medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 9, 2023
Abstract
Background
Type
2
diabetes
(T2DM)
incidence
is
increased
after
diagnosis
of
COVID-19.
The
impact
vaccination
on
this
increase,
for
how
long
it
persists,
and
the
effect
COVID-19
other
types
remain
unclear.
Methods
With
NHS
England
approval,
we
studied
following
in
pre-vaccination
(N=15,211,471,
January
2020-December
2021),
vaccinated
(N
=11,822,640),
unvaccinated
(N=2,851,183)
cohorts
(June-December
using
linked
electronic
health
records.
We
estimated
adjusted
hazard
ratios
(aHRs)
comparing
post-COVID-19
with
before
or
without
up
to
102
weeks
post-diagnosis.
Results
were
stratified
by
severity
(hospitalised/non-hospitalised)
type.
Findings
In
cohort,
aHRS
T2DM
(compared
diagnosis)
declined
from
3.01
(95%
CI:
2.76,3.28)
1-4
1.24
(1.12,1.38)
53-102.
higher
than
people
(4.86
(3.69,6.41))
versus
1.42
(1.24,1.62)
1-4)
hospitalised
(pre-vaccination
cohort
21.1
(18.8,23.7)
declining
2.04
(1.65,2.51)
52-102),
non-hospitalised
(1.45
(1.27,1.64)
1-4,
1.10
(0.98,1.23)
52-102).
persisted
4
months
∼73%
those
diagnosed.
Patterns
similar
1
diabetes,
though
excess
did
not
persist
beyond
a
year
post-COVID-19.
Interpretation
Elevated
greater,
persists
longer,
people.
It
markedly
less
apparent
post-vaccination.
Testing
severe
promotion
are
important
tools
addressing
public
problem.
Research
context
Evidence
study
searched
PubMed
population-based
observational
studies
published
between
December
1st
2019
July
12th
2023
examining
associations
SARS-CoV-2
infection
(search
string:
COVID*
coronavirus*)
subsequent
incident
term:
diabetes).
Of
nineteen
relevant
studies;
eight
had
composite
outcome
types,
six
type
five
pertained
type-1-diabetes
(T1DM)
only.
identify
any
relating
gestational
diabetes.
Eleven
US,
three
UK,
two
Germany,
one
Canada,
Denmark
South
Korea.
Most
described
cumulative
relative
risks
(for
no
infection)
years
post-SARS-CoV-2
1.2
2.6,
four
found
T1DM
post-acute
period.
All
lacked
power
compare
risk
type,
severity,
status
population
subgroups.
One
examined
status,
but
used
hyperlipidaemia
was
conducted
predominantly
white
male
population.
Two
evidence
elevated
30
days
diagnosis,
whilst
reported
at
months.
time
period
post-infection:
US
insurance
claims
persistent
association
post-infection,
whereas
large
UK
12
weeks.
However,
latter
only
primary
care
data,
therefore
cases
likely
have
been
under-ascertained.
No
investigated
persistence
diagnosed
COVID-19;
key
elucidating
role
stress/steroid-induced
hyperglycaemia.
Added
value
This
study,
which
largest
address
question
date,
analysed
secondary
records
testing
data
15
million
living
England.
enabled
us
elevation
overall
Importantly,
since
could
also
be
quantified.
Since
healthcare
universal
free-at-the-point-of-delivery,
almost
entire
registered
care.
Therefore
findings
generalisable.
that,
availability
vaccination,
(vs.
associated
remained
approximately
30%
diagnosis.
Though
still
present
(with
around
weeks),
these
substantially
attenuated
compared
Excess
greater
who
to,
beyond,
post
Around
73%
infection.
Implications
all
available
There
30-50%
post-COVID-19,
report
novel
finding
that
there
one-year
appear
year,
may
explain
why
previous
disagree.
For
first
general-population
dataset,
demonstrate
reduces,
does
entirely
ameliorate,
supports
policy
suggests
activities,
such
as
enhanced
screening
COVID-19,
warranted,
particularly
Hypertension,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
80(10), P. 2135 - 2148
Published: Aug. 21, 2023
SARS-CoV-2
may
trigger
new-onset
persistent
hypertension.
This
study
investigated
the
incidence
and
risk
factors
associated
with
hypertension
during
COVID-19
hospitalization
at
≈6-month
follow-up
compared
influenza.This
retrospective
observational
was
conducted
in
a
major
academic
health
system
New
York
City.
Participants
included
45
398
patients
(March
2020
to
August
2022)
13
864
influenza
(January
2018
without
history
of
hypertension.At
6-month
follow-up,
seen
20.6%
hospitalized
10.85%
nonhospitalized
COVID-19.
Persistent
among
did
not
vary
across
pandemic,
whereas
that
decreased
from
20%
March
≈10%
October
(R2=0.79,
P=0.003)
then
plateaued
thereafter.
Hospitalized
were
2.23
([95%
CI,
1.48-3.54];
P<0.001)
times
1.52
1.22-1.90];
P<0.01)
more
likely
develop
than
counterparts.
common
older
adults,
males,
Black,
preexisting
comorbidities
(chronic
obstructive
pulmonary
disease,
coronary
artery
chronic
kidney
disease),
those
who
treated
pressor
corticosteroid
medications.
Mathematical
models
predicted
79%
86%
accuracy.
In
addition,
21.0%
no
prior
developed
hospitalization.Incidence
is
higher
influenza,
constituting
burden
given
sheer
number
Screening
at-risk
for
following
illness
be
warranted.
Annals of Internal Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
177(3), P. 291 - 302
Published: March 1, 2024
Background:
Some
data
suggest
a
higher
incidence
of
diagnosis
autoimmune
inflammatory
rheumatic
diseases
(AIRDs)
among
patients
with
history
COVID-19
compared
uninfected
patients.
However,
these
studies
had
methodological
shortcomings.
Objective:
To
investigate
the
effect
on
long-term
risk
for
incident
AIRD
over
various
follow-up
periods.
Design:
Binational,
longitudinal,
propensity-matched
cohort
study.
Setting:
Nationwide
claims-based
databases
in
South
Korea
(K-COV-N
cohort)
and
Japan
(JMDC
cohort).
Participants:
10
027
506
Korean
12
218
680
Japanese
aged
20
years
or
older,
including
those
between
1
January
2020
31
December
2021,
matched
to
influenza
infection
control
Measurements:
The
primary
outcome
was
onset
(per
appropriate
codes
from
International
Classification
Diseases,
10th
Revision)
1,
6,
months
after
respective
index
date
Results:
Between
participants
(mean
age,
48.4
[SD,
13.4];
50.1%
men),
394
274
(3.9%)
98
596
(0.98%)
influenza,
respectively.
After
propensity
score
matching,
beyond
first
30
days
infection,
were
at
increased
(adjusted
hazard
ratio,
1.25
[95%
CI,
1.18
1.31])
influenza-infected
1.30
[CI,
1.02
1.59]).
more
severe
acute
COVID-19.
Similar
patterns
observed
cohort.
Limitations:
Referral
bias
due
pandemic;
residual
confounding.
Conclusion:
SARS-CoV-2
associated
without
infection.
greater
severity
Primary
Funding
Source:
National
Research
Foundation
Korea.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(1)
Published: Feb. 19, 2025
Abstract
We
investigated
the
long-term
kidney
and
cardiovascular
outcomes
of
patients
with
chronic
disease
(CKD)
after
COVID-19.
Our
retrospective
cohort
consisted
834
CKD
COVID-19
6,167
without
between
3/11/2020
to
7/1/2023.
Multivariate
competing
risk
regression
models
were
used
estimate
(as
adjusted
hazard
ratios
(aHR)
95%
confidence
intervals
(CI))
progression
a
more
advanced
stage
(Stage
4
or
5)
major
adverse
events
(MAKE),
(MACE)
at
6-,
12-,
24-month
follow
up.
Hospitalized
12
24
months
(aHR
1.62
CI[1.24,2.13]
1.76
[1.30,
2.40],
respectively),
but
not
non-hospitalized
patients,
higher
compared
those
Both
hospitalized
MAKE
12-
24-months
1.73
[1.21,
2.50],
1.77
[1.34,
2.33],
1.31
[1.05,
1.64],
MACE
increases
in
CKD.
These
findings
highlight
need
for
close
up
care
therapies
that
slow
this
high-risk
subgroup.
Journal of Medical Virology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
95(6)
Published: June 1, 2023
Abstract
Severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS‐CoV‐2)
infection
in
children
and
adolescents
may
increase
risk
for
a
variety
of
post‐acute
sequelae
including
new‐onset
type
1
diabetes
mellitus
(T1DM).
Therefore,
this
meta‐analysis
aims
to
estimate
the
developing
as
SARS‐CoV‐2
infection.
PubMed/MEDLINE,
CENTRAL,
EMBASE
were
systematically
searched
up
March
20,
2023.
A
systematic
review
subsequent
meta‐analyses
performed
calculate
pooled
effect
size,
expressed
ratio
(RR)
with
corresponding
95%
confidence
interval
(CI)
each
outcome
based
on
one‐stage
approach
random‐effects
sizes
generated
use
DerSimonian‐Laird
method.
Eight
reports
from
seven
studies
involving
11
220
530
participants
(2
140
897
patients
history
diagnosed
9
079
633
respective
control
groups)
included.
The
included
reported
data
four
U.S.
medical
claims
databases
covering
more
than
503
million
(IQVIA,
HealthVerity,
TriNetX,
Cerner
Real‐World
Data),
three
national
health
registries
all
Norway,
Scotland,
Denmark.
It
was
shown
that
T1DM
following
42%
(95%
CI
13%−77%,
p
=
0.002)
higher
compared
non‐COVID‐19
groups.
significantly
(67%,
32
%–112%,
0.0001)
between
0
years,
but
not
those
12
17
years
(RR
1.10,
0.54–2.23,
0.79).
We
also
found
only
exists
United
States
1.70,
1.37−2.11,
0.00001)
Europe
1.02,
0.67−1.55,
0.93).
Furthermore,
we
associated
an
elevation
diabetic
ketoacidosis
(DKA)
groups
2.56,
1.07−6.11,
0.03).
Our
findings
mainly
obtained
US
databases,
suggest
is
adolescents.
These
highlight
need
targeted
measures
raise
public
practitioners
physician
awareness
provide
intervention
strategies
reduce
who
have
had
COVID‐19.
Diagnostics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(6), P. 621 - 621
Published: March 14, 2024
While
ground-glass
opacity,
consolidation,
and
fibrosis
in
the
lungs
are
some
of
hallmarks
acute
SAR-CoV-2
infection,
it
remains
unclear
whether
these
pulmonary
radiological
findings
would
resolve
after
symptoms
have
subsided.
We
conducted
a
systematic
review
meta-analysis
to
evaluate
chest
computed
tomography
(CT)
abnormalities
stratified
by
COVID-19
disease
severity
multiple
timepoints
post-infection.
PubMed/MEDLINE
was
searched
for
relevant
articles
until
23
May
2023.
Studies
with
COVID-19-recovered
patients
follow-up
CT
at
least
12
months
post-infection
were
included.
evaluated
short-term
(1–6
months)
long-term
(12–24
follow-ups
(severe
non-severe).
A
generalized
linear
mixed-effects
model
random
effects
used
estimate
event
rates
findings.
total
2517
studies
identified,
which
43
met
inclusion
(N
=
8858
patients).
Fibrotic-like
changes
had
highest
rate
(0.44
[0.3–0.59])
(0.38
[0.23–0.56])
follow-ups.
meta-regression
showed
that
over
time
decreased
any
abnormality
(β
−0.137,
p
0.002),
opacities
−0.169,
<
0.001),
increased
honeycombing
0.075,
0.03),
did
not
change
fibrotic-like
changes,
bronchiectasis,
reticulation,
interlobular
septal
thickening
(p
>
0.05
all).
The
severe
subgroup
significantly
higher
bronchiectasis
0.02),
reticulation
0.001)
when
compared
non-severe
subgroup.
In
conclusion,
significant
remained
up
2
years
post-COVID-19,
especially
disease.
Long-lasting
post-SARS-CoV-2
infection
signal
future
public
health
concern,
necessitating
extended
monitoring,
rehabilitation,
survivor
support,
vaccination,
ongoing
research
targeted
therapies.
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12(8), P. 558 - 568
Published: July 23, 2024
Some
studies
have
shown
that
the
incidence
of
type
2
diabetes
increases
after
a
diagnosis
COVID-19,
although
evidence
is
not
conclusive.
However,
effects
COVID-19
vaccine
on
this
association,
or
effect
other
subtypes,
are
clear.
We
aimed
to
investigate
association
between
and
2,
1,
gestational
non-specific
diabetes,
COVID-
19
vaccination,
up
52
weeks
diagnosis.
Current Diabetes Reports,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
23(8), P. 207 - 216
Published: June 7, 2023
Abstract
Purpose
of
Review
Multiple
studies
report
an
increased
incidence
diabetes
following
SARS-CoV-2
infection.
Given
the
potential
global
burden
diabetes,
understanding
effect
in
epidemiology
is
important.
Our
aim
was
to
review
evidence
pertaining
risk
incident
after
COVID-19
Recent
Findings
Incident
by
approximately
60%
compared
patients
without
Risk
also
non-COVID-19
respiratory
infections,
suggesting
SARS-CoV-2-mediated
mechanisms
rather
than
general
morbidity
illness.
Evidence
mixed
regarding
association
between
infection
and
T1D.
associated
with
elevated
T2D,
but
it
unclear
whether
persistent
over
time
or
differs
severity
time.
Summary
diabetes.
Future
should
evaluate
vaccination,
viral
variant,
patient-
treatment-related
factors
that
influence
risk.
Endocrine Reviews,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
45(2), P. 281 - 308
Published: Nov. 2, 2023
Abstract
Obesity,
diabetes
mellitus
(mostly
type
2),
and
COVID-19
show
mutual
interactions
because
they
are
not
only
risk
factors
for
both
acute
chronic
manifestations,
but
also
alters
energy
metabolism.
Such
metabolic
alterations
can
lead
to
dysglycemia
long-lasting
effects.
Thus,
the
pandemic
has
potential
a
further
rise
of
pandemic.
This
review
outlines
how
preexisting
spanning
from
excess
visceral
adipose
tissue
hyperglycemia
overt
may
exacerbate
severity.
We
summarize
different
effects
SARS-CoV-2
infection
on
key
organs
tissues
orchestrating
metabolism,
including
tissue,
liver,
skeletal
muscle,
pancreas.
Last,
we
provide
an
integrative
view
derangements
that
occur
during
COVID-19.
Altogether,
this
allows
better
understanding
occurring
when
fire
starts
small
flame,
thereby
help
reducing
impact