‘It hurts your heart’: frontline healthcare worker experiences of moral injury during the COVID-19 pandemic
European journal of psychotraumatology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
13(2)
Published: Oct. 18, 2022
Background:
Moral
injury
is
defined
as
the
strong
emotional
and
cognitive
reactions
following
events
which
clash
with
someone's
moral
code,
values
or
expectations.
During
COVID-19
pandemic,
increased
exposure
to
Potentially
Morally
Injurious
Events
(PMIEs)
has
placed
healthcare
workers
(HCWs)
at
risk
of
injury.
Yet
little
known
about
lived
experience
cumulative
PMIE
how
NHS
staff
respond
this.Objective:
We
sought
rectify
this
knowledge
gap
by
qualitatively
exploring
experiences
perspectives
clinical
frontline
who
responded
COVID-19.Methods:
recruited
a
diverse
sample
30
HCWs
from
CHECK
study
cohort,
for
single
time
point
qualitative
interviews.
All
participants
endorsed
least
one
item
on
9-item
Injury
Scale
(MIES)
[Nash
et
al.,
2013.
Psychometric
evaluation
scale.
Military
Medicine,
178(6),
646–652]
six
month
follow
up.
Interviews
followed
semi-structured
guide
were
analysed
using
reflexive
thematic
analysis.Results:
described
being
routinely
exposed
ethical
conflicts,
created
exacerbations
pre-existing
systemic
issues
including
inadequate
staffing
resourcing.
found
that
experienced
range
mental
health
symptoms
primarily
related
perceptions
institutional
betrayal
well
feeling
unable
fulfil
their
duty
care
towards
patients.Conclusion:
These
results
suggest
multi-facetted
organisational
strategy
warranted
prepare
exposure,
promote
opportunities
resolution
associated
prevent
disengagement.HIGHLIGHTS
Clinical
have
been
an
accumulation
potentially
morally
injurious
throughout
betrayed
both
government
leaders
provide
patients.HCWs
significant
adverse
impact
health,
anxiety
depression
sleep
disturbance.Most
interviewed
believed
change
within
was
necessary
excess
distress.
Language: Английский
Severity and associated factors of moral injury in healthcare workers during the coronavirus pandemic: a comprehensive meta-analysis
Archives of Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
83(1)
Published: Feb. 14, 2025
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
placed
significant
emotional
and
ethical
burdens
on
healthcare
workers
(HCWs),
leading
to
the
emergence
of
moral
injury
(MI).
Understanding
pooled
mean
factors
associated
with
MI
is
crucial
for
developing
interventions
support
systems
HCWs.
This
meta-analysis
aims
examine
extent
among
HCWs
during
identify
potential
contributing
factors.
A
systematic
literature
search
was
conducted,
relevant
studies
reporting
in
were
included.
Pooled
means
calculated
using
random-effects
or
fixed
effect
models.
Subgroup
analyses
conducted
based
demographic
variables,
such
as
gender,
profession,
geographical
region.
Further,
Sensitivity
analysis
run
assess
individual
study
effect.
total
36
met
inclusion
criteria
included
meta-analysis.
ranged
from
3.06
(CI95%:
2.35–3.77)
119.17
103.04–135.30),
instrument
types.
Further
revealed
that
females
(P
=
0.21),
younger
0.13),
nurses
0.55),
those
countries
0.02)
experienced
higher
levels
MI.
highlights
substantial
by
(HCWs)
pandemic,
nurses,
HCWs,
being
particularly
affected.
Although
statistical
significance
not
observed
subgroup
differences,
trends
suggest
a
heightened
vulnerability
specific
groups.
These
findings
underscore
urgent
need
targeted
policies
high-risk
demographics,
emphasize
importance
standardized
assessment
tools
future
research.
Language: Английский
The Impact of Faith-Based Pastoral Care in Decreasingly Religious Contexts: The Australian Chaplaincy Advantage in Critical Environments
Journal of Religion and Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
62(3), P. 1491 - 1512
Published: March 28, 2023
This
article
considers
the
contribution
of
faith-based
chaplains
who
provide
holistic
pastoral
and
spiritual
care
within
critical
environments
such
as
military,
first
responders,
hospitals.
The
can
sometimes
be
taken
for
granted
or
not
properly
understood,
particularly
in
some
Western
countries
which
are
currently
experiencing
a
decline
religiosity.
Following
on
from
previous
paper
regarding
chaplaincy
utilization
(Layson
et
al.
2022),
this
presents
an
alternative
argument
to
secularist-humanist
perspective
by
noting
five
ways
faith
based
model
provides
best
practice
service
builds
capability
advantage
organizations
that
engage
services.
section
discusses
organizational
care;
second
role
chaplains-much
is
largely
unknown
poorly
appreciated;
third
unique
religious
those
none;
fourth
explores
how
leverage
positive
impact
additional
low-cost
resources
other
their
staff;
lastly,
operational
world
stage
considered,
light
culturally
linguistically
diverse
populations
whom
religiosity
increasingly
important.
Language: Английский
Restore and Rebuild (R&R) – a feasibility pilot study of a co-designed intervention for moral injury-related mental health difficulties
European journal of psychotraumatology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
14(2)
Published: Sept. 21, 2023
Moral
injury
can
significantly
negatively
impact
mental
health,
but
currently
no
validated
treatment
for
moral
injury-related
health
difficulties
exists
in
a
UK
context.
This
study
aimed
to
examine
whether
the
Restore
and
Rebuild
(R&R)
was
feasible
deliver,
acceptable
well
tolerated
by
military
veterans
with
related
difficulties.
The
R&R
delivered
20
patients
who
reported
distress
exposure
morally
injurious
event(s)
during
service.
is
20-session
psychotherapy
key
themes
of
processing
event,
self
compassion,
connecting
others
core
values.
Treatment
online,
weekly,
one-to-one
single
therapist.
Qualitative
interviews
therapist
were
conducted
explore
acceptability
analysed
using
thematic
analysis.
Following
treatment,
experienced
significant
reduction
symptoms
post-traumatic
stress
disorder,
depression,
alcohol
misuse
distress.
found
be
improved
their
perceived
wellbeing.
These
results
provide
preliminary
evidence
that
struggling
ill
benefit
from
treatment.
Language: Английский
Restore and Rebuild (R&R): a protocol for a phase 2, randomised control trial to compare R&R as a treatment for moral injury-related mental health difficulties in UK military veterans to treatment as usual
BMJ Open,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(5), P. e082562 - e082562
Published: May 1, 2024
Background
Exposure
to
potentially
morally
injurious
events
is
increasingly
recognised
as
a
concern
across
range
of
occupational
groups,
including
UK
military
veterans.
Moral
injury-related
mental
health
difficulties
can
be
challenging
for
clinicians
treat
and
there
currently
no
validated
treatment
available
We
developed
Restore
Rebuild
(R&R)
veterans
struggling
with
moral
difficulties.
This
trial
aims
examine
whether
it
feasible
conduct
pilot
randomised
controlled
(RCT)
R&R
compared
treatment-as-usual
(TAU)
control
group.
Methods
will
use
feasibility
single-blind,
single-site
RCT
design.
The
target
population
recruit
N=46
veteran
patients
who
randomly
allocated
(n=23)
or
TAU
(n=23).
Patients
receive
the
20-session
one-to-one
treatment,
delivered
online.
Veterans
TAU,
are
manualised
treatments
problems
available,
(online)
typically
provided
enter
service
collect
outcome
measures
injury,
post-traumatic
stress
disorder
(PTSD),
alcohol
misuse,
common
disorders
trauma
memory
at
pretreatment
baseline
(before
randomisation),
end
12
weeks
24
post-treatment.
primary
proportion
screen
positive
PTSD
distress
Ethics
dissemination
establish
feasible,
well-tolerated
beneficial
If
so,
results
widely
disseminated
may
improve
access
effective
care
those
struggle
following
injury
reduce
associated
negative
consequences
veterans,
their
families
wider
society.
Trial
registration
number
ISRCTN99573523
.
Language: Английский
Examination of Potentially Morally Injurious Events and Moral Injury in Medical Professionals
Fallon Keegan
No information about this author
Published: Dec. 1, 2023
The
current
study
examined
the
nature
and
extent
of
endorsement
PMIEs,
severity
MI
symptoms
related
to
a
PMIE,
relations
between
PMIEs
symptoms.
We
hypothesized
that
(1)
perpetrated
by
others
would
be
endorsed
greater
than
oneself;
(2)
medical
professionals
who
PMIE
report
significantly
on
all
compared
did
not
endorse
PMIE;
(3)
experiencing
(perpetrated
oneself
and/or
others)
predict
higher
levels
symptom
severity,
specifically
most
strongly
predicted
oneself.
Hypotheses
were
using
t-tests,
Pearson's
r
correlations,
multiple
multivariate
regression
analyses.
First,
found
those
themselves;
second,
exposure
was
associated
with
10
14
outcomes.
Third,
more
symptomatology
others,
indicating
while
are
common,
This
highlights
widespread
harmful
impact
among
professionals.
Language: Английский