Journal of Primary Care & Community Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Healthcare
providers
often
hesitate
to
discuss
medical
cannabis
(MC)
due
limited
understanding,
risks
and
benefits,
misinformation.
This
reluctance
is
notable
with
older
adult
patients,
despite
MC's
potential
benefits.
study
investigates
whether
primary
care
(PCPs)
routinely
inquire
about
MC
when
treating
adults
the
frequency
of
such
inquiries.
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
8(1), P. 166 - 173
Published: Nov. 19, 2021
Introduction:
Cannabis
products
containing
delta-8-THC
became
widely
available
in
most
of
the
United
States
late
2020
and
rapidly
a
significant
source
revenue
for
hemp
processing
companies,
especially
states
where
use
delta-9-THC
remains
illegal
or
requires
professional
authorization
medical
use.
Scientific
research
on
is
scarce,
previous
clinical
studies
included
combined
total
14
participants,
leading
some
state
governments
to
prohibit
it
until
its
properties
effects
are
better
understood.
Methods:
Researchers
developed
an
online
survey
consumers
addressing
broad
range
issues
regarding
delta-8-THC,
including
treatment
health
conditions.
Previous
cannabis
informed
components.
Results:
Patterns
had
both
similarities
with
differences
from
products.
Administration
methods
were
primarily
edibles
(64%)
vaping
concentrates
(48%).
About
half
participants
(51%)
used
treat
conditions,
anxiety
panic
attacks
(69%),
stress
(52%),
depression
bipolar
disorder
(46%),
chronic
pain
(41%).
Participants
compared
very
favorably
pharmaceutical
drugs
reported
substantial
levels
substitution
both.
Most
did
not
inform
their
primary
care
provider
(78%)
confident
provider's
ability
integrate
into
(70%).
Knowledge
effective
dosages
was
low,
participants'
knowledge
Internet
own
experiences.
Conclusion:
Harm
reduction
central
component
public
health.
Although
legal
environment
becoming
more
restrictive
comparison
delta-9-THC,
results
suggest
that
may
be
equally
desired
purposes
lower
undesirable
adverse
effects.
All
policies
practices
should
by
empirical
evidence.
Considerable
will
needed
systematically
verify
patterns
collaborations
among
academic
researchers,
government,
industry
valuable
developing
base
other
cannabinoids.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
25(11), P. 5749 - 5749
Published: May 25, 2024
Neurological
disorders
present
a
wide
range
of
symptoms
and
challenges
in
diagnosis
treatment.
Cannabis
sativa,
with
its
diverse
chemical
composition,
offers
potential
therapeutic
benefits
due
to
anticonvulsive,
analgesic,
anti-inflammatory,
neuroprotective
properties.
Beyond
cannabinoids,
cannabis
contains
terpenes
polyphenols,
which
synergistically
enhance
pharmacological
effects.
Various
administration
routes,
including
vaporization,
oral
ingestion,
sublingual,
rectal,
provide
flexibility
treatment
delivery.
This
review
shows
the
efficacy
managing
neurological
such
as
epilepsy,
neurodegenerative
diseases,
neurodevelopmental
disorders,
psychiatric
painful
pathologies.
Drawing
from
surveys,
patient
studies,
clinical
trials,
it
highlights
alleviating
symptoms,
slowing
disease
progression,
improving
overall
quality
life
for
patients.
Understanding
mechanisms
can
open
up
possibilities
using
this
plant
individual
needs.
Addiction,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 15, 2025
To
establish
the
feasibility
of
using
ecological
momentary
assessment
(EMA)
to
estimate
total
quantities
Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC)
and
cannabidiol
(CBD)
used
across
different
forms
cannabis,
assess
predictive
validity
THC
estimates
for
predicting
acute
cannabis-related
consequences.
14-day
EMA
a
smartphone
application
cannabis
use
in
real
time.
Canada.
Targeted
sample
n
=
42
young
adults
(59.52%
women,
mean
age
25
years)
reporting
frequent
use.
Surveys
completed
immediately
prior
assessed
quantities,
content
CBD
various
be
current
session;
participants
also
uploaded
photos
product
labels
when
available.
administered
at
fixed
times
throughout
day
(84.81%
completion
rate)
Participants
786
pre-cannabis
surveys,
which
79.39%
77.35%
contained
sufficient
information
calculate
(in
milligrams),
respectively.
High
agreement
was
observed
between
participant-entered
contents
those
shown
corresponding
labels.
Aggregating
all
products
used,
reported
an
average
141.41
[standard
deviation
(SD)
224.62,
range
0.00-2000.00]
milligrams
(i.e.
28.28
standard
five-milligram
units)
7.53
(SD
34.87,
0.00-484.22)
per
day.
Multilevel
models
revealed
that
were
more
likely
report
negative
consequences
following
sessions
their
estimated
higher
than
typical
At
between-person
level,
on
less
overall.
Using
appears
feasible,
with
preliminary
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
22(1)
Published: Sept. 8, 2022
Canadians
seeking
medical
cannabis
(MC)
may
encounter
difficulties
in
finding
a
healthcare
provider
(HCP)
who
authorizes
their
access
to
it.
Barriers
that
HCPs
face
authorizing
MC
are
unclear.
The
objectives
of
this
study
were
evaluate
HCP
opinions,
knowledge,
comfort,
and
practice
prescribing
counseling
on
recreational
use,
whether
the
COVID-19
pandemic
affected
practices.Eligible
participants
included
(e.g.,
attending
physicians,
nurses,
pharmacists)
Canada.
A
questionnaire
evaluating
was
designed
based
instruments
developed
previous
studies.
Between
April
13th-December
13th
2021,
ninety-one
associations
asked
distribute
survey
members,
an
advertisement
placed
online
Canadian
Medical
Association
Journal.
Descriptive
statistics
used
analyze
results.Twenty-four
organizations
agreed
disseminate
70
individuals
completed
Of
respondents,
71%
physicians
or
residents,
while
remainder
pharmacists
other
HCPs.
Almost
none
(6%)
received
training
professional
school
but
60%
did
receive
workshops,
conferences).
Over
half
(57%)
more
questions
regarding
since
legalized,
82%
reported
having
patients
use
MC.
However,
56%
felt
uncomfortable
ambivalent
knowledge
MC,
27%
unfamiliar
with
requirements
for
obtaining
most
common
symptoms
recommending
pain
nausea,
whereas
conditions
it
cancer
intractable
pain.
strongest
barrier
uncertainty
safe
effective
dosage
routes
administration.
lack
research
evidence
demonstrating
its
safety
efficacy.
During
pandemic,
many
respondents
greater
number
relieve
anxiety
depression.Our
results
suggest
across
Canada
responded
our
topics
related
barriers
appear
be
clinical
research,
Increasing
training,
help
feel
equipped
make
informed
treatment/prescribing
decisions,
which
improve
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
19(3), P. e0295858 - e0295858
Published: March 7, 2024
Background
In
Canada,
cannabis
legalization
altered
the
way
that
public
can
access
for
medical
purposes.
However,
Canadians
still
struggle
with
finding
healthcare
professionals
(HCPs)
who
are
involved
in
counselling
and
authorization.
This
raises
questions
about
barriers
causing
this
breakdown
care.
Our
study
explored
perceptions
of
primary
care
providers
regarding
their
practice.
Methods
Semi-structured
interviews
were
conducted
by
Zoom
HCPs
Newfoundland
Labrador
(NL)
to
discuss
experiences
non-medical
Family
physicians
nurse
practitioners
practicing
NL
included.
The
interview
guide
coding
template
developed
using
Theoretical
Domains
Framework
(TDF).
A
thematic
analysis
across
TDF
was
then
conducted.
Results
Twelve
participants
diverse
demographic
backgrounds
experience
levels
interviewed.
Five
main
themes
emerged
including,
knowledge
acquisition,
internal
influences,
patient
external
HCP
systemic
influences.
domain
resulting
greatest
representation
codes
environmental
context
resources.
Interpretation
findings
suggested
have
significant
gaps
authorizing
cannabis,
which
limited
practice
competence
confidence
area.
Referring
patients
clinics,
while
enforcing
harm-reduction
strategies,
an
interim
option
developing
guidelines
educational
resources
as
prominent
facilitators
promote
authorization
within
system.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
13
Published: Feb. 20, 2025
The
trends
of
recreational
use
cannabis
and
the
for
medical
indications
(i.e.,
"medical
cannabis")
have
grown
in
recent
years.
Despite
that,
there
is
still
limited
scientific
evidence
to
guide
clinical
decision-making,
strength
currently
considered
be
low.
In
contrast,
growing
negative
health
outcomes
related
cannabis.
this
rapidly
shifting
landscape,
role
physician
attitudes
regarding
therapeutic
value
has
become
essential.
This
study
aimed
characterize
knowledge/experience,
attitudes,
potential
predictors
practice
We
conducted
a
cross-sectional
survey
physicians
from
17
countries
between
2016
2018.
consisted
questions
designed
explore
knowledge,
attitude,
practices
Descriptive
statistics
were
used
examine
willingness
recommend
psychiatric
indications,
followed
by
regression
analysis
identify
A
total
323
responded
survey,
among
which
53%
women.
mean
age
was
35.4
±
9.5
years,
with
10.04
8.6
years
experience.
Clinical
experience
overall
(51.4%
noted
never
having
recommended
33%
inadequate
knowledge
cannabis).
majority
respondents
(84%)
recognized
risk
psychosis
use,
while
only
23%
correctly
identified
addiction
daily
use.
Overall,
highest
chemotherapy-induced
nausea
(67%),
refractory
chronic
neuropathic
pain
(52%),
spasticity
amyotrophic
lateral
sclerosis
(ALS;
51%).
international
examining
revealed
that
are
significant
gaps
domain-specific
There
wide
variability
cannabis,
not
consistent
current
evidence.
thus
highlights
need
greater
education
about
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
13(2), P. 13 - 13
Published: April 2, 2025
Background:
Medical
cannabis
continues
to
generate
interest
as
a
potential
therapeutic
option,
yet
its
acceptance
in
clinical
practice
faces
challenges,
including
regulatory
barriers,
social
stigma,
and
gaps
scientific
evidence.
Methods:
This
study
explores
the
perspectives
of
Greek
medical
doctors
pharmacists
on
cannabis—key
stakeholders
application—through
semi-structured
interviews
with
12
participants
from
each
profession.
Results:
expressed
range
views
cannabis,
many
acknowledging
while
emphasizing
need
for
rigorous,
disease-specific
research.
highlighted
lack
consistent
trials,
concerns
about
drug
interactions,
fine
line
between
use
misuse.
Pharmacists
echoed
these
concerns,
citing
inconsistencies
standardized
dosing.
Both
groups
agreed
that
stigma
misinformation
hinder
adoption,
advocating
targeted
education
transparent
research
communication.
Participants
indicated
barriers
also
pose
calls
harmonized
policies
phased
market
entry
approaches.
Effective
communication
strategies,
digital
outreach
clear
messaging,
were
suggested
differentiate
recreational
improve
trust
among
healthcare
providers
patients.
urgent
collaboration
policymakers,
researchers,
professionals
establish
credible
option.
Conclusion:
The
insights
gained
provide
actionable
recommendations
bridge
existing
emphasize
responsible,
evidence-based
approach
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
9(4), P. e1048 - e1055
Published: April 25, 2023
Introduction:
Medical
cannabis
users
tend
not
to
trust
or
rely
on
health
care
providers
regarding
advice.
Previous
surveys
of
physicians
have
focused
favorability
toward
medical
cannabis.
The
current
study
assesses
how
interact
with
patients
in
their
day-to-day
practice,
and
whether
they
address
important
topics
such
as
use
patterns
substituting
for
medications.
We
predicted
that
would
generally
perceive
dispensary
staff
caretakers
competent
addressing
patient
needs
be
likely
recommendations.
Methods:
Physicians
a
university-affiliated
system
completed
an
anonymous
online
survey.
survey
assessed
physicians'
related
education
experiences,
perceptions
knowledge
competence
cannabis,
the
content
discussions
patients.
also
examined
sources
influence
attitudes
caregivers
(MCCs).
Results:
A
few
(10%)
had
ever
signed
authorization
form
patients,
consistent
low
this
area.
Discussions
primarily
focus
risks
(63%)
rather
than
dosage
(6%)
harm
reduction
(25%).
see
weak
compared
other
information
unfavorable
MCCs.
Conclusion:
Greater
integration
is
needed
at
all
levels
clinical
potential
if
receive
no
guidance.
Continued
research
provide
strong
scientific
basis
developing
treatment
guidelines
standardized
use.