
Brain stimulation, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 15(2), P. 414 - 425
Published: Feb. 15, 2022
Language: Английский
Brain stimulation, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 15(2), P. 414 - 425
Published: Feb. 15, 2022
Language: Английский
Brain stimulation, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 17(2), P. 176 - 183
Published: Jan. 27, 2024
BackgroundCortical excitability measures neural reactivity to stimuli, usually delivered via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). Excitation/inhibition balance (E/I) is the ongoing equilibrium between excitatory and inhibitory activity of circuits. According some studies, E/I could be estimated in-vivo non-invasively through modeling electroencephalography (EEG) signals termed 'intrinsic excitability' measures. Several have been proposed (phase consistency in gamma band, sample entropy, exponent power spectral density 1/f curve, index extracted from detrend fluctuation analysis, alpha power). Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) primary motor cortex (M1) a non-invasive neuromodulation technique allowing controlled focal enhancement TMS cortical stimulated hemisphere.ObjectiveInvestigating what extent estimates scale with how they relate each other.MethodsM1 (TMS) several resting state EEG recordings were assessed before after iTBS cohort healthy subjects.ResultsEnhancement M1 excitability, as measured motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), phase high band correlated other. Other showed expected results, but no correlation or strong other.ConclusionsEEG offer an intriguing opportunity map non-invasively, spatio-temporal resolution stimulus independent approach. While different may reflect diverse excitatory-inhibitory circuits, spatial synchrony measure that best captures changes cortex.
Language: Английский
Citations
15Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 62(8)
Published: Dec. 2, 2020
Fombonne’s (2020) editorial is a thought‐provoking appraisal of the literature on ‘camouflaging’, whereby some autistic people mask or compensate for their characteristics as an attempt to fit in and cope with disabilities under neurotypical social norms. Fombonne highlights three issues contention: (a) construct validity measurement camouflaging; (b) camouflaging reason late autism diagnosis adolescence/adulthood; (c) feature ‘female phenotype’. Here, we argue that establishing different aspects warranted; subjective experiences are important differential not necessarily female individuals – nevertheless, taking into account sex gender influences development crucial understand behavioural manifestations autism. Future research clinical directions should involve clarification associated constructs measurements, demography, mechanisms, impact (including harms benefits) tailored support.
Language: Английский
Citations
59NeuroImage Clinical, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 32, P. 102811 - 102811
Published: Jan. 1, 2021
Our current understanding of autism is largely based on clinical experiences and research involving male individuals given the male-predominance in prevalence under-inclusion female due to small samples, co-occurring conditions, or simply being missed for diagnosis. There a significantly biased ‘male lens’ this field with autistic females insufficiently understood. We therefore conducted systematic review examine how sex gender modulate brain structure function individuals. Findings from past 20 years are yet converge specific regions/networks consistent sex/gender-modulating effects. Despite at least three well-powered studies identifying patterns significant sex/gender-modulation autism-control differences, many other likely underpowered, suggesting critical need future investigation into sex/gender-based heterogeneity better-powered designs. Future should also formally investigate effects gender, beyond biological sex, which mostly absent literature. Understanding roles development an imperative step extend field.
Language: Английский
Citations
45PLoS Biology, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 19(4), P. e3001146 - e3001146
Published: April 1, 2021
General anesthesia is characterized by reversible loss of consciousness accompanied transient amnesia. Yet, long-term memory impairment an undesirable side effect. How different types general anesthetics (GAs) affect the hippocampus, a brain region central to formation and consolidation, poorly understood. Using extracellular recordings, chronic 2-photon imaging, behavioral analysis, we monitor effects isoflurane (Iso), medetomidine/midazolam/fentanyl (MMF), ketamine/xylazine (Keta/Xyl) on network activity structural spine dynamics in hippocampal CA1 area adult mice. GAs robustly reduced spiking activity, decorrelated cellular ensembles, albeit with distinct signatures, altered dynamics. under all 3 was natural sleep. Iso most closely resembled unperturbed during wakefulness sleep, alterations recovered more readily than Keta/Xyl MMF. Correspondingly, consolidation impaired after exposure MMF, but not Iso. Thus, distinctly alter dynamics, synaptic connectivity, implications for GA strategy appraisal animal research clinical settings.
Language: Английский
Citations
44Brain stimulation, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 15(2), P. 414 - 425
Published: Feb. 15, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
35