npj Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
6(1)
Published: May 13, 2021
Abstract
As
SARS-CoV-2
vaccines
are
deployed
worldwide,
a
comparative
evaluation
is
important
to
underpin
decision-making.
We
here
report
systematic
literature
review
and
meta-analysis
of
Phase
I/II/III
human
trials
non-human
primates
(NHP)
studies,
comparing
reactogenicity,
immunogenicity
efficacy
across
different
vaccine
platforms
for
(updated
March
22,
2021).
Twenty-three
NHP
32
studies
included.
Vaccines
result
in
mostly
mild,
self-limiting
adverse
events.
Highest
spike
neutralizing
antibody
(nAb)
responses
identified
the
mRNA-1273-SARS-CoV
adjuvanted
NVX-CoV2373-SARS-CoV-2
vaccines.
ChAdOx-SARS-CoV-2
produces
highest
T
cell
ELISpot
responses.
Pre-existing
nAb
against
viral
vector
following
AdH-5-SARS-CoV-2
vaccination,
halving
immunogenicity.
The
mRNA
depend
on
boosting
achieve
optimal
especially
elderly.
BNT162b2,
mRNA-1273
>94%,
rAd26/5
>
91%
66.7%
efficacy.
Across
there
trade-offs
between
binding,
functional
titers,
frequency,
reactogenicity
Emergence
variants
makes
rapid
mass
rollout
high
essential
reduce
any
selective
advantage.
JAMA,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
325(23), P. 2370 - 2370
Published: May 13, 2021
Pregnant
women
are
at
increased
risk
of
morbidity
and
mortality
from
COVID-19
but
have
been
excluded
the
phase
3
vaccine
trials.
Data
on
safety
immunogenicity
in
these
populations
therefore
limited.
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
7(1)
Published: May 3, 2022
Abstract
With
the
constantly
mutating
of
SARS-CoV-2
and
emergence
Variants
Concern
(VOC),
implementation
vaccination
is
critically
important.
Existing
vaccines
mainly
include
inactivated,
live
attenuated,
viral
vector,
protein
subunit,
RNA,
DNA,
virus-like
particle
(VLP)
vaccines.
Viral
vector
vaccines,
subunit
mRNA
may
induce
additional
cellular
or
humoral
immune
regulations,
including
Th
cell
responses
germinal
center
responses,
form
relevant
memory
cells,
greatly
improving
their
efficiency.
However,
some
be
associated
with
complications
like
thrombocytopenia
myocarditis,
raising
concerns
about
safety
these
COVID-19
Here,
we
systemically
assess
efficacy
possible
different
effects
on
pregnant
women,
elderly,
people
diseases
acquired
immunodeficiency
syndrome
(AIDS),
transplant
recipients,
cancer
patients.
Based
current
analysis,
governments
agencies
are
recommended
to
continue
advance
vaccine
immunization
process.
Simultaneously,
special
attention
should
paid
health
status
timely
treatment
complications,
development,
ensuring
lives
In
addition,
available
measures
such
as
mix-and-match
vaccination,
developing
new
nanoparticle
optimizing
adjuvant
improve
could
considered.
Reviews in Medical Virology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
32(4)
Published: Nov. 9, 2021
Abstract
Since
the
outbreak
of
coronavirus
disease
2019
(Covid‐19)
in
December
2019,
caused
by
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
2
(SARS‐CoV‐2),
number
confirmed
infections
has
risen
to
more
than
242
million
worldwide,
with
nearly
5
deaths.
Currently,
nine
Covid‐19
vaccine
candidates
based
on
original
Wuhan‐Hu‐1
strain
are
at
forefront
research.
All
had
an
efficacy
over
50%
against
symptomatic
disease:
NVX‐CoV2373
(∼96%),
BNT162b2
(∼95%),
mRNA‐1273
(∼94%),
Sputnik
V
(∼92%),
AZD1222
(∼81%),
BBIBP‐CorV
(∼79%),
Covaxin
(∼78%),
Ad26.CoV.S
(∼66%)
and
CoronaVac
(∼51%).
However,
(VE)
can
be
jeopardised
rapid
emergence
spread
SARS‐CoV‐2
variants
concern
(VOCs)
that
could
escape
from
neutralising
antibodies
and/or
cell‐mediated
immunity.
Rare
adverse
events
have
also
been
reported
soon
after
administration
viral
vector
mRNA
vaccines.
Although
many
vaccines
developed,
additional
effective
still
needed
meet
global
demand.
Promising
such
as
WIBP‐CorV,
AD5‐nCOV,
ZyCoV‐D,
CVnCoV,
EpiVacCorona
ZF2001
advanced
clinical
studies.
This
review
describes
most
relevant
mutations
spike
protein,
discusses
VE
VOCs,
presents
rare
vaccination
introduces
some
promising
candidates.
Nature,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
596(7871), P. 268 - 272
Published: June 9, 2021
Abstract
The
Ad26.COV2.S
vaccine
1–3
has
demonstrated
clinical
efficacy
against
symptomatic
COVID-19,
including
the
B.1.351
variant
that
is
partially
resistant
to
neutralizing
antibodies
1
.
However,
immunogenicity
of
this
in
humans
SARS-CoV-2
variants
concern
remains
unclear.
Here
we
report
humoral
and
cellular
immune
responses
from
20
vaccinated
individuals
COV1001
phase
I–IIa
trial
2
original
strain
WA1/2020
as
well
B.1.1.7,
CAL.20C,
P.1
concern.
induced
median
pseudovirus
antibody
titres
were
5.0-fold
3.3-fold
lower
variants,
respectively,
compared
with
on
day
71
after
vaccination.
Median
binding
2.9-fold
2.7-fold
WA1/2020.
Antibody-dependent
phagocytosis,
complement
deposition
natural
killer
cell
activation
largely
preserved
variant.
CD8
CD4
T
responses,
central
effector
memory
comparable
among
WA1/2020,
B.1.351,
CAL.20C
variants.
These
data
show
by
reduced
but
functional
non-neutralizing
findings
have
implications
for
protection
JAMA,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
325(15), P. 1535 - 1535
Published: March 11, 2021
Control
of
the
global
COVID-19
pandemic
will
require
development
and
deployment
safe
effective
vaccines.To
evaluate
immunogenicity
Ad26.COV2.S
vaccine
(Janssen/Johnson
&
Johnson)
in
humans,
including
kinetics,
magnitude,
phenotype
SARS-CoV-2
spike-specific
humoral
cellular
immune
responses.Twenty-five
participants
were
enrolled
from
July
29,
2020,
to
August
7,
follow-up
for
this
day
71
interim
analysis
was
completed
on
October
3,
2020;
assess
durability
continue
2
years.
This
study
conducted
at
a
single
clinical
site
Boston,
Massachusetts,
as
part
randomized,
double-blind,
placebo-controlled
phase
1
trial
Ad26.COV2.S.Participants
randomized
receive
or
intramuscular
injections
with
5
×
1010
viral
particles
1011
placebo
administered
57
(5
each
group).Humoral
responses
included
binding
neutralizing
antibody
multiple
time
points
following
immunization.
Cellular
immunospot-based
intracellular
cytokine
staining
assays
measure
T-cell
(median
age,
42;
age
range,
22-52;
52%
women,
44%
male,
4%
undifferentiated),
all
through
end
point.
Binding
antibodies
emerged
rapidly
by
8
after
initial
immunization
90%
25%
recipients,
respectively.
By
57,
detected
100%
recipients
On
71,
geometric
mean
titers
2432
5729
242
449
vaccinated
groups.
A
variety
subclasses,
Fc
receptor
properties,
antiviral
functions
induced.
CD4+
CD8+
induced.In
study,
induced
rapid
neutralization
well
responses.
Two
3
trials
are
currently
underway
determine
efficacy
vaccine.ClinicalTrials.gov
Identifier:
NCT04436276.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
9(5), P. 467 - 467
Published: May 6, 2021
The
current
study
systematically
reviewed,
summarized
and
meta-analyzed
the
clinical
features
of
vaccines
in
trials
to
provide
a
better
estimate
their
efficacy,
side
effects
immunogenicity.
All
relevant
publications
were
searched
collected
from
major
databases
up
12
March
2021.
A
total
25
RCTs
(123
datasets),
58,889
cases
that
received
COVID-19
vaccine
46,638
controls
who
placebo
included
meta-analysis.
In
total,
mRNA-based
adenovirus-vectored
had
94.6%
(95%
CI
0.936–0.954)
80.2%
0.56–0.93)
efficacy
phase
II/III
RCTs,
respectively.
Efficacy
after
first
(97.6%;
95%
0.939–0.997)
second
(98.2%;
0.980–0.984)
doses
was
highest
against
receptor-binding
domain
(RBD)
antigen
3
weeks
injections.
level
reported
except
for
diarrhea
arthralgia.
Aluminum-adjuvanted
lowest
systemic
local
between
vaccines’
adjuvant
or
without
adjuvant,
injection
site
redness.
showed
doses,
higher
effects.
Remarkably
few
experienced
extreme
adverse
all
stimulated
robust
immune
responses.
Annals of Internal Medicine,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
174(11), P. 1572 - 1585
Published: Aug. 30, 2021
Patients
with
chronic
inflammatory
disease
(CID)
treated
immunosuppressive
medications
have
increased
risk
for
severe
COVID-19.
Although
mRNA-based
SARS-CoV-2
vaccination
provides
protection
in
immunocompetent
persons,
immunogenicity
immunosuppressed
patients
CID
is
unclear.To
determine
the
of
vaccines
CID.Prospective
observational
cohort
study.Two
U.S.
referral
centers.Volunteer
sample
adults
confirmed
eligible
early
COVID-19
vaccination,
including
hospital
employees
any
age
and
older
than
65
years.
Immunocompetent
participants
were
recruited
separately
from
employees.
All
received
2
doses
mRNA
vaccine
against
between
10
December
2020
20
March
2021.
Participants
assessed
within
weeks
before
days
after
final
vaccination.Anti-SARS-CoV-2
spike
(S)
IgG+
binding
all
participants,
neutralizing
antibody
titers
circulating
S-specific
plasmablasts
a
subset
to
assess
humoral
response
vaccination.Most
133
(88.7%)
53
developed
antibodies
although
some
numerically
lower
anti-S
IgG.
Anti-S
IgG
receiving
glucocorticoids
(n
=
17)
those
not
them;
geometric
mean
was
357
(95%
CI,
96
1324)
prednisone
versus
2190
(CI,
1598
3002)
it.
also
B-cell
depletion
therapy
(BCDT)
10).
Measures
differed
who
antimetabolites
48),
tumor
necrosis
factor
inhibitors
39),
Janus
kinase
11);
however,
95%
CIs
wide
overlapped.
Neutralization
seemed
generally
consistent
results.
Results
adjusted
differences
baseline
clinical
factors,
other
immunosuppressant
therapies.Small
that
lacked
demographic
diversity,
residual
confounding.Compared
nonusers,
BCDT
seem
vaccine-induced
responses.
These
preliminary
findings
require
confirmation
larger
study.The
Leona
M.
Harry
B.
Helmsley
Charitable
Trust,
Marcus
Program
Precision
Medicine
Innovation,
National
Center
Advancing
Translational
Sciences,
Institute
Arthritis
Musculoskeletal
Skin
Diseases.