Educological discourse,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
46(3)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Currently,
the
development
of
technologies
affects
all
spheres
society.
Artificial
intelligence
are
intensively
developing
and
beginning
to
be
actively
used
solve
various
problems
both
at
everyday
scientific
level.
Accordingly,
there
discussions
in
pedagogical
circle
about
possibilities
using
artificial
educational
tasks:
from
finding
material,
translating
material
into
another
language,
creating
a
curriculum,
computer
presentation
for
an
session,
program
or
project
communication
language
with
IA-assistant
(Artificial
Intelligence).
That
is,
worker
can
delegate
performance
certain
tasks
(but
further
verification
completed
by
technologies)
reduce
his
time
preparing
classes.
Increasingly,
scientists
emphasize
possibility
process
need
train
workers
use
intelligence.
purpose
article
was
analyze
concept
"artificial
intelligence"
describe
existing
approaches
process.
The
methodology
research
analysis
Ukrainian
foreign
scientists,
approaches,
explanation,
comparison
systematization
directions,
advantages,
disadvantages
education.
definition
is
presented.
We
defined
as
information
technology
that
ensures
complex
intellectual
tasks.
Examples
include:
Anima,
Grammarly,
CENTURY,
IntelliMetric,
API
DeepL,
OpenArt,
GodeRabbit,
etc.
areas
education
described
highlighted:
individualized
training,
intelligent
training
systems,
automated
assessment,
group
training.
advantages
characterized.
results
study
importance
studying
process,
because
this
rapidly,
has
prospects
active
human
activity:
scientific,
medical,
military,
pedagogical,
industrial,
household,
Organization Science,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
35(5), P. 1589 - 1607
Published: Aug. 13, 2024
The
rapid
advances
in
generative
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
open
up
attractive
opportunities
for
creative
problem-solving
through
human-guided
AI
partnerships.
To
explore
this
potential,
we
initiated
a
crowdsourcing
challenge
focused
on
sustainable,
circular
economy
business
ideas
generated
by
the
human
crowd
(HC)
and
collaborative
human-AI
efforts
using
two
alternative
forms
of
solution
search.
attracted
125
global
solvers
from
various
industries,
used
strategic
prompt
engineering
to
generate
solutions.
We
recruited
300
external
evaluators
judge
randomized
selection
13
out
234
solutions,
totaling
3,900
evaluator-solution
pairs.
Our
results
indicate
that
while
solutions
exhibited
higher
novelty—both
average
highly
novel
outcomes—human-AI
demonstrated
superior
viability,
financial
environmental
value,
overall
quality.
Notably,
cocreated
differentiated
search,
where
prompts
instructed
large
language
model
sequentially
outputs
distinct
previous
iterations,
outperformed
independent
By
incorporating
“AI
loop”
into
human-centered
problem-solving,
our
study
demonstrates
scalable,
cost-effective
approach
augment
early
innovation
phases
lays
groundwork
investigating
how
integrating
search
processes
can
drive
more
impactful
innovations.
Funding:
This
work
was
supported
Harvard
Business
School
(Division
Research
Faculty
Development)
Laboratory
Innovation
Science
at
(LISH)
Digital
Data
Design
(D
3
)
Institute
Harvard.
Supplemental
Material:
online
appendix
is
available
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.18430
.
Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
17(7), P. 2944 - 2944
Published: March 26, 2025
The
transition
toward
sustainable
conservation
practices
requires
a
scientifically
ground
approach
to
substituting
traditional
solvent
systems
with
green
alternatives.
This
study
aims
facilitate
the
adoption
of
solvents
by
restoration
professionals
systematically
evaluating
their
chemical
compatibility
and
toxicological
safety.
By
integrating
Hansen
solubility
parameters
(HSP),
Relative
Energy
Difference
(RED),
Integrated
Toxicity
Index
(ITI),
we
identified
high
potential
for
replacing
Cremonesi
mixtures.
analysis
revealed
that
ether-based
solvents,
such
as
2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran
cyclopentyl
methyl
ether,
exhibit
affinity
mixtures,
while
esters
fatty
acid
(FAMEs)
offer
balanced
combination
low
toxicity.
However,
also
underscores
significant
gaps
in
safety
data
(SDS)
many
innovative
highlighting
need
further
evaluation
before
widespread
implementation.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
This
study
investigates
the
capability
of
generative
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
in
creating
innovative
business
solutions
compared
to
human
crowdsourcing
methods.
We
initiated
a
challenge
focused
on
sustainable,
circular
economy
opportunities.
The
attracted
diverse
range
solvers
from
myriad
countries
and
industries.
Simultaneously,
we
employed
GPT-4
generate
AI
using
three
different
prompt
levels,
each
calibrated
simulate
distinct
crowd
expert
personas.
145
evaluators
assessed
randomized
selection
10
out
234
solutions,
total
1,885
evaluator-solution
pairs.
Results
showed
comparable
quality
between
AI-generated
solutions.
However,
ideas
were
perceived
as
more
novel,
whereas
delivered
better
environmental
financial
value.
use
natural
language
processing
techniques
rich
solution
text
show
that
although
cover
similar
industries
application,
exhibit
greater
semantic
diversity.
connection
diversity
novelty
is
stronger
suggesting
differences
how
created
by
humans
or
detected
evaluators.
illuminates
potential
limitations
both
solve
complex
organizational
problems
sets
groundwork
for
possible
integrative
human-AI
approach
problem-solving.
International Journal of Information Management,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
79, P. 102824 - 102824
Published: July 17, 2024
The
rise
of
generative
AI
has
brought
with
it
a
surprising
paradox:
systems
that
excel
at
tasks
once
thought
to
be
uniquely
human,
like
fluent
conversation
or
persuasive
writing,
while
simultaneously
failing
meet
traditional
expectations
computing,
in
terms
reliability,
accuracy,
and
veracity
(e.g.,
given
the
various
issues
so-called
'hallucinations').
We
argue
that,
when
is
seen
through
computing
lens,
its
development
focuses
on
optimizing
for
traits
remain
principle
unattainable.
This
risks
backgrounding
what
most
novel
defining
about
it.
As
probabilistic
technologies,
AIs
do
not
store,
any
sense,
data
content.
Rather,
essential
features
training
become
encoded
deep
neural
networks
as
patterns,
practically
available
styles.
discuss
happens
distinction
between
objects
their
appearance
dissolves
all
aspects
images
text
understood
styles,
accessible
exploration
creative
combination
generation.
For
example,
visual
qualities
entities
'chair'
'cat'
'chair-ness'
'cat-ness'
image
style
engines,
unique
capabilities
conceptualized
complementing
ones.
will
aid
both
practitioners
information
researchers
reconciling
integrating
into
IS
landscape.
Our
conceptualization
leads
us
propose
four
archetypes
application
use,
highlight
future
avenues
research
made
visible
by
this
conceptualization,
well
implications
practice
policymaking.
Journal of Creativity,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
34(2), P. 100086 - 100086
Published: April 2, 2024
The
intersection
of
Artificial
Intelligence
and
Design
disciplines
such
as
Architecture,
Urban
Planning,
Engineering
Product
has
been
a
longstanding
pursuit,
with
Generative
AI
(GAI)
ushering
in
new
era
possibilities.
research
presented
herein
explores
how
GAI
can
enhance
creativity
assist
practitioners
tasks
needed
to
create
products
as,
but
not
limited
to,
renderings,
concepts,
construction
techniques,
materials,
data
analytics
or
maps.
We
apply
framework
combinational,
exploratory
transformational
organize
recent
advancements
support
each
creative
category.
propose
conceptual
towards
creativity,
identify
real-world
examples
demonstrate
GAI's
impact,
transforming
sketches
into
detailed
renders,
facilitating
real-time
3D
model
generation,
predicting
trends
through
creating
images
reports
via
text
prompts.
Our
work
envisions
future
where
becomes
collaborator
complete
certain
automated
while
liberating
Designers
focus
on
innovation.
European Journal of Education,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
60(1)
Published: Jan. 27, 2025
ABSTRACT
The
acceptance
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
in
academic
settings,
particularly
the
context
research
creativity,
is
a
growing
area
interest.
This
study
aimed
to
design
and
validate
AI
Acceptance
Research
Creativity
Scale
(AIA&RCS)
among
faculty
members.
exploratory
mixed‐method
was
conducted
720
A
literature
review
participant
interviews
were
qualitative
phase
generate
develop
items.
In
quantitative
phase,
face
validity,
content
construct
convergent
validity
reliability
(internal
consistency
stability)
used.
Exploratory
factor
analysis
(EFA)
indicated
4‐factor
model
scale
with
‘perceived
usefulness
effectiveness
creativity’,
‘ethical
issues
research’,
‘trusted
capabilities’
‘willingness
use
AI’
accounting
for
51.6%
variance.
arrangement
verified
by
confirmatory
(CFA),
fit
indices
that
at
suitable
levels.
Then,
network
took
into
account
four‐factor
structure
AIA&RCS
further.
Similarly,
graph
(EGA)
configuration
AIA&RCS.
25‐item
well‐suited
measuring
innovation
because
its
psychometrics.