International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
18(17), P. 9342 - 9342
Published: Sept. 4, 2021
During
the
COVID-19
crisis,
an
apparent
growth
in
vaccine
hesitancy
has
been
noticed
due
to
different
factors
and
reasons.
Therefore,
this
scoping
review
was
performed
determine
prevalence
of
intention
use
vaccines
among
adults
aged
18-60,
identify
demographic,
social,
contextual
that
influence
vaccines.
The Lancet Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
6(4), P. e210 - e221
Published: Feb. 7, 2021
Opinion
polls
on
vaccination
intentions
suggest
that
COVID-19
vaccine
hesitancy
is
increasing
worldwide;
however,
the
usefulness
of
opinion
to
prepare
mass
campaigns
for
specific
new
vaccines
and
estimate
acceptance
in
a
country's
population
limited.
We
therefore
aimed
assess
effects
characteristics,
information
herd
immunity,
general
practitioner
(GP)
recommendation
representative
working-age
France.In
this
survey
experiment,
adults
aged
18-64
years
residing
France,
with
no
history
SARS-CoV-2
infection,
were
randomly
selected
from
an
online
research
panel
July,
2020,
stratified
by
gender,
age,
education,
household
size,
region
area
residence
be
French
population.
Participants
completed
questionnaire
their
background
behaviour-related
variables
(including
past
compliance,
risk
factors
severe
COVID-19,
perceptions
experience),
then
assigned
according
full
factorial
design
one
three
groups
receive
differing
immunity
(>50%
must
immunised
[either
or
infection];
>50%
immunity)
two
regarding
GP
(GP
recommends
expresses
opinion).
series
eight
discrete
choice
tasks
designed
refusal
based
hypothetical
characteristics
(efficacy
[50%,
80%,
90%,
100%],
serious
side-effects
[1
10
000
1
100
000],
location
manufacture
[EU,
USA,
China],
place
administration
[GP
practice,
local
pharmacy,
centre]).
Responses
analysed
two-part
model
disentangle
outright
(irrespective
defined
as
opting
all
tasks)
(acceptance
depending
characteristics).Survey
responses
collected
1942
adults,
whom
560
(28·8%)
opted
(outright
refusal)
1382
(71·2%)
did
not.
In
our
model,
both
significantly
associated
female
age
(with
inverted
U-shaped
relationship),
lower
educational
level,
poor
compliance
recommended
vaccinations
past,
report
specified
chronic
conditions
(ie,
hypertension
[for
hesitancy]
other
than
refusal]).
Outright
was
also
perceived
severity
whereas
when
benefits
communicated
working
versus
non-working
individuals,
those
experience
(had
symptoms
knew
someone
COVID-19).
For
campaign
involving
centres
communication
benefits,
predicted
29·4%
(95%
CI
28·6-30·2)
Predicted
highest
manufactured
China
50%
efficacy
(vaccine
27·4%
[26·8-28·0]),
lowest
EU
90%
61·3%
[60·5-62·1]).COVID-19
depends
national
strategy,
among
various
factors,
France.French
Public
Health
Agency
(Santé
Publique
France).
Frontiers in Psychology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Oct. 23, 2020
The
outbreak
of
the
SARS-CoV-2
novel
coronavirus
(COVID-19)
has
been
accompanied
by
a
large
amount
misleading
and
false
information
about
virus,
especially
on
social
media.
In
this
article,
we
explore
"infodemic"
how
behavioral
scientists
may
seek
to
address
problem.
We
detail
scope
problem
discuss
negative
influence
that
COVID-19
misinformation
can
have
widespread
adoption
health
protective
behaviors
in
population.
response,
insights
from
sciences
be
leveraged
manage
an
effective
societal
response
curb
spread
virus.
particular,
theory
psychological
inoculation
(or
prebunking)
as
efficient
vehicle
for
conferring
large-scale
resistance
against
fake
news.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
9(6), P. 593 - 593
Published: June 3, 2021
As
COVID-19
vaccines
are
rolled
out
across
the
world,
there
growing
concerns
about
roles
that
trust,
belief
in
conspiracy
theories,
and
spread
of
misinformation
through
social
media
play
impacting
vaccine
hesitancy.
We
use
a
nationally
representative
survey
1476
adults
UK
between
12
18
December
2020,
along
with
5
focus
groups
conducted
during
same
period.
Trust
is
core
predictor,
distrust
general
mistrust
government
raising
health
institutions
experts
perceived
personal
threat
vital,
revealing
hesitancy
driven
by
misunderstanding
herd
immunity
as
providing
protection,
fear
rapid
development
side
effects,
beliefs
virus
man-made
used
for
population
control.
In
particular,
those
who
obtain
information
from
relatively
unregulated
sources—such
YouTube—that
have
recommendations
tailored
watch
history,
hold
conspiratorial
beliefs,
less
willing
to
be
vaccinated.
Since
an
increasing
number
individuals
gathering
information,
interventions
require
action
governments,
officials,
companies.
More
attention
needs
devoted
helping
people
understand
their
own
risks,
unpacking
complex
concepts,
filling
knowledge
voids.
European Review of Social Psychology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
32(2), P. 348 - 384
Published: Feb. 22, 2021
There
has
been
increasing
concern
with
the
growing
infusion
of
misinformation,
or
"fake
news",
into
public
discourse
and
politics
in
many
western
democracies.
Our
article
first
briefly
reviews
current
state
literature
on
conventional
countermeasures
to
misinformation.
We
then
explore
proactive
measures
prevent
misinformation
from
finding
traction
place
that
is
based
psychological
theory
"inoculation".
Inoculation
rests
idea
if
people
are
forewarned
they
might
be
misinformed
exposed
weakened
examples
ways
which
misled,
will
become
more
immune
review
a
number
techniques
can
boost
people's
resilience
ranging
general
warnings
specific
instructions
about
misleading
(rhetorical)
techniques.
show
available
evidence,
inoculation
appears
promising
avenue
help
protect
news".
Journal of Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
31(7), P. 1007 - 1016
Published: Oct. 9, 2021
As
the
new
coronavirus
disease
propagated
around
world,
rapid
spread
of
news
caused
uncertainty
in
population.
False
has
taken
over
social
media,
becoming
part
life
for
many
people.
Thus,
this
study
aimed
to
evaluate,
through
a
systematic
review,
impact
media
on
dissemination
infodemic
knowing
and
its
impacts
health.
A
search
was
performed
MedLine,
Virtual
Health
Library
(VHL),
Scielo
databases
from
January
1,
2020,
May
11,
2021.
Studies
that
addressed
fake
patients
healthcare
professionals
world
were
included.
It
possible
methodologically
assess
quality
selected
studies
using
Loney
Newcastle–Ottawa
Scales.
Fourteen
eligible
inclusion,
consisting
six
cross-sectional
eight
descriptive
observational
studies.
Through
questionnaires,
five
included
measures
anxiety
or
psychological
distress
by
misinformation;
another
seven
assessed
feeling
fear,
uncertainty,
panic,
addition
attacks
health
people
Asian
origin.
By
analyzing
phenomenon
health,
it
observe
knowledge
can
cause
disorders
depression,
fatigue.