Who consumes ultra-processed food? A systematic review of sociodemographic determinants of ultra-processed food consumption from nationally representative samples DOI Creative Commons
Samuel J. Dicken,

Sulmaaz Qamar,

Rachel L. Batterham

et al.

Nutrition Research Reviews, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 37(2), P. 416 - 456

Published: Oct. 31, 2023

Abstract Ultra-processed food (UPF) intake is associated with increased non-communicable disease risks. However, systematic reports on sociodemographic predictors of UPF are lacking. This review aimed to understand consumption based factors, using nationally representative cohorts. The was pre-registered (PROSPERO:CRD42022360199), following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE searches (‘ultra-processed/ultraprocessed’ and ‘ultra-processing/ultraprocessing’) until 7 September 2022 retrieved 1131 results. Inclusion criteria included: observational, adult samples, in English, peer-reviewed journals, assessing the association between sociodemographics individual-level defined by NOVA classification. Exclusion not representative, no assessment NOVA. Risk bias assessed Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Fifty-five papers were included, spanning thirty-two countries. All thirteen variables identified significantly one or more studies. Significant differences seen across age, race/ethnicity, rural/urbanisation, insecurity, income region, up 10–20% (% total energy). Higher intakes younger urbanisation being unmarried, single, separated divorced. Education, socioeconomic status showed varying associations, depending country. Multivariate analyses indicated that associations independent other sociodemographics. Household gender generally intake. NOS averaged 5·7/10. Several characteristics independently high intake, indicating large variation risk. These findings highlight significant public health inequalities urgent need for policy action minimise social injustice-related inequalities.

Language: Английский

Ultra-processed foods and risk of all-cause mortality: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies DOI Creative Commons

Shuming Liang,

Yesheng Zhou, Qian Zhang

et al.

Systematic Reviews, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 14(1)

Published: March 3, 2025

Ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption has been steadily increasing globally, yet the associated risk of all-cause mortality remains unclear. We aimed to assess UPFs via an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library for studies published until July 2, 2024, addition referred included previous review. Prospective cohort assessing association between NOVA classification-defined UPF were included. Dose-response meta-analysis a random-effect model used combine results with hazard ratio (HR) as effect measure. Overall, 18 1,148,387 participants (173,107 deaths) identified. Compared lowest, highest had 15% increased (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.09–1.22; I2 83.0%). Furthermore, 10% higher detected each increment 1.10, 1.04–1.16; 91.0%). analysis showed positive linear (Pdose-response < 0.001). Moreover, subgroups sensitivity analyses indicated consistent findings, while meta-regression suggested sex distributions partially explained heterogeneity, males. Our meta-analysis, incorporating greater number newly using classification largest sample size date, strengthens evidence linking risk. Strategies such dietary guidelines policies limiting worldwide should be encouraged. PROSPERO CRD42023467226.

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Ultra-processed foods and mortality: analysis from the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology study DOI Creative Commons
Mahshid Dehghan, Andrew Mente, Sumathy Rangarajan

et al.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 117(1), P. 55 - 63

Published: Dec. 20, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

32
The inflammatory potential of the diet as a link between food processing and low-grade inflammation: An analysis on 21,315 participants to the Moli-sani study DOI
Cristiana Mignogna, Simona Costanzo, Augusto Di Castelnuovo

et al.

Clinical Nutrition, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 41(10), P. 2226 - 2234

Published: Aug. 24, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

29
Ultra-processed food consumption and exposure to acrylamide in a nationally representative sample of the US population aged 6 years and older DOI
Eurídice Martinez Steele, Jessie P. Buckley, Carlos Augusto Monteiro

et al.

Preventive Medicine, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 174, P. 107598 - 107598

Published: June 29, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

21
Who consumes ultra-processed food? A systematic review of sociodemographic determinants of ultra-processed food consumption from nationally representative samples DOI Creative Commons
Samuel J. Dicken,

Sulmaaz Qamar,

Rachel L. Batterham

et al.

Nutrition Research Reviews, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 37(2), P. 416 - 456

Published: Oct. 31, 2023

Abstract Ultra-processed food (UPF) intake is associated with increased non-communicable disease risks. However, systematic reports on sociodemographic predictors of UPF are lacking. This review aimed to understand consumption based factors, using nationally representative cohorts. The was pre-registered (PROSPERO:CRD42022360199), following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE searches (‘ultra-processed/ultraprocessed’ and ‘ultra-processing/ultraprocessing’) until 7 September 2022 retrieved 1131 results. Inclusion criteria included: observational, adult samples, in English, peer-reviewed journals, assessing the association between sociodemographics individual-level defined by NOVA classification. Exclusion not representative, no assessment NOVA. Risk bias assessed Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Fifty-five papers were included, spanning thirty-two countries. All thirteen variables identified significantly one or more studies. Significant differences seen across age, race/ethnicity, rural/urbanisation, insecurity, income region, up 10–20% (% total energy). Higher intakes younger urbanisation being unmarried, single, separated divorced. Education, socioeconomic status showed varying associations, depending country. Multivariate analyses indicated that associations independent other sociodemographics. Household gender generally intake. NOS averaged 5·7/10. Several characteristics independently high intake, indicating large variation risk. These findings highlight significant public health inequalities urgent need for policy action minimise social injustice-related inequalities.

Language: Английский

Citations

20