The Hidden Curriculum of Academic Writing: Toward Demystifying Manuscript Preparation in Counseling Psychology DOI Open Access
Bonnie Moradi, Melanie E. Brewster, Patrick R. Grzanka

et al.

Published: Aug. 29, 2022

In this article, we aim to unpack some of the hidden curriculum in publishing successfully Journal Counseling Psychology (JCP) and other academic outlets. The many unspoken implicit considerations behind writing a successful article can reinforce epistemic exclusions around class, gender, race, sexuality axes power that ultimately limit who gets publish journals about what. Thus, work articulate processes an article. Specifically, offer suggestions for (a) compelling, precise, parsimonious introductions, (b) clearly addressing goals study via accurate detailed description method, (c) aligning analytic decisions with research questions or hypotheses data parameters at hand, (d) discussing story context prior scholarship, limitations, real-world implications. Where applicable, provide concrete examples published studies “unhide” illustrate invisible narratives intentions key practices. We also present checklist as easy-to-reference companion help demystify process. This aligns commitment JCP’s editorial leadership play active role opening up scholarly publication process so pipeline manuscripts submitted accepted by JCP shapes more inclusive future field.

Language: Английский

A worldwide itinerary of research ethics in science for a better social responsibility and justice: a bibliometric analysis and review DOI Creative Commons

Ingrid Sonya Mawussi Adjovi

Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 10

Published: Feb. 11, 2025

This study provides a comprehensive overview of research ethics in science using an approach that combine bibliometric analysis and systematic review. The importance ethical conduct scientific to maintain integrity, credibility, societal relevance has been highlighted. findings revealed growing awareness issues, as evidenced by the development numerous guidelines, codes conduct, oversight institutions. However, significant challenges persist, including lack standardized approaches for detecting misconduct, limited understanding factors contributing unethical behavior, unclear definitions violations. To address these this recommends promoting transparency data sharing, enhancing education, training programs, establishing robust mechanisms identify encouraging collaborative open practices. emphasizes need restore public confidence science, protect its positive impact, effectively global challenges, while upholding principles social responsibility justice. is crucial maintaining conserving resources, safeguarding both participants public.

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Anti-Colonial Strategies in Cross-cultural Music Science Research DOI Open Access
Sarah A. Sauvé, Elizabeth J. Phillips,

Wyatt Schiefelbein

et al.

Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 40(4), P. 277 - 292

Published: April 1, 2023

This paper presents a critical analysis of ethical and methodological issues within cross-cultural music science research, including around community based participation, data sovereignty. Although such have long been discussed in social fields anthropology ethnomusicology, psychology cognition are only beginning to take them into serious consideration. aims fill that gap the literature, draw attention necessity critically considering how implicit cultural biases pure positivist approaches can mar scientific investigations music, especially context. We focus initially on two previous papers (Jacoby et al., 2020; Savage 2021) before broadening our discussion critique provide alternatives support assimilation, extractvism, universalism. then discuss considerations research ethics, ownership, open reproducibility. Throughout critique, we offer many personal recommendations researchers, suggest few larger systemic changes.

Language: Английский

Citations

12
Open-Science Guidance for Qualitative Research: An Empirically Validated Approach for De-Identifying Sensitive Narrative Data DOI Creative Commons
Rebecca Campbell, McKenzie Javorka, Jasmine Engleton

et al.

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 6(4)

Published: Oct. 1, 2023

The open-science movement seeks to make research more transparent and accessible. To that end, researchers are increasingly expected share de-identified data with other scholars for review, reanalysis, reuse. In psychology, practices have been explored primarily within the context of quantitative data, but demands qualitative becoming prevalent. Narrative far challenging de-identify fully, because methods often used in studies marginalized, minoritized, and/or traumatized populations, sharing may pose substantial risks participants if their information can be later reidentified. date, there has little guidance literature on how data. address this gap, we developed a methodological framework remediating sensitive narrative This multiphase process is modeled common qualitative-coding strategies. first phase includes consultations diverse stakeholders sources understand reidentifiability data-sharing concerns. second outlines an iterative recognizing potentially identifiable constructing individualized remediation strategies through group review consensus. third multiple assessing validity de-identification analyses (i.e., whether remediated transcripts adequately protect participants’ privacy). We applied set 32 interviews sexual-assault survivors. provide case examples blurring redaction techniques names, dates, locations, trauma histories, help-seeking experiences, about dyadic interactions.

Language: Английский

Citations

11
Exploring disparities in research through the lens of epistemic exclusion: A focus on Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy DOI Creative Commons
Martinque K. Jones, Petal Grower, Isis H. Settles

et al.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 25(1)

Published: Jan. 22, 2025

Abstract Epistemic exclusion is a form of scholarly devaluation based on disciplinary and identity‐based biases within systems evaluation. In two studies, we draw upon the theory epistemic to explore potential shaping journal review publication processes in Analyses Social Issues Public Policy ( ASAP ). Study 1, coded 1293 manuscripts submitted between 2016 2021 determine if there were disparities centered race/racism, gender/sexism, intersectionality, or other marginalized social identities/systems oppression (focal manuscripts) compared not focused these topics (non‐focal manuscripts). Results indicated both types similar levels scrutiny, focal 1.85 times more likely be published. 2, surveyed 106 authors who had differences experiences across research identities (race gender) investigate whether was related being that researchers conducting experienced less than their counterparts. Women men, though Asian/Asian American/Pacific Islander, underrepresented minority, White scholars exclusion. Experiences negatively associated with Implications future directions are discussed.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Identifying Gaps and Building Bridges Between Feminist Psychology and Open Science DOI Creative Commons
Jaclyn A. Siegel, Rachel M. Calogero, Asia A. Eaton

et al.

Psychology of Women Quarterly, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 45(4), P. 407 - 411

Published: Oct. 21, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

15
Understanding Sexual Assault Survivors’ Perspectives on Archiving Qualitative Data: Implications for Feminist Approaches to Open Science DOI
Rebecca Campbell, Rachael Goodman‐Williams, McKenzie Javorka

et al.

Psychology of Women Quarterly, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 47(1), P. 51 - 64

Published: Oct. 19, 2022

The open science movement has framed data sharing as necessary and achievable best practices for high-quality science. Feminist psychologists have complicated that narrative by questioning the purpose of across different paradigms, methodologies, research populations. In these debates, academic community centered needs voices researchers, participants’ perspectives are largely missing from this literature. study, we sought to understand how participants feel about qualitative on a sensitive subject—sexual victimization. As part participatory action project, conducted interviews with sexual assault survivors their post-assault help-seeking experiences. federal funding agency supported project requires researchers archive de-identified in national repository (the National Archive Criminal Justice Data [NACJD]). All consented archiving data, vast majority expressed positive views because they wanted help other survivors. Participants emphasized our approach stated goal helping were important considerations decisions regarding sharing. Researchers should obtain informed consent sharing/archiving, discuss dissemination plans during process.

Language: Английский

Citations

10
Nature and characteristics of global attention to research on article processing charges DOI
Williams E. Nwagwu

The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 49(6), P. 102808 - 102808

Published: Nov. 1, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

6
Changing the Academic Gender Narrative through Open Access DOI Creative Commons
Katie Wilson, Chun‐Kai Huang, Lucy Montgomery

et al.

Publications, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 10(3), P. 22 - 22

Published: July 4, 2022

In this article, we ask whether dominant narratives of gender and performance within academic institutions are masking stories that may be both more complex potentially hopeful than those which often told using publication-related data. Influenced by world university rankings, emphasise so-called ‘excellent’ research practices: publish in ‘high impact’, elite subscription journals indexed the commercial bibliographic databases inform various ranking systems. particular, data relating to institutional demographics open access publications could support a different story about roles women playing as pioneers practitioners scholarship. We review bias scholarly discuss examples highlight positive advantage for women. Using analysis workforce from our Open Knowledge Initiative project, explore relationships correlations between output universities Australia United Kingdom. This opens conversation possibilities models exploring changing narrative deficit publishing.

Language: Английский

Citations

7
Incorporating feminist practices into (psychological) science - the why, the what and the how DOI Open Access
Helena Hartmann, Kohinoor Monish Darda, Vasiliki Meletaki

et al.

Published: Sept. 11, 2023

Feminism is about all forms of challenging social, economic and political power taken by a dominant group. Applying feminist lens to scientific research brings many advantages, such as broadening theoretical perspectives, encouraging collaboration with—and inclusion of—marginalized groups, widening the scope methods. However, findings from an informal survey part SIPS hackathon revealed that both academics non-academics grapple with lack clear conceptual understanding regarding approaches feminism whole. We aim for this perspective piece provide access point why researchers should incorporate in psychological science, what could look like how can start incorporating them into their own work. In answering why, practices, we strive make working way more legible accessible, ultimate cultivating comprehensive human psychology diverse perspectives. Based on our unique viewpoints eight ECRs different domains propose constructive integrating values practices science. highlight possible barriers exist one‘s work future embrace practices. also short glossary explaining terminology support communication well curated checklist out with. This warmly invites—and promotes—researchers backgrounds engage contribute exploration within realm

Language: Английский

Citations

2
Anti-Colonial Strategies in Cross-cultural Music Science Research DOI Open Access
Sarah A. Sauvé,

Elizabeth Phillips,

Wyatt Schiefelbein

et al.

Published: Jan. 14, 2022

This paper presents a critical analysis of ethical and methodological issues within cross-cultural music science research, including around community based participation, data sovereignty. Although such have long been discussed in social fields anthropology ethnomusicology, psychology cognition are only beginning to take them into serious consideration. aims fill that gap the literature, draw attention necessity critically considering how implicit cultural biases pure positivist approaches can mar scientific investigations music, especially context. We focus initially on two previous papers (Jacoby et al., 2020; Savage 2021) before broadening our discussion critique provide alternatives support assimilation, extractvism, universalism. then discuss considerations research ethics, ownership, open reproducibility. Throughout critique, we offer many personal recommendations researchers, suggest few larger systemic changes.

Language: Английский

Citations

3