Disentangling the complexity of human–nature interactions DOI Creative Commons
Elena M. Bennett, Belinda Reyers

People and Nature, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 6(2), P. 402 - 409

Published: Feb. 12, 2024

Abstract Human–nature interactions have been identified as an important leverage point for achieving sustainability. Processes to recognize, protect, improve and reimagine human–nature will be central shift the world more sustainable equitable pathways futures. In context of interconnected rapidly changing Anthropocene, work on must move beyond dominant linear assumptions a relatively simple easily predictably manipulated acknowledge engage with complex, dynamic, asymmetrical unequal nature connecting people nature. Based three key features highlighted by study complex social–ecological systems (SES)—that these are relational, open dynamic—we propose new directions management that can help disentangle globally intertwined dynamic interactions. These suggest foci sustainability science: inseparable relational qualities between nature; cross‐scale relationships; continuously evolving form relationships. To bridge gap theory reductionist tendencies in research practice, SES raises opportunities connect local action global learning; mobilize develop capacities encourage synergies avoid trade‐offs; explore, experiment learn our way forward onto pathways. Read free Plain Language Summary this article Journal blog.

Language: Английский

A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability DOI
Guido Caniglia, Christopher Luederitz, Timo von Wirth

et al.

Nature Sustainability, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 4(2), P. 93 - 100

Published: Oct. 5, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

400

Sustainability Science: Toward a Synthesis DOI Open Access
William C. Clark,

Alicia G. Harley

Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 45(1), P. 331 - 386

Published: Aug. 4, 2020

This review synthesizes diverse approaches that researchers have brought to bear on the challenge of sustainable development. We construct an integrated framework highlighting union set elements and relationships those shown be useful in explaining nature–society interactions multiple contexts. Compelling evidence has accumulated should viewed as a globally interconnected, complex adaptive system which heterogeneity, nonlinearity, innovation play formative roles. The long-term evolution cannot predicted but can understood partially guided through dynamic interventions. Research identified six capacities necessary support such interventions guiding development pathways toward sustainability. These are ( a) measure development, b) promote equity, c) adapt shocks surprises, d) transform into more pathways, e) link knowledge with action, f) devise governance arrangements allow people work together exercising other capacities.

Language: Английский

Citations

287

How leisure activities affect health: a narrative review and multi-level theoretical framework of mechanisms of action DOI
Daisy Fancourt, Henry Aughterson, Saoirse Finn

et al.

The Lancet Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 8(4), P. 329 - 339

Published: Feb. 11, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

286

Foundations of complexity economics DOI Open Access
W. Brian Arthur

Nature Reviews Physics, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 3(2), P. 136 - 145

Published: Jan. 29, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

243

Global targets that reveal the social–ecological interdependencies of sustainable development DOI
Belinda Reyers, Elizabeth R. Selig

Nature Ecology & Evolution, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 4(8), P. 1011 - 1019

Published: July 20, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

198

Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education DOI Creative Commons

Zack Walsh,

Jessica Böhme, Christine Wamsler

et al.

AMBIO, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 50(1), P. 74 - 84

Published: Feb. 28, 2020

Relational thinking has recently gained increasing prominence across academic disciplines in an attempt to understand complex phenomena terms of constitutive processes and relations. Interdisciplinary fields study, such as science technology studies (STS), the environmental humanities, posthumanities, for example, have started reformulate understanding nature-cultures based on relational thinking. Although sustainability crisis serves a contemporary backdrop fact calls innovative forms interdisciplinary scholarship, field research not yet tapped into rich possibilities offered by Against this background, purpose paper is identify approaches ontology, epistemology, ethics which are relevant research. More specifically, we analyze how been understood conceptualized broad range contexts harness connections contributions future sustainability-related work. Our results highlight common themes patterns approaches, helping characterize paradigm within On basis, conclude with call action researchers co-develop agenda advancing research, practice, education.

Language: Английский

Citations

162

The contributions of resilience to reshaping sustainable development DOI
Belinda Reyers,

Michele‐Lee Moore,

L. Jamila Haider

et al.

Nature Sustainability, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 5(8), P. 657 - 664

Published: May 12, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

83

Intertwined people–nature relations are central to nature-based adaptation to climate change DOI
Bruno Locatelli, Sandra Lavorel, Matthew J. Colloff

et al.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 380(1917)

Published: Jan. 9, 2025

Adaptation to climate change is a social–ecological process: it not solely result of natural processes or human decisions but emerges from multiple relations within social systems, ecological systems and between them. We propose novel analytical framework evaluate in nature-based adaptation, encompassing (people–people), (nature–nature) (people–nature) relations. Applying this 25 case studies, we analyse the associations among these identify archetypes adaptation. Our findings revealed that adaptation actions with more people–nature mobilize identified four archetypes, distinct modes along gradient interaction scores, summarized as: (i) nature control; (ii) biodiversity-based; (iii) ecosystem services-based; (iv) integrated approaches. This study contributes nuanced understanding highlighting importance integrating diverse across systems. offer valuable insights for informing design implementation strategies policies. article part discussion meeting issue ‘Bending curve towards recovery: building on Georgina Mace's legacy biodiverse future’.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science: introducing a critical systems approach DOI Creative Commons
Anita Lazurko,

Michele‐Lee Moore,

L. Jamila Haider

et al.

Global Sustainability, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 8

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Abstract Non-technical summary Transdisciplinary sustainability scientists work with many different actors in pursuit of change. In so doing they make choices about why and how to engage perspectives their research. Reflexivity – active individual collective critical reflection is considered an important capacity for researchers address the resulting ethical practical challenges. We developed a framework reflexivity as transformative science through systems approach, which helps any decisions that influence are included or excluded research explicit. suggest transdisciplinary can become more by nurturing reflexivity. Technical increasingly applied study Yet, involves diverse who hold contrasting sometimes conflicting worldviews. cited crucial navigating challenges, yet notions often focused on researcher reflections lack explicit links process predominant modes inquiry field. This gap presents risk remains periphery becomes ‘unreflexive’, dimensions left unacknowledged. Our objective was establish approach. refined rapid scoping review literature transdisciplinarity, transformation, reflexivity, scenario Red River Basin (US, Canada). The characterizes nurture dynamic, embedded, self-scrutiny mutual learning service change, manifests interacting boundary processes delineation, interaction, transformation. case suggests embedding this expose block transformation reflexive Social media may process.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

The minimum complexity necessary: the value of a simple Social-Ecological systems analysis in holistic marine environmental management DOI Creative Commons
Gemma Smith,

Jonathan P. Atkins,

Amanda Gregory

et al.

Sustainable Futures, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100476 - 100476

Published: Feb. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

2