Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
27(9), P. 833 - 851
Published: May 11, 2023
Socioeconomic
status
(SES)
is
associated
with
children's
brain
and
behavioral
development.
Several
theories
propose
that
early
experiences
of
adversity
or
low
SES
can
alter
the
pace
neurodevelopment
during
childhood
adolescence.
These
make
contrasting
predictions
about
whether
adverse
are
accelerated
delayed
neurodevelopment.
We
contextualize
these
within
context
normative
development
cortical
subcortical
structure
review
existing
evidence
on
structural
to
adjudicate
between
competing
hypotheses.
Although
none
fully
consistent
observed
SES-related
differences
in
development,
suggests
trajectories
more
a
simply
different
developmental
pattern
than
an
acceleration
Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
16(6), P. 1463 - 1472
Published: Sept. 7, 2021
We
review
the
three
prevailing
approaches—specificity,
cumulative
risk,
and
dimensional
models—to
conceptualizing
developmental
consequences
of
early-life
adversity
address
fundamental
problems
with
characterization
these
frameworks
in
a
recent
Perspectives
on
Psychological
Science
piece
by
Smith
Pollak.
respond
to
concerns
raised
Pollak
about
models
early
experience
highlight
value
for
studying
adversity.
Basic
dimensions
proposed
existing
include
threat/harshness,
deprivation,
unpredictability.
These
identify
core
that
cut
across
categorical
exposures
have
been
focus
specificity
risk
approaches
(e.g.,
abuse,
institutional
rearing,
chronic
poverty);
delineate
aspects
are
likely
influence
brain
behavioral
development;
afford
hypotheses
adaptive
maladaptive
responses
different
adversity;
articulate
specific
mechanisms
through
which
exert
their
influences,
experience-driven
plasticity
within
an
evolutionary-developmental
framework.
In
doing
so,
advance
falsifiable
hypotheses,
grounded
neurodevelopmental
evolutionary
principles,
supported
accumulating
evidence
provide
fertile
ground
empirical
studies
Development and Psychopathology,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
29(5), P. 1777 - 1794
Published: Nov. 22, 2017
Childhood
adversity
is
associated
with
increased
risk
for
psychopathology.
Neurodevelopmental
pathways
underlying
this
remain
poorly
understood.
A
recent
conceptual
model
posits
that
childhood
can
be
deconstructed
into
at
least
two
dimensions,
deprivation
and
threat,
are
distinct
neurocognitive
consequences.
This
argues
(i.e.,
a
lack
of
cognitive
stimulation
learning
opportunities)
poor
executive
function
(EF),
whereas
threat
not.
We
examine
hypothesis
in
studies
measuring
EF
multiple
levels:
performance
on
tasks,
neural
recruitment
during
EF,
problems
daily
life.
In
Study
1,
(low
parental
education
child
neglect)
was
greater
parent-reported
adolescents
(N
=
169;
13-17
years)
after
adjustment
levels
(community
violence
abuse),
which
were
unrelated
to
EF.
2,
low
working
memory
(WM)
inefficient
the
parietal
prefrontal
cortex
high
WM
load
among
51,
13-20
adjusting
abuse,
task
WM.
These
findings
constitute
strong
preliminary
evidence
novel
neurodevelopmental
consequences
adversity.
Development and Psychopathology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
34(2), P. 447 - 471
Published: March 14, 2022
Abstract
Two
extant
frameworks
–
the
harshness-unpredictability
model
and
threat-deprivation
attempt
to
explain
which
dimensions
of
adversity
have
distinct
influences
on
development.
These
models
address,
respectively,
why,
based
a
history
natural
selection,
development
operates
way
it
does
across
range
environmental
contexts,
how
neural
mechanisms
that
underlie
plasticity
learning
in
response
experiences
influence
brain
Building
these
frameworks,
we
advance
an
integrated
experience,
focusing
threat-based
forms
harshness,
deprivation-based
unpredictability.
This
makes
clear
why
are
inextricable
and,
together,
essential
understanding
environment
matter.
Core
integrative
concepts
include
directedness
learning,
multiple
levels
developmental
adaptation
environment,
tradeoffs
between
adaptive
maladaptive
responses
adversity.
The
proposes
proximal
distal
cues
as
well
unpredictability
those
cues,
calibrate
both
immediate
rearing
environments
broader
ecological
current
future.
We
highlight
actionable
directions
for
research
needed
investigate
experience.
Annual Review of Psychology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
74(1), P. 547 - 576
Published: Sept. 14, 2022
Exposure
to
adversity
(e.g.,
poverty,
bereavement)
is
a
robust
predictor
of
disruptions
in
psychological
functioning.
However,
people
vary
greatly
their
responses
adversity;
some
experience
severe
long-term
disruptions,
others
minimal
or
even
improvements.
We
refer
the
latter
outcomes-faring
better
than
expected
given
adversity-as
resilience.
Understanding
what
processes
explain
resilience
has
critical
theoretical
and
practical
implications.
Yet,
psychology's
understanding
incomplete,
for
two
reasons:
(a)
lack
conceptual
clarity,
(b)
major
approaches
resilience-the
stress
coping
approach
emotion
emotion-regulation
approach-have
limitations
are
relatively
isolated
from
one
another.
To
address
these
obstacles,we
first
discuss
questions
about
Next,
we
offer
an
integrative
affect-regulation
framework
that
capitalizes
on
complementary
strengths
both
approaches.
This
advances
our
by
integrating
existing
findings,
highlighting
gaps
knowledge,
guiding
future
research.
NeuroImage,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
209, P. 116493 - 116493
Published: Dec. 27, 2019
Investigating
the
developmental
sequelae
of
early
life
stress
has
provided
researchers
opportunity
to
examine
adaptive
responses
extreme
environments.
A
large
body
work
established
mechanisms
by
which
stressful
experiences
childhood
poverty,
maltreatment,
and
institutional
care
can
impact
brain
distributed
systems
body.
These
are
reviewed
briefly
lay
foundation
upon
current
neuroimaging
literature
been
built.
More
recently,
cognitive
neuroscientists
have
identified
a
number
effects
adversity,
including
differential
behavior
function.
Among
most
consistent
these
findings
differences
in
processing
emotion
reward-related
information.
The
neural
correlates
processing,
particularly
frontolimbic
functional
connectivity,
well
studied
samples
with
results
indicating
accelerated
maturation
following
adversity.
Reward
received
less
attention,
but
here
evidence
suggests
deficit
reward
sensitivity.
It
is
as
yet
unknown
whether
emotion-regulation
circuits
comes
at
cost
delayed
development
other
systems,
notably
system.
This
review
addresses
that
investigated
identifying
important
next
steps
study
function
Journal of Abnormal Psychology,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
127(2), P. 160 - 170
Published: Feb. 1, 2018
Prior
research
demonstrates
a
link
between
exposure
to
childhood
adversity
and
psychopathology
later
in
development.However,
work
on
mechanisms
linking
fails
account
for
specificity
these
pathways
across
different
types
of
adversity.Here,
we
test
conceptual
model
that
distinguishes
deprivation
threat
as
distinct
forms
with
psychopathology.Deprivation
involves
an
absence
inputs
from
the
environment,
such
cognitive
social
stimulation,
influence
by
altering
development,
verbal
abilities.Threat
includes
experiences
involving
harm
or
increase
risk
through
disruptions
social-emotional
processing.We
prediction
deprivation,
but
not
threat,
increases
altered
abilities.Data
were
drawn
Child
Development
Project
(N=585),
which
followed
children
over
decade.We
analyze
data
assessment
points
at
age
5,
6,
14,
17
years.Mothers
completed
interviews
5
6
experiences.Youth
abilities
assessed
14.At
17,
mothers
reported
child
psychopathology.A
path
analysis
tested
longitudinal
paths
internalizing
externalizing
problems
threat.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
1428(1), P. 151 - 169
Published: July 16, 2018
Early
life
adversity
(ELA)
is
associated
with
poorer
health
in
adulthood,
an
association
explained,
at
least
part,
by
increased
engagement
health-risk
behaviors
(HRBs).
In
this
review,
we
make
the
case
that
ELA
influences
brain
development
ways
increase
likelihood
of
engaging
HRBs.
We
argue
alters
neural
circuitry
underpinning
cognitive
control
as
well
emotional
processing,
including
networks
involved
processing
threat
and
reward.
These
changes
are
psychologically
behaviorally
heightened
reactivity,
blunted
reward
responsivity,
emotion
regulation,
greater
delay
discounting.
then
demonstrate
these
adaptations
to
risk
smoking
cigarettes,
drinking
alcohol,
eating
high-fat,
high-sugar
foods.
Furthermore,
explore
how
HRBs
affect
reinforce
addiction
further
explain
clustering