The language network is not engaged in object categorization DOI Creative Commons
Yael Benn, Anna A. Ivanova, Oliver James Clark

et al.

Cerebral Cortex, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 33(19), P. 10380 - 10400

Published: Aug. 9, 2023

The relationship between language and thought is the subject of long-standing debate. One claim states that facilitates categorization objects based on a certain feature (e.g. color) through use category labels reduce interference from other, irrelevant features. Therefore, impairment expected to affect items grouped by single (low-dimensional categories, e.g. "Yellow Things") more than share many features (high-dimensional "Animals"). To test this account, we conducted two behavioral studies with individuals aphasia an fMRI experiment healthy adults. showed selective low-dimensional was present in some, but not all, severe anomia characteristic general. results revealed little activity language-responsive brain regions during both low- high-dimensional categorization; instead, recruited domain-general multiple-demand network (involved wide-ranging cognitive tasks). Combined, demonstrate system implicated object categorization. Instead, might be caused damage responsible for control. Our work adds growing evidence dissociation tasks

Language: Английский

Dissociating language and thought in large language models DOI
Kyle Mahowald, Anna A. Ivanova, Idan Blank

et al.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 28(6), P. 517 - 540

Published: March 19, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

121

The language network as a natural kind within the broader landscape of the human brain DOI
Evelina Fedorenko, Anna A. Ivanova, Tamar I. Regev

et al.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 25(5), P. 289 - 312

Published: April 12, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

73

Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought DOI
Evelina Fedorenko, Steven T. Piantadosi,

Edward Gibson

et al.

Nature, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 630(8017), P. 575 - 586

Published: June 19, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

37

Driving and suppressing the human language network using large language models DOI
Greta Tuckute, Aalok Sathe, Shashank Srikant

et al.

Nature Human Behaviour, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 8(3), P. 544 - 561

Published: Jan. 3, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

34

Diverging neural dynamics for syntactic structure building in naturalistic speaking and listening DOI Creative Commons
Laura Giglio, Markus Ostarek, Daniel Sharoh

et al.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 121(11)

Published: March 5, 2024

The neural correlates of sentence production are typically studied using task paradigms that differ considerably from the experience speaking outside an experimental setting. In this fMRI study, we aimed to gain a better understanding syntactic processing in spontaneous versus naturalistic comprehension three regions interest (BA44, BA45, and left posterior middle temporal gyrus). A group participants (n = 16) was asked speak about events episode TV series scanner. Another 36) listened spoken recall participant first group. To model processing, extracted word-by-word metrics phrase-structure building with top–down bottom–up parser make different hypotheses timing structure building. While anticipates structure, sometimes before it is obvious listener, builds integratory way after all evidence has been presented. comprehension, activity found be modeled by parser, while production, parser. We additionally two strategies were developed here predictions incrementality during speaking. for highly incremental anticipatory which confirmed converging analysis pausing patterns speech. Overall, study shows feasibility studying dynamics language production.

Language: Английский

Citations

19

Prediction during language comprehension: what is next? DOI Creative Commons
Rachel Ryskin, Mante S. Nieuwland

Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 27(11), P. 1032 - 1052

Published: Sept. 11, 2023

Prediction is often regarded as an integral aspect of incremental language comprehension, but little known about the cognitive architectures and mechanisms that support it. We review studies showing listeners readers use all manner contextual information to generate multifaceted predictions upcoming input. The nature these may vary between individuals owing differences in experience, among other factors. then turn unresolved questions which guide search for underlying mechanisms. (i) Is prediction essential processing or optional strategy? (ii) Are generated from within system by domain-general processes? (iii) What relationship memory? (iv) Does comprehension require simulation via production system? discuss promising directions making progress answering developing a mechanistic understanding language.

Language: Английский

Citations

41

Distributed Sensitivity to Syntax and Semantics throughout the Language Network DOI Creative Commons
Cory Shain, Hope Kean, Colton Casto

et al.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 36(7), P. 1427 - 1471

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Abstract Human language is expressive because it compositional: The meaning of a sentence (semantics) can be inferred from its structure (syntax). It commonly believed that syntax and semantics are processed by distinct brain regions. Here, we revisit this claim using precision fMRI methods to capture separation or overlap function in the brains individual participants. Contrary prior claims, find distributed sensitivity both throughout broad frontotemporal network. Our results join growing body evidence for an integrated network human within which internal specialization primarily matter degree rather than kind, contrast with influential proposals advocate different areas types linguistic functions.

Language: Английский

Citations

14

Language in Brains, Minds, and Machines DOI
Greta Tuckute, Nancy Kanwisher, Evelina Fedorenko

et al.

Annual Review of Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 47(1), P. 277 - 301

Published: April 26, 2024

It has long been argued that only humans could produce and understand language. But now, for the first time, artificial language models (LMs) achieve this feat. Here we survey new purchase LMs are providing on question of how is implemented in brain. We discuss why, a priori, might be expected to share similarities with human system. then summarize evidence represent linguistic information similarly enough enable relatively accurate brain encoding decoding during processing. Finally, examine which LM properties—their architecture, task performance, or training—are critical capturing neural responses review studies using as silico model organisms testing hypotheses about These ongoing investigations bring us closer understanding representations processes underlie our ability comprehend sentences express thoughts

Language: Английский

Citations

13

Functional characterization of the language network of polyglots and hyperpolyglots with precision fMRI DOI Open Access
Saima Malik-Moraleda, Olessia Jouravlev, Maya Taliaferro

et al.

Cerebral Cortex, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 34(3)

Published: March 1, 2024

Abstract How do polyglots—individuals who speak five or more languages—process their languages, and what can this population tell us about the language system? Using fMRI, we identified network in each of 34 polyglots (including 16 hyperpolyglots with knowledge 10+ languages) examined its response to native language, non-native languages varying proficiency, unfamiliar languages. All conditions engaged all areas relative a control condition. Languages that participants rated as higher proficiency elicited stronger responses, except for which similar lower than proficiency. Furthermore, were typologically related participants’ high-to-moderate-proficiency unrelated The results suggest network’s magnitude scales degree engagement linguistic computations (e.g. lexical access syntactic-structure building). We also replicated prior finding weaker responses non-polyglot bilinguals. These contribute our understanding how multiple coexist within single brain provide new evidence responds strongly stimuli fully engage computations.

Language: Английский

Citations

10

Neural populations in the language network differ in the size of their temporal receptive windows DOI
Tamar I. Regev, Colton Casto, Eghbal A. Hosseini

et al.

Nature Human Behaviour, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 8(10), P. 1924 - 1942

Published: Aug. 26, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

9