Mitochondrial metabolism and cancer DOI Creative Commons
Paolo E. Porporato, Nicoletta Filigheddu, José Manuel Bravo‐San Pedro

et al.

Cell Research, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 28(3), P. 265 - 280

Published: Dec. 8, 2017

Glycolysis has long been considered as the major metabolic process for energy production and anabolic growth in cancer cells. Although such a view instrumental development of powerful imaging tools that are still used clinics, it is now clear mitochondria play key role oncogenesis. Besides exerting central bioenergetic functions, provide indeed building blocks tumor anabolism, control redox calcium homeostasis, participate transcriptional regulation, govern cell death. Thus, constitute promising targets novel anticancer agents. However, tumors arise, progress, respond to therapy context an intimate crosstalk with host immune system, many immunological functions rely on intact mitochondrial metabolism. Here, we review cell-intrinsic cell-extrinsic mechanisms through which influence all steps oncogenesis, focus therapeutic potential targeting metabolism therapy.

Language: Английский

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) DOI Creative Commons
Daniel J. Klionsky, Kotb Abdelmohsen,

Akihisa Abe

et al.

Autophagy, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 12(1), P. 1 - 222

Published: Jan. 2, 2016

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered field. Our knowledge base relevant technologies also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important update these monitoring autophagy different organisms. Various reviews described range assays that used purpose. Nevertheless, there continues be confusion regarding acceptable methods measure autophagy, especially multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point needs emphasized difference between measurements monitor numbers or volume autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes autolysosomes) at any stage process versus those flux through pathway (i.e., complete including amount rate cargo sequestered degraded). particular, block macroautophagy results autophagosome accumulation must differentiated from stimuli increase activity, defined as increased induction coupled with delivery to, degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes some protists such Dictyostelium) vacuole plants fungi). other words, investigators field understand appearance more does not necessarily equate fact, cases, accumulate because trafficking without concomitant change biogenesis, whereas an autolysosomes may reflect reduction degradative activity. It worth emphasizing here lysosomal digestion evaluating its competence crucial part evaluation flux, autophagy. Here, present selection interpretation use by who aim examine related processes, well reviewers need provide realistic reasonable critiques papers are focused processes. These meant formulaic rules, appropriate depend question being asked system used. addition, emphasize no individual assay guaranteed one every situation, strongly recommend multiple Along lines, potential pleiotropic effects due blocking genetic manipulation, imperative target gene knockout RNA interference than autophagy-related protein. Atg proteins, groups involved cellular pathways implying all proteins can specific marker process. guidelines, consider various assessing what information can, cannot, obtained them. Finally, discussing merits limits particular assays, hope encourage technical innovation

Language: Английский

Citations

5735

Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018 DOI Creative Commons
Lorenzo Galluzzi, Ilio Vitale, Stuart A. Aaronson

et al.

Cell Death and Differentiation, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 25(3), P. 486 - 541

Published: Jan. 23, 2018

Over the past decade, Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has formulated guidelines for definition and interpretation of cell death from morphological, biochemical, functional perspectives. Since field continues to expand novel mechanisms that orchestrate multiple pathways are unveiled, we propose an updated classification subroutines focusing mechanistic essential (as opposed correlative dispensable) aspects process. As provide molecularly oriented definitions terms including intrinsic apoptosis, extrinsic mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT)-driven necrosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, parthanatos, entotic death, NETotic lysosome-dependent autophagy-dependent immunogenic cellular senescence, mitotic catastrophe, discuss utility neologisms refer highly specialized instances these processes. The mission NCCD is a widely accepted nomenclature in support continued development field.

Language: Английский

Citations

5351

Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment DOI

Thomas F. Gajewski,

Hans Schreiber, Yang‐Xin Fu

et al.

Nature Immunology, Journal Year: 2013, Volume and Issue: 14(10), P. 1014 - 1022

Published: Sept. 18, 2013

Language: Английский

Citations

3645

Immunogenic Cell Death in Cancer Therapy DOI
Guido Kroemer, Lorenzo Galluzzi, Oliver Kepp

et al.

Annual Review of Immunology, Journal Year: 2012, Volume and Issue: 31(1), P. 51 - 72

Published: Nov. 16, 2012

Depending on the initiating stimulus, cancer cell death can be immunogenic or nonimmunogenic. Immunogenic (ICD) involves changes in composition of surface as well release soluble mediators, occurring a defined temporal sequence. Such signals operate series receptors expressed by dendritic cells to stimulate presentation tumor antigens T cells. We postulate that ICD constitutes prominent pathway for activation immune system against cancer, which turn determines long-term success anticancer therapies. Hence, suboptimal regimens (failing induce ICD), selective alterations (preventing emission during defects effectors (abolishing perception system) all contribute therapeutic failure. surmise and its subversion pathogens also play major roles antiviral responses.

Language: Английский

Citations

2844

Immunogenic cell death and DAMPs in cancer therapy DOI
Dmitri V. Krysko, Abhishek D. Garg,

Agnieszka Kaczmarek

et al.

Nature reviews. Cancer, Journal Year: 2012, Volume and Issue: 12(12), P. 860 - 875

Published: Nov. 15, 2012

Language: Английский

Citations

2548

Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease DOI
Lorenzo Galluzzi,

Aitziber Buqué,

Oliver Kepp

et al.

Nature reviews. Immunology, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 17(2), P. 97 - 111

Published: Oct. 17, 2016

Language: Английский

Citations

2435

Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy DOI
Ivan Đikić, Zvulun Elazar

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 19(6), P. 349 - 364

Published: April 4, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

2365

Biological Functions of Autophagy Genes: A Disease Perspective DOI Creative Commons
Beth Levine, Guido Kroemer

Cell, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 176(1-2), P. 11 - 42

Published: Jan. 1, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

2281

Targeting autophagy in cancer DOI
Jean M. Mulcahy Levy, Christina G. Towers, Andrew Thorburn

et al.

Nature reviews. Cancer, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 17(9), P. 528 - 542

Published: July 28, 2017

Language: Английский

Citations

2151

Self-consumption: the interplay of autophagy and apoptosis DOI
Guillermo Mariño, Mireia Niso‐Santano, Eric H. Baehrecke

et al.

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, Journal Year: 2014, Volume and Issue: 15(2), P. 81 - 94

Published: Jan. 8, 2014

Language: Английский

Citations

1998