Clinical outcomes of digital scans versus conventional impressions for implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis DOI

Isabella Neme Ribeiro dos Reis,

Camila Nogueira Chamma-Wedemann,

Ian Artoni de Oliveira Silva

et al.

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Oct. 1, 2023

Language: Английский

Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study DOI Creative Commons

Seyedeh Sahar Taheri Otaghsara,

Tim Joda, Florian M. Thieringer

et al.

Journal of Dentistry, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 132, P. 104487 - 104487

Published: March 21, 2023

This in-vitro study compared the accuracy of implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted surgery (CAIS) at two sites.Partially edentulous maxillary models were 3D-printed, and implants (Straumann TL RN 4.1 × 10 mm) inserted in FDI positions 15 16 per model CAIS approaches (10 approach). A three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction tool was used for planning, surgical guide design, measuring positioning accuracy. In CAIS, placed with 3D-printed guides (n = 20); real-time navigation performed 20). Primary outcomes defined as coronal apical global deviation well angular deviations comparison between 16; secondary outcome bi-directional mesial-distal, buccal-palatal, apical-coronal direction.The mean 0.88±0.31 mm 1.45±0.37 mm, position 0.67±0.31 1.07±0.32 respectively. 0.97±0.32 1.58±0.56 0.79±0.29 1 ± 0.37 Buccal-palatal higher mesial-distal CAIS. 15, apex platform lower than ones. 16, buccal-palatal group For analysis, (P 0.0028) 0.0056) significantly molar sites Mesial-distal 0.0246) revealed values following CAIS.Both resulted accurate placement. However, exhibited mesial direction an setting. addition, site affects both approaches.Both demonstrate high guided placement..

Language: Английский

Citations

25

Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study DOI Creative Commons

Ariel Shusterman,

Rizan Nashef, Simona Tecco

et al.

Journal of Dentistry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 146, P. 105052 - 105052

Published: May 9, 2024

This in vitro study aimed to compare the accuracy of dental implant placement partially edentulous maxillary models using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation (MR-DN) system conventional static computer-assisted surgery (s-CAIS) and freehand (FH) method.

Language: Английский

Citations

7

Beyond Accuracy: Clinical Outcomes of Computer Assisted Implant Surgery DOI Creative Commons
Sofya Sadilina,

Kay Vietor,

Romain Doliveux

et al.

Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 11(3)

Published: May 16, 2025

ABSTRACT Objectives Computer Assisted Implant Surgery (CAIS) with different technologies and modalities is becoming increasingly utilized in clinical practice. The aim of this White Paper was to synthesize evidence, reported experience, best practices regard clinically relevant outcomes static, dynamic, robotic CAIS. Materials Methods A review the literature compiled existing evidence from studies up November 2024, which later discussed synthesized into questions a panel international experts. Results There overwhelming for superiority CAIS accuracy implant placement some limited superior esthetic outcomes. At same time, related primary stability, survival rates, intra‐ postoperative complications, marginal bone loss, peri‐implant tissue health appear similar between guided non‐guided surgery, while efficiency poorly defined studied. importance execution comprehensive, prosthetically driven treatment plan not reflected most studies, focus mainly on assessment procedures rather than entire workflows. Such inherent limitations available research might conceal potential Conclusions Guided can achieve at least as good surgery. Studies that assess benefits part workflow, isolated procedures, could improve our understanding these technologies.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

The current role and future potential of digital diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry: A scoping review DOI
João Marcus de Carvalho e Silva Fuglsig, Isabella Neme Ribeiro dos Reis, Andy Wai Kan Yeung

et al.

Clinical Oral Implants Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 35(8), P. 793 - 809

Published: Nov. 22, 2023

Diagnostic imaging is crucial for implant dentistry. This review provides an up-to-date perspective on the application of digital diagnostic in

Language: Английский

Citations

14

Clinical evaluation of autonomous robotic‐assisted full‐arch implant surgery: A 1‐year prospective clinical study DOI
Rui Xie, Yuchen Liu, Hongbo Wei

et al.

Clinical Oral Implants Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 35(4), P. 443 - 453

Published: Feb. 6, 2024

Abstract Objectives This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and 1‐year follow‐up performance of dental implant placement with an autonomous robot (ADIR) system in full‐arch surgery. Materials Methods Twelve patients edentulous arches or final dentition received 102 implants using ADIR system. Global platform deviation, global apex angular deviation between planned actual were calculated after Data statistically analyzed for factors including jaws, positions, patient sequences, systems, length. Surgery duration was recorded. Patients followed 3 months 1 year Periodontal parameters, buccal bone thickness (BBT), facial vertical wall peak (IP‐FC) Results Among implants, mean (SD) 0.53 (0.19) mm, 0.58 (0.17) 1.83 (0.82)°, respectively. The differences mandible maxilla did not show statistical significance ( p > .05). No significant found length deviations periodontal BBT, IP‐FC remained stable during follow‐up. Conclusion showed excellent positional accuracy. surgery indicated that could achieve promising performance. Additional evidence is requisite furnish guidelines implementation

Language: Английский

Citations

6

Periodontal regeneration using platelet‐rich fibrin. Furcation defects: A systematic review with meta‐analysis DOI Creative Commons
Richard J. Miron, Vittório Moraschini, Nathan E. Estrin

et al.

Periodontology 2000, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 26, 2024

Abstract The objective of the study was to compare treatment outcomes periodontal furcation defects by using platelet‐rich fibrin (PRF) with other commonly utilized modalities. eligibility criteria comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing clinical PRF those modalities for defects. Studies were classified into 11 categories in 3 different groups as follows: Group I (addition PRF): (1) open flap debridement (OFD) alone versus OFD/PRF, (2) OFD/bone graft (OFD/BG) OFD/BG/PRF; II (comparative studies (3) OFD/BG (4) OFD/collagen membrane (5) OFD/PRP (6) OFD/rhBMP2 OFD/PRF; and III biomaterial/biomolecule OFD/PRF … (7) OFD/PRF/BG, (8) OFD/PRF/amniotic (AM), (9) OFD/PRF/metformin, (10) OFD/PRF/bisphosphonates, (11) OFD/PRF/statins. Weighted means forest plots calculated reduction probing pocket depth (PPD), gain vertical horizontal attachment levels (VCAL HCAL), bone (VBL, HBL), radiographic fill (RBF). From 45 articles identified, 21 RCTs reporting on class furcations included. use OFD/BG/PRF statistically significantly reduced PPD improved VCAL HCAL when compared OFD or OFD/BG, respectively. comparison between OFD/CM, OFD/PRP, led similar all investigated parameters, including a PPD, VCAL/HCAL gain, RBF. additional incorporation BG only mildly outcomes, whereas addition AM outcomes. small biomolecules such metformin, bisphosphonates, statins significant improvements VCAL, alone. Noteworthy, very high heterogeneity found studies. alone, being observed and/or OFD/rhBMP2. Future research geared toward better understanding potential ways enhance regenerative properties various may prove valuable future applications. histological investigating human is largely needed. conjunction values, yielding comparable used biomaterials. combination grafts offer benefits, thus warranting investigation.

Language: Английский

Citations

6

Efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation with xenografts and resorbable socket sealing materials in the esthetic region: A systematic review with meta‐analyses DOI
Karin Apaza‐Bedoya, Gabriel Leonardo Magrin, Mario Romandini

et al.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 26(1), P. 4 - 14

Published: Sept. 6, 2023

The present systematic review aimed to identify and summarize the clinical, radiographic, histological outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation using bone xenografts absorbable sealing materials compared with spontaneous healing in esthetic zone.

Language: Английский

Citations

12

Survival and complications of zygomatic implants compared to conventional implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow‐up period of at least 5 years: A systematic review and meta‐analysis DOI
Vittório Moraschini,

Tiago Rocha de Queiroz,

Suelen Cristina Sartoretto

et al.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 25(1), P. 177 - 189

Published: Nov. 14, 2022

Abstract Background Zygomatic implants (ZI) have been frequently indicated to rehabilitate patients with extensive atrophies in alternatives major bone reconstructions. It can be installed inside the maxillary sinus, called instrasinus zygomatic implant (IZI) or outside sinus (EZI), depending on surgery technique. Objective To evaluate survival and complication rates of ZI longitudinal studies when compared conventional (CI). Methods An electronic search was performed five databases Gray literature for articles published until April, 2022. The eligibility criteria comprised observational cohort (prospective retrospective) randomized clinical trials (RCTs) at least 5 years follow‐up, reporting rate versus CI. A meta‐analysis conduct 18 studies. Results total 5434 (2972 2462 CI) were analyzed 1709 patients. mean 96.5% ± 5.02 95.8% 6.36 CI, respectively (mean follow‐up time 78 months). There observed no statistically significant between CI prospective (risk ratio [RR] 1.21; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.28 5.28; chi‐squared [Chi 2 ] = 11.37; I 56%; degrees freedom [df] 5; z‐score 0.25; P 0.80), retrospective IZI (RR 1.29; CIs: 0.52 3.23; Chi 4.07; 2%; df 4; 0.55; 0.58) EZI 0.72; 0.31 1.66; 1.99; 0%; 3; 0.78; 0.44). biological complications most related sinusitis, followed by infection oroantral communication. Conclusion a high long‐term (96.5% 91.5 months follow‐up), showing difference prevalent is being commonly This systematic review (SR) registered INPLASY under number INPLASY202280025.

Language: Английский

Citations

19

Implant placement using mixed reality-based dynamic navigation: A proof of concept DOI Creative Commons

Ariel Shusterman,

Rizan Nashef, Simona Tecco

et al.

Journal of Dentistry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 149, P. 105256 - 105256

Published: July 21, 2024

To present the first clinical application of a novel mixed reality-based dynamic navigation (MR-DN) system in rehabilitation single tooth gap.

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Accuracy of the novel digital non-cross-arch surgical guides with integration of tooth undercut retention and screw-bone support for implant placement in mandibular free-end DOI Creative Commons
Qin Wu, Yuxin Lou,

Jikui Sun

et al.

BMC Oral Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 24(1)

Published: May 11, 2024

Abstract Background Large cross-arch free-end surgical guides can obscure the visual field, compromising accuracy due to insufficient stability at free-end. This in vitro study aims evaluate of novel digital non-cross-arch designed for implant placement mandibular free-end, incorporating tooth undercut retention and screw-bone support. Materials methods A dental model lacking left molars was utilized fabricate unilateral (cross-arch) tooth-supported (GT I, n = 20). Subsequently, two additional types were fabricated: GT II (covering teeth, 20) III three These utilize supporting teeth enhance with support guide’s Furthermore, 60 identical guiding blocks assembled on facilitate implants’ insertion. On a phantom head, 120 replicas placed Federal Dentaire Internationale (FDI) positions #36 #37 model, employing combination blocks. To assess accuracy, planned compared using intraoral optical scanning. Discrepancies angulation linear deviations, including coronal/apical 3D lateral deviation as well depth deviation, measured. Statistical analysis performed two-way ANOVA Bonferroni test (α 0.05). Results I exhibited significantly largest discrepancies, angular deviations crest apex every site. Especially depth, site #36, mean value (0.27 ± 0.13 mm) twice large (0.13 0.07 mm), almost (0.14 0.08 mm). However, #37, this increased five-fold relationship between (0.63 0.12 0.09 No significant discrepancies existed either or #37. Conclusion provides practical protocol enhancing reducing size used molar sites.

Language: Английский

Citations

3