Psychiatry Research,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
307, P. 114318 - 114318
Published: Nov. 29, 2021
Loneliness,
which
is
increasingly
recognised
as
an
important
public
health
problem,
may
have
increased
during
the
COVID-19
pandemic
in
wake
of
social
distancing
measures.
This
study
examined
loneliness
Japan
ongoing
and
its
association
with
mental
health.
Cross-sectional
online
survey
data
that
were
collected
at
monthly
intervals
from
April
to
December
2020
analysed.
Loneliness
was
assessed
Three-Item
Scale.
Information
also
obtained
on
depressive
(PHQ-9)
anxiety
(GAD-7)
symptoms.
Logistic
regression
analysis
used
examine
associations.
For
combined
sample
(N
=
9000),
41.1%
respondents
categorised
lonely
when
using
≥
6
a
cutoff
score,
16.5%
7.
The
prevalence
changed
little
across
period.
Younger
age,
male
sex
socioeconomic
disadvantage
(low
income,
deteriorating
financial
situation,
unemployment)
associated
loneliness.
In
fully
adjusted
analyses,
linked
(odds
ratio
[OR]:
5.78,
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]:
5.08–6.57)
symptoms
(OR:
5.34,
CI:
4.53–6.29).
prevalent
poorer
A
focus
issue
now
warranted.
American Psychologist,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
77(5), P. 660 - 677
Published: May 9, 2022
The
COVID-19
pandemic
and
measures
aimed
at
its
mitigation,
such
as
physical
distancing,
have
been
discussed
risk
factors
for
loneliness,
which
increases
the
of
premature
mortality
mental
health
conditions.
To
ascertain
whether
loneliness
has
increased
since
start
pandemic,
this
study
to
narratively
statistically
synthesize
relevant
high-quality
primary
studies.
This
systematic
review
with
meta-analysis
was
registered
PROSPERO
(ID
CRD42021246771).
Searched
databases
were
PubMed,
PsycINFO,
Cochrane
Library/Central
Register
Controlled
Trials/EMBASE/CINAHL,
Web
Science,
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
database,
supplemented
by
Google
Scholar
citation
searching
(cutoff
date
search
December
5,
2021).
Summary
data
from
prospective
research
including
assessments
before
during
extracted.
Of
6,850
retrieved
records,
34
studies
(23
longitudinal,
9
pseudolongitudinal,
2
reporting
both
designs)
on
215,026
participants
included.
Risk
bias
(RoB)
estimated
using
in
non-randomised
studies-of
interventions
(ROBINS-I)
tool.
Standardized
mean
differences
(SMD,
Hedges'
g)
continuous
values
logOR
prevalence
rates
calculated
pooled
effect
size
estimators
random-effects
meta-analyses.
Pooling
longitudinal
designs
only
(overall
N
=
45,734),
scores
(19
studies,
SMD
0.27
[95%
confidence
interval
0.14-0.40],
Z
4.02,
p
<
.001,
I
98%)
(8
0.33
[0.04-0.62],
2.25,
.02,
96%)
relative
prepandemic
times
small
sizes.
Results
robust
respect
studies'
overall
RoB,
pseudolongitudinal
designs,
timing
assessments,
clinical
populations.
heterogeneity
effects
indicates
a
need
further
investigate
protective
progresses
inform
targeted
interventions.
(PsycInfo
Database
Record
(c)
2022
APA,
all
rights
reserved).
Journal of Psychiatric Research,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
142, P. 218 - 225
Published: Aug. 4, 2021
Internet
gaming
disorder
(IGD)
and
problematic
internet
use
(PIU)
are
becoming
increasingly
detrimental
to
modern
society,
with
serious
consequences
for
daily
functioning.
IGD
PIU
may
be
exacerbated
by
lifestyle
changes
imposed
the
coronavirus
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
This
study
investigated
in
during
pandemic
risk
factors
them.
is
a
part
of
larger
online
smartphone
Japan,
originally
planned
2019,
expanded
August
2020
include
impact
COVID-19.
51,246
adults
completed
an
survey
(August
2020),
Japan.
Of
these,
3,938
had
also
before
onset
(December
2019)
were
used
as
population
determine
how
has
influenced
PIU.
was
assessed
using
Gaming
Disorder
Scale
(IGDS).
measured
Compulsive
Use
(CIUS).
The
prevalence
probable
COVID-19
4.1%
overall
[95%CI,
3.9%–4.2%]
(N
=
51,246),
8.6%
among
younger
people
(age
<
30),
1–2.5%
higher
than
reported
Probable
7.8%
7.6%–8.1%],
17.0%
15.9%–18.2%]
people,
3.2–3.7%
Comparisons
pandemic,
revealed
that
increased
1.6
times,
1.5
times
(IGD:
χ2
619.9,
p
.001,
PIU:
594.2,
.001).
Youth
30)
infection
strongly
associated
exacerbation
(odds
ratio,
2.10
1.18
3.75]
5.67
1.33
24.16]).
appear
aggravated
In
particular,
persons
infected
at
Disorder.
Prevention
treatment
these
problems
needed.
Social Science & Medicine,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
293, P. 114674 - 114674
Published: Dec. 21, 2021
Impacts
of
the
COVID-19
pandemic
on
well-being
and
mental
health
are
a
concern
worldwide.
This
article
is
based
two
longitudinal
studies
that
investigated
role
social
media
use
in
loneliness
psychological
distress
before
during
pandemic.
Study
1
utilized
nationally
representative
3-point
data
(n
=
735)
collected
2017-2020
Finnish
population.
2
5-point
840)
2019-2021
representing
working
We
analyzed
using
multilevel
mixed-effects
regression
analysis.
A
analysis
showed
perceived
did
not
increase
among
population
Stronger
involvement
identity
bubbles
predicted
lower
results
since
outbreak
pandemic,
has
increased
lonely
individuals
but
general
Involvement
generally
it
buffer
against
higher
individuals.
The
findings
suggest
risk
factor
for
prolonged
negative
effects
Social
can
offer
meaningful
resources
times
distancing
cannot
protect
those
who
perceive
themselves
as
often
lonely.
European Psychologist,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
26(4), P. 310 - 322
Published: Oct. 1, 2021
Abstract.
The
COVID-19
pandemic
is
one
of
the
most
serious
health
and
economic
crises
21st
century.
From
a
psychological
point
view,
its
consequences
can
be
conceptualized
as
multidimensional
potentially
toxic
stressor
for
mental
in
general
population.
This
selective
literature
review
provides
an
overview
longitudinal
studies
published
until
June
2021
that
have
investigated
impact
on
European
Risk
protective
factors
identified
are
summarized.
Forty-two
met
inclusion
search
criteria
(
COVID-19,
health,
longitudinal,
Europe)
PubMed,
PsycInfo,
Web
Science
databases
indicate
differential
effects
distress,
depression,
anxiety,
depending
samples
methods
used.
Age-specific
(e.g.,
young
age),
social
female,
ethnical
minority,
loneliness),
well
physical
health-related
pre-pandemic
illness)
were
risk
poor
health.
to
several
such
support,
higher
cognitive
ability,
resilience,
self-efficacy.
Increasing
evidence
supports
assumption
being
with
some
populations
appearing
more
vulnerable
than
others,
although
inconsistencies
arise.
Whether
will
lead
increase
prevalence
disorders
open
question.
Further
high-quality
multi-national
meta-analyses
needed
draw
complete
picture
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
19(15), P. 9347 - 9347
Published: July 30, 2022
The
worldwide
spread
of
SARS-CoV-2
has
been
responsible
for
an
infectious
pandemic,
with
repercussions
on
socio-economic
aspects
and
the
physical
mental
health
general
population.
present
systematic
review
aimed
to
evaluate
data
belonging
European
framework,
analyzing
population
by
age
group.
Original
articles
reviews
state
have
researched
starting
from
2021.
Initially,
a
total
1764
studies
were
found,
among
which
75
selected.
Youth
group
most
affected
pandemic
consequences
health,
emotional
behavioral
alterations
observed
third
more
than
half
children
adolescents
examined.
Among
both
adults,
female
gender
had
higher
prevalence
psychopathological
symptoms.
main
risk
factors
poor
social
support,
economic
difficulties,
and,
in
particular,
unemployment
or
job
changes.
Additional
individual
perception
loneliness,
presence
pre-pandemic
illness/distress,
some
personality
traits,
such
as
neuroticism,
impulsiveness,
use
maladaptive
coping
strategies.
Unexpectedly,
elderly
maintained
good
resilience
towards
change,
even
if
stress
factor
was
represented
feeling
loneliness
contact.
As
regards
suicidal
behaviors,
adolescents,
there
increase
attempts
25%,
greater
gender.
This
increased
also
association
symptoms
anxiety
depression,
socio-environmental
conditions.
In
conclusion,
groups
found
be
at
psychological
burden
during
waves,
thus
representing
priority
targets
socio-health
interventions.
BMC Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
22(1)
Published: Jan. 10, 2022
The
COVID-19
pandemic
and
its
associated
national
lockdowns
have
been
linked
to
deteriorations
in
mental
health
worldwide.
A
number
of
studies
analysed
changes
indicators
during
the
pandemic;
however,
these
generally
had
a
small
timepoints,
focused
on
initial
months
pandemic.
Furthermore,
most
followed-up
same
individuals,
resulting
significant
loss
follow-up
biased
estimates
change.
Here
we
report
time
trends
key
amongst
Danish
adults
over
course
(March
2020
-
July
2021)
focusing
subgroups
defined
by
gender,
age,
self-reported
previously
diagnosed
chronic
and/or
illness.
We
used
time-series
data
collected
Epinion
(N=8,261)
with
43
timepoints
between
20
March
22
2021.
Using
repeated
cross-sectional
study
design,
independent
sets
individuals
were
asked
respond
Copenhagen
Corona-Related
Mental
Health
questionnaire
at
each
timepoint,
was
weighted
population
proportions.
six
examined
loneliness,
anxiety,
social
isolation,
quality
life,
COVID-19-related
worries,
scale.
Gender,
presence
illness
stratify
into
for
comparisons.
Poorer
observed
strictest
phases
lockdowns,
whereas
better
outcomes
occurred
reopening
phases.
Women,
young
(<34
yrs),
those
mental-
demonstrated
poorer
mean
than
others.
Those
pre-existing
further
less
reactive
time-series.
greatest
differences
women/men
younger/older
age
groups
second
lockdown.
People
reported
disadvantageous
but
stable
levels
thus
far,
they
seem
be
affected
factors
that
result
fluctuating
other
subgroups.
Cureus,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: July 3, 2024
Background
and
aims:
COVID-19
survivors
often
experience
significant
pervasive
psychological
distress.
This
study
aimed
to
investigate
the
prevalence
demographic
factors
affecting
anxiety,
stress,
depression
levels
among
in
Kurdistan
region
of
Iraq.
Method:
online
cross-sectional
was
conducted
from
August
1,
2023
December
17,
2023,
Iraq,
including
Erbil,
Sulaymaniyah,
Duhok.
Purposive
sampling
used
collect
data
using
an
survey.
The
survey
included
information
Depression,
Anxiety,
Stress
Scale
-
21
Items
(DASS-21).
Statistical
analysis
performed
Stata
version
12
(StataCorp
LLC,
College
Station,
TX),
with
frequency
percentage
for
categorical
variables
mean
standard
deviation
quantitative
variables.
Ordinal
regression
analyses
were
assess
associations
between
mental
health
outcomes.
A
p-value
less
than
0.05
considered
statistically
significant.
Results:
total
783
participants
enrolled
study.
score
anxiety
11.62
±
4.71,
indicating
moderate
levels.
For
depression,
11.54
5.21,
mild
levels,
14.0
5.78,
normal
Younger
individuals
(15-27)
showed
higher
stress
(Estimate:
18.96,
P=0.001)
2.79,
compared
older
age
groups.
Males
reported
significantly
lower
-1.01,
P=0.001),
-1.29,
-0.72,
females.
Participants
a
diploma
had
0.65,
P=0.004)
0.77,
P=0.002)
those
only
elementary
education.
Conclusions:
found
survivors,
To
address
these
issues,
it
is
recommended
that
policymakers
develop
targeted
interventions.
Healthcare
providers
should
focus
on
early
identification
treatment,
providing
personalized
counseling
support
enhance
coping
mechanisms
overall
well-being.
By
implementing
measures,
outcomes
Iraq
can
be
improved.