Biological Conservation,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
268, P. 109514 - 109514
Published: March 7, 2022
How
to
manage
forest
for
biodiversity
conservation
is
an
ongoing
debate.
We
argue
that
maximizing
in
managed
landscapes
requires
a
diversity
of
management
regimes
space
and
time.
This
will
generate
high
levels
habitat
heterogeneity
at
landscape
scale,
which
turn
support
various
groups
species.
Based
on
concepts
from
ecology,
we
formulate
five
hypotheses
how
diversity,
i.e.
combining
approaches
can
benefit
overall
across
production
landscape.
First,
increase
and,
therefore,
beta
(the
hypothesis).
Second,
asynchrony
timing
enhance
long-term
availability
different
types
spatio-temporal
Third,
create
spatial
adjacency
or
proximity
stands
with
successional
stages
by
providing
simultaneous
access
multiple
resources
interspersion
Fourth,
heterogeneous
unmanaged
set-aside
forests,
interspersed
are
needed
complete
natural
Fifth,
functional
connectivity
between
protected
forests
species
through
time
temporary
corridor
Although
strongly
grounded
these
remain
largely
under-investigated,
suggest
methods
they
be
tested.
In
the
meantime,
increasing
represents
risk-spreading
approach
adaptation
global
change,
therefore
likely
reasonable
objective
sustainable
forestry
moving
forward.
AMBIO,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
49(1), P. 85 - 97
Published: May 4, 2019
Retention
forestry
implies
that
biological
legacies
like
dead
and
living
trees
are
deliberately
selected
retained
beyond
harvesting
cycles
to
benefit
biodiversity
ecosystem
functioning.
This
model
has
been
applied
for
several
decades
in
even-aged,
clearcutting
(CC)
systems
but
less
so
uneven-aged,
continuous-cover
(CCF).
We
provide
an
overview
of
retention
CCF
temperate
regions
Europe,
currently
largely
focused
on
habitat
wood.
The
relevance
current
meta-analyses
many
other
studies
CC
is
limited
since
they
emphasize
larger
patches
open
surroundings.
Therefore,
we
reflect
here
the
ecological
foundations
socio-economic
frameworks
approaches
CCF,
highlight
areas
with
development
potential
future.
Conclusions
from
this
perspective
paper,
based
both
research
practice
continents,
although
highlighting
also
relevant
world
using
forest
management
approaches.
Forest Ecosystems,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
5(1)
Published: June 13, 2018
The
circumboreal
forest
encompasses
diverse
landscape
structures,
dynamics
and
age
distributions
determined
by
their
physical
setting,
historical
current
disturbance
regimes.
However,
due
to
intensifying
utilisation,
in
certain
areas
increasing
natural
disturbances,
boreal
age-class
structures
have
changed
rapidly,
so
that
the
proportion
of
old
has
substantially
declined,
while
young
post-harvest
post-natural-disturbance
proportions
increased.
In
future,
with
a
warming
climate
regions,
this
trend
may
further
be
enhanced
an
increase
disturbances
large-scale
use
biomass
replace
fossil-based
fuels
products.
major
drivers
change
class
include
clearcut
short-rotation
harvesting,
more
frequent
severe
regions.
decline
area,
managed
lacking
post-disturbance
structural
legacies,
represent
transformation
ecological
conditions
beyond
limits
variability.
This
introduce
threat
biodiversity,
ecosystem
resilience
long-term
adaptive
capacity
ecosystem.
To
safeguard
biodiversity
functioning,
maintain
multiple
services
provided
societies
biome,
it
is
pivotal
adequate
share
qualities
stages,
along
mature
stages
old-growth
characteristics.
requires
management
for
legacy
innovative
uneven-aged
continuous
cover
approaches
critical
late-successional
landscapes.
Ecological Indicators,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
122, P. 107275 - 107275
Published: Dec. 21, 2020
The
accelerating
global
rate
of
species
extinctions
and
the
inevitable
human
impacts
on
biodiversity
have
increased
need
to
conserve,
restore
use
ecosystems
sustainably.
Indicators
for
are
most
frequently
used
tool
monitor
status
biodiversity,
changes
effects
management
actions.
In
this
study,
we
aim
assess
magnitude
studies
indicators
(IB)
in
European
forest
ecosystems,
establish
analyze
link
between
IB
silvicultural
measures
(MM),
define
(IM),
that
support
at
stand
landscape
level.
We
performed
a
systematic
literature
review
analyzed
data
from
162
studies.
identified
9
groups,
corresponding
32
linked
them
7
IM
groups
44
IM.
Arthropods,
birds,
plants
managed
forests.
found
with
clear
links
specific
IM,
such
as
saproxylic
Collembola
(collembolans)
deadwood,
bird
families
(Passeriformes,
Piciformes,
Accipitriformes)
microhabitats,
ground-dwelling
regeneration.
17
proposed
umbrella
based
examined.
This
shows
high
structural
diversity
is
associated
an
increase
diversity,
especially
regard
vascular
plants,
birds
species.
adaptation
requires
regular
active
monitoring
temporal
spatial
effectiveness
measures.
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
95(1), P. 1 - 12
Published: Aug. 4, 2021
Abstract
There
is
increasing
interest
across
Europe
in
adopting
forest
management
strategies,
which
promote
species
and
structural
diversity
through
the
use
of
irregular
silvicultural
systems,
an
approach
often
described
as
continuous
cover
forestry
(CCF).
However,
there
little
information
about
proportion
CCF
practised
continent
or
knowledge
gaps
other
obstacles
that
limit
its
use.
A
survey
respondents
33
European
countries
sought
to
address
these
issues.
The
results
indicated
systems
associated
with
were
single
stem,
group
selection
shelterwood.
Rotational
(RFM)
was
more
frequent
than
66
per
cent
countries,
whereas
25
reverse
true.
We
estimated
between
22
30
forests
are
managed
CCF,
although
good
data
lacking.
main
were:
uncertainties
arising
from
climate
change
(e.g.
appropriate
choice,
carbon
storage
CCF),
using
increase
resilience,
deployment
mechanized
harvesting
lack
amongst
professional
foresters
better
on
economic
implications
this
approach.
Major
included:
awareness
owners,
limited
competence
within
profession
a
scarcity
skilled
workers
implement
approach,
high
ungulate
populations
damaging
natural
regeneration,
sawmilling
sector
geared
processing
medium-sized
logs,
subsidy
regimes
favouring
practices
RFM
experience
transforming
plantation
diverse
structures.
Better
different
essential
allow
policymakers
stakeholders
monitor
progress
diversifying
forests.
Establishment
continental
network
long-term
operational
trials
expanding
existing
Association
Futaie
Irrégulière
network)
would
improve
understanding
demonstrate
owners
could
provide
valuable
platform
for
supporting
research.
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
4
Published: April 9, 2021
Global
forest
area
is
declining
rapidly,
along
with
degradation
of
the
ecological
condition
remaining
forests.
Hence
it
necessary
to
adopt
management
approaches
that
can
achieve
a
balance
between
(1)
human
designs
based
on
homogenization
structure
efficiently
deliver
economic
values
and
(2)
naturally
emerging
self-organized
ecosystem
dynamics
foster
heterogeneity,
biodiversity,
resilience
adaptive
capacity.
Natural
disturbance-based
suggested
provide
such
an
approach.
It
grounded
premise
disturbance
key
process
maintaining
diversity
structures,
species
functions,
evolutionary
potential,
which
functionally
link
sustainability
services
supporting
well-being.
We
review
development,
foundations
applications
natural
management.
With
emphasis
boreal
forests,
we
compare
this
approach
two
mainstream
sustainable
management,
retention
continuous-cover
forestry.
Compared
these
approaches,
provides
more
comprehensive
framework,
compatible
current
understanding
multiple-scale
processes
underlie
potential
ecosystems.
conclude
ecosystem-based
framework
for
managing
forests
needs
commodity
production
immaterial
values,
while
health
in
rapidly
changing
global
environment.
AMBIO,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
49(5), P. 1050 - 1064
Published: Sept. 16, 2019
Abstract
The
multi-scale
approach
to
conserving
forest
biodiversity
has
been
used
in
Sweden
since
the
1980s,
a
period
defined
by
increased
reserve
area
and
conservation
actions
within
production
forests.
However,
two
thousand
forest-associated
species
remain
on
Sweden’s
red-list,
2020
goals
for
sustainable
forests
are
not
being
met.
We
argue
that
ongoing
changes
matrix
require
more
consideration,
must
be
adapted
to,
integrated
with,
development.
To
make
this
case,
we
summarize
trends
habitat
provision
protected
forests,
variety
of
ways
silviculture
can
affect
biodiversity.
discuss
how
different
forestry
trajectories
type
extent
approaches
needed
secure
biodiversity,
suggest
leverage
points
aiding
adoption
diversified
silviculture.
long-term
experience
with
intensive
provides
insights
other
countries
trying
conserve
landscapes.
Environmental Evidence,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
10(1)
Published: Jan. 6, 2021
Forest
harvesting
changes
forest
habitat
and
impacts
dependent
species.
Uneven-aged
management
is
often
considered
better
for
biodiversity
than
even-aged
management,
but
there
an
ongoing
discourse
over
the
benefits
disadvantages
of
different
silvicultural
systems.
This
systematic
review
contributes
to
public
discussion
provides
evidence
policy
making
by
synthesising
current
on
uneven-aged
in
boreal
forests
Fennoscandia
European
Russia.
In
this
are
compared
directly
each
other
as
well
natural
provide
a
broad
basis
discussion.
Both
peer-reviewed
grey
literature
were
searched
bibliographical
databases,
organizational
webpages
internet
search
engines
English,
Finnish,
Swedish
Russian.
Articles
screened
relevance
their
title/abstract
again
full
text.
The
inclusion
studies
was
assessed
against
pre-defined
criteria
published
priori
protocol.
A
narrative
synthesis
meta-analysis
conducted
describe
base
compare
species
richness
abundance
between
differently
managed
forests.
influence
specialism,
taxon,
years
since
harvesting,
deadwood
availability
intensity
also
tested.
Searching
identified
43,621
articles
which
137
with
854
had
independent
data
included
synthesis.
Of
those,
547
meta-analysis.
most
studied
taxa
arthropods,
vascular
plants,
bryophytes,
fungi,
lichens.
Results
showed
that
less
disturbance
(uneven-aged
mature
even-aged)
host
more
young
(<
80
old)
although
difference
only
marginally
significant
(>
old).
similar
number
individuals
whereas
forest.
Open
numerous
undergone
retention
harvest.
Effect
sizes
found
mostly
large
indicating
strong
uniform
impact
based
species’
preferences.
addition
harvest
explained
some
differences
due
increase
open
early
successional
stages
late
stages.
Taxon
limited
explanatory
power.
Habitat
preferences
determine
response
methods
magnitude
effect
large.
Less
from
opposite
true
important
maintain
However,
results
highlight
needed
ensure
future
Given
broader
set
aspects
be
protected,
best
overall
variety
at
landscape
level
can
achieved
ensuring
mosaic
within
landscapes.