllable
process.
emerge
LOC,
considered
until
recently
published
study.[9]
paradox
plays
decisive
role
regaining
Molecular
"active
reboot"
Under
addition
behavioral
manifestations,
such
forms
reflexes,
undergoes
changes
at
cellular
levels.
During
anesthesia-induced
subsequent
recovery,
power
occurs
between
proposed
apparent
contradictions,
these
effects
be
characterized
dynamic.
contradictory
proposals
follows,
external
force
leading
internal
cause
Typically,
pair
contradictions
dominant
determines
final
outcome.
Does
regain
LOC?
provided
showing
active
rebooting
anesthesia.[9]
When
forced
into
minimum
responsive
state
(MRS)
rapid
downregulation
K+/Cl−
cotransporter
2
(KCC2)
posteromedial
nucleus
(VPM)
thalamus
serves
Ubiquitin
proteasomal
degradation
KCC2
downregulation,
driven
ubiquitin
ligase
Fbxl4.
phosphorylation
Thr1007
promotes
interaction
leads
GABAAR-mediated
disinhibition,
enabling
accelerated
VPM
excitability
inhibition.
intermediate
step
en
route
key
points
anesthesia[9]
include
following:
first,
distinct
much
earlier
than
observed
discontinuation.
almost
simultaneously
parallel
induction,
beginning
when
MRS
continuing
during
exits
state.
Second,
anesthetic-induced
action.
KCC2,
neuron-specific
isoform
cotransporter,
transports
Cl−
out
cell.[10]
Normal
expression
essential
maintenance
inhibitory
GABAAR
responses.
under
impairs
reduces
Third,
mediated
ubiquitin-proteasomal
degradation,
but
previously
recognized
NMDAR–Ca2+–calpain
brain-derived
neurotrophic
factor
(BDNF)–tropomyosin
receptor
kinase
B
(TrkB)
activation.[11–15]
Activity-dependent
via
NMDAR-Ca2+–calpain
BDNF–TrkB
activation
context
increased
excitability;
however,
decreased
excitability.
Fourth,
independent
highlighted
targets.
KCC2-Thr1007
causes
KCC2.
Although
ketamine
produces
acting
NMDARs
propofol;
pentobarbital
isoflurane
produce
GABAARs,
increases
ketamine,
propofol,
pentobarbital,
occur
NMDAR
activity.
Changes
EGABA
occurred
independently
GABAAR.
Propofol,
activating
GABAARs.
propofol
KCC2-phosphorylation
HEK293
cells
overexpressing
(wild-type
[WT]
mutant),
whereas
no
expressed
cells.
supports
notion
isoflurane,
their
proteins,
NMDARs.[9]
successfully
downregulation-independent
continues.
later
depend
clearance
body;
reversal
patterns
anesthetic-related
nuclei;
targets,
neurotransmitter
systems,
circuits,
other
unknown
mechanisms.[1]
Novel
Based
progress
studies,
previous
assumptions,
inferences
about
following
analogy
conceptualized;
neurons
serve
"power
generators"
connected
networks,
lines"
exchange
signals.
Anesthesia
disrupts
outage".
Ubiquitin-proteasomal
"reboot"
within
neuron
restore
thalamocortical
activation.
Thus,
balance
if
allow
would
without
effective
work
generators",
could
even
termination
removal
anesthetics.
Conversely,
sustained
high
enough
concentrations,
anesthesia-interrupted
lines",
regardless
speed
intensity
worked.
Artificial
anesthesia-inhibited
systems
help
therefore
synergistically
interact
all
necessary
resulting
unconsciousness
concept
illustrated
Figure
1.
while
significantly
innovative,
further
research
reliable
basis.Figure
1:
An
illustrative
diagram
thalamus.
LOC:
Loss
consciousness;
MRS:
Minimum
state;
VPM:
Ventral
nucleus;
KCC2:
2.Acknowledgments
thank
William
Song
University
Pennsylvania
Perelman
Medical
School
his
thoughtful
comments
suggestions.
Funding
partly
supported
grant
National
Natural
Science
Foundation
China
(No.
82350710225).
Conflicts
interest
None.
Language: Английский
VCP controls KCC2 degradation through FAF1 recruitment and accelerates emergence from anesthesia
Peng Chen,
No information about this author
Jiang-Jian Hu,
No information about this author
Yuexin Liu
No information about this author
et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
122(1)
Published: Dec. 30, 2024
Ubiquitin-proteasomal
degradation
of
K
+
/Cl
−
cotransporter
2
(KCC2)
in
the
ventral
posteromedial
nucleus
(VPM)
has
been
demonstrated
to
serve
as
a
common
mechanism
by
which
brain
emerges
from
anesthesia
and
regains
consciousness.
KCC2
during
is
driven
E3
ligase
Fbxl4.
However,
ubiquitinated
targeted
proteasome
not
elucidated.
We
report
cultured
neuro-2a
cells
that
valosin-containing
protein
(VCP)
transported
mice
vivo
experiments
inhibition
VCP
restored
expression
VPM
enhanced
effects
anesthesia.
In
cells,
propofol-induced
was
inhibited
inhibitor
DBeQ
knockout
plasmid
sgRNA(VCP).
Propofol-induced
interaction
between
Fbxl4
or
Fas-associated
factor
1
(FAF1).
studies,
pharmacological
genetic
significantly
prevented
propofol
anesthesia;
these
were
abrogated
antagonist
VU0463271.
These
results
demonstrate
controls
ubiquitin-proteasomal
dependent
on
FAF1
recruitment
serves
for
KCC2,
responsible
subsequent
emergence
Language: Английский