Preventive Medicine Reports,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
25, P. 101686 - 101686
Published: Dec. 27, 2021
We
aimed
to
describe
worry
and
uptake
of
behaviours
that
prevent
the
spread
infection
(respiratory
hand
hygiene,
distancing)
in
UK
at
start
COVID-19
outbreak
(January
February
2020)
investigate
factors
associated
with
adopting
protective
behaviours.
Three
cross-sectional
online
surveys
adults
(28
30
January,
n
=
2016;
3
6
February,
2002;
10
13
2020,
2006)
were
conducted.
used
logistic
regressions
associations
between
outcome
measures
(worry,
respiratory
hygiene
behaviour,
distancing
behaviour)
explanatory
variables.
19.8%
participants
(95%
CI
18.8%
20.8%)
very
or
extremely
worried
about
COVID-19.
People
from
minoritized
ethnic
groups
particularly
likely
feel
worried.
39.9%
37.7%
42.0%)
had
completed
one
more
behaviour
than
usual
last
seven
days.
Uptake
was
greater
worry,
perceived
effectiveness
individual
behaviours,
self-efficacy
for
engaging
them,
having
heard
information
13.7%
12.2%
15.2%)
reduced
number
people
they
met.
This
effectiveness,
self-efficacy.
At
novel
infectious
disease
outbreaks,
communications
should
emphasise
ease
which
can
be
carried
out.
EClinicalMedicine,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
40, P. 101113 - 101113
Published: Sept. 2, 2021
High
rates
of
vaccination
worldwide
are
required
to
establish
a
herd
immunity
and
stop
the
current
COVID-19
pandemic
evolution.
Vaccine
hesitancy
is
major
barrier
in
achieving
across
different
populations.
This
study
sought
conduct
systematic
review
literature
regarding
attitudes
receiving
worldwide.A
search
PubMed
Web
Science
was
performed
on
July
5th,
2021,
using
developed
keywords.
Inclusion
criteria
(1)
be
conducted
English;
(2)
investigate
attitudes,
hesitancy,
and/or
barriers
vaccine
acceptability
among
given
population;
(3)
utilize
validated
measurement
techniques;
(4)
have
full
text
paper
available
peer-reviewed
prior
final
publication.Following
PRISMA
guidelines,
209
studies
were
included.
The
Newcastle
Ottawa
(NOS)
scale
for
cross-sectional
used
assess
quality
studies.Overall,
acceptance
ranged
considerably
between
countries
time
points,
with
Arabian
showing
highest
compared
other
parts
world.A
variety
factors
contributed
increased
including
having
negative
perception
efficacy,
safety,
convenience,
price.
Some
consistent
socio-demographic
groups
that
identified
associated
included:
women,
younger
participants,
people
who
less
educated,
had
lower
income,
no
insurance,
living
rural
area,
self-identified
as
racial/ethnic
minority.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
19(8), P. 4649 - 4649
Published: April 12, 2022
Several
studies
have
attempted
to
identify
how
people's
risk
perceptions
differ
in
regard
containing
COVID-19
infections.
The
aim
of
the
present
review
was
illustrate
awareness
towards
predicts
preventive
behaviors
and
understand
which
features
are
associated
with
it.
For
review,
77
articles
found
six
different
databases
(
Journal of Infection and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
14(10), P. 1398 - 1403
Published: Aug. 25, 2021
The
COVID-19
government
public
health
measures
are
necessary
to
prevent
the
spread
of
COVID-19,
however,
their
efficacy
is
largely
dependent
on
adherence.
This
study
utilized
Health
Belief
Model
(HBM)
explain
public's
adopted
prevention
practices
during
outbreak
in
Saudi
Arabia.
used
"COVID-19
Snapshot
MOnitoring
(COSMO):
monitoring
knowledge,
risk
perceptions,
preventive
behaviours,
and
trust
current
coronavirus
outbreak"
research
protocol
which
developed
by
WHO
Regional
Office
for
Europe
COSMO
group.
questionnaire
was
translated
into
Arabic
distributed
as
an
online
survey
via
WhatsApp
instant
messaging
application
from
May
2nd
26th,
2020.
variable
mean
adopting
ten
practices.
These
were
hand
washing,
avoiding
touching
eyes,
nose
mouth,
use
sanitizer,
covering
mouth
when
coughing/sneezing,
staying
home
sick,
close
contact
with
infected
persons,
social
distancing,
wearing
masks,
isolation,
lockdown.
independent
variables
included
HBM
constructs
(susceptibility
severity
benefits
barriers
behaviors,
cues
action,
motivation,
self-efficacy),
sociodemographic
factors,
presence
chronic
illness,
perceived
actual
knowledge.
We
conducted
bivariate
multivariate
analyses
reported
significant
findings
(P
≤
0.05).
analyzed
1027
surveys.
About
38%
adhered
all
behaviors
adherence
9.
(p
=
0.001),
0.004),
action
0.046)
associated
after
adjusting
other
factors.
Respondents
highest
levels
education
income
less
likely
adopt
compared
those
lower
ranks
income.
Our
suggest
that
can
be
applied
understand
recognition
beliefs
important
developing
effective
intervention
strategies.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
20(3), P. 1775 - 1775
Published: Jan. 18, 2023
The
use
of
social
media
has
increased
during
the
COVID-19
pandemic
because
people
are
isolated
and
working
from
home.
enhances
information
exchange
in
society
may
influence
public
protective
behavior
against
pandemic.
purpose
this
study
is
to
identify
factors
affecting
when
relying
on
pandemic-related
content
shared
media.
A
model
based
Protection
Motivation
Theory
(PMT)
was
proposed
validated
using
a
quantitative
survey
approach.
questionnaire
distributed
random
respondents,
488
responses
were
received
analyzed
Smart-PLS
software.
findings
showed
that
perceived
risk,
e-health
literacy,
awareness,
health
experts'
participation
share
COVID-19-relevant
content.
outcomes
can
enhance
government
agencies'
care
authorities'
understanding
how
raise
awareness
reduce
panic
among
public.
Heliyon,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
9(7), P. e18141 - e18141
Published: July 1, 2023
Currently,
food
safety
hazards
have
introduced
as
one
of
the
most
important
threats
to
public
health
worldwide.
Considering
numerous
crises
in
field
at
global,
regional,
and
national
levels,
their
impact
on
physical
mental
consumers,
it
is
very
vital
evaluate
risk
communication
strategies
each
country.
Food
(FSRC)
aims
provide
means
for
individuals
protect
from
risks
make
informed
decisions
about
risks.
The
purpose
this
study
present
FSRC
key
parts
analysis,
its
importance
considering
prevalence
contamination
recent
related
food.
Additionally,
stages
implementation
are
mentioned.
In
FSRC,
essential
comply
with
principles
prerequisites.
There
various
nowadays.
Different
platforms
rapidly
evolving.
Choosing
evaluating
appropriate
strategy
according
target
group,
consensus
stakeholders,
cooperation
coordination
assessors
managers
a
significant
order
improve
implement
FSRC.
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
11(1), P. e002331 - e002331
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
Objective
To
analyse
the
association
between
level
of
use
injury
risk
estimation
feedback
(I-REF)
provided
to
athletes
and
burden
during
an
athletics
season.
Method
We
conducted
a
prospective
cohort
study
over
38-week
follow-up
period
on
competing
at
French
Federation
Athletics.
Athletes
completed
daily
questionnaires
their
activity,
psychological
state,
sleep,
self-reported
I-REF
use,
injuries.
for
next
day,
ranging
from
0%
(no
injury)
100%
(maximum
injury).
The
primary
outcome
was
follow-up,
defined
as
number
days
with
per
1000
hours
activity.
A
negative
binomial
regression
model
used
burden.
Results
Of
897
who
met
inclusion
criteria,
112
(38%
women)
were
included
in
analysis.
mean
response
rate
37%±30%.
analysis
found
no
significant
(n=112,
e
β
:
0.992,
95%
CI:
0.977
1.007;
p=0.308).
However,
when
considering
athletes’
secondary
analysis,
least
9%,
we
observed
(n=76,
0.981,
0.965
0.998;
p=0.027).
Conclusions
Daily
using
machine
learning
not
associated
reducing
Frontiers in Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
9
Published: June 9, 2021
Behavioral
risk
factors,
such
as
smoking,
excessive
alcohol
consumption,
physical
inactivity,
obesity,
and
unhealthy
food
intake
are
added
factors
for
severe
outcomes
of
COVID-19
infections.
Preventive
measures
to
avoid
infections
therefore
particularly
important
individuals
engaging
in
behavioral
factors.
We
seek
determine
whether
(BRFs)
play
a
significant
role
the
adherence
preventive
population
aged
50
above.
The
SHARE
wave
8
(Survey
Health,
Ageing
Retirement
Europe)
Survey
served
database,
resulting
an
analytical
sample
17,588
respondents
from
23
European
countries
plus
Israel.
Of
these
36.04%
engaged
at
least
one
BRF
16.68%
3
or
more
BRFs.
Multilevel
logistic
regressions
revealed
that
engagement
was
significantly
associated
with
less
hygiene
measures,
i.e.,
hand-sanitizing,
hand-washing
covering
coughs
sneezes
(OR:
0.86;
95%
CI:
0.78;
0.94),
two
BRFs
0.85;
0.74;
0.97)
three
0.72;
0.59;
0.88).
No
association
found
between
adherences
social
isolation
avoiding
meeting
than
five
people,
visiting
others
going
shopping,
regulated
wearing
mask
keeping
distance.
also
stronger
when
were
(1
vs.
BRFs:
χ2
=
3.43,
p
0.06;
2
6.05;
0.01).
study
gives
insight
into
protective
behavior
inherent
vulnerability
during
global
health
emergency.
It
lays
foundation
follow-up
research
about
evolution
pandemic
progresses
long-term
changes.
In
addition,
it
can
aide
efforts
increasing
compliance
by
raising
awareness
pose.
BMJ Global Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
8(7), P. e012203 - e012203
Published: June 1, 2023
Background
Previous
studies
have
observed
that
countries
with
the
strongest
levels
of
pandemic
preparedness
capacities
experience
greatest
COVID-19
burden.
However,
these
analyses
been
limited
by
cross-country
differentials
in
surveillance
system
quality
and
demographics.
Here,
we
address
limitations
previous
comparisons
exploring
country-level
relationships
between
measures
comparative
mortality
ratios
(CMRs),
a
form
indirect
age
standardisation,
excess
mortality.
Methods
We
indirectly
standardised
mortality,
from
Institute
for
Health
Metrics
Evaluation
modelling
database,
comparing
total
to
an
expected
age-specific
rate
reference
country
derive
CMRs.
then
linked
CMRs
data
on
Global
Security
(GHS)
Index.
These
were
used
as
input
into
multivariable
linear
regression
included
income
covariate
adjusted
multiple
comparisons.
conducted
sensitivity
analysis
using
estimates
WHO
The
Economist.
Results
GHS
Index
was
negatively
associated
(β=
−0.21,
95%
CI=−0.33,
−0.10).
Greater
related
prevention
−0.11,
CI=
−0.20
−0.03),
detection
(β=−0.09,
−0.17
−0.02),
response
(β
=
−0.19,
−0.32
−0.05),
international
commitments
−0.17,
−0.30
−0.04)
risk
environments
−0.30,
−0.42
−0.18)
each
lower
After
adjustment
hypotheses,
(table
2;
β=
CI=−0.41,
−0.02)
environment
CI=−0.50,
−0.10)
remained
deaths.
not
replicated
models
rely
more
heavily
reported
deaths
(eg,
Economist).
Conclusion
first
direct
comparison
rates
across
accounting
under-reporting
structure
confirms
greater
Additional
research
is
needed
confirm
robust
national-level
impact
become
available.