The Digital Undertow and Institutional Displacement: A Sociomaterial Approach

Organization Theory, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 4(2)

Published: April 1, 2023

As “the digital” becomes pervasive within organizations and industries, it is increasingly evident that how we live, work, connect, coordinate, govern are being significantly changed by digitalization. Many of these digital transformations highly visible dramatic, involving a purposeful repositioning restructuring industries. But in addition to direct changes, argue processes digitalization also producing less core institutional values, norms, rules, which indirectly, yet more profoundly, reconfiguring industries perform. Referencing findings from two different sectors, posit the corollary effects waves digitalization—what conceptualize as “digital undertow”—are generating set dynamics displacing apparatuses their positions primacy authority We further suggest our conventional toolkits for studying organizational phenomena not well equipped examining such In addressing this challenge, consider relational performative theorizing strong sociomateriality provides powerful analytic investigating highlight offers valuable insights into displacements arising undertow.

Language: Английский

---

Large Language Models and the Future of Organization Theory

Organization Theory, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 5(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

In this editorial essay, we explore the potential of large language models (LLMs) for conceptual work and developing theory papers within field organization management studies. We offer a technically informed, but at same time accessible, analysis generative AI technology behind tools such as Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Claude Gemini, to name most prominent LLMs currently in use. Our aim essay is go beyond prior provide more nuanced reflection on possible application different activities reasoning processes that constitute theorizing our domain scholarly inquiry. Specifically, highlight ways which might augment theorizing, also point out fundamental constraints how contemporary ‘reason’, setting considerable limits what produce ‘conceptual’ or ‘theoretical’ outputs. Given worrisome trade-offs their use, urge authors be careful reflexive when they use assist (parts of) transparently disclose manuscripts. conclude with statement Organization Theory’s policy LLMs.

Language: Английский

---

Understanding the digital ecosystem of interpreting

Digital Translation, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Feb. 4, 2025

Preview this online first article: Understanding the digital ecosystem of interpreting, Page 1 < Previous page | Next > /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1075/dt.24015.das/dt.24015.das-1.gif

Language: Английский

---

From Old to New Colonial Dependencies: Public Perceptions of Chinese Surveillance Cameras in Central Asia

Swiss Political Science Review, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 26, 2025

Abstract While a growing body of literature examines the role Chinese surveillance cameras in technological rivalry between China and US, relatively little is known about how publics Global South perceive respond to presence these technologies their communities. This research note seeks address this gap through an empirical analysis 105 individual 40 focus group interviews conducted with wider Russian‐speaking urban public Almaty (Kazakhstan), Bishkek (Kyrgyzstan), Dushanbe (Tajikistan), Tashkent (Uzbekistan) 2022. The study asks, do Central Asians spaces? interview data, supplemented by recent opinion polling data from Asia Barometer (2022), reveals that Asians’ support for shaped two colonial factors: legacy Soviet‐era collectivism state monitoring, region's economic dependencies on China.

Language: Английский

---

Online Exploitation: Drawing the Line for Surveillance Advertising in Europe

Journal of Advertising, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 20

Published: April 21, 2025

Language: Английский

---

Theorizing the Economy of Traces: From Audit Society to Surveillance Capitalism

Organization Theory, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 3(3)

Published: July 1, 2022

This essay is a conversation between Shoshana Zuboff’s theory of surveillance capitalism, Mikkel Flyverbom’s conceptualization the hyper-visibility afforded by digital architectures, and my own ‘analog’ accounting dynamics in ‘audit society’. Drawing upon trends practice research I develop number inflection points which define theoretical tensions concepts audit society capitalism. These suggest that innovation required face of: accelerating constitution organizations platforms their processes – ‘platformization’; human agents as data-driven subjects these data architectures ‘cyborgization’; reconstruction social sciences pervasive positivism becomes ‘accountics’. The exploration three reveals deep operational logic capitalism an ‘economy traces’ traceability. challenge political dystopia governed technology giants image ‘overlit’ necessitate re-specification have previously theorized. propose this form critical ‘traceology’ takes its focus ongoing production all manner traces how they make up organizations, people forms knowledge.

Language: Английский

---

Orchestrating distributed data governance in open social innovation

Information and Organization, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 33(1), P. 100453 - 100453

Published: Feb. 2, 2023

Open Social Innovation (OSI) involves the collaboration of multiple stakeholders to generate ideas, and develop scale solutions make progress on societal challenges. In an OSI project, share data information, utilize it better understand a problem, combine with digital technologies create digitally-enabled solutions. Consequently, governance is essential for orchestrating project facilitate coordination innovation. Because brings together, each stakeholder participates voluntarily, in has distributed nature. this essay we put forward framework consisting three dimensions allowing inquiry into effectiveness such governance: (1) openness (i.e., freely sharing information), (2) accountability willingness be held responsible provide justifications one's conduct) (3) power resourceful actors' ability impact other stakeholder's actions). We apply reflect #WirVsVirus ("We versus virus" English), illustrate challenges organizing effective governance, derive implications research practice.

Language: Английский

---

Panacea or Dangerous Practice: A Counterpoint to Hanisch's Argument for Prescriptive Theorizing

Journal of Management Studies, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 61(4), P. 1717 - 1730

Published: Jan. 15, 2024

Abstract In this paper we provide a counterpoint to the view that prescriptive theorizing reflects viable means for enhancing practical impact of management towards addressing some most pressing societal concerns and grand challenges our times. To do so, first contextualize roots in research, arguing approach developed by Hanisch is reflective wider ‘positive’ turn social science theorizing. Second, problematize presumptive basis upon which much as well related ideas around utopian thinking are based. doing broader aim draw attention bases claims made specifically highlight dangers implementing decontextualized, overly simple stylized prescriptions face complex challenges. contrast theorizing, propose theory may rather be enhanced through tempering instrumental rationality with deep(er) concern phenomena experience. We conclude offering number ways can done.

Language: Английский

---

Organizations as Algorithms: A New Metaphor for Advancing Management Theory

Journal of Management Studies, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 61(6), P. 2748 - 2769

Published: Jan. 17, 2024

Abstract According to the ‘Point’ essay, management research's reliance on corporate data threatens replace objective theory with profit‐biased ‘corporate empiricism’, undermining scientific and ethical integrity of field. In this ‘Counterpoint’ we offer a more expansive understanding big algorithmic processing and, by extension, see promising applications theory. Specifically, propose novel metaphor: organizations as algorithms. This metaphor offers three insights for developing innovative, relevant, grounded organization First, agency is distributed in assemblages rather than being solely attributed individuals, algorithms, or data. Second, machine‐readability serves immutable mobile base organizing decision‐making. Third, prompting programming transform role professional expertise organizational relationships technologies. Contrary no theoretical ‘end’ sight; algorithm enables scholars build innovative theories that account intricacies

Language: Английский

---

The power to transform structures: power complexes and the challenges for realising a wellbeing economy

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(1)

Published: May 2, 2024

Abstract This article draws on different strands of existing scholarship to provide an analytical framework for understanding the barriers achieving a well-being economy. It explores interplay between agential and structural power, where some actor-coalitions can reproduce or transform pre-existing structures. Conversely, these structures are strategically selective, favouring actors, interests, strategies over others. Making sense this introduces notion power complex e s —time-space-specific with common industry-related interests in given conjuncture. To understand historical “becoming” today’s political-economic terrain, provides regulationist-inspired history rise, fall, re-emergence four complexes: financial, fossil, livestock-agribusiness, digital. They pose significant threats pillars wellbeing economy such as ecological sustainability, equ(al)ity, democracy. Subsequently, context is scrutinised more detail why certain actors dominate strategic calculations contemporary complexes. reveals selectivities that favour multi- transnational corporate civil society, labour movements, public bureaucracies. The then examines firm-to-state lobbying strategy employed by within assert their interests. presents illustrative cases Blackstone, BP, Bayer, Alphabet. Finally, it implications challenges realising based post-/degrowth visions. emphasises double challenge faced wellbeing-economy actor-coalition. On one hand, has navigate modes regulation capital accumulation while, other, must confront self-expanding extractive logic capital. In context, three key outlined: need form unconventional alliances, operate various spatial dimensions simultaneously, institutionalise alternatives influence policymaking.

Language: Английский

---