Forewordwe
also
need
the
wisdom,
insights
and
perspectives
of
historians,
geographers,
philosophers,
psychologists
experts
from
a
wide
variety
other
disciplines.Through
its
COVID-19
-Shape
Future
programme,
British
Academy
brought
together
scholars
around
world
to
help
us
see
our
way
forward
in
these
dark
difficult
demanding
times.In
order
build
back
better
after
Covid,
we
know
where
have
been,
are,
what
do,
going
forward.This
report,
by
turns
deeply
evidenced,
profoundly
humane
full
practical
hope,
does
precisely
that.
JMIR Aging,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
4(2), P. e26474 - e26474
Published: March 10, 2021
Background
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
drastically
changed
the
lives
of
countless
members
general
population.
Older
adults
are
known
to
experience
loneliness,
age
discrimination,
and
excessive
worry.
It
is
therefore
reasonable
anticipate
that
they
would
greater
negative
outcomes
related
given
their
increased
isolation
risk
for
complications
than
younger
adults.
Objective
This
study
aims
synthesize
existing
research
on
impact
pandemic,
associated
protective
measures,
older
secondary
objective
investigate
with
Alzheimer
disease
dementias.
Methods
A
rapid
review
published
literature
was
conducted
October
6,
2020,
through
a
search
6
online
databases
results
from
original
studies
regarding
Human
Development
Model
conceptual
framework–Disability
Creation
Process
used
describe
understand
interactions
between
personal
factors,
environmental
life
habits.
reported
following
Preferred
Reporting
Items
Systematic
Reviews
Meta-analyses
Statement.
Results
total
135
records
were
included
initial
strategy
13,452
individual
studies.
Of
these,
113
(83.7%)
determined
be
level
4
according
levels
evidence
classification
by
Centre
Evidence-Based
Medicine.
presence
psychological
symptoms,
exacerbation
ageism,
physical
deterioration
aged
populations
in
Decreased
social
fewer
in-person
during
occasionally
reduced
quality
depression.
Difficulties
accessing
services,
sleep
disturbances,
reduction
activity
also
noted.
Conclusions
Our
highlight
need
adequate
measures.
represent
heterogeneous
group,
which
could
explain
contradictory
found
literature.
Individual,
organizational,
institutional
strategies
should
established
ensure
able
maintain
contacts,
preserve
family
ties,
ability
give
or
receive
help
current
pandemic.
Future
focus
specific
consequences
needs
more
at-risk
inclusion,
both
public
health
recommendations
considerations
made
policy
makers.
Health Expectations,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
24(4), P. 1158 - 1167
Published: May 4, 2021
Abstract
Background
COVID‐19
vaccines
can
offer
a
route
out
of
the
pandemic,
yet
initial
research
suggests
that
many
are
unwilling
to
be
vaccinated.
A
rise
in
spread
misinformation
is
thought
have
played
significant
role
vaccine
hesitancy.
To
maximize
uptake,
it
important
understand
why
has
been
able
take
hold
at
this
time
and
may
pose
more
problem
within
certain
contexts.
Objective
people's
beliefs,
their
interactions
with
(mis)information
during
attitudes
towards
vaccine.
Design
Participants
Bradford,
UK,
was
chosen
as
study
site
provide
evidence
local
decision
makers.
In‐depth
phone
interviews
were
carried
20
people
from
different
ethnic
groups
areas
Bradford
Autumn
2020.
Reflexive
thematic
analysis
conducted.
Results
discussed
wide
range
they
had
encountered,
resulting
confusion,
distress
mistrust.
Vaccine
hesitancy
could
attributed
three
prominent
factors:
safety
concerns,
negative
stories
personal
knowledge.
The
confused,
distressed
mistrusting
participants
felt
about
social
worlds
less
positive
Conclusions
needs
understood
context
relationship
between
associated
emotional
reactions.
programmes
should
focused,
localized
empathetic
response
counter
misinformation.
Patient
or
Public
Contribution
rapid
community
stakeholder
engagement
process
undertaken
identify
priority
topics
citizens
Frontiers in Psychology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Dec. 4, 2020
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
led
governments
worldwide
to
implement
unprecedented
response
strategies.
While
crucial
limiting
the
spread
of
virus,
"social
distancing"
may
lead
severe
psychological
consequences,
especially
in
lonely
individuals.We
used
cross-sectional
(n
=
380)
and
longitudinal
74)
designs
investigate
links
between
loneliness,
anxiety,
depression
symptoms
(ADS)
risk
perception
affective
young
adults
who
implemented
social
distancing
during
first
2
weeks
state
epidemic
threat
Poland.Loneliness
was
correlated
with
ADS
COVID-19's
health.
However,
increased
worry
about
isolation
heightened
for
financial
problems
observed
lonelier
individuals.
cross-lagged
influence
initial
on
subsequent
levels
loneliness
also
found.The
reciprocal
connections
be
importance
crisis.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
16(2), P. e0247139 - e0247139
Published: Feb. 17, 2021
Background
A
significant
proportion
of
the
worldwide
population
is
at
risk
social
isolation
and
loneliness
as
a
result
COVID-19
pandemic.
We
aimed
to
identify
effective
interventions
reduce
that
are
compatible
with
shielding
distancing
measures.
Methods
findings
In
this
rapid
systematic
review,
we
searched
six
electronic
databases
(Medline,
Embase,
Web
Science,
PsycINFO,
Cochrane
Database
Systematic
Reviews
SCOPUS)
from
inception
April
2020
for
reviews
appraising
and/or
isolation.
Primary
studies
those
were
eligible
if
they
included:
1)
participants
in
non-hospital
setting;
2)
would
be
feasible
during
measures;
3)
relevant
control
group;
4)
quantitative
measures
isolation,
support
or
loneliness.
At
least
two
authors
independently
screened
studies,
extracted
data,
assessed
bias
using
Downs
Black
checklist.
Study
registration:
PROSPERO
CRD42020178654.
identified
45
RCTs
13
non-randomised
controlled
trials;
none
conducted
The
nature,
type,
potential
effectiveness
varied
greatly.
Effective
include
psychological
therapies
such
mindfulness,
lessons
on
friendship,
robotic
pets,
facilitation
software.
Few
improved
Overall,
37
58
“Fair”
quality,
measured
by
&
main
study
limitations
inclusion
variable
quality;
applicability
our
entire
population;
current
poor
understanding
types
experienced
different
groups
affected
Conclusions
Many
involved
cognitive
educational
components,
facilitated
communication
between
peers.
These
may
require
minor
modifications
align
shielding/social
Future
high-quality
randomised
trials
under
constraints
urgently
needed.
Perspectives In Psychiatric Care,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
57(4), P. 1578 - 1584
Published: Jan. 6, 2021
Objective
To
determine
the
influence
of
coping
behaviors,
resilience,
and
social
support
on
students'
emotional
loneliness
during
COVID-19
pandemic.
Design
Methods
A
cross-sectional
research
design
was
used
to
gather
data
from
303
college
students
Central
Philippines
using
four
standardized
scales
through
an
online
survey.
Findings
Loneliness
among
high
coronavirus
Resilience,
were
identified
as
protective
factors
against
loneliness.
Practice
Implications
Interventions
directed
toward
increasing
support,
behaviors
may
help
decrease
caused
by
mandatory
lockdown
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
18(19), P. 9982 - 9982
Published: Sept. 23, 2021
The
COVID-19
global
pandemic
and
subsequent
public
health
social
measures
have
challenged
our
economic
life,
with
increasing
concerns
around
potentially
rising
levels
of
isolation
loneliness.
This
paper
is
based
on
cross-sectional
online
survey
data
(available
in
10
languages,
from
2
June
to
16
November
2020)
20,398
respondents
101
different
countries.
It
aims
help
increase
understanding
the
risk
factors
that
are
associated
loneliness,
irrespective
culture
or
country,
support
evidence-based
policy,
services
interventions.
We
found
prevalence
severe
loneliness
was
21%
during
6%
retrospectively
reporting
prior
pandemic.
A
fifth
were
defined
as
isolated
their
usual
connections,
13%
a
substantial
COVID-19.
Personal
finances
mental
overarching
consistently
cross-cutting
predictors
isolation,
both
before
With
likelihood
future
waves
related
restrictions,
it
must
be
priority
address
root
causes
and,
particular,
needs
specific
groups
such
carers
those
living
alone.
Perspectives in Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
141(4), P. 226 - 236
Published: June 19, 2021
The
present
study
investigates
whether
loneliness
and
social
isolation
are
associated
with
poor
physical
mental
health
among
adolescents
young
adults,
age
gender
play
a
role
in
the
associations
of
health.This
used
cross-sectional
self-report
data
from
2017
Danish
Health
Morbidity
Surveys
titled
'How
you?'
(N
=
19,890,
M
22.6
years).Logistic
regression
analyses
showed
that
were
independently
health.
Loneliness
was
increased
odds
asthma,
migraine,
osteoarthritis,
rheumatoid
arthritis,
hypertension,
slipped
disc/back
pain,
tinnitus,
long-term
illness,
depressive
symptomatology,
anxiety
symptomatology
alcohol
problems.
Social
decreased
having
osteoarthritis
problems,
an
risk
illness
symptomatology.
Small
differences
detected.In
These
findings
highlight
need
for
targeted
prevention
intervention
initiatives
to
alleviate
isolation.
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
55(12), P. 1144 - 1156
Published: July 13, 2021
Loneliness
is
known
to
be
associated
with
both
poorer
physical
and
mental
health,
being
increased
mortality.
Responses
throughout
the
world
current
COVID-19
pandemic
all
incorporate
varying
degrees
of
social
distancing
isolation.
There
an
imperative
provide
a
timely
review
synthesis
impact
on
loneliness
in
general
population.PubMed
was
searched
using
key
terms
'COVID-19',
'coronavirus',
'SARS-COV2'
'loneliness'.
Fifty-four
articles
were
identified
screened
against
inclusion
criteria.
The
criteria
stipulated
that
study
needed
measure
participants
drawn
from
adult
population.
Twenty-four
studies
met
criteria.The
data
extracted
24
reviewed
are
presented
summarised
focus
demographics
participants,
research
designs
utilised,
measures
employed
other
variables
assessed
studies.
Overall,
findings
indicate
has
been
significant
issue
during
positively
health
symptoms.
However,
there
inconsistencies
results
evident
across
studies.To
our
knowledge,
this
first
systematic
investigating
Despite
some
studies,
it
clearly
apparent
having
wellbeing
Furthermore,
had
population
significantly
illness
symptomatology.
Thus,
address
through
public
policy
interventions.
limitations
noted
directions
given
for
future
research.
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
31
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
Abstract
Aims
Due
to
the
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
different
countries
implemented
quarantine
measures
limit
spread
of
virus.
Many
studies
analysed
mental
health
consequences
restrictive
confinement,
some
which
focused
their
attention
on
specific
populations.
The
general
public's
also
requires
significant
attention,
however.
This
study
aimed
evaluate
effects
COVID-19
population's
in
European
countries.
Risk
and
protective
factors
associated
with
psychological
symptoms
were
analysed.
Methods
A
systematic
search
was
conducted
four
electronic
databases
(PubMed,
PsycINFO,
Scopus
Google
Scholar).
Studies
published
up
until
20th
April
2021,
following
eligibility
criteria
selected
for
this
review.
One
thousand
three
hundred
thirty-five
(1335)
screened,
105
included.
Via
network
analysis,
current
investigated
pathways
that
underlie
possible
risk
outcomes.
Results
Anxiety,
depression,
distress
post-traumatic
are
frequently
experienced
during
often
changes
sleeping
eating
habits.
Some
socio-demographic
COVID-19-related
variables
found
be
an
individual's
wellbeing.
In
particular,
being
female,
young,
having
a
low
income,
unemployed
COVID-19-like
or
chronic
disorders,
most
common
symptoms.
Conclusions
pandemic
represented
unprecedented
threat
globally.
order
prevent
morbidity
offer
support
tailored
short-,
medium-
long-term
negative
outcomes,
it
is
essential
identify
direct
indirect
psychosocial
lockdown
measures,
especially
certain
vulnerable
groups.
addition
reduce
curve
viral
transmission,
policy
makers
should
urgently
take
into
consideration
provisions
alleviate
hazards
health.