Environmental Science & Policy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
155, P. 103722 - 103722
Published: March 15, 2024
Transdisciplinary
research
(TDR)
is
one
method
where
scientific
and
societal
actors,
each
with
various
backgrounds,
collaborate
to
address
complex
problems
through
knowledge
co-creation.
Despite
its
widespread
use,
TDR
still
lacks
a
common
definition
methodology
which
makes
it
challenging
define
clear
mechanisms
for
co-creation
that
facilitate
impact.
Many
authors
across
complementary
bodies
of
literature
provide
lists
principles,
best
practices
approaches
TDR,
but
in
practice
these
are
rarely
applied
consistently.
In
this
conceptual
paper,
we
fill
gap
increase
methodological
coherence
sustainability
by
consolidating
into
list
suggested
activities
scientists
practitioners
contexts
apply
enhance
the
impact
their
work.
We
consolidate
primary
secondary
from
fields
sustainability,
impact,
stakeholder
engagement,
project
management,
boundary
work
systems
our
own
practical
experience
projects.
This
synthesis
leads
analytical
framework
twelve
credible,
salient
legitimate
(CSL)
knowledge.
Our
assumption
if
successfully
implemented
phases
CSL
knowledge,
then
there
will
be
cascading
effects
support
higher
likelihood
use
outcomes
lead
impactful
transformations.
Agricultural Systems,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
184, P. 102901 - 102901
Published: Aug. 5, 2020
Agricultural
innovation
systems
has
become
a
popular
approach
to
understand
and
facilitate
agricultural
innovation.
However,
there
is
often
no
explicit
reflection
on
the
role
of
in
food
transformation
how
they
relate
transformative
concepts
visions
(e.g.
agroecology,
digital
agriculture,
Agriculture
4.0,
AgTech
FoodTech,
vertical
protein
transitions).
To
support
such
we
elaborate
importance
mission-oriented
perspective
systems.
We
review
pertinent
literature
from
innovation,
transition
policy
sciences,
argue
that
(MAIS)
can
help
at
different
geographical
scales
develop
enable
transformation,
terms
forces,
catalysts,
barriers
change.
Focus
points
be
mapping
missions
sub-missions
MAIS
within
across
countries,
or
understanding
drivers,
networks,
governance,
theories
change,
evolution
impacts
MAIS.
Future
work
needed
further
conceptual
empirical
development
its
connections
with
existing
frameworks.
Also,
scholars
practitioners
need
reflect
technologies
MAIS,
these
represent
particular
directionality
whether
also
may
exnovation.
Science and Public Policy,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 16, 2020
Abstract
We
aim
for
a
better
conceptualization
of
mission-oriented
innovation
policy
(MIP).
Our
starting
point
is
an
analytical
decomposition
societal
problems
and
innovative
solutions
based
on
three
dimensions
wickedness:
(1)
contestation;
(2)
complexity;
(3)
uncertainty.
argue
that
both
can
be
divergent
(contested,
complex,
uncertain)
or
convergent
(uncontested,
well-defined,
informed).
Based
the
resulting
problem–solution
typology,
we
suggest
process-oriented
view
MIP
discuss
alternative
pathways
along
which
convergence
between
achieved
to
come
from
wicked
legitimate
solutions.
illustrate
these
using
examples
different
related
health
(smoking
bans),
security
(CCTV),
energy
(wind
turbines).
For
makers,
locating
challenge
in
this
space,
implementing
strategies
achieve
problem
solution
convergence,
expected
accelerate
legitimacy
mission
Policy and Society,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
38(2), P. 167 - 179
Published: April 3, 2019
Abstract
The
concept
of
wicked
problems
has
served
as
an
inspiration
for
research
in
a
variety
fields
but
also
contributed
to
conceptual
confusion
through
the
various
ways
which
it
been
defined
and
used.
In
this
special
issue,
number
ontological,
theoretical
methodological
issues
are
discussed.
First,
while
its
use
buzzword
undermined
precise
definition,
recent
work
goes
beyond
versus
tame
dichotomy
conceptualizes
wickedness
matter
degree,
differentiates
between
dimensions
emphasizes
relational
character
problem
definitions.
Second,
new
existing
governance
approaches
have
often
unproblematically
proposed
solve
problems,
only
imperfect
solutions,
partial
solutions
or
small
wins
achievable
practice.
Third,
had
little
direct
impact
on
policy
theories,
some
argue
that
analysis
should
be
mainstreamed
public
thinking,
others
propose
reject
rely
theories.
Fourth,
used
practice,
tend
provoke
either
paralysis
overestimation
what
can
do
about
problems.
Possible
forward
include
(1)
leaving
behind;
(2)
using
literature
knowledge
base
understand
when
why
fail;
(3)
developing
(i.e.
conflict,
complexity
uncertainty)
into
more
analytically
tools
linking
them
with
closely
contemporary
science
developments.
Global Environmental Change,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
72, P. 102422 - 102422
Published: Dec. 14, 2021
Co-production,
the
collaborative
weaving
of
research
and
practice
by
diverse
societal
actors,
is
argued
to
play
an
important
role
in
sustainability
transformations.
Yet,
there
still
poor
understanding
how
navigate
tensions
that
emerge
these
processes.
Through
analyzing
32
initiatives
worldwide
co-produced
knowledge
action
foster
sustainable
social-ecological
relations,
we
conceptualize
‘co-productive
agility’
as
emergent
feature
vital
for
turning
into
Co-productive
agility
refers
willingness
ability
actors
iteratively
engage
reflexive
dialogues
grow
shared
ideas
actions
would
not
have
been
possible
from
outset.
It
relies
on
embedding
production
within
processes
change
constantly
recognize,
reposition,
opportunities.
opens
up
multiple
pathways
transformation
through:
(1)
elevating
marginalized
agendas
ways
maintain
their
integrity
broaden
struggles
justice;
(2)
questioning
dominant
engaging
with
power
challenge
assumptions,
(3)
navigating
conflicting
actively
transform
interlinked
paradigms,
practices,
structures;
(4)
exploring
learning
mutual
respect
a
plurality
perspectives.
We
explore
six
process
considerations
vary
four
provide
framework
enable
argue
spend
too
much
time
closing
down
debate
over
different
–
thereby
avoiding,
suppressing,
or
polarizing
tensions,
call
more
efforts
facilitate
better
interactions
among
agendas.
Global Transitions,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
2, P. 51 - 59
Published: Jan. 1, 2020
While
national
governments
are
the
main
actors
in
innovation
policy,
we
witness
a
proliferation
of
challenge-oriented
policies
both
at
subnational
and
supranational
level.
This
begs
question
about
subsidiarity:
what
for
societal
challenges
should
be
organized
subnational,
levels?
We
provide
arguments
that
aimed
to
solve
challenges,
such
as
climate
change
or
aging,
best
pursued
levels
given
contested
nature
problem
identification
contextual
problem-solving.
Regional
then,
formulate
concrete
goals
tailored
local
context,
while
transnational
context
promotes
inter-regional
learning
provides
complementary
realms
basic
research,
regulation
taxation.
In
addition,
level
can
set
overall
made
more
operational