Cureus,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 20, 2023
Vaccination
has
a
fundamental
role
in
protecting
against
and
modifying
the
severity
of
several
infectious
diseases,
including
COVID-19.
Several
immune
non-immune
adverse
events
have
been
reported
post-COVID-19
vaccine.
The
aim
this
study
was
to
assess
effect
COVID-19
vaccine
on
women's
menstrual
bleeding.A
cross-sectional
conducted
among
399
vaccinated
women
Eastern
Province
Saudi
Arabia.
Data
were
collected
using
direct
interview-based
questionnaire
four
sections.A
total
recruited,
with
mean
age
25.54
±
6.177
years.
More
than
half
(53.9%)
participants
post-vaccination
bleeding
abnormality
terms
heavy
or
irregular
cycle.
Out
number,
40
(21.4%)
having
flow,
67
(16.8%)
had
non-menstrual
after
receiving
Fully
at
greater
risk
(p
=
0.058).
However,
there
no
correlation
between
booster
shot
type
>
0.05).
In
addition,
significant
association
shot,
first
dose,
prior
history
infection
0.05).Despite
vaccination
being
most
effective
way
prevent
COVID-19,
it
does
an
impact
menorrhagia
metrorrhagia.
Therefore,
more
studies
are
needed
understand
mechanism
long-term
vaccines
hemostatic
system.
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
50(3), P. 212 - 225
Published: June 10, 2024
Menstrual
health
is
a
key
patient-reported
outcome
beyond
its
importance
as
general
indicator
of
and
fertility.
However,
menstrual
function
was
not
measured
in
the
clinical
trials
COVID-19
vaccines.
The
purpose
this
review
to
synthesise
existing
literature
on
relationship
between
vaccination
outcomes.
Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
4
Published: Jan. 31, 2024
Introduction:
Menstrual
disorders
are
commonly
reported
after
COVID-19
vaccination
and
heavy
menstrual
bleeding
was
added
to
the
product
information
of
vaccines
Moderna
Pfizer.
The
aim
this
review,
using
a
systematic
search,
is
provide
an
overview
available
literature
on
risk
vaccination.
Methods:
review
conducted
according
Preferred
Reporting
Items
for
Systematic
reviews
Meta-Analysis
(PRISMA)
guidelines.
A
PubMed
search
performed
15
August
2023,
including
solely
quantitative
studies
in
English
Dutch.
Results:
total
61
were
included,
which
40
cross-sectional
studies,
18
cohort
three
self-controlled
case
series.
Outcomes
included
wide
variety
disorders,
changes
cycle
length
(
n
=
54),
amount
44),
menses
30),
experience
(pre)menstrual
pain
21),
breakthrough
18).
All
found
higher
percentage
at
least
one
disorder
first
different
types
doses.
Discussion:
In
conclusion,
evidence
suggests
that
may
cause
women
reproductive
age.
However,
there
need
more
longitudinal
because
important
limitations
study
designs
many
studies.
Although
short-lived
predominantly
mild,
it
healthcare
professionals
be
informed
about
these
potential
adverse
reactions
assess
events
clinical
trials
vaccines.
Journal of Medical Virology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
96(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Abstract
The
clinical
effect
of
Coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID‐19)
on
endometrial
receptivity
and
embryo
implantation
remains
unclear.
Herein,
we
aim
to
investigate
whether
a
COVID‐19
history
adversely
affect
female
pregnancy
outcomes
after
frozen‐thawed
transfer
(FET).
This
prospective
cohort
study
enrolled
230
women
who
underwent
FET
cycles
from
December
2022
April
2023
in
an
academic
fertility
center.
Based
the
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS‐CoV‐2)
infection
before
FET,
were
divided
into
infected
group
(
n
=
136)
control
94).
primary
outcome
was
rate
per
cycle.
Multivariate
logistic
regression
analysis
conducted
adjust
for
potential
confounders,
while
subgroup
restricted
cubic
splines
used
depict
postinfection
time
interval
FET.
results
showed
that
59.6%
63.9%
p
0.513).
Similarly,
two
groups
comparable
rates
biochemical
(69.1%
vs.
76.6%;
0.214)
(51.7%
54.5%;
0.628).
After
adjustment,
nonsignificant
association
remained
between
prior
(OR
0.78,
95%
CI:
0.42–1.46).
However,
odds
significantly
lower
≤30
days
0.15,
0.03–0.77),
no
statistical
significance
detected
31–60
>60
subgroups
compared
with
uninfected
women.
In
conclusion,
our
findings
suggested
SARS‐CoV‐2
had
significant
subsequent
treatment
overall,
but
tended
be
decreased
if
vitrified‐thawed
embryos
transferred
within
30
infection.
A
1‐month
postponement
should
rationally
recommended,
further
studies
larger
sample
longer
follow‐up
periods
are
warranted
confirmation.
BMC Women s Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
25(1)
Published: Feb. 18, 2025
Following
a
significant
relaxation
of
restrictions
in
China
on
December
7,
2022,
after
surge
SARS-CoV-2
infections,
an
uptick
women
presenting
with
menstrual
disorders
was
observed
clinics.
This
study
aimed
to
explore
the
alterations
characteristics
and
associated
factors
post
infection.
A
cross-sectional
online
survey
conducted
among
869
non-amenorrheic
adult
Chinese
females
(aged
18–53)
changes
other
infection-related
initial
The
reported
(group
A)
were
compared
no
B).
Data
collected
included
basic
individual-level
information
such
as
age,
height,
weight,
history,
reproductive
disorders,
chronic
diseases,
vaccination
status,
COVID-19
symptoms,
(regularity,
period
volume,
degree
dysmenorrhea)
Of
participants,
442
(50.9%,
group
at
least
one
characteristic;
171
(19.7%)
experienced
extended
cycle,
122
(14.0%)
decrease
volume.
Participants
who
more
likely
have
pre-existing
diseases
(7.7%
vs.
3.0%,
P
=
0.003)
exhibit
symptoms
during
acute
(4.94
4.03,
<
0.001)
recovery
(4.37
3.41,
phases.
These
participants
also
report
fever
symptom
(93.4%
86.9%,
longer
duration
(2.25
1.96
days,
B.
Notably,
fewer
vaccine
doses,
COVID-19-related
frequent
(P
0.05)
than
may
experience
infection
according
self-report
results
this
study.
Obstetrics and Gynecology International,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
2025(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Purpose:
This
study
aimed
to
evaluate
the
effect
of
COVID-19
infection
and
vaccination
on
all
menstrual
cycle
parameters
in
women
reproductive
age
group,
18-45
years,
at
a
tertiary
care
hospital.
Methods:
A
single-center,
descriptive
cross-sectional
was
done
from
January
2,
2023,
June
24,
2023.
Sampling
nonprobabilistic
purposeful.
Participants
were
recruited
via
calls,
in-person
interviews,
online
surveys.
total
931
participants
recruited,
which
141
eligible
for
study.
Descriptive
statistics
performed
variables.
Pearson's
chi-square
test
compare
categorical
variables
among
different
groups,
Wilcoxon
matched
pair
signed-rank
patterns
before
after
vaccination.
Simple
linear
regression
multiple
analysis
wherever
necessary.
p
<
0.05
considered
statistically
significant.
Results:
The
median
29
years.
Those
who
reported
abnormalities
mainly
group
18-27
(n
=
62,
44.0%),
resided
an
urban
locality
123,
87.2%),
employed
(full-time/part-time)
57,
40.4%).
Of
42
with
changes,
27
(64.3%)
experienced
changes
post-COVID-19
their
first
dose
15
(35.7%)
dose.
In
this
continue
experience
cycles.
Analysis
showed
that
having
severe
symptoms
more
likely
have
earlier
onset
(beta
-2.072,
p=0.040).
above-normal
BMI
increased
pain/cramps
during
menses
0.236,
p=0.0.013).
students/employed
-0.365,
p=0.001)
0.182,
p=0.024)
mood
swings/tension/irritability.
On
comparing
duration
postvaccination
it
found
latter
had
late-onset
short-term
effect,
while
former
early-onset
long-term
menses.
Conclusion:
Our
shows
there
is
evidence
irregularities
following
revealed
influence
cycles,
posing
higher
risk,
but
effects
menstruation
independent
one
another
are
be
studied
further.
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
33(8)
Published: Aug. 1, 2024
ABSTRACT
Background
Reports
of
adverse
menstrual
events
emerged
during
the
COVID‐19
vaccination
campaign
in
multiple
countries.
This
raised
question
whether
these
reports
were
caused
by
vaccines.
The
aim
this
systematic
review
was
to
evaluate
comparative
studies
on
topic
(registered
at
PROSPERO
[CRD42022324973]).
Methods
We
included
observational
such
as
cohort
and
surveys
comparing
response
self‐reported
questionnaires
between
post‐
versus
pre‐vaccination
data.
PubMed
Cochrane
Library
searches
conducted
1
September
2023.
primary
outcome
incidence
any
prespecified
event,
measure
risk
ratio.
meta‐analysis
using
Mantel–Haenszel
method
random
effects
model.
summarized
results
factors
well
key
findings
included.
Results
retrieved
161
references
from
electronic
databases
additional
sources
lists.
Of
those,
we
considered
21
studies.
event
reported
12
resulted
a
pooled
estimate
(risk
ratio
1.13;
95%
CI,
0.96–1.31)
that
did
not
favor
group.
analysis
constrained
considerable
clinical
statistical
heterogeneity.
Risk
for
changes
history
infection,
concern
about
vaccines,
smoking,
previous
cycle
irregularities,
depression,
stress,
other
issues.
Conclusions
group
heterogeneity
prevalent
among
Most
suggested
temporary,
minor,
nonserious.
Cureus,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 22, 2024
Introduction
Menstrual
changes
after
COVID-19
vaccination
suggest
a
secondary
connection
to
the
immune
response
rather
than
specific
component
of
vaccine.
The
evaluation
these
alterations
in
women
with
same
and
multiple
schedules
will
provide
valuable
information.
Methods
An
observational,
cross-sectional
study
was
carried
out;
data
were
collected
through
survey
164
vaccinated
at
American
British
Cowdray
(ABC)
Santa
Fe
Medical
Center
Hospital
Mexico
City.
validated
by
Delphi
method.
Results
applied
from
March
2023
February
2024.
Post-vaccination
menstrual
occurred
48.1%;
most
frequent
alteration
menorrhagia
20.7%
pain
accompanied
menstruation
27.4%.
Fifty-seven
percent
had
history
previous
infection.
There
no
significant
associations
between
bleeding
vaccination,
infection,
age
group
(p>0.9).
However,
who
received
doses
vaccines
higher
risk
suffering
abnormalities
36.6%.
Conclusion
incidence
disorders
this
post
49%.
patients
single
regimen
similar
47%
48%,
where
there
is
statistical
significance.
greatest
number
seen
first
dose
36%,
probably
due
immunity
they
acquired
different
types
vaccination.
Vaccination
very
effective
way
prevent
severity
infection;
it
has
an
impact
on
terms
metrorrhagia.
against
associated
small
cycle,
without
Women
receiving
vaccine
amount
specifically
amount.
Frontiers in Global Women s Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
5
Published: July 30, 2024
Introduction
Four
years
after
the
start
of
pandemic,
there
is
limited
evidence
on
impact
COVID-19
women's
health
regardless
their
reproductive
status.
Objective
The
aim
was
to
analyze
prevalence
and
associated
factors
menstrual-related
disturbances
in
formerly
menstruating
women
following
SARS-CoV-2
infection.
Study
design
A
retrospective
observational
study
adult
Spain
conducted
during
month
December
2021
using
an
online
survey
(
N
=
17,512).
present
analysis
includes
a
subpopulation
SARS-CoV-2-infected
n
72).
collected
data
included
general
characteristics,
medical
history,
specific
information
COVID-19.
Chi-square
Mann-Whitney
U
-tests
were
performed.
Bivariate
logistic
regression
then
performed
investigate
possible
associations
between
occurrence
Results
38.8%
participants
experienced
Among
these,
unexpected
vaginal
bleeding
(20.8%)
most
common
event,
followed
by
spotting
(11.1%)
Table
1
).
Other
reported
changes
length
(shorter
12.5%)
flow
(heavier
30.3%)
menstrual
comparison
previous
experience.
Regression
revealed
that
being
perimenopausal
woman
[adjusted
odds
ratio
(AOR)
4.721,
CI
95%,
1.022–21.796,
p
0.047]
having
diagnosis
menorrhagia
(AOR
5.824
1.521–22.310,
0.010)
with
event.
Conclusion
These
findings
could
help
professionals
provide
patients
up-to-date
scientific
empower
them
actively
manage
health,
especially
societies
where
still
taboo.
Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
20(1), P. 24 - 30
Published: Dec. 1, 2023
Objective:
This
study
aimed
to
explore
the
impact
of
various
COVID-19
vaccines
on
menstrual
cycle
Jordanian
women.
Materials
and
Methods:
We
conducted
a
retrospective
analysis
tracked
changes
using
an
anonymous
questionnaire
written
in
local
language.
received
732
responses,
after
exclusions,
617
responses
were
analyzed.
The
covered
six
sectors:
demographics,
medical
history,
infection
vaccination
status,
obstetric
gynecological
specific
questions
about
length,
flow,
any
symptoms
before
each
vaccine
shot.
Participants
included
females
who
had
type
vaccine.
Results:
Among
participants
analyzed,
two-thirds
between
ages
20-35,
majority
normal
BMI
(59.6%).
Most
single,
nulliparous,
never
used
contraception
methods
(79.3%,
82.0%,
93.8%,
respectively).
Only
small
percentage
other
risk
factors
influencing
changes,
such
as
surgical
procedures
(10.5%)
medications
(8.10%).
Baseline
information
was
recorded.
Forty
percent
experienced
duration,
approximately
one-fifth
reported
heavier
more
severe
premenstrual
syndrome
(PMS)
symptoms.
Body
mass
index
(BMI)
directly
correlated
with
bleeding
intensity
vaccination.
Parity
weakly
proportional
However,
parity
did
not
significantly
correlate
PMS
symptoms,
or
cramps
Conclusion:
In
population
young,
non-sexually
active
women
BMI,
most
experience
significant
their
cycles
receiving
shorter
bleeding,
frequent,
painful,
post-vaccination.