Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
16(20), P. 8990 - 8990
Published: Oct. 17, 2024
Grasping
how
scale
influences
the
interactions
among
ecosystem
services
(ESs)
is
vital
for
sustainable
management
of
multiple
ESs
at
regional
level.
However,
it
currently
unclear
whether
actual
ES
and
their
driving
mechanisms
are
consistent
across
different
spatial
temporal
scales.
Therefore,
using
Lishui
River
Basin
China
as
a
case
study,
we
analyzed
distribution
five
key
three
scales
(grid,
sub-watershed,
county)
from
2010
to
2020.
We
also
innovatively
used
Pearson
correlation
analysis,
Self-organizing
Mapping
(SOM),
random
forest
analysis
assess
dynamic
trends
trade-offs/synergies
ESs,
service
bundles
(ESBs),
main
socio-ecological
drivers
spatiotemporal
The
findings
showed
that
(1)
varied
with
land
use
types,
high-value
areas
mainly
in
western
northern
mountainous
regions
lower
values
eastern
part.
Temporally,
significant
improvements
were
observed
soil
conservation
(SC,
3028.23–5023.75
t/hm2)
water
yield
(WY,
558.79–969.56
mm),
while
carbon
sequestration
(CS)
habitat
quality
(HQ)
declined
(2)
trade-offs
synergies
exhibited
enhanced
larger
scales,
being
predominant
relationship.
These
relationships
remained
relatively
stable
over
time,
pairs
related
nitrogen
export
(NE).
(3)
ESBs
At
grid
scale,
frequent
ESB
flows
transformations
observed,
use/land
cover
(LULC)
drivers.
other
climate
(especially
temperature)
topography
dominant.
Ecosystem
focused
on
city
or
downstream
east
basin,
aligning
urban
expansion
trends.
insights
will
offer
valuable
guidance
decision-making
regarding
hierarchical
strategies
resource
allocation
ESs.
Land,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
13(3), P. 369 - 369
Published: March 14, 2024
Clarifying
the
spatio-temporal
patterns
of
ecosystem
services
trade-off/synergy
relationships
(ESTSs)
and
their
attribution
in
Yellow
River
Basin
is
crucial
to
constructing
ecological
civilization
China.
This
study
first
analyzed
change
(ESs)
including
water
yield,
soil
conservation,
carbon
sequestration,
habitat
quality
during
2000–2020
based
on
InVEST
RUSLE
models.
Then,
spatial
autocorrelation
methods
were
used
quantify
differentiation
ESTSs,
Geo-detector
method
was
employed
identify
contributions
driving
factors
associated
with
natural,
social-economic,
regional
policy
aspects
ESTSs.
Finally,
random
forest
analysis
variance
validate
reasonability
major
obtained
by
Geo-detector.
The
main
findings
include:
(1)
In
2000–2020,
increased,
sequestration
decreased.
ESs
had
a
pattern
high
east
low
west.
(2)
Overall,
there
synergistic
between
four
Ess.
distribution
expansion
synergy
zone
trade-off
occupied
majority.
zones
tended
be
concentrated
northwest
southeast
area.
contrast,
more
scattered
than
zone,
mainly
focused
east-central
southwestern
parts
Basin.
(3)
both
showed
that
natural
strong
explanatory
power
which
NDVI
key
driver.
Both
results
interactions
exerted
most
significant
influence
followed
interaction
socio-economic
factors.
Geography and sustainability,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
6(1), P. 100211 - 100211
Published: Aug. 6, 2024
Ecosystems
play
a
pivotal
role
in
advancing
Sustainable
Development
Goals
(SDGs)
by
providing
indispensable
and
resilient
ecosystem
services
(ESs).
However,
the
limited
analysis
of
spatiotemporal
heterogeneity
often
restricts
recognition
ESs'
roles
attaining
SDGs
landscape
planning.
We
selected
183
counties
Sichuan
Province
as
study
area
mapped
10
7
ESs
from
2000
to
2020.
used
correlation
analysis,
principal
component
Geographically
Temporally
Weighted
Regression
model,
self-organizing
maps
reveal
impacts
bundle
on
develop
spatial
planning
management
strategies.
The
results
showed
that
(1)
was
improved
all
counties,
with
SDG
1
(No
Poverty)
3
(Good
Health
Well-being)
exhibiting
poor
performance.
Western
demonstrated
stronger
performance
environment-related
Province,
while
Basin
better
progress
socio-economic-related
SDGs;
(2)
habitat
quality,
carbon
sequestration,
air
pollution
removal,
soil
retention
significantly
influenced
development
9
(3)
supporting,
regulating,
provisioning
service
bundles
have
persistent
stable
effects
SDG1,
SDG8,
SDG11,
SDG13,
SDG15.
These
findings
substantiate
need
for
integrated
multiple
facilitate
regional
achievement
geographically
intricate
areas.
Land Degradation and Development,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 28, 2025
ABSTRACT
Effective
management
of
ecosystem
services
(ESs)
is
critical
for
sustainable
regional
development.
Multi‐scale
ESs
assessments
provide
valuable
insights
spatial
management.
However,
limited
attention
has
been
given
to
the
spatial–temporal
heterogeneity
and
driving
mechanisms
across
urban
hierarchies
their
integration
into
Therefore,
taking
Yangtze
River
Economic
Belt
in
China
as
a
case
study,
we
assessed
service
values
(ESVs)
five
from
2000
2020.
Results
showed
that
area
ratios
variation
ESVs
trends
were
typically
S‐shaped
small
cities
super
cities.
High‐value
clusters
decreased,
low‐value
ESV
linear
increase
intensified.
Human
activities
predominantly
impacted
lower
hierarchy,
whereas
terrain
conditions
significantly
higher
hierarchy.
Furthermore,
novel
framework
was
proposed
integrate
management,
emphasizing
multi‐scale
ESs.
This
study
effective
strategies
support
region‐specific
Land,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
13(6), P. 805 - 805
Published: June 6, 2024
Understanding
the
dynamics
of
ecosystem
services
(ESs)
in
arid
landscapes
and
socio-ecological
systems
is
crucial
for
sustainable
development
human
well-being.
This
study
uses
Invest
model
to
quantify
spatio-temporal
changes
four
key
ecosystems
Altay
from
1990
2020:
water
yield
(water
yield),
carbon
stock
(carbon
stock),
soil
retention
(soil
retention),
habitat
quality
(habitat
quality).
The
trade-offs/synergies
between
different
ESs
were
investigated
via
Spearman’s
correlation
analysis.
Ecosystem
service
bundles
(ESBs)
mapped
using
self-organizing
mapping
(SOM),
drivers
ES
relationships
ESBs
revealed
through
redundancy
results
showed
that
increased
by
33.7%
1.2%,
while
decreased
3.5%
1.24%,
respectively.
spatial
distribution
pattern
had
a
clear
zonal
pattern,
with
northern
mountainous
areas
higher
than
southern
desert
areas.
six
pairs
ESs,
general,
mainly
low
trade-off
high
synergistic
relationships,
trade-offs
stock,
quality,
decreasing
trend
over
time.
Four
types
distinguished,
compositional
differences
within
each
ESB
determined
interactions
landscape
types.
There
are
complex
non-linear
years.
Before
2010,
ecological
factors
influencing
ESBs,
whereas
social
environmental
combined
drive
allocations
after
2010.
Additionally,
this
found
implementation
conservation
measures,
such
as
reforestation
land
management
practices,
positively
influenced
provision
region.
These
findings
underscore
importance
integrating
efforts
into
use
planning
decision-making
processes
ensure
delivery
landscapes.
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12
Published: Feb. 22, 2024
Clarifying
the
driving
mechanisms
of
spatial
and
temporal
changes
in
regulating
ecosystem
service
value
(RESV)
is
an
important
part
realizing
goal
sustainable
development.
Existing
studies
have
focused
on
specific
factors,
ignoring
complex
interactions
between
factors
their
regional
differences.
In
this
regard,
RESV
its
different
zones
(core
area,
fringe
peripheral
area)
were
explored
Poyang
Lake
Area,
China.
The
results
showed
that
spatially
distribution
characteristics
area
>
core
while
lakes
influenced
provision
services,
showing
per
unit
was
higher
gradually
declined
with
increase
distance
from
lakes,
presenting
decreasing
trend
area.
From
2000
to
2020,
study
lost
70.5988
billion
CNY
for
RESV,
which
most
affected.
Further
analysis
mechanism
areas
found
there
are
differences
paths
factors:
Population
density
mainly
affects
precipitation
GDP
land
Heritage Science,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12(1)
Published: Aug. 2, 2024
Abstract
Understanding
the
spatiotemporal
variation
and
drivers
of
ecosystem
services
is
fundamental
to
optimal
management
sustainable
development
World
Heritage
(WH)
sites.
Although
WH
sites
face
multiple
natural
anthropogenic
threats,
our
understanding
their
still
limited,
especially
for
karst
In
this
study,
we
assessed
habitat
quality
(HQ),
carbon
storage
(CS),
soil
retention
(SR),
water
conservation
(WC),
combined
service
(CES)
non-karst
in
Southwest
China
from
2000
2020
using
InVEST
model.
We
also
trade-offs/synergies
among
spatial
overlay
method,
identified
driving
factors
geographical
detector
structural
equation
models.
The
results
showed
that
exhibited
high
variation.
particular,
there
were
higher
values
property
zone
than
buffer
zone,
an
increasing
trend
SR
but
a
decreasing
HQ
CES
over
time.
Compared
sites,
had
significantly
lower
HQ,
CS,
SR,
CES,
heterogeneity
WC,
CES.
Weak
trade-offs
dominated
with
proportion
weak
synergies
strong
synergies.
provision
was
primarily
influenced
by
(e.g.,
landscape
division
index
normalized
difference
vegetation
index),
followed
distance
road
population
density).
Overall,
these
findings
may
have
important
implications
decision-making
aimed
at
protecting
outstanding
universal
value,
authenticity,
integrity
different
attributes.