Atmosphere,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
13(2), P. 273 - 273
Published: Feb. 5, 2022
Objectives:
Policy
responses
to
the
COVID-19
pandemic
in
2020
led
behaviour
changes
UK’s
population,
including
a
sudden
shift
towards
working
from
home.
These
may
have
affected
overall
exposure
fine
particulate
matter
(PM2.5),
an
air
pollutant
and
source
of
health
harm.
We
report
results
simulation
model
representative
sample
workers
non-workers,
estimate
PM2.5
before
during
pandemic.
Methods:
was
simulated
April
August
2017–2020
for
10,000
individuals
across
UK
drawn
2011
nationwide
census.
data
were
combined
with
ambient
monitoring
network,
time
use
on
relevant
personal
first
stage
(such
as
smoking
cooking).
Results:
The
exposures
significantly
different
between
each
year.
Changes
resulted
regional
temporal
variation.
People
living
homes
where
someone
smoked
experienced
higher
than
those
smoke-free
homes,
increase
4
µg/m3
2020.
Conclusions:
minimal
most
despite
increases
cooking
activity.
Those
(estimated
be
around
11%
population)
increased
COVID
lockdown
measures
this
is
likely
mortality
morbidity
among
group.
Government
policy
should
address
risk
second-hand
smoke
event
future
COVID-19-related
restrictions.
Tobacco Control,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
31(2), P. 250 - 256
Published: March 1, 2022
Adoption
of
smoke-free
measures
has
been
one
the
central
elements
tobacco
control
activity
over
past
30
years.
The
decade
seen
an
increasing
number
countries
and
proportion
global
population
covered
by
policies
to
some
extent.
Despite
reductions
in
smoking
prevalence,
growth
means
that
non-smokers
exposed
harms
caused
secondhand
smoke
remains
high.
Smoke-free
policy
have
shown
be
useful
protecting
from
smoke,
can
additionally
increase
cessation
reduce
initiation.
Policies
tend
aimed
primarily
at
enclosed
public
or
workplace
settings
with
very
few
attempting
exposure
private
semiprivate
spaces
such
as
homes
cars,
and,
a
result,
children
may
benefiting
less
than
adults.
Compliance
legislation
also
varies
country
there
is
need
for
education
empowerment
together
guidance
changing
social
norms
help
deliver
full
benefits
bring.
Restrictions
on
use
electronic
cigarettes
(e-cigarettes)
require
more
research
determine
implications
bystanders’
e-cigarette
aerosol,
dual
cessation.
JAMA Network Open,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
5(5), P. e2210029 - e2210029
Published: May 3, 2022
Menthol
cigarettes
were
prohibited
in
England
May
2020
and
nationally
Canada
October
2017
but
remain
permitted
the
US.
Evidence
on
outcomes
of
menthol
cigarette
bans
among
youth
outside
Canada,
characteristics
smokers,
is
lacking.To
evaluate
smoking
to
characterize
smokers
terms
demographics
consumption
dependence.This
survey
study
uses
data
from
online
repeat
cross-sectional
International
Tobacco
Control
Youth
Vaping
Surveys
conducted
2018,
2019,
February
2020,
August
2020.
Participants
included
past
30-day
aged
16
19
years.
Data
analysis
was
performed
March
2021
January
2022.Usually
smoke
a
brand
that
menthol,
including
capsule.Menthol
ban,
comparing
3
countries
over
time:
where
ban
already
existed,
England,
implemented
during
study,
US,
no
national
present.
Age,
sex,
race,
dependence
also
examined
by
each
country,
before
vs
after
ban.The
analytical
sample
comprised
7067
participants
years,
whom
4129
female
5019
White.
In
weighted
percentage
who
reported
or
capsule
stable
waves
(2018
9.4%
12.1%;
adjusted
odds
ratio
[AOR],
1.03;
95%
CI,
0.99-1.06;
P
=
.15)
decreased
3.0%
(February
AOR,
1.07;
1.04-1.10;
<
.001).
The
decrease
between
similar
across
all
demographic
groups
greater
perceived
themselves
as
addicted
(AOR,
0.37;
0.41-0.97;
.04).
2
comparison
countries,
2020:
33.6%-36.9%;
3.1%-2.3%)
more
prevalent
US
than
5.58;
4.63-6.72;
male
(10.9%
7.2%;
1.04;
1.01-1.06;
.002);
identified
Black
White
(60.6%
31.9%;
1.33;
1.23-1.44;
.001)
frequent
1.01-1.13;
.03),
smoked
per
day
(2-5
1,
1.09;
1.02-1.15;
.006;
>5
1.10;
1.03-1.18;
.007),
had
urges
every
most
days
1.08;
1.02-1.14;
.006);
1.02;
1.00-1.03;
.01).In
this
proportion
(including
capsule)
substantially
England.
This
association
consistent
groups.
Perceived
addiction
lower
banned.
Abstract
Introduction
This
study
aimed
to
estimate
time
trends
in
cigarette
consumption
among
smokers
England
between
2008
and
2023
explore
differences
by
key
potential
moderators.
Aims
Methods
We
used
data
from
57
778
adult
participating
a
nationally
representative
monthly
cross-sectional
survey
January
September
2023.
estimated
mean
daily
of
(1)
any,
(2)
manufactured,
(3)
hand-rolled
cigarettes
all
main
type
smoked,
smoking
frequency,
age,
gender,
occupational
social
grade,
region,
nicotine
replacement
therapy
use,
vaping
status.
Results
Overall
fell
13.6
[95%
CI
=
13.3
13.9]
10.6
[10.5
10.8]
per
day
October
2019
(a
22%
decrease),
then
remained
stable
up
Over
this
period,
the
proportion
mainly
or
exclusively
increased
(from
30.6%
[29.1%–32.1%]
52.1%
[49.7%–54.5%]
2023).
As
result,
manufactured
47%,
9.5
[9.2–9.8]
5.0
[4.7–5.3]
2023,
while
35%,
4.2
[3.9–4.4]
5.6
[5.3–5.9],
respectively.
The
decline
overall
was
observed
across
subgroups,
but
greater
non-daily
smokers,
younger
those
who
vaped.
Conclusions
last
15
years,
average
number
consumed
each
has
fallen
almost
quarter,
plateaued
since
2019.
There
been
sharp
an
increase
consumed,
as
have
increasingly
shifted
towards
using
tobacco.
Implications
While
over
past
declining
trend
stalled
(and
reversed
some
population
groups)
availability
cheap,
tobacco
appears
be
undermining
policies
that
aim
reduce
raising
price
(eg,
through
taxation)
could
targeted
reignite
consumption.
BMC Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
20(1)
Published: Sept. 21, 2022
Employment
disruptions
can
impact
smoking
and
alcohol
consumption.
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
many
countries
implemented
furlough
schemes
to
prevent
job
loss.
We
examine
how
was
associated
with
smoking,
vaping
consumption
in
UK.Data
from
27,841
participants
eight
UK
adult
longitudinal
surveys
were
analysed.
Participants
self-reported
employment
status
current
(>4
days/week
or
5+
drinks
per
typical
occasion)
both
before
during
early
stages
of
pandemic
(April-July
2020).
Risk
ratios
estimated
within
each
study
using
modified
Poisson
regression,
adjusting
for
a
range
potential
confounders,
including
pre-pandemic
behaviour.
Findings
synthesised
random
effects
meta-analysis.Compared
stable
after
adjustment
characteristics,
not
(ARR
=
1.05;
95%
CI:
0.95-1.16;
I2:
10%),
0.89;
0.74-1.08;
0%)
drinking
1.03;
0.94-1.13;
48%).
There
similar
findings
no
longer
being
employed,
unemployment,
though
this
varied
by
sex:
unemployment
women
1.35;
1.00-1.82;
47%)
but
men
(0.84;
0.67-1.05;
0%).
No
employed
among
2.74;
1.59-4.72;
1.25;
0.83-1.87;
0%).We
found
clear
evidence
having
adverse
impacts
on
behaviours
UK.
Differences
risk
compared
those
who
remained
largely
explained
characteristics.
Air Quality Atmosphere & Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
16(3), P. 553 - 566
Published: Nov. 28, 2022
Abstract
The
health
impacts
associated
with
exposure
to
elevated
concentrations
of
fine
particulate
matter
(PM
2.5
)
are
well
recognised.
There
is
a
substantial
number
studies
characterising
PM
outdoors,
as
in
homes
within
low-
and
middle-income
countries.
In
high-income
countries
(HICs),
there
sizeable
literature
on
indoor
relating
smoking,
but
the
evidence
generated
from
non-tobacco
sources
sparse.
This
especially
relevant
people
living
HICs
spend
majority
their
time
at
home,
northern
hemisphere
households
often
have
low
air
exchange
rates
for
energy
efficiency.
review
identified
49
that
described
variety
common
household
real-life
home
settings
HICs.
These
included
wood/solid
fuel
burning
appliances,
cooking,
candles,
incense,
cleaning
humidifiers.
reported
varied
widely,
both
between
groups
same
source.
solid
fuels
was
found
generate
highest
concentrations.
On
occasion,
other
were
also
be
responsible
high
concentrations;
however,
this
only
few
select
examples.
highlights
many
inconsistencies
ways
data
collected
reported.
variable
methods
measurement
reporting
make
comparison
interpretation
difficult.
need
standardisation
agreed
contextual
more
useful
epidemiological
aid
impact
different
interventions
policies.
BMC Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
22(1)
Published: June 11, 2022
Abstract
Background
People
remain
exposed
to
secondhand
smoke,
a
serious
health
hazard,
inside
their
home
as
households
face
challenges
in
setting
no-smoking
rules
or
are
smoke
drifting
from
neighbouring
homes.
This
study
explores
the
psychosocial
impacts,
views,
and
experiences
with
residential
densely
populated
urban
setting.
Methods
In-depth
online
interviews
18
key
informants
who
had
been
involved
public
discourse,
policy,
advocacy
handling
complaints
related
14
smokers,
16
non-smokers
home.
All
participants
were
residents
of
Singapore,
populated,
multi-ethnic
city-state.
Interview
transcripts
coded
NVivo
using
deductive
inductive
coding
process.
Findings
Secondhand
has
wide-reaching
impacts
on
physical
wellbeing,
even
if
smokers
tried
minimise
smoke.
Feelings
anxiety
stress
generally
tied
feeling
discomfort
one’s
personal
space,
perceived
lack
control
over
situation,
resentment
towards
concerns
effects.
Family,
community,
cultural
dynamics
add
complexities
tackling
issue,
especially
patriarchal
households.
exposure
neighbours
is
considered
widespread
exacerbated
by
structural
factors
such
building
layout
COVID-19
pandemic.
Resolving
issue
amicably
challenging
due
absence
regulations
reluctance
stir
up
conflict
neighbours.
While
took
measures
reduce
these
described
ineffective
other
participants.
Smokers
appeared
have
contrasting
views
what
it
means
socially
responsible
manner.
Conclusion
Given
there
case
for
stronger
interventions,
settings
where
more
difficult
avoid.
Health Education Research,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
38(5), P. 445 - 457
Published: July 25, 2023
Abstract
Globally,
COVID-19
has
been
a
major
societal
stressor
and
disrupted
social
physical
environments
for
many.
Elucidating
mechanisms
through
which
disruptions
influence
smoking
behavior
implications
future
tobacco
control
efforts.
Qualitative
interviews
were
conducted
among
38
adults
who
smoked
combustible
cigarettes
in
2020
2021.
The
majority
women
(75.7%),
identified
as
Black
(56.8%),
employed
(61.3%),
had
smoke-free
home
(66.7%)
lived
small
metro
or
rural
(79.0%)
county,
primarily
southwest
Georgia.
Participants
reported
more
time
at
home,
increased
isolation
less
socializing,
changed
work
financial
situations
altered
household
family
contexts.
vast
of
participants
some
point
during
the
pandemic
with
about
half
these
continuing
to
smoke
interview.
More
multiple
sources
stress
boredom
main
reasons
smoking.
Decreases
attributed
strain,
rules
nonsmoking
members,
concerns
socializing
friends
smoke.
Future
efforts
stressors
such
pandemics
should
take
into
account
specific
psychosocial
environmental
influences
attempts
minimize
negative
changes
patterns.
Nicotine & Tobacco Research,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
25(2), P. 298 - 308
Published: Aug. 24, 2022
Abstract
Introduction
Cigarettes
and
smokeless
tobacco
(snus
nicotine
pouches)
are
prevalent
among
youth
young
adults
in
Denmark.
Here,
we
examined
the
extent
of
changes
use
cigarettes
during
first
Coronavirus
Disease
2019
(COVID-19)
lockdown
March
April
2020
Denmark
as
well
reasons
for
changed
behavior.
Aims
Methods
This
study
used
data
from
a
nationwide
survey
conducted
15-
to
29-year-olds
January
2021
including
13
530
respondents
(response
rate
=
36.0%).
Logistic
regression
analyses
assessed
associations
between
sociodemographic
characteristics
odds
initiating
or
increasing
trying
stop
decreasing
cigarette
smoking
use.
Results
The
prevalence
was
17.8%
10.5%
reported
using
tobacco.
Around
40%
those
currently
smoke
on
par
COVID-19
before,
24.5%
started
increased
their
smoking,
27.4%
tried
smoked
less.
Approximately
37%
same
level
as,
before
lockdown,
38.8%
initiated
more,
14.1%
Females
were
more
prone
initiate
increase
younger
participants
More
females
compared
with
males
behaviors
because
mood,
did
so
fewer
social
gatherings.
Conclusion
Although
most
youths
adults’
remained
many
also
decreased
behaviors—especially
participants.
Implications
enables
possibility
detecting
new
tendencies
subgroups
population
lockdown.
knowledge
is
crucial
identifying
which
groups
vulnerable
other
pandemic
situations
call
special
attention
after
period.
Future
efforts
may
focus
affected
by
pandemic,
such
females,
there
need
monitor
closely
whether
society
becomes
normalized.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
19(3), P. 1568 - 1568
Published: Jan. 29, 2022
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
posed
a
substantial
threat
to
people's
lives
and
aroused
health
concerns.
This
study
aims
at
exploring
the
following
questions.
First,
how
does
affect
willingness
pay
for
(WPH)
in
short
long
term?
Second,
what
is
psychological
mechanism
underlying
such
an
effect?
Finally,
are
boundary
conditions
this
To
answer
these
questions,
we
conducted
three
longitudinal
surveys.
first
survey
was
launched
February
2020-the
time
of
most
serious
outbreak
China.
Data
were
obtained
from
1548
participants
through
questionnaires
on
online
platform.
sample
covered
297
prefecture-level
cities
31
provincial
administrative
regions.
Subsequently,
two
follow-up
surveys
August
2020
July
2021.
samples
randomly
selected
survey.
findings
showed
that
promoted
WPH
period.
fear
death
self-esteem
mediated
moderated
effect,
respectively.
Moreover,
effect
persisted
six
months
after
had
been
brought
under
control
(August
2020).
However,
disappeared
year
half
(July
2021).
These
results
indicate
sustained
term
but
not
term.