Acta Oncologica,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
62(10), P. 1184 - 1193
Published: Oct. 3, 2023
Background
The
performance
of
deep
learning
segmentation
(DLS)
models
for
automatic
organ
extraction
from
CT
images
in
the
thorax
and
breast
regions
was
investigated.
Furthermore,
readiness
feasibility
integrating
DLS
into
clinical
practice
were
addressed
by
measuring
potential
time
savings
dosimetric
impact.
Communications Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
2(1)
Published: Oct. 27, 2022
An
increasing
array
of
tools
is
being
developed
using
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
and
machine
learning
(ML)
for
cancer
imaging.
The
development
an
optimal
tool
requires
multidisciplinary
engagement
to
ensure
that
the
appropriate
use
case
met,
as
well
undertake
robust
testing
prior
its
adoption
into
healthcare
systems.
This
review
highlights
key
developments
in
field.
We
discuss
challenges
opportunities
AI
ML
imaging;
considerations
algorithms
can
be
widely
used
disseminated;
ecosystem
needed
promote
growth
Frontiers in Oncology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: July 8, 2021
Lung
cancer
is
the
leading
cause
of
cancer-related
mortality
for
males
and
females.
Radiation
therapy
(RT)
one
primary
treatment
modalities
lung
cancer.
While
delivering
prescribed
dose
to
tumor
targets,
it
essential
spare
tissues
near
targets—the
so-called
organs-at-risk
(OARs).
An
optimal
RT
planning
benefits
from
accurate
segmentation
gross
volume
surrounding
OARs.
Manual
a
time-consuming
tedious
task
radiation
oncologists.
Therefore,
crucial
develop
automatic
image
relieve
oncologists
contouring
work.
Currently,
atlas-based
technique
commonly
used
in
clinical
routines.
However,
this
depends
heavily
on
similarity
between
atlas
segmented.
With
significant
advances
made
computer
vision,
deep
learning
as
part
artificial
intelligence
attracts
increasing
attention
medical
segmentation.
In
article,
we
reviewed
based
techniques
related
compared
them
with
technique.
At
present,
auto-segmentation
OARs
relatively
large
such
heart
etc.
outperforms
organs
small
esophagus.
The
average
Dice
coefficient
(DSC)
lung,
liver
are
over
0.9,
best
DSC
spinal
cord
reaches
0.9.
esophagus
ranges
0.71
0.87
ragged
performance.
terms
volume,
below
0.8.
Although
indicate
superiority
many
aspects
manual
segmentation,
various
issues
still
need
be
solved.
We
discussed
potential
including
low
contrast,
dataset
size,
consensus
guidelines,
network
design.
Clinical
limitations
future
research
directions
were
well.
Radiation Oncology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
16(1)
Published: June 8, 2021
Abstract
Purpose
We
recently
described
the
validation
of
deep
learning-based
auto-segmented
contour
(DC)
models
for
organs
at
risk
(OAR)
and
clinical
target
volumes
(CTV).
In
this
study,
we
evaluate
performance
implemented
DC
in
radiotherapy
(RT)
planning
workflow
report
on
user
experience.
Methods
materials
were
two
cancer
centers
used
to
generate
OAR
CTVs
all
patients
undergoing
RT
a
central
nervous
system
(CNS),
head
neck
(H&N),
or
prostate
cancer.
Radiation
Therapists/Dosimetrists
Oncologists
completed
post-contouring
surveys
rating
degree
edits
required
DCs
(1
=
minimal,
5
significant)
overall
satisfaction
poor,
high).
Unedited
compared
edited
treatment
approved
contours
using
Dice
similarity
coefficient
(DSC)
95%
Hausdorff
distance
(HD).
Results
Between
September
19,
2019
March
6,
2020,
generated
approximately
551
eligible
cases.
203
collected
27
CNS,
54
H&N,
93
plans,
resulting
an
survey
compliance
rate
32%.
The
majority
minimal
subjectively
(mean
editing
score
≤
2)
objectively
DSC
HD
was
≥
0.90
2.0
mm).
Mean
4.1
4.4
4.6
structures.
Overall
CTV
(n
25),
which
encompassed
prostate,
seminal
vesicles,
lymph
node
volumes,
4.1.
Conclusions
Previously
validated
subjective
objective
resulted
positive
experience,
although
low
concern.
model
evaluation
even
more
limited,
but
high
suggests
that
they
may
have
served
as
appropriate
starting
points
patient
specific
edits.
Clinical Oncology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
35(6), P. 354 - 369
Published: Jan. 31, 2023
Auto-contouring
could
revolutionise
future
planning
of
radiotherapy
treatment.
The
lack
consensus
on
how
to
assess
and
validate
auto-contouring
systems
currently
limits
clinical
use.
This
review
formally
quantifies
the
assessment
metrics
used
in
studies
published
during
one
calendar
year
assesses
need
for
standardised
practice.
A
PubMed
literature
search
was
undertaken
papers
evaluating
2021.
Papers
were
assessed
types
metric
methodology
generate
ground-truth
comparators.
Our
identified
212
studies,
which
117
met
criteria
review.
Geometric
116
(99.1%).
includes
Dice
Similarity
Coefficient
113
(96.6%)
studies.
Clinically
relevant
metrics,
such
as
qualitative,
dosimetric
time-saving
less
frequently
22
(18.8%),
27
(23.1%)
18
(15.4%)
respectively.
There
heterogeneity
within
each
category
metric.
Over
90
different
names
geometric
measures
used.
Methods
qualitative
all
but
two
papers.
Variation
existed
methods
plans
assessment.
Consideration
editing
time
only
given
11
(9.4%)
single
manual
contour
a
comparator
65
(55.6%)
Only
31
(26.5%)
compared
auto-contours
usual
inter-
and/or
intra-observer
variation.
In
conclusion,
significant
variation
exists
research
accuracy
automatically
generated
contours.
are
most
popular,
however
their
utility
is
unknown.
perform
Considering
stages
system
implementation
may
provide
framework
decide
appropriate
metrics.
analysis
supports
auto-contouring.
Nature Communications,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15(1)
Published: Oct. 24, 2024
Target
volume
contouring
for
radiation
therapy
is
considered
significantly
more
challenging
than
the
normal
organ
segmentation
tasks
as
it
necessitates
utilization
of
both
image
and
text-based
clinical
information.Inspired
by
recent
advancement
large
language
models
(LLMs)
that
can
facilitate
integration
textural
information
images,
here
we
present
an
LLM-driven
multimodal
artificial
intelligence
(AI),
namely
LLMSeg,
utilizes
applicable
to
task
3-dimensional
context-aware
target
delineation
oncology.We
validate
our
proposed
LLMSeg
within
context
breast
cancer
radiotherapy
using
external
validation
data-insufficient
environments,
which
attributes
highly
conducive
real-world
applications.We
demonstrate
exhibits
markedly
improved
performance
compared
conventional
unimodal
AI
models,
particularly
exhibiting
robust
generalization
data-efficiency.
Advances in Radiation Oncology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
9(5), P. 101470 - 101470
Published: Feb. 8, 2024
PurposeManual
contour
work
for
radiation
treatment
planning
takes
significant
time
to
ensure
volumes
are
accurately
delineated.
The
use
of
artificial
intelligence
with
deep
learning
based
autosegmentation
(DLAS)
models
has
made
itself
known
in
recent
years
alleviate
this
workload.
It
is
used
organs
at
risk
(OAR)
contouring
consistency
performance
and
saving.
purpose
study
was
evaluate
the
current
published
data
DLAS
clinical
target
volume
(CTV)
contours,
identify
areas
improvement,
discuss
future
directions.MethodologyA
literature
review
performed
by
utilizing
key
words
"Deep
Learning"
AND
("Segmentation"
OR
"Delineation")
"Clinical
Target
Volume"
an
indexed
search
into
PubMed.
A
total
154
articles
on
criteria
were
reviewed.
considered
model
used,
disease
site,
targets
contoured,
guidelines
utilized,
overall
performance.ResultsOf
53
investigating
CTV,
only
6
before
2020.
Publications
have
increased
years,
46
between
2020-2023.
cervix
(n=19)
prostate
(n=12)
studied
most
frequently.
Most
studies
(n=43)
involved
a
single
institution.
Median
sample
size
130
patients
(range:
5-1,052).
common
metrics
utilized
measure
Dice
similarity
coefficient
(DSC)
followed
Hausdorff
distance.
Dosimetric
seldom
reported
(n=11).
There
also
variability
specific
(RTOG,
ESTRO,
others).
had
good
CTV
multiple
sites,
showing
DSC
values
>0.7.
delineated
faster
compared
manual
contouring.
However,
some
contours
still
required
least
minor
edits,
require
improvement.ConclusionsDLAS
demonstrates
capability
completing
plans
efficiency
accuracy.
developed
validated
institutions
using
developing
institutions.
about
years.
Future
need
include
larger
datasets
different
patient
demographics,
stages,
validation
multi-institutional
settings,
inclusion
dosimetric
performance.
Manual
directions.
Of
improvement.
Radiation Oncology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
17(1)
Published: Jan. 31, 2022
The
evaluation
of
automatic
segmentation
algorithms
is
commonly
performed
using
geometric
metrics.
An
analysis
based
on
dosimetric
parameters
might
be
more
relevant
in
clinical
practice
but
often
lacking
the
literature.
aim
this
study
was
to
investigate
impact
state-of-the-art
3D
U-Net-generated
organ
delineations
dose
optimization
radiation
therapy
(RT)
for
prostate
cancer
patients.A
database
69
computed
tomography
images
with
prostate,
bladder,
and
rectum
used
single-label
U-Net
training
dice
similarity
coefficient
(DSC)-based
loss.
Volumetric
modulated
arc
(VMAT)
plans
have
been
generated
both
manual
segmentations
same
settings.
These
were
chosen
give
consistent
when
applying
perturbations
segmentations.
Contours
evaluated
terms
DSC,
average
95%
Hausdorff
distance
(HD).
Dose
distributions
as
reference
volume
histogram
(DVH)
a
3%/3
mm
gamma-criterion
10%
cut-off.
A
Pearson
correlation
between
DSC
metrics,
i.e.
gamma
index
DVH
parameters,
has
calculated.3D
U-Net-based
achieved
0.87
(0.03)
0.97
(0.01)
bladder
0.89
(0.04)
rectum.
mean
HD
below
1.6
(0.4)
5
(4)
mm,
respectively.
V[Formula:
see
text]
rectum,
showed
agreement
within
[Formula:
text],
D[Formula:
its
3
expansion
(surrogate
target
volume)
distribution
2%
Gy
exception
one
case.
pass-rate
85%.
comparison
metrics
no
strong
statistically
significant
correlation.The
developed
work
geometrical
performance.
Analysis
clinically
VMAT
demonstrated
neither
excessive
increase
OARs
nor
substantial
under/over-dosage
all
Yet
indicated
several
cases
low
pass
rates.
highlighted
importance
adding
standard
evaluation.