Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptability among refugees and other migrant populations: A systematic scoping review
Yasaman Yazdani,
No information about this author
Poojitha Pai,
No information about this author
Shahab Sayfi
No information about this author
et al.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
19(7), P. e0292143 - e0292143
Published: July 5, 2024
Objective
This
study
aimed
to
map
the
existing
literature
identify
predictors
of
COVID-19
vaccine
acceptability
among
refugees,
immigrants,
and
other
migrant
populations.
Methods
A
systematic
search
Medline,
Embase,
Scopus,
APA
PsycInfo
Cumulative
Index
Nursing
Allied
Health
Literature
(CINAHL)
was
conducted
up
31
January
2023
relevant
English
peer-reviewed
observational
studies.
Two
independent
reviewers
screened
abstracts,
selected
studies,
extracted
data.
Results
We
identified
34
cross-sectional
primarily
in
high
income
countries
(76%).
Lower
acceptance
associated
with
mistrust
host
countries’
government
healthcare
system,
concerns
about
safety
effectiveness
vaccines,
limited
knowledge
infection
lower
risk
perception,
integration
level
country.
Female
gender,
younger
age,
education
level,
being
single
were
most
Additionally,
sources
information
vaccines
previous
history
infection,
also
influence
acceptance.
Vaccine
towards
booster
doses
various
brands
not
adequately
studied.
Conclusions
hesitancy
a
lack
trust
have
become
significant
public
health
within
These
findings
may
help
providing
for
current
future
outreach
strategies
Language: Английский
Racial Disparity in Healthcare Experience Among Women Seeking Fertility Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Zaher Merhi,
No information about this author
Serin Seckin,
No information about this author
Priscilla Morelli
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 7, 2025
There
are
racial
disparities
in
access
and
outcomes
of
assisted
reproductive
technology
treatment
the
USA;
however,
effect
pandemic
on
disparity
within
healthcare
has
not
been
extensively
studied.
This
study
aimed
to
identify
how
affected
patient
decision-making
regarding
fertility
planning
among
Black
versus
non-Black
women.
The
parameters
that
were
assessed
included
discontinuing
or
changing
plans
as
well
visits
clinic.
is
a
cross-sectional
questionnaire
was
conducted
at
university-affiliated
clinic
between
January
December
2021.
A
link
survey
emailed
patients
who
asked
fill
out
prior
during
pandemic,
particular,
choice
type
treatment,
exposure
COVID-19,
acceptability
vaccine
while
trying
conceive,
canceling
postponing
use
telehealth
pandemic.
Out
223
patients,
majority
reported
did
change
their
plans,
minority
either
treatments
with
financial
instability
being
most
reason.
Fewer
women
vaccinated
compared
When
whether
well-handled
by
major
systems,
less
likely
than
think
it
met
expectations.
Additionally,
be
comfortable
visiting
clinics
person
interested
future
at-home
monitoring,
if
available,
Thus,
undergoing
individuals
associated
lower
percentage
vaccinated,
satisfied
systems
handling
lesser
comfort
physically.
clear
need
understand
underlying
reasons
why
contributed
treatments.
Language: Английский
COVID-19 Vaccine Knowledge, Attitude, Acceptance and Hesitancy among Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Systematic Review of Hospital-Based Studies
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
11(11), P. 1697 - 1697
Published: Nov. 7, 2023
The
risk
of
unfavourable
outcomes
for
SARS-CoV-2
infection
is
significant
during
pregnancy
and
breastfeeding.
Vaccination
a
safe
effective
measure
to
lower
this
risk.
This
study
aims
at
reviewing
the
literature
concerning
anti-SARS-CoV-2
vaccine's
acceptance/hesitancy
among
pregnant
breastfeeding
women
attending
hospital
facilities.
A
systematic
review
was
carried
out.
Hospital-based
observational
studies
related
vaccination
acceptance,
hesitancy,
knowledge
attitude
were
included.
Determinants
acceptance
hesitancy
investigated
in
detail.
Quality
assessment
done
via
Johann
Briggs
Institute
quality
tools.
After
search,
43
included,
30
which
only
focused
on
(total
sample
25,862
subjects).
Sample
size
ranged
from
109
7017
people.
Acceptance
vaccine
16%
78.52%;
between
91.4%
24.5%.
Fear
adverse
events
either
woman,
child,
or
both,
main
driver
hesitancy.
Other
determinants
included
religious
concerns,
socioeconomic
factors,
inadequate
information
regarding
lack
trust
towards
institutions.
hospitalized
appears
be
significant,
efforts
more
communication
these
subjects
are
required.
Language: Английский
A Mother’s Dilemma: The 5-P Model for Vaccine Decision-Making in Pregnancy
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
11(7), P. 1248 - 1248
Published: July 17, 2023
Pregnant
women
are
a
highly
vaccine-resistant
population
and
face
unique
circumstances
that
complicate
vaccine
decision-making.
also
at
increased
risk
of
adverse
maternal
neonatal
outcomes
to
many
vaccine-preventable
diseases.
Several
models
have
been
proposed
describe
factors
informing
hesitancy
acceptance.
However,
none
these
existing
applicable
the
complex
decision-making
involved
with
acceptance
during
pregnancy.
We
propose
model
for
in
pregnancy
incorporates
following
key
factors:
(1)
perceived
information
sufficiency
regarding
vaccination
risks
pregnancy,
(2)
harm
avoidance
protect
fetus,
(3)
relationship
healthcare
provider,
(4)
benefits
vaccination,
(5)
disease
susceptibility
severity
In
addition
factors,
availability
research
on
safety
social
determinants
health,
structural
barriers
access,
prior
acceptance,
trust
system
play
roles
As
final
step,
pregnant
individual
must
balance
themselves
their
which
adds
greater
complexity
decision.
Our
represents
first
step
synthesizing
by
women,
who
represent
high
infectious
Language: Английский
Health and Well-Being through COVID-19 Vaccination: Physical, Oral, and Psychological Effects
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
20(4), P. 3117 - 3117
Published: Feb. 10, 2023
The
Coronavirus
Disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
and
its
evolving
variants
have
spurred
a
worldwide
effort
to
control
transmission
reduce
impact
[...].
Language: Английский
Reducing vaccine hesitancy in pregnancy by the health literacy model inclusive of modern communication tools
Stefania Triunfo,
No information about this author
Veronica Iannuzzi,
No information about this author
Martina Podda
No information about this author
et al.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
308(5), P. 1391 - 1393
Published: Aug. 8, 2023
Language: Английский
Increasing Vaccine Uptake during Pregnancy by Using Prenatal Education Classes: An Effective Tool for Health Communication and Promotion
Stefania Triunfo,
No information about this author
Silvia Perossini,
No information about this author
Esther Burdin
No information about this author
et al.
Children,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
10(9), P. 1466 - 1466
Published: Aug. 28, 2023
Childbirth
education
classes
represent
an
antenatal
tool
for
supporting
pregnant
women
and
couples
in
increasing
knowledge
on
pregnancy,
delivery,
breastfeeding,
newborn
care.
The
aim
of
this
study
was
to
investigate
the
impact
additional
lesson
during
prenatal
course
regarding
advantage
vaccination
mitigation
maternal
anxiety.
An
observational
designed
that
included
participants
childbirth
compared
courses
enhanced
by
extra
pregnancy
versus
those
who
did
not
receive
it.
Assessment
educational
measured
using
validated
questionnaires
(State-Trait
Anxiety
Inventory,
STAI;
Perceived
Stress
Scale,
PSS;
World
Health
Organization-
Five
Well-Being
Index,
WHO-5).
A
total
145
participated
investigation
answering
online
survey.
Of
them,
33
patients
(22.8%)
belonged
without
a
vaccine,
while
112
(77.2%)
meeting
usefulness
getting
vaccinated
pregnancy.
No
statistical
differences
were
found
between
groups
terms
demographics
perinatal
outcomes.
Participants
enriched
reported
lower
basal
anxiety
levels
than
vaccine
(STAI-State,
normal
score
<
40,
30
vs.
19%,
p-value
0.041;
STAI-State,
mild
40-50,
78
67%,
0.037).
With
reference
prior
two
weeks,
wellbeing
level
improved
added
class
(score
>
13
as
measurement
wellbeing:
62%
80%,
0.05).
Moderate
perceived
stress
assessed
PSS
(64
50%,
0.042).
introduction
program
wellbeing,
addition
reducing
stress.
Language: Английский
Using the diffusion of innovations theory to understand factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination among tobacco users
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
19(12), P. e0309780 - e0309780
Published: Dec. 12, 2024
The
coronavirus
disease
(COVID-19)
pandemic
has
spread
in
the
US
with
more
than
100
million
human
infections
and
a
deaths
since
March
2020.
A
population
of
concern
are
high-risk
individuals
such
as
adults
who
tobacco
users,
COVID-19
is
respiratory
that
affects
lungs.
Although
79%
≥
18
years
age
have
completed
primary
vaccine
series;
it
imperative
to
understand
factors
associated
receiving
or
declining
among
populations
improve
vaccination
rates.
Guided
by
diffusion
innovations
(DOI)
theory,
this
study
identified
impact
on
uptake
use
tobacco.
We
conducted
cross-sectional
using
sample
Pennsylvanian
adult
users
sending
unique
survey
link
4,081
email
addresses
April
2022.
Participants
were
asked
about
use,
status,
reasons
for
receiving/declining
vaccine.
(n
=
157)
75%
female,
96%
White,
74%
current
had
mean
50.1
(SD
10.8)
years.
Nearly
78%
119)
received
at
least
one
dose
(primary
series).
categorized
all
vaccinated
into
adopter
categories
DOI
theory;
innovators
(10%),
early
adopters
(14%),
majority
(33%),
late
(11%),
laggards
(32%).
major
reason
prompted
participants
get
was
ensure
they
well
protected
against
infection
(77%).
Additionally,
only
significantly
predicted
(being
an
innovator
adopter)
“to
loosen
restrictions
mask
mandates
social/physical
distancing”
(p
0.0180).
Among
22%
did
not
receive
vaccine,
most
common
declined
because
felt
politics
played
big
role
development
process
(94%).
Our
findings
suggest
f
actors
influenced
why
would
decline
included
control
mandates,
protection
from
infection,
politics.
Investigating
these
can
help
public
health
professionals
design
develop
future
programs
order
scale
up
Language: Английский
The Research Protection-Inclusion Dilemma in Pregnancy: Who is Being Protected? Who is Being Included?
Carl Terhune D'Angio,
No information about this author
Lainie Friedman Ross
No information about this author
The American Journal of Bioethics,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
23(6), P. 103 - 106
Published: May 23, 2023
Click
to
increase
image
sizeClick
decrease
sizeThis
article
refers
to:IRBs
and
the
Protection-Inclusion
Dilemma:
Finding
a
Balance
Additional
informationFundingThe
author(s)
reported
there
is
no
funding
associated
with
work
featured
in
this
article.
Language: Английский
Increasing Vaccine Uptake during Pregnancy by Using Prenatal Education Classes: An Effective Tool for Health Communication and Promotion
Stefania Triunfo,
No information about this author
Silvia Perossini,
No information about this author
Esther Burdin
No information about this author
et al.
Published: Aug. 22, 2023
Childbirth
education
classes
represent
an
antenatal
tool
for
supporting
pregnant
women
and
couples
in
increasing
knowledge
on
pregnancy,
delivery,
breastfeeding,
newborn
care.
The
aim
of
this
study
was
to
investigate
the
impact
additional
lesson
prenatal
course
regarding
advantage
vaccination
mitigation
maternal
anxiety.
An
observational
designed
including
participants
childbirth
classes,
comparing
courses
enhanced
by
extra
during
pregnancy
versus
those
lacking
it.
Assessment
educational
vaccine
measured
using
validated
questionnaires
(State-Trait
Anxiety
Inventory,
STAI;
Perceived
Stress
Scale,
PSS;
World
Health
Organization-
Five
Well-Being
Index,
WHO-5).
A
total
145
participated
investigation
answering
online
survey.
Of
them,
33
patients
(22.8%)
belong
without
vaccine,
while
112
(77.2%)
inclusive
meeting
usefulness
get
vaccinated
pregnancy.
No
statistical
differences
were
found
between
groups
demographics
perinatal
outcomes.
Participants
enriched
reported
lower
basal
anxiety
levels
than
(STAI-State,
normal
score
<40,
30
vs.
19%,
p-value
0.041;
STAI-State,
mild
40-50,
78
vs
67%,
0.037).
With
reference
last
two
weeks,
wellbeing
level
improved
added
class
(score
>13
as
measurement
wellbeing:
62%
80%,
p-value<0.05).
Moderate
perceived
stress
assessed
PSS
(64
50%,
0.042).
introduction
a
program
improves
wellbeing,
addition
reducing
stress.
Language: Английский