Public Health, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 240, P. 88 - 94
Published: Jan. 29, 2025
Language: Английский
Public Health, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 240, P. 88 - 94
Published: Jan. 29, 2025
Language: Английский
Current Addiction Reports, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 9(4), P. 486 - 517
Published: Sept. 12, 2022
Abstract Purpose of Review The COVID-19 pandemic changed people’s lifestyles and such included the potential increasing addictive behaviors. present systematic review meta-analysis aimed to estimate prevalence different behavioral addictions (i.e., internet addiction, smartphone gaming social media food exercise gambling shopping addiction) both overall separately. Recent Findings Four databases ( PubMed , Scopus, ISI Web Knowledge ProQuest ) were searched. Peer-reviewed papers published in English between December 2019 July 2022 reviewed analyzed. Search terms selected using PECO-S criteria: population (no limitation participants’ characteristics), exposure (COVID-19 pandemic), comparison (healthy populations), outcome (frequency or addiction), study design (observational study). A total 94 studies with 237,657 participants from 40 countries (mean age 25.02 years; 57.41% females). addiction irrespective type (after correcting for publication bias) was 11.1% (95% CI : 5.4 16.8%). rates each separate 10.6% 30.7% 5.3% 15.1% 21% 9.4% sex 7% 7.2% addiction. In lockdown periods, higher compared non-lockdown periods. Smartphone associated methodological quality risk boas, rate). Other factors percentage female participants, mean individuals country, developing status country. all Gaming data collection method (online vs. other methods) that is much lower online methods collect data. Summary Behavioral appeared be health issues during pandemic. Healthcare providers government authorities should foster some campaigns assist people coping stress pandemics prevent them subsequent pandemics.
Language: Английский
Citations
117Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 14
Published: March 8, 2023
Background The mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic remain a public concern. High quality synthesis extensive global literature is needed to quantify this impact and identify factors associated with adverse outcomes. Methods We conducted rigorous umbrella review meta-review present (a) pooled prevalence probable depression, anxiety, stress, psychological distress, post-traumatic (b) standardised mean difference in depression anxiety pre-versus-during period, (c) comprehensive narrative poorer Databases searched included Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE dated March 2022. Eligibility criteria systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses, published post-November 2019, reporting data English on outcomes during pandemic. Findings Three hundred thirty-eight were included, 158 which incorporated meta-analyses. Meta-review symptoms ranged from 24.4% (95%CI: 18–31%, I 2 : 99.98%) for general populations 41.1% 23–61%, 99.65%) vulnerable populations. Prevalence depressive 22.9% 17–30%, 99.99%) 32.5% 17–52%, 99.35) distress PTSD/PTSS 39.1% 34–44%; 99.91%), 44.2% 32–58%; 99.95%), 18.8% 15–23%; 99.87%), respectively. comparing pre-COVID-19 revealed standard differences 0.20 (95%CI = 0.07–0.33) 0.29 0.12–0.45), Conclusion This first synthesise longitudinal show that significantly higher than pre-COVID-19, provide some evidence adolescents, pregnant postpartum people, those hospitalised experienced heightened health. Policymakers can modify future responses accordingly mitigate such measures
Language: Английский
Citations
68Current Addiction Reports, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(3), P. 565 - 587
Published: March 14, 2024
Abstract Purpose of Review The COVID-19 pandemic has promoted behavioral changes and elevated mental distress. Addictive behaviors often increased, generating health problems. present study’s primary aim was to investigate associations between different types addictions (including addictions, related conditions, phenomena) secondary aims were: (i) identify possible sources heterogeneity (ii) explore potential moderators in Recent Findings Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), studies from the period December 2019 May 2023 were sought PubMed , Scopus ISI Web Knowledge Google Scholar its first ten pages. articles’ relevance screened evaluated. included papers’ quality assessed according Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Fisher’s Z scores computed magnitudes I 2 indices used estimate levels meta-analysis. Among 85 (N = 104,425 23 countries; mean age 24.22 years; 60.77% female), most internet-related phenomena (28 on social media, 25 internet, smartphone, 12 gaming). pooled estimation showed that higher internet use (regardless type) associated with more problems which type). Moderator analyses almost no variables affected founded associations. Summary Most focused behaviors, suggesting relationships specific during pandemic. Moreover, found systematic review meta-analysis comparable identified conducted before How help people reduce address concerns are important topics healthcare providers.
Language: Английский
Citations
26Frontiers in Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 16
Published: March 6, 2025
Being infected by COVID-19 represents a major psychological stressor, with the virus itself exerting direct biological effects that may contribute to cognitive and mental health challenges. In retrospective study conducted in Brazil, Bonfim et al reported 24% of 630 outpatients, confirmed positive between December 2020 March 2022, exhibited symptoms. These symptoms ranged from difficulties attention memory impaired thinking. Depression, fatigue, female gender were identified as risk factors for these Similarly, Li surveying 482 patients China 2022 June 2023, found 13% experienced depression, 27% anxiety, 25% stress. The severity long-term COVID correlated poorer outcomes, while resilience social support emerged protective factors.While infection-control measures have been effective limiting spread virus, they often come at cost health. For example, Barbalat nationwide online survey during France's first lockdown (March-May 2020), involving approximately 19,000 participants. They observed gradual decline over course lockdown, psychiatric conditions concerns about access equipment serving factors. Conversely, optimism pandemic's trajectory, neighborhood support, participation collective actions Qing examined impact campus lockdowns on Chinese university students elevated levels stress depression compared pre-lockdown periods. Using latent class mixed models, authors distinct trajectories unfavorable peer relationships more likely experience trajectories.Healthcare professionals, frequently exposed heavy workloads, high challenges pandemic 15 . Zhu surveyed 145 members medical security team Winter Olympic Games Paralympics longer work durations associated worse including higher anxiety. Females particularly vulnerable. Such findings underscore unique pressures faced frontline workers public crises. extends beyond physical well-being motivation. Vega-Fernández al, 161 Chilean school teachers late 2021, 98% musculoskeletal disorders past year. quality life. this study, females also disorders. Tang & He college depressive showed reduced academic engagement, highlighting broader motivational consequences struggles.As become milder restrictions relaxed, new emerged. Hao after eased its control January one five individuals over-concern characterized obsessive thoughts anxiety regarding infection. Poor self-rated worries family contracting over-concerns. Cheng 2,000 healthcare professionals shortly relaxations, half gender, younger age, low professional rank, working hours another Jiang further suggested reciprocal problems job burnout period.Despite general decrease infection isolation winds down, studies indicate loneliness, heightened stringent quarantine measures, has not fully returned pre-pandemic 13,14 de Vroege van dex Broek 510 improvements work-life balance reductions complaints postpandemic earlier stages. However, 36% increased 21% depression. Wang, Zhang, noted four 2023 levels. emphasize importance ongoing monitoring tailored care, even subsides. Not all outcomes negative. Some demonstrated posttraumatic growth, deeper appreciation life meaningful interpersonal relationships. Zeng 39% resident physicians growth. Satisfaction income sufficient workplace key highlight potential foster growth offer pathway improved outcomes.Female gender. A consistent factor above mentioned is being (Bonfim al). This difference finding; epidemiological long are developing disorders, 16 17 Several mechanisms proposed explain vulnerability. instance, severe forms adverse childhood experiences, predisposing them 18 Moreover, engage rumination (i.e., repetitive passive focus negative emotional experiences) 19 exhibit risk-aversive behaviors situations 20 less intense activity 21 , which benefits 22,23 Another explanation highlighted Sasaki who investigated role emotion malleability beliefs. Their suggest hold fixed beliefs cannot or change their emotions. linked distress prevalent among women, those under 45 years old, Social support. extensive evidence 24,25 crucial factor. addition Shi lower enhance perceived control, lack could lead sense helplessness, development states 26 Perceived promotes problem-focused coping strategies help address stressors, maladaptive strategies, such avoidance, rumination, suppression, increase psychopathology 27 .Self-control. Self-control appeared an important correlation self-control irritability students. network analysis, impulse bridge symptoms, resistance temptation acted Self-control, enables manage emotions, behaviors, thoughts, determinant 28 29 .Leisure engagement. self-control, active leisure engagement against Kulbin using profile categorized 439 Estonia adults into based changes coping. participants healthiest exercise, spending time nature, pursuing hobbies. activities known promote (see next section) [30][31][32] .Together, multifaceted approach well-being, combining psychological, behavioral, mitigate psychopathology.The current collection offers valuable insights various intervention health.Physical exercise. Tian, Luo systematic review meta-analysis assess exercise interventions Based 12 studies, estimated effect size follows: standardized mean (SMD) =-1.02 (95% CI: -1.42 -0.62); SMD = -0.81 -1.10 -0.52); stress, -1.05 -1.33 -0.78). greatest single sessions lasting 30-40 minutes frequency 3-5 times per week. align supporting regular [21][22][23][31][32][33][34][35] behind include release neurotrophic factors, endorphins, endocannabinoids, along activation dopamine serotonin neurotransmitter systems 22,23,[35][36][37] .Nature contact. Patwary outdoors green spaces significantly health, reducing finding growing interest nature horticultural therapy [38][39][40][41][42] contact relaxation brain, well endocrine immune Furthermore, engaging interactions, loneliness enhancing 43 .Mindfulness. Melvin qualitative, interpretative phenomenological analysis facilitators mindfulness program pandemic. Mindfulness practices, meditation yoga, shown alleviate body awareness, attention, regulation, facilitating perspective shifts clarifying values 44,45 both delivering programs online, providing future programs.Wong evaluated 8-week smartphone-delivered multicomponent lifestyle medicine through randomized controlled trial nonclinical sample. combined changes, healthy eating, practices like yoga. While no focused solely nutrition, supports critical nutrition proper brain function 46,47 combination expected synergistic effects. Wong overall insomnia, sizes ranging 0.13 0.56 (Cohen's d). Notably, persisted 1-month follow-up.Light therapy. Chen light adolescents young adults. were: SMD=-2.1 -2.5 -1.68) concurrent medications, SMD=-1.03 -1.27 -0.78) without medications. Light thought reset altered circadian seasonal rhythms 48 performed additional analyses determine optimal dosing guidelines, clinical applications.We hope Research Topic offered perspectives exacerbated them. intricate interplay shaping outcomes. calls holistic combines individual systemic care strengthened community By addressing issues collaborative interdisciplinary approach, we can transform lessons improve generations. We inspires research, innovation, policy meet
Language: Английский
Citations
2Nutrients, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 14(19), P. 3989 - 3989
Published: Sept. 26, 2022
Obesity is one of the most dangerous epidemics 21st century. In 2019, COVID-19 pandemic began and caused many deaths among patients with obesity without complications. Simultaneously, lockdown related to a host emotional problems including anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances. Many people cope their emotions by increasing food (emotional eating) alcohol consumption in combination decreased physical activity, promoted development overweight obesity. Emotional eating, also known as stress defined propensity eat response positive negative not need. It should be noted that eating may first step binge disorder its extreme subtypes such addiction. Interestingly some post-bariatric surgery patients, an increased frequency addictive disorders has been observed, for example addiction replaced called: “cross addiction” or “addiction transfer”. This data indicates treated psychosomatic disease, which external factors causing formation play significant role. Currently, these pandemic. manuscript discusses relationships between well potential implications viral on pandemic, need change approach treatment future.
Language: Английский
Citations
61Building and Environment, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 227, P. 109799 - 109799
Published: Nov. 13, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
46Frontiers in Medicine, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 9
Published: Feb. 15, 2022
Purpose The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused psychological distress and changed human living styles. However, rare studies have examined the protective behaviors across different populations. Therefore, present study aimed to assess distress, behaviors, potential predictors of Hong Kong general population, Taiwan healthcare workers, outpatients. Methods A cross-sectional design was used recruit participants from Taiwan. Telephone interviews were carried out for ( n = 1,067; 30.2% male participants); online surveys workers 500; 8.0% participants) outpatients 192; 32.8% participants). All completed questions on behaviors. Multiple linear regressions multivariable logistic employed explore respectively. Results had significantly lower levels than [mean (SD) 0.16 (0.39) vs. 0.47 (0.59) in 0.46 (0.65) outpatients; p < 0.001]. (51.7%) more people showing fear COVID-19 (52.0%) providers (40.8%; 0.001). Moreover, engaged most followed by being a female, worry about personal savings associated with general. Conclusions Despite greater severity Kong, population experienced less psychosocial higher compliance other groups
Language: Английский
Citations
42International Journal of Hospitality Management, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 111, P. 103491 - 103491
Published: April 6, 2023
Language: Английский
Citations
27Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 14
Published: April 6, 2023
The literature indicates a negative impact on the mental health of university students during COVID-19 pandemic. It remains unclear if this persists even after lockdown measures are lifted. current study therefore investigates status by drawing two previous studies present seeks to investigate differences in across three time points.A cross-sectional, anonymous online survey among six universities was conducted between April and May 2022 (N = 5,510). Symptoms depression, anxiety, hazardous alcohol use eating disorders as well social emotional variables were assessed utilizing standardized instruments. Risk- protective factors for severity depressive anxiety symptoms investigated using multiple regression models. Differences e.g., depression points with one-way analysis variance.More than one third exhibited clinically relevant (35.5%), (33.0-35.5% depending gender) or disorder (31.1%). Taken together, almost out (61.4%) reported at least aforementioned symptom patterns, while fifth suicidal ideation thoughts self-harm (19.6%). Higher perceived stress loneliness significantly predicted higher levels symptoms, resilience support identified factors. Compared 2020 2021, reduced 2022, consumption showed small but significant increase from 2021 2022. Worryingly, prevalence highest yet, being (14.5%) (16.5%).These results confirm that pandemic had still has students. broadens view fact some areas seem recover quicker, others worryingly. Especially persistent rise constant reduction associated is concerning. claim low-threshold accessible same beginning
Language: Английский
Citations
23Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 5(2), P. 75 - 84
Published: April 1, 2022
Introduction: The purpose of this research was to predict mental illness among university students using various machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods: A structured questionnaire-based online survey conducted on 2121 (private and public) living in Bangladesh. After obtaining informed consent, the participants completed a web-based examining sociodemographic variables behavioral tests (including Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scale Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7 scale). This study applied six well-known ML algorithms, namely logistic regression, random forest (RF), support vector (SVM), linear discriminate analysis, K-nearest neighbors, Naïve Bayes, which were used from Dhaka city Results: Of eligible respondents, 45% male 55% female, approximately 76.9% 21–25 years old. prevalence severe depression anxiety higher for women than men. Based performance parameters, results accuracy assessment showed that RF outperformed other models prediction (89% accuracy), while SVM provided best result (91.49% accuracy). Conclusion: these findings, we recommend algorithm more moderate any health status Bangladesh (depression anxiety, respectively). Finally, proposes apply classification when is core interest.
Language: Английский
Citations
37