Empathy is hard work: People choose to avoid empathy because of its cognitive costs. DOI Creative Commons
C. Daryl Cameron, Cendri A. Hutcherson, Amanda M Ferguson

et al.

Journal of Experimental Psychology General, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 148(6), P. 962 - 976

Published: April 18, 2019

Empathy is considered a virtue, yet it fails in many situations, leading to basic question: When given choice, do people avoid empathy? And if so, why? Whereas past work has focused on material and emotional costs of empathy, here, we examined whether experience empathy as cognitively taxing costly, them it. We developed the selection task, which uses free choices assess desire empathize. Participants make series binary choices, selecting situations that lead engage or an alternative course action. In each 11 studies (N = 1,204) meta-analysis, found robust preference was associated with perceptions more effortful aversive less efficacious. Experimentally increasing efficacy eliminated avoidance, suggesting cognitive directly cause choice. choice share others' feelings, act not worth effort. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Language: Английский

Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms DOI
Nancy C. Andreasen

PsycTESTS Dataset, Journal Year: 1982, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 1, 1982

Language: Английский

Citations

1887

Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort DOI Open Access
Amitai Shenhav, Sebastian Musslick, Falk Lieder

et al.

Annual Review of Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 40(1), P. 99 - 124

Published: April 4, 2017

In spite of its familiar phenomenology, the mechanistic basis for mental effort remains poorly understood. Although most researchers agree that is aversive and stems from limitations in our capacity to exercise cognitive control, it unclear what gives rise those why they result an experience control as costly. The presence these costs also raises further questions regarding how best allocate minimize maximize attendant benefits. This review explores recent advances computational modeling empirical research aimed at addressing level psychological process neural mechanism, examining both exertion we manage limited resources. We conclude by identifying remaining challenges theoretical accounts well possible applications available findings understanding causes potential solutions apparent failures exert required us.

Language: Английский

Citations

978

Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited DOI
Michael Inzlicht, Brandon J. Schmeichel, C. Neil Macrae

et al.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Journal Year: 2014, Volume and Issue: 18(3), P. 127 - 133

Published: Jan. 15, 2014

Language: Английский

Citations

855

Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism DOI Open Access
Matthew Botvinick, Todd S. Braver

Annual Review of Psychology, Journal Year: 2014, Volume and Issue: 66(1), P. 83 - 113

Published: Sept. 24, 2014

Research on cognitive control and executive function has long recognized the relevance of motivational factors. Recently, however, topic come increasingly to center stage, with a surge new studies examining interface motivation control. In present article we survey research situated at this interface, considering work from social psychology behavioral economics, but particular focus neuroscience research. We organize existing findings into three core areas, them in light currently vying theoretical perspectives. Based accumulated evidence, advocate for view that treats it as domain reward-based decision making. More broadly, argue neuroscientific evidence plays critical role understanding mechanisms by which interact. Opportunities further cross-fertilization between are highlighted.

Language: Английский

Citations

848

Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review DOI Creative Commons

Pauline van der Wel,

Henk van Steenbergen

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 25(6), P. 2005 - 2015

Published: Feb. 12, 2018

Pupillometry research has experienced an enormous revival in the last two decades. Here we briefly review surge of recent studies on task-evoked pupil dilation context cognitive control tasks with primary aim being to evaluate feasibility using as index effort exertion, rather than task demand or difficulty. Our shows that across three domains updating, switching, and inhibition, increases demands typically leads dilation. Studies show a diverging pattern respect relationship between performance how account can provide explanation these findings. We also discuss future directions further corroborate this theories their potential neurobiological substrates.

Language: Английский

Citations

684

Situational Strategies for Self-Control DOI
Angela Duckworth,

Tamar Szabó Gendler,

James J. Gross

et al.

Perspectives on Psychological Science, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 11(1), P. 35 - 55

Published: Jan. 1, 2016

Exercising self-control is often difficult, whether declining a drink in order to drive home safely, passing on the chocolate cake stay diet, or ignoring text messages finish reading an important paper. But enacting not always particularly when it takes form of proactively choosing changing situations ways that weaken undesirable impulses potentiate desirable ones. Examples situational include partygoer who chooses seat far from where drinks are being poured, dieter asks waiter bring around dessert cart, and student goes library without cell phone. Using process model self-control, we argue full range strategies can be organized by considering timeline developing tempting impulse. Because tend grow stronger over time, strategies-which nip impulse bud-may especially effective preventing action. Ironically, may underappreciate for same reason so effective-namely, manipulating our circumstances advantage, able minimize in-the-moment experience intrapsychic struggle typically associated with exercising self-control.

Language: Английский

Citations

654

The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued DOI
Michael Inzlicht, Amitai Shenhav, Christopher Y. Olivola

et al.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 22(4), P. 337 - 349

Published: Feb. 21, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

622

Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach DOI Open Access
Andrew Westbrook, Todd S. Braver

Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2015, Volume and Issue: 15(2), P. 395 - 415

Published: Feb. 11, 2015

Language: Английский

Citations

528

What Is the Subjective Cost of Cognitive Effort? Load, Trait, and Aging Effects Revealed by Economic Preference DOI Creative Commons
Andrew Westbrook,

Daria Kester,

Todd S. Braver

et al.

PLoS ONE, Journal Year: 2013, Volume and Issue: 8(7), P. e68210 - e68210

Published: July 22, 2013

It has long been assumed that people treat cognitive effort as costly, but also such costs may vary greatly across individuals. Individual differences in subjective could present a major and pervasive confound behavioral neuroscience assessments, by conflating ability with motivation. Self-report scales have developed, objective measures are lacking. In this study, we use the economic approach of revealed preferences to quantify effort. Specifically, adapted well-established discounting paradigm measure extent which causes participants discount monetary rewards. The resulting metrics sensitive both within-individual factors, including load reward amount, between-individual age trait engagement. We further validate benchmarking it against delay discounting. results highlight promise utility tools for assessing state influences on

Language: Английский

Citations

494

Cognitive Offloading DOI
Evan F. Risko, Sam J. Gilbert

Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 20(9), P. 676 - 688

Published: Aug. 16, 2016

Language: Английский

Citations

492