Health Psychology Open,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
10(1), P. 205510292311791 - 205510292311791
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
Regulatory
health
policies
facilitate
desired
behaviours
in
communities,
and
among
them,
smoke-free
COVID-19
restrictions
have
been
widely
implemented.
Qualitative
research
studies
explored
how
these
measures
other
environmental
influences
shape
preventive
behaviours.
The
objective
of
this
systematic
review
was
to
synthesize
previously
published
qualitative
research,
generate
across-study
themes,
propose
recommendations
for
behaviour
change
interventions.
We
used
a
comprehensive
search
strategy,
relevance
screening
confirmation,
data
extraction,
quality
assessment,
thematic
synthesis,
quality-of-evidence
assessment.
In
total,
87
relevant
were
identified.
Findings
grouped
under
six
overarching
themes
mapped
three
categories:
(i)
the
political
environment,
(ii)
sociocultural
(iii)
physical
environment.
These
findings
provide
insights
into
indicate
future
interventions
may
be
more
effective
by
considering
moral
norms,
community
policy
support,
group
identity.
BMC Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
22(1)
Published: April 13, 2022
Daily
testing
using
a
rapid
Lateral
Flow
Device
(LFD)
has
been
suggested
as
an
alternative
to
self-isolation.
A
randomised
trial
comparing
daily
contact
(DCT)
in
schools
with
self-isolation
found
that
SARS-CoV-2
transmission
within
school
was
comparable
and
low
both
groups.
However,
if
this
approach
is
be
adopted
widely,
it
critical
we
understand
the
perspective
of
those
who
will
delivering
receiving
DCT.
The
aim
qualitative
process
study
embedded
controlled
(RCT)
improve
understanding
range
behavioural
factors
could
influence
implementation.Interviews
were
conducted
63
participants,
including
staff,
students,
parents
students
had
identified
being
close
someone
COVID-19.
topic
guide
explored
perceptions
testing,
positive
negative
test
results,
adherence
guidance.
Data
analysed
inductive
thematic
approach.Results
organised
under
three
main
headings:
(1)
influencing
(2)
interpretation
results
(3)
behaviour
during
period.
Participants
recognized
may
allow
remain
school,
which
viewed
necessary
for
education
social
needs.
Whilst
some
felt
safer
result
others
raised
concerns
about
safety.
did
not
always
how
interpret
respond
although
participants
reported
high
levels
guidance,
improved
communications
desired.Daily
feasible
acceptable
among
contacts
people
positive.
are
needed
ensure
all
have
good
rationale
what
mean,
should
acted
on,
likely
following
contact.
Support
self-isolate
safety
testing.
Journal of Criminology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 22, 2025
Public
health
regulations
introduced
in
response
to
the
Covid-19
pandemic
placed
unprecedented
restrictions
on
U.K.
public.
To
maximise
compliance
with
regulations,
new
policing
powers
were
enabling
officers
issue
Fixed
Penalty
Notices
(FPNs)
those
believed
have
breached
them.
In
Scotland,
where
over
20,000
Covid-FPNs
issued
for
regulatory
breaches,
police
reported
particular
challenges
dealing
non-compliance
amongst
people
vulnerabilities
involving
mental
illness
and
substance
use.
Health
studies
suggest
that
such
conditions
most
severely
impacted
by
a
whole
range
of
ways;
however,
there
are
no
existing
whether
this
includes
use
enforcement.
Our
study
addresses
gap
using
linked
administrative
data
from
organisations
Scotland.
Using
case-control
design,
we
found
who
had
accessed
services
psychiatric
or
more
likely
received
Covid-FPN,
especially
during
first
lockdown.
The
strength
association
was
greatest
multiple
accessing
both
before
pandemic.
findings
disproportionately
suffering
and/or
addictions
point
previously
unidentified
justice
inequality.
This
novel
linkage
highlights
importance
taking
into
greater
consideration
when
planning
future
preparedness.
Frontiers in Political Science,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
6
Published: Feb. 14, 2024
This
paper
addresses
the
relationship
between
populist
beliefs
and
compliance
with
COVID-19
containment
measures.
We
argue
that
an
understanding
of
this
issue
depends
upon
developing
a
social/political
psychology
which
impact
social
groups
relations
behavior.
More
specifically
we
propose
are
based
on
notion
elite
authorities
opposed
to
people
hence
not
be
trusted
by
them
in
turn
reduces
what
they
propose.
Furthermore,
draw
distinctions
different
domains
(getting
vaccinated,
distancing
complying
“track
trace”)
forms
authority
(politicians
scientists).
that,
whereas
loss
trust
politicians
only
undermines
engagement
involve
direct
political
(i.e.,
track
trace)
scientists
very
belief
there
is
pandemic
all
compliance.
use
survey
321
English
Welsh
respondents
address
these
arguments.
The
data
provide
weak
support
for
hypothesis
populism
has
effect
through
but
case
participating
trace.
stronger
scientists,
when
perceived
as
part
elite.
Over
results
demonstrate
ability
understand
complex
relationships
able
explain
how
human
behavior
shaped
identities
which,
turn,
ideologies.
Journal of Risk Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
27(3), P. 372 - 388
Published: March 3, 2024
This
article
presents
new
arguments
on
the
role
of
trust
in
government
and
nationalist
sentiments
fostering
policy-compliant
behaviors.
In
July
September
2020,
we
launched
two
waves
a
COVID-related
survey
China
with
stratified
quota
sampling,
formed
longitudinal
panel
dataset
822
responses.
Based
data,
examined
how
risk
perceptions
jointly
elicited
agencies
and,
consequently,
support
for
state-sponsored
immunization
program.
We
argue
that
increasing
concern
about
to
state
posed
by
pandemic
motivated
Chinese
citizens
rally
around
comply
its
vaccination
drives.
Nationalist
simultaneously
elevated
perceptions,
reinforcing
their
impact
government.
Our
findings
contribute
literature
crisis
governance,
offering
evidence
sentiment
may
influence
dynamic
interplay
between
policy
compliance.
ObjectivesWhen
followed,
there
is
evidence
that
social
distancing
measures
play
a
major
role
in
reducing
the
transmission
of
viruses
such
as
COVID-19.
However,
not
all
individuals
follow
guidance.
This
study
aimed
to
explore
barriers
and
facilitators
compliance
with
United
Kingdom
guidelines
during
COVID-19
pandemic.MethodSemi-structured
interviews
116
adults.
Data
were
analysed
using
reflexive
thematic
analysis
themes
mapped
domains
Capability,
Opportunity
Motivation
Model
Behaviour
(COM-B).Main
Outcome
MeasuresWe
identified
12
affecting
UK
guidelines.ResultsBarriers
included
inconsistent
rules,
caring
responsibilities,
fatigue,
unintended
consequences
control
measures,
need
for
emotional
support.
Facilitators
informational
support
responsibility.
Six
acted
both
barrier
or
facilitator:
lived
environment
shared
spaces,
beliefs
about
non-compliance,
influence
others,
practical
support,
trust
government.
Conclusions
Participants
experienced
range
compliance,
often
dependent
on
individual
circumstances.
Reflective
motivation,
psychological
capability
opportunity
important
drivers
compliance.
Measures
enable
alongside
strategies
help
maintain
motivation
comply,
provide
clear
guidance
optimise
cohesion
should
be
promoted.
BMJ Open,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(3), P. e084437 - e084437
Published: March 1, 2024
Objective
Testing
for
COVID-19
was
a
key
component
of
the
UK’s
response
to
pandemic.
This
strategy
relied
on
positive
individuals
self-isolating
reduce
transmission,
making
isolation
lynchpin
in
public
health
approach.
Therefore,
we
scoped
evidence
systematically
identify
and
categorise
barriers
facilitators
compliance
with
self-isolation
guidance
during
pandemic
UK,
inform
strategies
future
pandemics.
Design
A
rapid
scoping
review
conducted.
Search
Key
terms
were
used
search
literature
databases
(PubMed,
Scopus
WHO
Research
Database,
7
November
2022),
Google
Scholar
stakeholder-identified
manuscripts,
ultimately
including
published
English
from
UK-based
studies
conducted
between
2020
2022.
Data
extraction
synthesis
extracted
synthesised
into
themes,
organised
broadly
capability,
opportunity
motivation,
reviewed
stakeholders
UK
Health
Security
Agency
(UKHSA).
Results
We
included
105
sources,
63
identified
UKHSA
their
decision-making
Influences
decision
comply
categorised
six
themes:
perceived
ability
isolate;
information
guidance;
logistics;
social
influences,
trust;
value;
consequences.
Individuals
continuously
assessed
these
factors
deciding
whether
or
not
self-isolate.
Conclusions
Decisions
self-isolate
after
test
influenced
by
multiple
factors,
individuals’
beliefs,
concerns,
priorities
personal
circumstances.
Future
testing
must
facilitate
meaningful
financial,
practical
mental
support
allow
overcome
actual
negative
consequences
isolating.
Clear,
consistent
communication
purpose
procedures
isolating
will
also
be
critical
guidance,
should
leverage
people’s
value
protecting
others.
Building
trust
is
essential,
but
requires
investment
before
next
starts.
British Journal of Health Psychology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 2, 2024
Abstract
Objectives
Physical
distancing
and
handwashing
can
be
important
infection
prevention
measures
during
an
infectious
disease
outbreak
such
as
the
COVID‐19
pandemic.
To
stimulate
these
behaviours,
knowledge
of
psychosocial
determinants
well
contextual
factors
is
vital.
We
present
longitudinal,
within‐person
analyses
impact
on
behaviour.
Design
used
individual‐level
data
(186,490
participants
completing
971,899
surveys)
from
Corona
Behavioural
Unit
Cohort,
a
dynamic
cohort
study
conducted
26
months
pandemic
in
Netherlands.
Methods
Fixed‐effects
models
were
employed
to
estimate
associations
between
behaviour,
combined
with
main
moderating
effects
factors.
Results
Pandemic
severity
was
associated
more
while
duration
had
little
effect.
Within‐person
changes
response
efficacy
most
relevant
for
both
self‐efficacy,
descriptive
norms
perceived
infecting
others
affected
behaviour
indirectly.
These
stable
over
time.
Associations
larger
cross‐sectional
models,
indicating
that
tend
overestimate
effects.
Conclusions
Our
highlights
importance
longitudinal
detect
possible
causal
associations.
The
results
suggest
outbreak,
government
public
health
professionals
should
clearly
communicate
(e.g.,
hospitalization
rates)
effectiveness
recommended
reducing
risk;
seek
improve
people's
capabilities
opportunities
adhere
guidelines,
example,
by
modifying
environment.
Annals of Behavioral Medicine,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
58(2), P. 79 - 91
Published: Sept. 14, 2023
Abstract
Background
Physical
distancing
is
an
effective
preventative
measure
during
respiratory
infectious
disease
outbreaks.
Prior
studies
on
behaviors
have
largely
ignored
context
characteristics
(physical,
social)
and
time.
Purpose
We
investigated
patterns
in
physical
over
time
across
situations,
as
well
sociodemographic
variation
herein.
Methods
employed
data
from
five
rounds
of
a
cohort
study
conducted
throughout
the
pandemic
by
Dutch
public
health
institute
(RIVM;
N
≈
50.000
per
round).
Latent
Class
Analyses
to
investigate
range
followed
regression
models
associations
between
behavior
characteristics.
Results
Participants
differed
their
general
tendency
adhere
guidelines
but
there
were
also
substantial
differences
particularly
at
work,
with
friends
family
outdoors.
Distancing
work
was
strongly
associated
environment
Younger
age
groups
reported
less
behavior,
close
relations
(friends
or
family)
work.
In
periods
when
situation
most
severe,
people
adhered
more
pronounced
these
periods.
Conclusions
social
matters
for
distancing,
highlighting
importance
developing
strategies
preparedness
that
improve
opportunities
(e.g.,
reducing
crowding,
one-way
traffic)
accommodate
young
safely
meet
even
times
high
severity
lockdowns.
Future
should
account
which
observed.