Deleted Journal,
Journal Year:
2014,
Volume and Issue:
1(2), P. 139 - 144
Published: Sept. 15, 2014
The
integration
of
artificial
intelligence
into
scientific
research
has
significantly
changed
methodologies,
including
data
analysis,
literature
review
and
academic
writing.
This
paper
aims
to
explore
the
diverse
applications
tools
in
its
relationship
with
ethics.
shows
that
accelerate
processes,
especially
data-intensive
fields,
by
improving
efficiency
accuracy
analysis
review.
It
also
highlights
growing
role
writing,
where
such
as
ChatGPT
streamline
text
generation
editing.
However,
rapid
adoption
sparked
ethical
debates,
particularly
around
integrity,
originality
reliability
generated
sources.
assesses
these
emerging
challenges
need
for
clear
guidelines.
Ultimately,
it
concludes
are
a
powerful
tool
can
greatly
benefit
if
used
responsibly,
but
unethical
practices
manipulation
plagiarism
must
be
avoided.
Human
oversight
remains
essential
ensure
use
processes.
Postdigital Science and Education,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 3, 2024
Abstract
The
disruptive
potential
of
generative
AI
(GenAI)
tools
to
academic
labour
is
potentially
vast.
Yet
as
we
argue
herein,
such
also
represent
a
continuation
the
inequities
inherent
academia’s
prestige
economy
and
intensified
hierarchy
precarisation
endemic
universities
institutions.
In
recent
survey
n
=
284
UK-based
academics,
reasons
were
put
forward
for
avoiding
GenAI
tools.
These
responses
surface
concerns
about
automative
technologies
corrupting
identity
inauthenticating
scholarly
practice;
that
are
salient
all
who
participate
within
benefit
from
work
communities.
discussion
these
results,
explore
ambivalence
whether
expedite
acquisition
or
depletion
demanded
especially
where
adopted
increase
productivity.
We
appraise
whether,
far
helping
academics
cope
with
climate
hyper-intensifcation,
ultimately
exacerbate
their
vulnerability,
status-based
peripheralisation,
self-estrangement.
Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
35(1), P. 1 - 24
Published: Jan. 24, 2025
Artificial
intelligence
is
not
a
new
concept.
However,
it
has
reached
an
important
point
with
technological
development.
Today,
there
are
many
software
developed
using
artificial
and
various
application
areas
where
they
used.
Generative
intelligence,
one
of
these
areas,
technology
in
machine
learning
aiming
to
generate
content
by
training
on
large
data
sets.
used
fields
such
as
health,
business,
finance,
e-commerce,
academic
studies,
R&D.
This
study
evaluates
the
use
generative
applications
field.
In
this
context,
differences
similarities
between
texts
generated
ChatGPT,
Claude
Sonet,
Google
Gemini
prepared
human
were
analyzed
regarding
subject
integrity,
language,
ethics,
plagiarism
rate.
Descriptive
analysis,
qualitative
methods,
was
study.
As
result,
concluded
that
similar
integrity
content,
rates
vary
according
language.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 16, 2024
Abstract
It
is
estimated
that
ChatGPT
already
widely
used
in
academic
paper
writing.
This
study
aims
to
investigate
whether
the
usage
of
specific
terminologies
has
increased,
focusing
on
words
and
phrases
frequently
reported
as
overused
by
ChatGPT.
The
list
118
potentially
AI-influenced
terms
was
curated
based
posts
comments
from
anonymous
users,
75
common
were
controls.
PubMed
records
2000
2024
(until
April)
analyzed
track
frequency
these
terms.
Usage
trends
normalized
using
a
modified
Z-score
transformation.
A
linear
mixed-effects
model
compare
over
time.
total
26,403,493
investigated.
Among
terms,
displayed
meaningful
increase
(modified
≥
3.5)
2024.
showed
significant
effect
compared
(p
<
0.001).
noticeable
starting
2020.
revealed
certain
phrases,
such
“delve,”
“underscore,”
“meticulous,”
“commendable,”
have
been
more
medical
biological
fields
since
introduction
rate
words/phrases
increasing
for
several
years
before
release
ChatGPT,
suggesting
might
accelerated
popularity
scientific
expressions
gaining
traction.
identified
this
can
provide
valuable
insights
both
LLM
educators,
supervisors
fields.
Author
Summary
Artificial
intelligence
systems
rapidly
integrated
into
writing,
particularly
investigates
changes
By
analyzing
2024,
we
tracked
them
with
phrases.
study’s
findings
reveal
‘delve,’
‘underscore,’
‘meticulous,’
‘commendable’
saw
marked
However,
trend
actually
began
around
suggests
while
some
large
language
may
their
adoption
literature.
Furthermore,
analysis
highlights
impact
extends
beyond
new
altering
style
commonly
Understanding
help
researchers
educators
see
how
AI
tools
are
shaping
Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 335 - 366
Published: Sept. 20, 2024
Academic
writing
in
the
current
times
is
significantly
different
from
what
it
was
a
decade
ago.
Most
prevalent
today's
digital
world
disruption
caused
by
Artificial
Intelligence
(AI)
tools
employed
to
assist
academic
works.
In
this
chapter,
we
overview
ongoing
trend
of
ethical
challenge
and
implications
using
AI-text
detection
systems
for
fostering
research
integrity.
Using
literature
on
topic,
chapter
has
presented
real-world
cases
where
individuals
have
complained
that
platforms
like
provided
Turnitin
flagged
(as
AI-generated)
content
edited
language
AI
assistive
Grammarly
translators.
Furthermore,
reviewing
up-to-date
empirical
studies,
an
false-positive
scenario
these
their
biases
towards
non-native
English
writers.
Finally,
provides,
besides
future
outlook
practical
implications,
including
consideration
fair
transparent
AI-based
tool
usage
policies.
International Journal of Research Publications,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
148(1)
Published: April 16, 2024
This
paper
delves
into
the
burgeoning
field
of
AI
in
academic
writing,
exploring
complex
interplay
between
technology
and
scholarly
communication.
By
examining
advantages,
limitations,
ethical
considerations
employing
tools
this
study
sheds
light
on
potential
impact
writing
processes
work
quality.
The
findings
offer
a
nuanced
understanding
benefits
using
such
as
enhanced
efficiency,
accuracy,
accessibility,
alongside
challenges
posed
by
lack
subjectivity,
bias
algorithms,
overreliance
technology.
Ethical
surrounding
use
including
plagiarism
detection,
data
privacy,
fairness,
are
also
discussed.
contributes
to
existing
literature
providing
comprehensive
analysis
implications
practices,
highlighting
need
for
collaboration,
education,
responsible
promoting
integrity
innovation.
Future
research
avenues
suggested
further
explore
critical
thinking,
develop
guidelines
academia,
examine
effectiveness
diverse
genres.
underscores
importance
navigating
complexities
harness
its
while
upholding
standards
fostering
culture
technological
Micromachines,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15(11), P. 1368 - 1368
Published: Nov. 12, 2024
As
a
kind
of
long-term
favorable
device,
the
microelectromechanical
system
(MEMS)
sensor
has
become
powerful
dominator
in
detection
applications
commercial
and
industrial
areas.
There
have
been
series
mature
solutions
to
address
possible
issues
device
design,
optimization,
fabrication,
output
processing.
The
recent
involvement
neural
networks
(NNs)
provided
new
paradigm
for
development
MEMS
sensors
greatly
accelerated
research
cycle
high-performance
devices.
In
this
paper,
we
present
an
overview
progress,
applications,
prospects
NN
methods
sensors.
superiority
leveraging
structural
compensation/calibration
is
reviewed
discussed
illustrate
how
NNs
reformed
Relevant
usage
NNs,
such
as
available
models,
dataset
construction,
parameter
are
presented.
Many
application
scenarios
demonstrated
that
can
enhance
speed
predicting
performance,
rapidly
generate
device-on-demand
solutions,
establish
more
accurate
calibration
compensation
models.
Along
with
improvement
efficiency,
there
also
several
critical
challenges
need
further
exploration
area.
The
rapid
adoption
of
generative
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
in
scientific
research,
particularly
large
language
models
(LLMs),
has
outpaced
the
development
ethical
guidelines,
leading
to
a
“Triple-Too”
problem:
too
many
high-level
initiatives,
abstract
principles
lacking
contextual
and
practical
relevance,
much
focus
on
restrictions
risks
over
benefits
utilities.
Existing
approaches—principlism
(reliance
principles),
formalism
(rigid
application
rules),
technological
solutionism
(overemphasis
fixes)—offer
little
guidance
for
addressing
challenges
AI
research
practices.
To
bridge
gap
between
day-to-day
practices,
user-centered,
realism-inspired
approach
is
proposed
here.
It
outlines
five
specific
goals
use:
1)
understanding
model
training
output,
including
bias
mitigation
strategies;
2)
respecting
privacy,
confidentiality,
copyright;
3)
avoiding
plagiarism
policy
violations;
4)
applying
beneficially
compared
alternatives;
5)
using
transparently
reproducibly.
Each
goal
accompanied
by
actionable
strategies
realistic
cases
misuse
corrective
measures.
I
argue
that
requires
evaluating
its
utility
against
existing
alternatives
rather
than
isolated
performance
metrics.
Additionally,
propose
documentation
guidelines
enhance
transparency
reproducibility
AI-assisted
research.
Moving
forward,
we
need
targeted
professional
development,
programs,
balanced
enforcement
mechanisms
promote
responsible
use
while
fostering
innovation.
By
refining
these
adapting
them
emerging
capabilities,
can
accelerate
progress
without
compromising
integrity.