medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Nov. 17, 2022
Abstract
Objectives
The
mental
health
impacts
of
the
COVID-19
pandemic
continue
to
be
documented
worldwide
with
systematic
reviews
playing
a
pivotal
role.
Here
we
present
updated
findings
from
our
review
and
meta-analysis
on
among
hospital
healthcare
workers
during
COVID-19.
Methods
We
searched
MEDLINE,
CINAHL,
PsycINFO,
Embase
Web
Of
Science
Core
Collection
between
1st
January
2000
17
th
February
2022
for
studies
using
validated
methods
reporting
prevalence
diagnosed
or
probable
disorders
in
pandemic.
A
proportions
odds
ratio
was
performed
random
effects
model.
Heterogeneity
investigated
test
subgroup
differences
95%
prediction
intervals.
Results
included
401
studies,
representing
458
754
participants
across
58
countries.
Pooled
depression
28.5%
(95%CI:
26.3-30.7),
anxiety
28.7%
26.5-31.0),
PTSD
25.5%
22.5-28.5),
alcohol
substance
use
disorder
25.3%
13.3-39.6)
insomnia
24.4%
19.4-29.9).
Prevalence
rates
were
stratified
by
physicians,
nurses,
allied
health,
support
staff
students,
which
varied
considerably.
There
significantly
higher
women,
those
working
high-risk
units
providing
direct
care.
Limitations
Majority
used
self-report
measures
reflected
rather
than
actual
diagnosis.
Conclusions
These
have
enhanced
understanding
at-risk
groups
hospitals.
Targeted
research
towards
these
risks
are
recommended
mitigate
any
long-term
consequences.
Journal of Affective Disorders,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
330, P. 329 - 345
Published: March 16, 2023
The
mental
health
impacts
of
the
COVID-19
pandemic
continue
to
be
documented
worldwide
with
systematic
reviews
playing
a
pivotal
role.
Here
we
present
updated
findings
from
our
review
and
meta-analysis
on
among
hospital
healthcare
workers
during
COVID-19.
We
searched
MEDLINE,
CINAHL,
PsycINFO,
Embase
Web
Of
Science
Core
Collection
between
1st
January
2000
17th
February
2022
for
studies
using
validated
methods
reporting
prevalence
diagnosed
or
probable
disorders
in
pandemic.
A
proportions
odds
ratio
was
performed
random
effects
model.
Heterogeneity
investigated
test
subgroup
differences
95
%
prediction
intervals.
included
401
studies,
representing
458,754
participants
across
58
countries.
Pooled
depression
28.5
(95
CI:
26.3–30.7),
anxiety
28.7
26.5–31.0),
PTSD
25.5
22.5–28.5),
alcohol
substance
use
disorder
25.3
13.3–39.6)
insomnia
24.4
19.4–29.9).
Prevalence
rates
were
stratified
by
physicians,
nurses,
allied
health,
support
staff
students,
which
varied
considerably.
There
significantly
higher
women,
those
working
high-risk
units
providing
direct
care.
Majority
used
self-report
measures
reflected
rather
than
actual
diagnosis.
These
have
enhanced
understanding
at-risk
groups
hospitals.
Targeted
research
towards
these
risks
are
recommended
mitigate
any
long-term
consequences.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
19(1), P. e0289454 - e0289454
Published: Jan. 19, 2024
Background
The
mental
health
of
healthcare
workers
during
the
coronavirus-2019
pandemic
was
seriously
affected,
and
risk
problems
high.
present
study
sought
to
systematically
evaluate
worldwide
determine
latest
global
frequency
COVID-19
associated
problems.
Methods
Data
in
Cumulative
Index
Nursing
Allied
Health
Literature
(CINAHL),
EMBASE,
Elsevier,
MEDLINE,
PubMed,
PsycINFO
Web
Science
before
November
11,
2022,
were
searched.
Cohort,
case-control
cross-sectional
studies
included.
meta-analysis
used
a
random
effects
model
synthesize
comprehensive
prevalence
rate
Subgroup
analyses
performed
based
on
time
data
collection;
whether
country
or
not
developed;
continent;
doctors
nurses;
doctors/nurses
vs.
other
workers;
psychological
evaluation
scale.
Results
A
total
161
included,
including
341,014
worldwide,
with
women
accounting
for
82.8%.
Occupationally,
16.2%
doctors,
63.6%
nurses
13.3%
medical
staff.
During
pandemic,
47%
(95%
confidence
interval
[CI],
35–60%)
reported
job
burnout,
38%
CI,
35–41%)
experienced
anxiety,
34%
CI
30–38%)
depression,
30%
29–31%)
had
acute
stress
disorder,
26%
21–31%)
post-traumatic
disorder.
Conclusions
found
that
there
common
among
care
pandemic.
most
followed
by
Although
has
been
brought
under
control,
its
long-term
impact
cannot
be
ignored.
Additional
research
is
required
develop
measures
prevent,
monitor
treat
disorders
workers.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
19(3), P. 1154 - 1154
Published: Jan. 20, 2022
The
high
risk
of
coronavirus
(COVID-19)
infection
can
increase
the
physical
and
psychological
strain
on
nurses
in
professional
practice,
which
lead
to
mental
health
problems.
purpose
this
systematic
review
meta-analysis
is
establish
estimate
combined
incidence
depression
anxiety
among
during
COVID-19
pandemic
using
standard
measurement
tools.
A
search
electronic
databases
PubMed,
Web
Science,
SCOPUS
was
carried
out
identify
cross-sectional
studies
period
from
3
March
2020
18
February
2021.
Two
reviewers
independently
critically
evaluated
have
been
included,
Agency
for
Healthcare
Research
Quality
checklist.
We
identified
twenty-three
(n
=
44,165)
nine
countries.
22%
(95%
CI
0.15–0.30,
I2
99.71%),
symptoms
29%
(95%CI
0.18–0.40,
99.92%).
No
significant
difference
observed
percentage
between
study
subjects
working
frontlines
vs.
those
a
mixed
group
(those
behind
lines).
This
shows
that
over
one-fifth
practice
epidemic
suffer
disorders,
almost
one-third
experience
symptoms.
underscores
importance
providing
comprehensive
support
strategies
conditions.
Further
longitudinal
research
necessary
assess
severity
related
factor.
Human Resources for Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
22(1)
Published: Jan. 25, 2024
Abstract
Background
Health
and
care
workers
(HCW)
faced
the
double
burden
of
SARS-CoV-2
pandemic:
as
members
a
society
affected
by
public
health
emergency
HWC
who
experienced
fear
becoming
infected
infecting
others,
stigma,
violence,
increased
workloads,
changes
in
scope
practice,
among
others.
To
understand
short
long-term
impacts
terms
COVID-19
pandemic
other
emergencies
international
concern
(PHEICs)
on
HCW
relevant
interventions
to
address
them,
we
designed
conducted
living
systematic
review
(LSR).
Methods
We
reviewed
literature
retrieved
from
MEDLINE—PubMed,
Embase,
SCOPUS,
LILACS,
World
Organization
database,
ClinicalTrials.org
ILO
published
January
2000
until
December
2021.
included
quantitative
observational
studies,
experimental
quasi-experimental,
mixed
methods
or
qualitative
studies;
addressing
mental,
physical
well-being
quality
life.
The
targeted
HCW;
exposures,
implemented
during
PHEICs.
assess
risk
bias
used
Johanna
Briggs
Institute
(JBI)
Critical
Appraisal
Tools.
Data
were
qualitatively
synthetized
using
meta-aggregation
meta-analysis
was
performed
estimate
pooled
prevalence
some
outcomes.
Results
1013
studies
mainly
research,
cross-sectional,
with
medium
bias/quality,
at
least
one
following:
mental
issue,
well-being,
Additionally,
short-
impact
PHEICs
review,
although
scarce,
behavioral
individual
oriented,
aimed
improving
through
development
interventions.
A
lack
organizational
systemic
bottlenecks
noted.
Discussion
impacted
greatest
toll
health.
are
intricate
complex.
revealed
consequences
for
service
delivery,
unplanned
absenteeism,
disruption
occupation
turnover
that
subvert
capacity
answer
PHEICs,
specifically
challenging
resilience
systems.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
20(5), P. 4586 - 4586
Published: March 4, 2023
Background:
Research
has
shown
the
substantial
impact
of
COVID-19
pandemic
on
healthcare
workers’
(HCWs)
mental
health,
however,
it
mostly
relies
data
collected
during
early
stages
COVID-19.
The
aim
this
study
is
to
assess
long-term
trajectory
HCWs’
health
and
associated
risk
factors.
Methods:
a
longitudinal
cohort
was
carried
out
in
an
Italian
hospital.
At
Time
1
(July
2020–July
2021),
990
HCWs
took
part
completed
General
Health
Questionnaire
(GHQ-12),
Impact
Event
Scale
(IES-R),
Anxiety
Disorder
(GAD-7)questionnaire.
McNemar’s
test
measured
changes
symptoms’
trajectories,
random
effects
models
evaluated
factors
with
scores
above
cut-off.
Results:
310
participated
follow-up
evaluation
(Time
2;
July
2021–July
2022).
2,
cut-offs
were
significantly
lower
(p
<
0.001)
than
at
for
all
scales
(23%
vs.
48%
GHQ-12;
11%
25%
IES-R;
15%
23%
GAD-7).
Risk
psychological
impairment
being
nurse
(IES-R:
OR
4.72,
95%
CI
1.71–13.0;
GAD-7:
2.82,
1.44–7.17),
assistant
6.76,
1.30–35.1),
or
having
had
infected
family
member
(GHQ-12:
1.95,
1.01–3.83).
Compared
1,
gender
experience
units
lost
significance
symptoms.
Conclusions:
over
more
24
months
from
onset
showed
improvement
health;
our
findings
suggested
need
tailor
prioritize
preventive
actions
towards
workforce.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10(2), P. 247 - 247
Published: Feb. 6, 2022
Public
health
workers
(PHWs)
have
experienced
substantial
workload
changes
because
of
their
role
in
managing
measures
to
limit
the
spread
COVID-19.
The
study's
aim
was
assess
lifestyle
Italian
PHWs
during
pandemic.
attending
an
annual
meeting
completed
anonymous
questionnaire
assessing
sociodemographic
and
behavioral
characteristics
A
total
1000
questionnaires
were
completed.
Most
participants
(63.5%
women,
mean
age
40
±
13.1
years)
normal
weight
(61.5%),
non-smokers
(81.9%),
had
a
screen
time
≥5
h/day
(83.1%),
slept
at
least
6
h/night
(88.7%).
Approximately
one-third
consumed
sweet
foods
every
day
(30%)
did
not
engage
physical
activity
(34.6%).
Current
food
consumption,
activity,
sleep
associated
with
these
behaviors
last
2
years
(Tau-b
=
0.155;
Tau-b
-0.175;
-0.276,
respectively,
p
<
0.001).
An
increase
remote
working
worse
(odds
ratio
(OR)
2.065,
95%
confidence
interval
(CI)
1.482-2.877)
diet
(OR
1.982,
CI
1.385-2.838),
increased
tablet/PC
use
3.314,
2.358-4.656).
Health
promotion
are
needed
support
adoption
healthy
lifestyles
this
population
current
Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
15(4), P. 2977 - 2977
Published: Feb. 7, 2023
Background:
COVID-19
has
radically
changed
our
lives,
bringing
with
it
numerous
consequences.
While
this
is
already
true
for
the
general
population,
even
more
so
a
specific
job
category:
healthcare
workers.
Objective:
This
study
aims
to
analyze
mental
health
and
quality
of
professional
life
workers
one
year
after
outbreak
pandemic.
Methods:
based
on
an
exploratory
quantitative
method.
The
researchers
submitted
questionnaire
consisting
scales
validated
in
literature
through
Lime-Survey
platform.
dimensions
explored
included
health,
burnout,
compassion
fatigue,
satisfaction
basic
work-related
needs,
perceived
support
from
friends
family.
results
show
how
well-being
continues
decline
due
increased
stress,
which,
turn,
leads
situations
psychological
distress
discomfort
that
are
summarized
appearance
disorders
such
as,
example,
burnout.
In
situation
distress,
some
protective
aspects
emerge
social
support,
especially
dimension
friendship.
Conclusions:
general,
taking
care
category
turns
out
be
essential
prepared
possible
future
illnesses
people
who
suffer.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
19(11), P. 6762 - 6762
Published: June 1, 2022
In
this
research,
we
examined
how
COVID-19
impacts
employee
decision-making
and
performance,
knowing
that
virus
has
negatively
affected
public
health,
crippled
economies,
transformed
social
business
environments
across
the
globe.
To
quantitatively
test
our
specific
hypotheses
regarding
effects
of
employees’
perceived
risk
psychological
distress
on
negative
performance
outcomes,
surveyed
443
healthcare
workers
who
were
employed
by
a
group
private
hospitals
in
Zimbabwe.
These
essential
delivering
day-to-day
frontline
services
with
high
exposure
to
during
pandemic.
We
find
increases
their
disengagement,
turnover
intention,
burnout,
low
morale
at
p
<
0.05
significance
level.
latter
relationships
are
mediated
Our
findings
shed
light
pandemic
is
affecting
cognitions
behaviors
vulnerable
contagious
disease.
Turnover
intentions
amplified
among
employees,
due
resulting
distress.
Similarly,
burnout
becomes
predominant
as
these
worry
about
contracting
coronavirus
poor
working
conditions
they
face.
As
such,
research
confirms
intensified
precariousness
work
challenge
managing
especially
for
workers.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10
Published: March 25, 2022
As
the
SARS-CoV-2
Omicron
variant
spreads
in
several
countries,
healthcare
workers'
(HCWs)
perceptions
and
worries
regarding
vaccine
effectiveness
boosters
warrant
reassessment.An
online
questionnaire
among
HCWs
Saudi
Arabia
(KSA)
was
distributed
from
Dec
1st-6th
2021
to
assess
their
perceptions,
advocacy
variant,
perception
of
infection
prevention
measures
vaccination
prevent
its
spread,
related
comparison
other
variants,
agreement
with
mandatory
general
for
adults.Among
1,285
HCW
participants,
two-thirds
were
female,
49.8
%
nurses,
46.4%
physicians,
50.0%
worked
tertiary
care
hospitals.
66.9%
considered
be
most
effective
way
spread
future
variants.
The
respondents
however
perceived
social
distancing
(78.0%),
universal
masking
(77.8%),
avoiding
unnecessary
travel
(71.4%)
as
slightly
superior
aging
55
or
older
agreed
significantly
ineffectiveness
control
while
those
who
believed
non-pharmacological
that
purpose.
Male
had
a
significant
all
eligible
adult
populations.
On
hand,
unwilling
receive
strong
disagreements
vaccination.The
current
study
first
week
showed
only
felt
best
option
indicating
need
further
motivation
campaigns
booster
dose.
belief
contain
variants
should
encouraged
augmented.
BMC Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
22(1)
Published: Dec. 20, 2022
Abstract
Background
Long-term
psychological
impacts
of
the
COVID-19
pandemic
on
healthcare
workers
remain
unknown.
We
aimed
to
determine
one-year
progression
burnout
and
mental
health
since
onset,
verify
if
protective
factors
against
distress
at
beginning
(Cyr
et
al.
in
Front
Psychiatry;
2021)
remained
associated
when
assessed
several
months
later.
Methods
used
validated
questionnaires
(Maslach
Burnout
Inventory,
Hospital
Anxiety
Depression
posttraumatic
stress
disorder
[PTSD]
Checklist
for
DSM-5
scales)
assess
410
from
Quebec,
Canada,
three
12
after
onset.
then
performed
multivariable
regression
analyses
identify
months.
As
equivalent
post-pandemic
onset
had
already
been
conducted
previous
paper,
we
could
compare
both
time
points.
Results
Prevalence
anxiety
were
similar
(52%
vs.
51%,
p
=
0.66;
23%
23%,
0.91),
while
PTSD
(23%
11%,
<
0.0001)
depression
(11%
6%,
0.001)
decreased
significantly
over
time.
Higher
resilience
was
with
a
lower
probability
all
outcomes
Perceived
organizational
support
reduced
risk
Social
emerged
as
factor
persisted
studied
PTSD,
anxiety,
depression.
Conclusions
Healthcare
workers’
occupational
stabilized
or
improved
between
The
predominant
perceived
support.
For
depression,
social
important