bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Nov. 4, 2022
The
authors
have
withdrawn
this
manuscript
owing
to
duplicate
posting.
Therefore,
the
do
not
wish
work
be
cited
as
reference
for
project.
If
you
any
questions,
please
contact
corresponding
author.
correct
can
found
at
https://doi.org/10.1101/754515
.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
377(1851)
Published: April 4, 2022
Although
uniquely
destructive
and
wasteful,
intergroup
conflict
warfare
are
not
confined
to
humans.
They
seen
across
a
range
of
group-living
species,
from
social
insects,
fishes
birds
mammals,
including
nonhuman
primates.
With
its
unique
collection
theory,
research
review
contributions
biology,
anthropology
economics,
this
theme
issue
provides
novel
insights
into
taxa.
Here,
we
introduce
organize
on
the
origins
consequences
conflict.
We
provide
coherent
framework
by
modelling
conflicts
as
multi-level
games
strategy
in
which
individuals
within
groups
cooperate
compete
with
(individuals
in)
other
for
scarce
resources,
such
territory,
food,
mating
opportunities,
power
influence.
Within
framework,
identify
cross-species
mechanisms
(participating
conclude
highlighting
crosscutting
innovations
study
set
forth
individual
contributions.
These
include,
among
others,
how
within-group
heterogeneities
leadership
relate
group
conflict,
shapes
organization
climate
change
environmental
degradation
transition
relations
peaceful
coexistence
violent
This
article
is
part
‘Intergroup
taxa’.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
377(1851)
Published: April 4, 2022
Peaceful
coexistence
and
trade
among
human
groups
can
be
fragile
intergroup
relations
frequently
transition
to
violent
exchange
conflict.
Here
we
specify
how
exogenous
changes
in
groups'
environment
ensuing
carrying-capacity
stress
increase
individual
participation
conflict,
out-group
aggression
particular.
In
two
contest
experiments,
individuals
could
contribute
private
resources
(versus
in-group
defense).
Environmental
unpredictability,
induced
by
making
non-invested
subject
risk
of
destruction
not),
created
psychological
increased
coordination
attacks.
Archival
analyses
interstate
conflicts
showed,
likewise,
that
sovereign
states
engage
revisionist
warfare
more
when
their
pre-conflict
economic
climatic
were
volatile
unpredictable.
Given
conflict
is
wasteful,
environmental
unpredictability
not
only
made
often
victorious
but
also
less
wealthy.
Macro-level
the
natural
a
root
cause
turn
benign
violent.
This
article
part
theme
issue
‘Intergroup
across
taxa’.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
377(1851)
Published: April 4, 2022
Group
territory
defence
poses
a
collective
action
problem:
individuals
can
free-ride,
benefiting
without
paying
the
costs.
Individual
heterogeneity
has
been
proposed
to
solve
such
problems,
as
high
in
reproductive
success,
rank,
fighting
ability
or
motivation
may
benefit
from
defending
territories
even
if
others
free-ride.
To
test
this
hypothesis,
we
analysed
30
years
of
data
chimpanzees
(
Pan
troglodytes
)
Kasekela
community,
Gombe
National
Park,
Tanzania
(1978–2007).
We
examined
extent
which
individual
participation
patrols
varied
according
correlates
success
(mating
rate,
age),
(hunting),
(scores
personality
ratings),
costs
defecting
(the
number
adult
males
community)
and
gregariousness
(sighting
frequency).
By
contrast
expectations
theory,
participated
at
consistently
rates
(mean
±
s.d.
=
74.5
11.1%
patrols,
n
23
males).
The
best
predictors
patrol
were
sighting
frequency,
age
hunting
participation.
Current
former
alpha
did
not
participate
higher
rate
than
that
never
achieved
status.
These
findings
suggest
temptation
free-ride
is
low,
mutualistic
mechanism
group
augmentation
better
explain
territorial
behaviour.
This
article
part
theme
issue
‘Intergroup
conflict
across
taxa’.
Ecology Letters,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
28(4)
Published: April 1, 2025
Past
work
has
shown
that
group
formation
in
foraging
animals
aids
resource
acquisition
and
reduces
the
number
of
interactions
with
predators.
However,
can
also
increase
competition
for
resources
among
members.
Here,
we
model
how
individual
costs
benefits
drive
size.
Our
predicts
when
occurs
within
between
groups,
forager
size
will
exhibit
a
one-third
power-law
relationship
population
abundance.
if
groups
form
due
to
intragroup
predation,
predict
either
one-half
abundance
or
constant
depending
on
coupling
predator
prey.
Using
empirical
data
birds
ungulates,
found
scaling
consistent
power-law,
suggesting
hierarchical
drives
average
results
support
highlighting
importance
density-dependent
maintaining
stability.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
377(1851)
Published: April 4, 2022
Neighbouring
groups
compete
over
access
to
resources
and
territories
in
between-group
encounters,
which
can
escalate
into
conflicts
(BGCs).
Both
the
ecological
characteristics
of
a
territory
rival's
fighting
ability
shape
occurrence
outcome
such
contests.
What
remains
poorly
understood,
however,
is
how
seasonal
variability
value
together
with
related
likelihood
encounters
extent
these
conflicts.
To
test
this,
we
observed
followed
four
vervet
monkey
wild,
recorded
group
structure
(i.e.
size,
composition),
locations
outcomes
515
BGCs.
We
then
assessed
key
measures
at
locations,
as
vegetation
availability
(estimated
from
Copernicus
Sentinel
2
satellite
images)
intensity
usage
locations.
tested
what
factors
influenced
found
that
BGCs
increased
higher
relative
annual
within
group's
home
territory.
Also,
engaging
BGC
far
away
their
were
less
likely
win
BGC.
Regarding
structure,
smaller
systematically
won
against
larger
groups,
be
explained
by
potentially
rates
individual
free-riding
occurring
groups.
This
study
sheds
light
on
ecology
encounter
combination
social
critically
impact
dynamics
non-human
primate
species.
article
part
theme
issue
'Intergroup
conflict
across
taxa'.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
377(1851)
Published: April 4, 2022
In
many
group-living
mammals,
philopatric
females
form
the
stable
core
of
group
and
defend
food
or
shelter
against
other
groups
females.
Where
males
are
larger,
their
participation
could
give
female
edge.
How
can
secure
contribution
that
neither
father
current
infants,
nor
dominant
male
expecting
to
sire
next
generation
infants?
It
has
been
proposed
recruit
these
as
‘hired
guns’,
receiving
social
support
copulations
in
exchange
for
fighting,
interests
male.
We
first
develop
logic
this
hypothesis
unprecedented
detail
by
considering
potential
pay-off
consequences
males.
then
provide
empirical
evidence
existence
hired
guns
context
several
primate
species.
The
game-theoretical
aspects
phenomenon
remain
be
studied,
is
distribution
across
contexts
(e.g.
predation
avoidance)
species
gun
phenomenon.
This
article
part
theme
issue
‘Intergroup
conflict
taxa’.
International Journal of Primatology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
44(4), P. 696 - 721
Published: Aug. 1, 2023
Abstract
Conspecific
animal
groups
often
compete
for
access
to
fitness-enhancing
resources.
The
more
valuable
the
resource
at
stake
is,
greater
costs
can
afford
outcompete
their
neighbours,
leading
between-group
conflicts.
We
investigated
what
factors
affected
intergroup
encounter
outcome
(win,
loss,
or
draw)
and
intensity
(level
of
aggression
duration)
in
wild,
crested
macaques
(
Macaca
nigra
).
collected
data
on
158
dyadic
encounters
among
three
Tangoko
Nature
Reserve
(Indonesia)
between
November
2015
July
2016.
Intergroup
were
likely
have
a
clear
winner
larger
group
size
difference
was
opposing
when
both
rarely
used
location.
Groups
tended
win
specific
parts
home
range,
regardless
numerical
advantage,
frequency
use
location
its
distance
closest
core
area.
Most
involved
aggression,
but
contact
rare.
None
our
candidate
predictors
helped
explain
differences
escalation.
Male
common
than
female
aggression.
probability
male
participation
increased
with
other
sex.
Males
chased
attacked
females
(i.e.,
herded
them)
most
encounters.
Our
study
suggests
that
intragroup
sexual
conflict
occurs
during
macaques.
More
detailed
longer
studies
may
help
understand
behind
macaque
intensity.
Royal Society Open Science,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
10(12)
Published: Dec. 1, 2023
According
to
the
ecological
model
of
female
social
relationships
(EMFSR),
within-group
competition
and
between-group
in
female-bonded
species
are
shaped
by
food
distribution.
Strong
contests
expected
over
large,
monopolizable
resources
high
population
density,
but
not
when
low-quality
is
distributed
across
undefended
home
ranges.
Within-group
be
more
frequent
with
increasing
heterogeneity
among
feeding
sites
group
size.
We
tested
these
predictions
Asian
elephants,
which
show
traits
associated
infrequent
contests-graminivory,
fission-fusion
overlapping
examined
how
distribution
competitor
density
affected
agonistic
interactions
within
between
elephant
clans
(social
groupings)
Kabini
grassland,
southern
India.
found
stronger
between-clan
contest
grassland
than
that
known
from
neighbouring
forests,
agonism
females
clans.
Such
strong
was
attributable
being
a
food-rich
habitat
patch,
thus
supporting
EMFSR.
Within-clan
also
frequent,
did
increase
heterogeneity,
contradicting
Contrary
recent
claims,
within-clan
size
suggested
constraints
on
large
groups
despite
fission-fusion.
High
may
explain
such
graminivory
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Sept. 1, 2019
Abstract
Socioecological
theory
attributes
variation
in
social
organization
of
female-bonded
species
to
differences
within-
and
between-group
competition,
shaped
by
food
distribution.
Strong
contests
are
expected
over
large,
monopolisable
resources,
not
generally
that
feed
on
low
quality
resources
distributed
across
undefended
home
ranges.
Within
groups,
frequent
discrete
feeding
sites
but
low-quality,
dispersed
resources.
We
report
the
first
tests
socioecological
theory,
largely
unexplored
non-primate
species,
female
Asian
elephants.
elephants
show
graminivory,
overlapping
ranges,
high
fission-fusion
dynamics,
traits
thought
be
associated
with
infrequent
contests.
studied
agonistic
interactions
within
between
elephant
clans
respect
distribution,
abundance,
competitor
density
effects
group
size
clan
density,
a
grassland
habitat
around
Kabini
backwaters,
southern
India.
found
had
three
times
grass
biomass
as
adjacent
forests,
between-clan
encounters
were
considerably
higher
than
known
from
neighbouring
forest.
Individual-level
agonism
was
also
more
clans.
Thus,
food-rich
patch
probably
enabled
strong
contest
competition
under
graminivory.
Moreover,
rate
increased
when
present,
duration
positively
related
at
contested
sites.
Despite
within-clan
somewhat
frequent,
influenced
contradiction
classic
predictions,
possibly
because
intensified
due
density.
Interestingly,
until
intermediate
sizes,
suggesting
tension
within-group
might
govern
size,
since
larger
groups
advantageous
this
regime.
Our
findings
refine
current
understanding
socioecology.
predominant
graminivory
can
especially
large
face
ecological
constraints
Further,
may
arise
despite
non-territoriality
becomes
patchy
is
high.
These
changes
effected
anthropogenic
alteration
habitats.