Journal of Management Studies,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 22, 2024
Abstract
Experts
increasingly
refine
their
expertise
into
specialties
as
they
labour
in
and
around
organizations.
Yet,
previous
research
assumes
that
experts
are
organized
the
workplace
ways
passively
accommodate
or
mirror
pre‐existing
focuses
on
organizational
structures
codify
content
of
experts’
knowledge
an
encroachment.
Drawing
a
qualitative
field
study
aeronautical
organization's
engineering
unit,
this
paper
examines
chart
area
knowledge,
i.e.,
specialties.
The
findings
show
generative,
defining
contours
existing
catalysing
formation
new
ones
(
generating
).
However,
also
encode
criteria
implicitly
rank
some
forms
over
others,
thereby
reinforcing
status
hierarchies
grading
),
misalignment
across
renders
invisible
ghosting
By
showing
active
role
shaping
rather
than
simply
housing
it,
contributes
to
our
understanding
development
well
dynamics
access
resources
among
experts.
Further,
reveals
how
misalignments
multiple
may
impact
management
human
capital.
Journal of Management Studies,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
61(3), P. 739 - 751
Published: Jan. 30, 2024
Abstract
This
editorial
introduces
and
explains
the
Journal
of
Management
Studies’
(JMS)
new
policy
on
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
.
We
reflect
use
AI
in
conducting
research
generating
journal
submissions
what
this
means
for
wider
JMS
community,
including
our
authors,
reviewers,
editors,
readers.
Specifically,
we
consider
how
AI‐generated
text
could
both
assist
augment
publication
process,
as
well
harm
it.
Consequentially,
acknowledges
need
careful
oversight
regarding
to
authoring
texts
data
analyses,
while
also
noting
importance
requiring
authors
be
transparent
about
how,
when
where
they
have
utilized
their
or
underlying
research.
Additionally,
examine
ways
AI's
may
antithetical
spirit
a
quality
like
that
values
human
voice
transparency.
Our
why
require
author
teams
oversee
all
aspects
within
projects,
take
personal
responsibility
accuracy
explain
prohibition
peer‐reviewers’
evaluations
submissions,
editors’
handling
manuscripts.
British Journal of Management,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
35(1), P. 3 - 23
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Shuang
Ren,
Riikka
M.
Sarala,
Paul
Hibbert
The
advent
of
generative
artificial
intelligence
(GAI)
has
sparked
both
enthusiasm
and
anxiety
as
different
stakeholders
grapple
with
the
potential
to
reshape
business
management
landscape.
This
dynamic
discourse
extends
beyond
GAI
itself
encompass
closely
related
innovations
that
have
existed
for
some
time,
example,
machine
learning,
thereby
creating
a
collective
anticipation
opportunities
dilemmas
surrounding
transformative
or
disruptive
capacities
these
emerging
technologies.
Recently,
ChatGPT's
ability
access
information
from
web
in
real
time
marks
significant
advancement
profound
implications
businesses.
feature
is
argued
enhance
model's
capacity
provide
up-to-date,
contextually
relevant
information,
enabling
more
customer
interactions.
For
businesses,
this
could
mean
improvements
areas
like
market
analysis,
trend
tracking,
service
real-time
data-driven
problem-solving.
However,
also
raises
concerns
about
accuracy
reliability
sourced,
given
sometimes
unverified
nature
content.
Additionally,
might
complicate
data
privacy
security,
boundaries
interactions
extend
into
vast
diverse
Internet
These
factors
necessitate
careful
responsible
approach
evaluating
using
advanced
capabilities
contexts.
attracting
much
interest
academic
practitioner
literature.
A
quick
search
Google
Scholar,
terms
'generative
intelligence'
'business'
'management',
yields
approximately
1740
results.
Within
extensive
repository,
scholars
delve
facets,
exploring
GAI's
applications
across
various
functions,
contemplating
its
educators
scrutinizing
specific
technological
applications.
Learned
societies
such
British
Academy
Management
joined
forces
leading
discussion
on
AI
digitalization
academe.
Meanwhile,
practitioners
consultants
alike
(e.g.
McKinsey
&
Company,
PWC,
World
Economic
Forum)
produced
dedicated
discussions,
reports
forums
offer
insights
multifaceted
impacts
considerations
integration
contemporary
practices.
Table
1
illustrates
current
documented
Zalando
[online
platform
fashion
lifestyle]
Instacart
[e-commerce
application]
Salesforce
[cloud-based
relationship
software
provider]
DHL
[logistics
Coca-Cola
[beverage
company]
Nestlé
Mondelez
[confectionary]
Heinz
[food
processing
Air
India
[airline]
Duolingo
[language
learning
Mastercard
[financial
services]
In
an
attempt
capture
new
challenges
brought
by
technology
hopefully
find
way
forward
guide
research
practice,
journals
been
swift
embrace
trend,
introducing
special
issues
GAI.
aim
promote
intellectual
debate,
instance
relation
disciplines
Benbya,
Pachidi
Jarvenpaa,
2021)
organizational
possibilities
pitfalls
(Chalmers
et
al.,
2023).
amidst
commendable
efforts
reflect
broad
spectrum
perspectives,
critical
examination
burgeoning
hype
around
reveals
gap.
Despite
proliferation
discussions
scholars,
general
public,
prevailing
often
speculative,
lacking
robust
theoretical
foundation.
deficiency
points
existing
theories
their
efficacy
explaining
unique
demands
created
indicates
urgent
need
refining
prior
even
redeveloping
theories.
There
pressing
move
wave
explore
underpinnings
dynamics
impact,
ensure
nuanced
informed
can
future
application
rapidly
evolving
area.
direction,
Journal
(BJM)
invited
prominent
who
serve
editors
weigh
contribute
knowledge
symposium
paper
phenomenon.
collaborative
effort
aims
advance
theorization
intricacies
associated
impact
engaging
intensive
how
attempts
be
made
make
sense
myths
truths
quest
theory,
either
seeking
refining,
long-standing
tradition
Colquitt
Zapata-Phelan,
2007).
While
seven
pieces
below
place
elements
under
spotlight
scrutiny,
one
common
thread
reconceptualize
relational
realm
workplaces.
introduction
workplace
refines
norm
working
together
person-to-person
group
human–GAI
group,
latter
illustrating
three
novel
conceptual
contributions
comparison
traditional
understandings
workplace.
GAI-laden
workplace,
it
imperative
shift
our
perspective
deterministic
outlook
manages
emergence.
Quattrone,
Zilber
Meyer
encapsulate
emergent
GAI-related
phenomena
pointing
out
'the
not
there'.
Rather
than
attempting
predict
future,
they
advocate
making
through
creativity
reflection.
Equally,
posit
should
viewed
construction
whose
functions
effects
are
predetermined
but
shaped
people's
decisions
utilization.
etymological
lens
bring
encourages
rethinking
ontologically.
recognition
inability
know
what
it,
centred
upon
relations
between
generations
ways,
people
within
generations,
objects
locations
broadly.
Relationality
thus
establishes
context
sense-making,
where
workings
outcomes
unfold
phenomena,
MacKenzie,
Decker
Lubinski
illuminate
importance
contextual
understanding
when
examining
advocating
'context
matters'.
propose
expansive
concept
analysis
past
imaginaries
technologies,
technologies
currently
question
along
other
well
incorporation
institutional
over
economic,
political
systems).
essence,
call
recognize
matters'
guiding
principle
idiosyncratic,
isolated
examinations
relationships
emergence
development.
Brown,
Ellis
Gore
ask
we
redefine
'team'
if
integrates
daily
work.
As
conventional
definitions
team
comprise
individuals,
extent
which
considered
member
becomes
pivotal.
may
seem
human-like
(including
robotic
'human'),
does
yet
possess
feelings,
desires,
intentions
responsibility
same
human
beings.
team,
Davison
Ravishankar
first-hand
experience
research,
specifically
tasks
literature
review,
transcribing
analysing
data.
They
caution
against
mere
reliance
generating
original
research.
Nonetheless,
conclude
highlighting
leveraging
effective
'prompts'
maximize
GAI,
leaving
readers
valuable
food
thought.
Munzio
Faulconbridge
take
focusing
producer–consumer
shape
professionalism.
highlight
range
questions
will
challenge
established
constructs
theoretically
empirically.
addition,
Islam
Greenwood
debates
(or
absence)
use
unfold.
production
GAI-based
large
language
models
accountability.
perhaps
humans
coordinated
uncoordinated.
sum,
BJM
committed
fostering
deeper
stimulating
debate
studies.
collection
do
seek
definitive
solutions;
instead,
invaluable
starting
point
journey
exploration
discovery
field.
offered
here
boundaries,
challenging
enriching
fresh
perspectives
stimulated
phenomenon
pivotal
developing,
extending,
adapting
frameworks
remain
landscape
become
GAI-driven.
ethical
societal
management,
emphasizing
sustainable
By
bridging
theory
managers
tools
navigate
complexities
integrating
strategies
operations,
appropriate,
manner.
symposium,
body
only
seeks
understand
explain
work,
employment,
business,
governance
society
towards
directions.
Paolo
Tammar
Zilber,
Renate
etymology
words
source
meaning,
speculate
imagine
meanings
so
obvious
see
signalled
surprising
ways.
'artificial'
'intelligence'
disappoint.
'Artificial'
comes
'art'
-fex
'maker',
facere
'to
do,
make'.
'Intelligence'
inter
'between'
legere
'choose,
pick
out,
read'
'collect,
gather'.
enough
etymologies
few
speculations
contours
possible
futures.
first
inspired
craft
relates
very
function
AI.
Most
fascinations
emphasize
predictive
increasingly
available
at
easy
disposal.
Indeed,
marketers
next
toothbrush,
fuel
cars,
buy
clothes,
forth.
list
long.
enchants
us
when,
instance,
thinks
product
and,
invariably,
advertisement
appears
social
media
page.
quasi-magical
captures
imaginations
draws
well-ingrained
forms
presuppose
techniques
there
represent
world,
paradoxically,
there,
case
predictions.
issue
there;
want
still,
called
respond
demands.
availability
huge
amounts
intelligence,
proximal
mundane
–
examples
above,
always
holds
surprises.
means
useful
actually
reveals.
art
possibility
conceiving
compositional
art,
helps
create
images
sparks
imagination
hopefully,
offers
space
speculation
word
second
cue,
stresses
'inter'
'in
between'.
entrepreneurs
ventures
(Hjorth
Holt,
2022),
probe
grey
statuses
courses
action.
It
used
scenarios,
sure
set
produces
alternative
options
leave
juggling
among
decision-making
criteria
without
reducing
complex
states
affairs
single
criteria,
most
likely,
value
rather
values.
how,
wisely
refrain
apocalyptic
salvific
scenarios
characterize
On
hand,
seen
worst
menaces
humankind.
control
minds
direct
habits,
entirely
dependent.
Very
Luddites
were
proven
wrong
(but
completely)
looking
Industrial
Revolutions,
pessimist
views
prove
wrong,
completely,
clear
agency
(Latour,
1987)
informing
judgement
multimodal
affects,
is,
relying
repertoire
senses,
all
mobilized
think
smartwatches
influence
training
habits).
similar
enterprise
resource
planning
(ERP)
systems
panacea
many
problems,
diseases
grand
challenges,
poverty
climate
change,
least
until
realizes
SAP
stand
'Solves
All
Problems'
(Quattrone
Hopper,
2006).
dystopian
utopian
attitudes
soon
debunked
room
balanced
views,
acknowledge
address
wicked
problems
problem
itself,
again,
realize
wisdom
found
middle,
middle
views.
case,
in-between
view
construction.
Like
resources
(Feldman
Worline,
2006)
(Orlikowski,
2000),
effect
pre-given
determined
thereof.
productive
'facts'
those
reminiscent
fact
facts
'made',
nothing
less
factual
for,
Romans
knew
(from
factum,
i.e.
made),
constructed,
them
quantities.
good
speculate,
foster
having
amount
available,
potentially
bad,
own
establish
magnify
Foucault's
adage
power.
third
cue
stands
root
leg-,
originates
not,
including
(to
read,
choose),
legare
knot)
indeed
religion.
medieval
classifying
inventories
invent
solutions
old
recombining
forms,
choosing
picking
depending
purpose
calculation,
reimagine
(Carruthers,
1998),
bigger
generate
inventions
finally
'what
not'
fruitful
imagining
unprecedented
define
is'
(Quattrone,
2017).
Only
then
truly
generative.
was
Steve
Ballmer,
CEO
Microsoft,
presented
iPhone.
He
exclaimed
'who
would
pay
five
hundred
dollars
phone?'.
had
realized
comprehend
power
better
are.
cell
phone
camera,
TV
cinema,
newspaper,
journal/calendar.
begins
X,
negative,
correlations
defines
Z
(a
cinema)
meeting
place).
negative
potential,
be,
core
facilitate
help
avoid
taking
things
granted.
So,
predicting
develop
affect
lives
bound
fail
ways
go
unintended
consequences.
At
stage,
try
unknowable
present
pathways
open
close.
Exploring
framing
contests
AI,
actors
involved
interests
tell
ourselves
fantasies,
fears
hopes
future.
brings
whether
inform
thinking
actions.
That
behaviour
now
taken
granted,
deterministic,
affordances
designers,
counts
possibly
black
box
reopen.
Since
invention
printing
press,
Roland
Barthes
Michael
Foucault,
notion
authorship
questioned
(Barthes,
1994;
1980),
authors'
authority
truer
now,
algorithms
kinds
already
seemingly
autonomously,
high-frequency
trading
finance
digital
twins
construction,
being
able
write
meaningful
sentences
disrupt
outlets
texts
typically
published,
(Conroy,
We
moving
non-human
'decision-maker',
self-driving
car
rover
autonomously
Mars,
'makers'
tout
court,
difference
no
And
world
personal,
work
lives.
policy
implications.
terms,
legal
form
corporation
emerged
limit
regulate
individual
greed
(Meyer,
Leixnering
Veldman,
witness
fictitious
persona,
virtual
corporation,
factories
employees,
while
still
producing
distributing
through,
to,
them,
respectively.
Designing
anticipatory
intricate
corporations,
dispersed
ephemeral,
say
slippery.
Theoretically,
edge
revolution
important
organization
twentieth
century.
Herbert
Simon
(1969)
foresaw
science
artificial,
object
artefacts
kinds,
ends
bounded
rationality
decision-making.
surprised
'New
Science
Artificial',
study
rationality,
twenty-first
sure,
govern
intertwine
changing
both.
Niall
G.
Stephanie
Decker,
Christina
subject
breathless
treatments
academics
commentators
alike,
claims
impending
ubiquity
doom,
your
perspective)
life
upended,
millions
jobs
destroyed
(Eglash
2020).
Historians
will,
course,
new.
Technological
innovation
adoption
long
generally
well-researched
history
(Chandler,
2006;
Scranton,
2018)
true
resistance
(Juma,
2016;
Mokyr,
1990;
Thompson,
1963)
moral
panics
(Orben,
What,
anything,
'it's
new…'?
Good
historical
practice
requires
dialogue
(Wadhwani
Thus,
character
development
occurred
occurs.
was/is
underpinned
progression
several
mathematics,
telecommunications,
warfare,
mining
computing
(amongst
more)
(Buchanan,
Chalmers,
Carter,
2021;
Haenlein
Kaplan,
2019).
despite
rapid
recent
progress,
result
iterative
developments
sectors
enable(d)
facilitate(d)
it.
Consistent
imagined
futures
(Beckert,
2016)
pushed
technologists,
entrepreneurs,
policymakers
futurists
society.
regard
illustrated
considering
(Taylor,
2004)
generated
part
previous
adoption.
When
emerges,
fanfare
change
better,
and/or
settled
arrangements
(Budhwar,
Ubiquity-posited
competing
promises
doing
improved,
alternatives
averred
economic
benefits
promised,
accompanied
regarding
job
destruction,
upheaval
threat
machines
over.
consequence,
compete
each
themselves
spaces
frame
experiments
Viebig,
2021).
analyse
auguries
posited
adopt
adapt
changes
bring.
post-hoc
claims.
historians
non-technological
transformations
(Lubinski
2023),
theorizing
imaginaries,
play
role
legitimation
adoption,
opposition.
Given
contested
societally
therefore
consider
emerge
order
appropriate
lenses
them.
context,
nuances
parallels
come
past.
Luddite
riots
nineteenth
century,
whereby
agricultural
workers
sought
destroy
machinery
replacing
labour
(Mokyr,
1963),
probably
famous
response
technology,
giving
rise
term
'Luddite'
commonly
today
describe
someone
opposed
technology.
Contrastingly,
playwright
Oscar
Wilde
his
1900
essay
'The
soul
man
socialism'
'All
unintellectual
labour,
monotonous,
dull
deals
dreadful
things,
involves
unpleasant
conditions,
must
done
machinery'
(Wilde,
1891/2007).
More
recently,
Lawrence
Katz,
economist
Harvard,
repeated
Wilde's
suggestion
'information
robots
eliminate
artisanal
economy'
(Thompson,
2015).
Both
Katz's
comments
tilt
imaginary
automation
freeing
up
focus
creative
rewarding
pursuits,
whilst
expressing
serious
misgivings
jobs,
livelihoods
mechanization.
bad
necessary
really
understood
post
hoc
context.
Mary
O'Sullivan
recently
pointed
based
her
steam
engine
Cornish
copper
mines
eighteenth
rewards
suggested
system
developed
remains
controlled
small
groups
powerful
individuals
(O'Sullivan,
Similar
principal
proponents
comprising
global
multinationals,
state-controlled
military,
racing
dominance
(Piper,
concerning
warnings
threats,
particularly
light
shifts.
face
ongoing
new,
ubiquity-focused
accompanying
(which
constitute
noise,
albeit
kernels
truth/accuracy
hidden
therein).
sense,
theorize
(and
vice
versa),
foretell
provides
impacted
in.
Interrogating
conceptualization
turn
allow
harness
greater
good.
Olivia
David
A.
Ellis,
Julie
Digital
continue
permeate
society,
teams
collaborate
(Barley,
Bechky
Milikhen,
communication
led
globally
distributed
corporate
(see
Gilson
volume
variety
types
linked
accelerated,
witnessed
(LLMs),
ChatGPT
bringing
attention
wider
audience.
Broadly
referred
(GAI),
allows
teams)
quickly
provided
detailed,
actionable,
conversational
responses.
Sometimes
agents
retrieval
systems,
responses
effectively
members.
teamwork
organizations
shifted
whether,
circumstances,
'team
member'
(Malone,
2018).
Conceptualizing
manner
suggests
away
viewing
supportive
tool
adjunct
Robert,
2019
healthcare)
intrinsic
task-execution
processes
(O'Neill
2022).
New
raised
members
improve
performance
trust
them?
so,
much?
To
degree
merely
replacements
decision-making?
hybrid
completes
task,
takes
successes
failures?
How
leaders
quantify
accountability?
Addressing
early
dictates
reframe
readdress
studied
theoretical,
practical
perspectives.
From
perspective,
th
Journal of Management Inquiry,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
33(3), P. 207 - 229
Published: Feb. 22, 2024
Current
and
future
developments
in
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
systems
have
the
capacity
to
revolutionize
research
process
for
better
or
worse.
On
one
hand,
AI
can
serve
as
collaborators
they
help
streamline
conduct
our
research.
other
such
also
become
adversaries
when
impoverish
ability
learn
theorists,
lead
us
astray
through
inaccurate,
biased,
fake
information.
No
matter
which
angle
is
considered,
whether
we
like
it
not,
are
here
stay.
In
this
curated
discussion,
raise
questions
about
human
centrality
agency
process,
multiple
philosophical
practical
challenges
facing
now
ones
will
face
future.
Research Policy,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
52(8), P. 104828 - 104828
Published: June 21, 2023
With
the
rise
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI),
professional
services
firms
(PSFs)
need
to
innovate
their
adapt
AI.
However,
traditional
ad
hoc
innovations
driven
by
individual
professionals
have
limitations
in
incorporating
new
technology
outside
expertise.
Although
service
R&D—an
organizational
function
for
centralized
coordination
strategically
targeted
areas—is
potentially
effective,
studies
on
R&D
still
been
scarce.
This
case
study
aims
fill
gap
examining
how
PSFs
can
establish
and
utilize
services,
overcoming
challenges
AI
adoption.
An
in-depth
qualitative
was
conducted
process
which
Big
Four
audit
incorporated
into
external
Japan
2010s.
The
analysis
shows
detailed
newly
created
organizations
advanced
adoption
firms.
contributes
literature
(1)
demonstrating
neglected
but
critical
role
as
an
innovation
enabler
beyond
existing
expertise
firms,
(2)
constructing
a
three-phase
model
evolution
function,
(3)
suggesting
significance
design
legitimation
innovations.
also
expands
our
knowledge
adoption,
presenting
tailored
address
inherent
PSFs.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Experts
increasingly
refine
their
expertise
into
specialties
as
they
labour
in
and
around
organizations.
Yet,
previous
research
assumes
that
experts
are
organized
the
workplace
ways
passively
accommodate
or
mirror
pre-existing
focuses
on
organizational
structures
codify
content
of
experts'
knowledge
an
encroachment.
Drawing
a
qualitative
field
study
aeronautical
organization's
engineering
unit,
this
paper
examines
chart
area
knowledge,
i.e.,
specialties.
The
findings
show
generative,
defining
contours
existing
catalysing
formation
new
ones
(generating).
However,
also
encode
criteria
implicitly
rank
some
forms
over
others,
thereby
reinforcing
status
hierarchies
(grading),
misalignment
across
renders
invisible
(ghosting).
By
showing
active
role
shaping
rather
than
simply
housing
it,
contributes
to
our
understanding
development
well
dynamics
access
resources
among
experts.
Further,
reveals
how
misalignments
multiple
may
impact
management
human
capital.
Journal of Management Studies,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
61(6), P. 2748 - 2769
Published: Jan. 17, 2024
Abstract
According
to
the
‘Point’
essay,
management
research's
reliance
on
corporate
data
threatens
replace
objective
theory
with
profit‐biased
‘corporate
empiricism’,
undermining
scientific
and
ethical
integrity
of
field.
In
this
‘Counterpoint’
we
offer
a
more
expansive
understanding
big
algorithmic
processing
and,
by
extension,
see
promising
applications
theory.
Specifically,
propose
novel
metaphor:
organizations
as
algorithms.
This
metaphor
offers
three
insights
for
developing
innovative,
relevant,
grounded
organization
First,
agency
is
distributed
in
assemblages
rather
than
being
solely
attributed
individuals,
algorithms,
or
data.
Second,
machine‐readability
serves
immutable
mobile
base
organizing
decision‐making.
Third,
prompting
programming
transform
role
professional
expertise
organizational
relationships
technologies.
Contrary
no
theoretical
‘end’
sight;
algorithm
enables
scholars
build
innovative
theories
that
account
intricacies
Journal of Management Studies,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 15, 2024
Abstract
New
technologies
are
equivocal,
triggering
sensemaking
responses
from
the
individuals
who
encounter
them.
As
an
‘epistemic
technology’
AI
poses
new
challenges
to
expertise
and
jurisdictions
of
professionals.
Such
may
be
interpreted
quite
differently,
however,
depending
on
specialized
role
identities
which
develop
within
wider
professional
domain.
We
explore
these
intra‐professional
groupings
posed
by
through
empirical
study
professionals
playing
different
roles
(front‐line,
hybrid
field‐level)
in
field
radiology
NHS
England.
found
that
sought
make
sense
a
triadic
view
focused
interplay
professional,
client
technology.
This
sensemaking,
arising
jurisdictional
contexts,
led
individual
perceive
their
agency
was
diminished,
complemented
or
enhanced
as
result
introduction
AI.
Our
findings
contribute
literature
professions
showing
how
differences
affect
contestant.